    July  1995, 1(3): 303-346. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.303

## Parabolic singular limit of a wave equation with localized boundary damping

Received  October 1994 Revised  April 1995 Published  May 1995

We will consider the family of wave equations with boundary damping

$\qquad\qquad \qquad\qquad \epsilon u_{t t} -\Delta u + \lambda u =f$ on $\Omega \times (0,T)$

$(P_{\epsilon, \lambda, \Gamma_0})\qquad\qquad u_t + \frac{\partial u}{\partial \vec{n}} =g$ on $\Gamma_1 \times (0,T)$

$\qquad\qquad u=0$ on $\Gamma_0 \times (0,T)$

where $0< \epsilon \leq \epsilon_0$, $\Omega \subset \mathbb R^N$ is a regular open connected set, $\lambda \geq 0$ and $\Gamma = \Gamma_0\cup \Gamma_1$ is a partition of the boundary of $\Omega$. We will also consider the case where $\Gamma_0$ is empty (see below for more precise assumptions on $\lambda$, $\Omega$ and $\Gamma_0$, $\Gamma_1$).
For this problem the corresponding formal singular perturbation at $\epsilon =0$ is

$\qquad\qquad \qquad\qquad -\Delta u + \lambda u =f$ on $\Omega \times (0,T)$

$(P_{0, \lambda, \Gamma_0}) \qquad\qquad u_t + \frac{\partial u}{\partial \vec{n}} =g$ on $\Gamma_1 \times (0,T)$

$\qquad\qquad u=0$ on $\Gamma_0 \times (0,T)$

We are here concerned with the well possedness of both problems for the non--homogeneous case, i.e. $f=f(t,x)$, $g=g(t,x)$, and with the convergence, as $\epsilon$ approaches $0$, of the solutions of $(P_{\epsilon, \lambda, \Gamma_0})$ to solutions of $(P_{0, \lambda, \Gamma_0})$.

Citation: Aníbal Rodríguez-Bernal, Enrique Zuazua. Parabolic singular limit of a wave equation with localized boundary damping. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1995, 1 (3) : 303-346. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.303
  Nicolas Fourrier, Irena Lasiecka. Regularity and stability of a wave equation with a strong damping and dynamic boundary conditions. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2013, 2 (4) : 631-667. doi: 10.3934/eect.2013.2.631  Tae Gab Ha. On viscoelastic wave equation with nonlinear boundary damping and source term. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (6) : 1543-1576. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.1543  Alhabib Moumni, Jawad Salhi. Exact controllability for a degenerate and singular wave equation with moving boundary. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/naco.2022001  Enzo Vitillaro. Blow–up for the wave equation with hyperbolic dynamical boundary conditions, interior and boundary nonlinear damping and sources. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (12) : 4575-4608. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021130  Mohammad Akil, Ibtissam Issa, Ali Wehbe. Energy decay of some boundary coupled systems involving wave\ Euler-Bernoulli beam with one locally singular fractional Kelvin-Voigt damping. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021059  Serge Nicaise, Cristina Pignotti. Stability of the wave equation with localized Kelvin-Voigt damping and boundary delay feedback. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (3) : 791-813. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016029  Belkacem Said-Houari, Flávio A. Falcão Nascimento. Global existence and nonexistence for the viscoelastic wave equation with nonlinear boundary damping-source interaction. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (1) : 375-403. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.375  Huafei Di, Yadong Shang, Jiali Yu. Existence and uniform decay estimates for the fourth order wave equation with nonlinear boundary damping and interior source. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (1) : 221-261. doi: 10.3934/era.2020015  Wei Wang, Yan Lv. Limit behavior of nonlinear stochastic wave equations with singular perturbation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (1) : 175-193. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.175  Dalibor Pražák. On the dimension of the attractor for the wave equation with nonlinear damping. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2005, 4 (1) : 165-174. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.165  Biyue Chen, Chunxiang Zhao, Chengkui Zhong. The global attractor for the wave equation with nonlocal strong damping. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (12) : 6207-6228. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021015  Feifei Cheng, Ji Li. Geometric singular perturbation analysis of Degasperis-Procesi equation with distributed delay. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (2) : 967-985. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020305  Khadijah Sharaf. A perturbation result for a critical elliptic equation with zero Dirichlet boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (3) : 1691-1706. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017070  Kim Dang Phung. Decay of solutions of the wave equation with localized nonlinear damping and trapped rays. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2011, 1 (2) : 251-265. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2011.1.251  Jiayun Lin, Kenji Nishihara, Jian Zhai. Critical exponent for the semilinear wave equation with time-dependent damping. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (12) : 4307-4320. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.4307  Moez Daoulatli. Energy decay rates for solutions of the wave equation with linear damping in exterior domain. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2016, 5 (1) : 37-59. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016.5.37  Mohammad A. Rammaha, Daniel Toundykov, Zahava Wilstein. Global existence and decay of energy for a nonlinear wave equation with $p$-Laplacian damping. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (12) : 4361-4390. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.4361  Donghao Li, Hongwei Zhang, Shuo Liu, Qingiyng Hu. Blow-up of solutions to a viscoelastic wave equation with nonlocal damping. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2022  doi: 10.3934/eect.2022009  Menglan Liao. The lifespan of solutions for a viscoelastic wave equation with a strong damping and logarithmic nonlinearity. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2022, 11 (3) : 781-792. doi: 10.3934/eect.2021025  Navnit Jha. Nonpolynomial spline finite difference scheme for nonlinear singuiar boundary value problems with singular perturbation and its mechanization. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 355-363. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.355

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392