# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Convergence of nonautonomous multivalued problems with large diffusion to ordinary differential inclusions
• CPAA Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
The stampacchia maximum principle for stochastic partial differential equations forced by lévy noise
April  2020, 19(4): 2333-2346. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020101

## Analysis of an anaerobic digestion model in landfill with mortality term

 1 Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Natural Resources and Environment, Ibn Tofaïl University, Kénitra, Morocco 2 IRIMAS, University of Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, France, University of Strasbourg, France 3 LBE, University of Montpellier, INRA, Narbonne, France 4 MISTEA, University of Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France 5 University of Haute-Alsace, IRIMAS UR 7499, F-68100 Mulhouse, France, University of Strasbourg, France

*Corresponding author

Dedicated to Professor Tomás Caraballo on the occasion of his 60-th birthday

Received  August 2019 Revised  October 2019 Published  January 2020

We study a mathematical model of anaerobic digestion with biomass recirculation, dedicated to landfill problems, and analyze its asymptotic behavior. We show that the global attractor is composed of an infinity of non-hyperbolic equilibria. For non-monotonic growth functions, this set is non connected, which impacts the performances of the bioprocess.

Citation: S. Ouchtout, Z. Mghazli, J. Harmand, A. Rapaport, Z. Belhachmi. Analysis of an anaerobic digestion model in landfill with mortality term. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (4) : 2333-2346. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020101
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Overall scheme of the anaerobic degradation of organic matter
Graphs of Monod and Haldane functions
Graph of the Haldane function considered in the example
Graph of $S(\cdot)$ for initial conditions $X_0 = 340$ to $X_0 = 360$ with a step of 5
">Figure 5.  Threshold on $X_0$ as a function of $K_d$ for model parameters indicated in Table 1
Biogas production as a function of $X_0$ for $K_d = 0.02$
$\lambda^-$, $\lambda^+$ (on top) ${\rm Biogas}^-$ and ${\rm Biogas}^+$ (on bottom) as functions of $K_d$
 $K_h$ $Y$ $f_1$ $f_2$ $\alpha$ 0.176 0.05 0.7 0.76 0.9
 $K_h$ $Y$ $f_1$ $f_2$ $\alpha$ 0.176 0.05 0.7 0.76 0.9
 [1] Pablo G. Barrientos, Artem Raibekas. Robustly non-hyperbolic transitive symplectic dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (12) : 5993-6013. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018259 [2] Wen Si, Fenfen Wang, Jianguo Si. Almost-periodic perturbations of non-hyperbolic equilibrium points via Pöschel-Rüssmann KAM method. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (1) : 541-585. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020027 [3] Zhicong Liu. SRB attractors with intermingled basins for non-hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (4) : 1545-1562. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1545 [4] Vanderlei Horita, Marcelo Viana. Hausdorff dimension for non-hyperbolic repellers II: DA diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 13 (5) : 1125-1152. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.1125 [5] Katrin Gelfert. Non-hyperbolic behavior of geodesic flows of rank 1 surfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (1) : 521-551. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019022 [6] Anna Cima, Armengol Gasull, Víctor Mañosa. Parrondo's dynamic paradox for the stability of non-hyperbolic fixed points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (2) : 889-904. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018038 [7] Inmaculada Baldomá, Ernest Fontich, Pau Martín. Gevrey estimates for one dimensional parabolic invariant manifolds of non-hyperbolic fixed points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (8) : 4159-4190. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017177 [8] Bernard Dacorogna, Alessandro Ferriero. Regularity and selecting principles for implicit ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (1) : 87-101. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.87 [9] Zvi Artstein. Averaging of ordinary differential equations with slowly varying averages. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 353-365. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.353 [10] Yongluo Cao, Stefano Luzzatto, Isabel Rios. Some non-hyperbolic systems with strictly non-zero Lyapunov exponents for all invariant measures: Horseshoes with internal tangencies. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (1) : 61-71. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.61 [11] Serge Nicaise. Stability and asymptotic properties of dissipative evolution equations coupled with ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021057 [12] Stefano Maset. Conditioning and relative error propagation in linear autonomous ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (7) : 2879-2909. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018165 [13] W. Sarlet, G. E. Prince, M. Crampin. Generalized submersiveness of second-order ordinary differential equations. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (2) : 209-221. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.209 [14] Aeeman Fatima, F. M. Mahomed, Chaudry Masood Khalique. Conditional symmetries of nonlinear third-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 655-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018040 [15] Ping Lin, Weihan Wang. Optimal control problems for some ordinary differential equations with behavior of blowup or quenching. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 809-828. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018036 [16] Jean Mawhin, James R. Ward Jr. Guiding-like functions for periodic or bounded solutions of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (1) : 39-54. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.39 [17] Hongwei Lou, Weihan Wang. Optimal blowup/quenching time for controlled autonomous ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 517-527. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.517 [18] Alex Bihlo, James Jackaman, Francis Valiquette. On the development of symmetry-preserving finite element schemes for ordinary differential equations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020, 7 (2) : 339-368. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2020014 [19] Iasson Karafyllis, Lars Grüne. Feedback stabilization methods for the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 283-317. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.283 [20] Bin Wang, Arieh Iserles. Dirichlet series for dynamical systems of first-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 281-298. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.281

2020 Impact Factor: 1.916