American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
July  1995, 1(3): 421-448. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.421

Approximate inertial manifolds of exponential order

Ricardo Rosa 1,

1. 

The Institute for Scientific Computing & Applied Mathematics, 618 E. Third St., Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States

Received  February 1995 Published  May 1995

A fairly general class of nonlinear evolution equations with a self-adjoint or non self-adjoint linear operator is considered, and a family of approximate inertial manifolds (AIMs) is constructed. Two cases are considered: when the spectral gap condition (SGC) is not satisfied and an exact inertial manifold is not known to exist the construction is such that the AIMs have exponential order, while when the SGC is satisfied (and hence there exists an exact inertial manifold) the construction is such that the AIMs converge exponentially to the exact inertial manifold.
Keywords: approximate inertial manifolds, nonlinear evolution equations., self-adjoint linear operator.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 37L05, 37L25, 35Q3.
Citation: Ricardo Rosa. Approximate inertial manifolds of exponential order. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1995, 1 (3) : 421-448. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.421
[1]

Nuno Costa Dias, Andrea Posilicano, João Nuno Prata. Self-adjoint, globally defined Hamiltonian operators for systems with boundaries. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (6) : 1687-1706. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1687
[2]

Abdallah El Hamidi, Aziz Hamdouni, Marwan Saleh. On eigenelements sensitivity for compact self-adjoint operators and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (2) : 445-455. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016006
[3]

Norbert Koksch, Stefan Siegmund. Feedback control via inertial manifolds for nonautonomous evolution equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (3) : 917-936. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.917
[4]

Olivier Goubet. Approximate inertial manifolds for a weakly damped nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1997, 3 (4) : 503-530. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.503
[5]

Oscar P. Manley. Some physical considerations attendant to the approximate inertial manifolds for Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (4) : 585-593. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.585
[6]

Wen Deng. Resolvent estimates for a two-dimensional non-self-adjoint operator. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (1) : 547-596. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.547
[7]

Erik Kropat, Silja Meyer-Nieberg, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. Computational networks and systems-homogenization of self-adjoint differential operators in variational form on periodic networks and micro-architectured systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (2) : 139-169. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017010
[8]

Dachun Yang, Sibei Yang. Maximal function characterizations of Musielak-Orlicz-Hardy spaces associated to non-negative self-adjoint operators satisfying Gaussian estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (6) : 2135-2160. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016031
[9]

Rolf Bronstering. Some computational aspects of approximate inertial manifolds and finite differences. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (4) : 417-454. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.417
[10]

A. V. Rezounenko. Inertial manifolds with delay for retarded semilinear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2000, 6 (4) : 829-840. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.829
[11]

Vladimir V. Chepyzhov, Anna Kostianko, Sergey Zelik. Inertial manifolds for the hyperbolic relaxation of semilinear parabolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1115-1142. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019009
[12]

Benjamin Boutin, Frédéric Coquel, Philippe G. LeFloch. Coupling techniques for nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Ⅱ. resonant interfaces with internal structure. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16 (2) : 283-315. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021007
[13]

O. A. Veliev. On the spectrality and spectral expansion of the non-self-adjoint mathieu-hill operator in $ L_{2}(-\infty, \infty) $. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (3) : 1537-1562. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020077
[14]

Mourad Bellassoued, Ibtissem Ben Aïcha, Zouhour Rezig. Stable determination of a vector field in a non-Self-Adjoint dynamical Schrödinger equation on Riemannian manifolds. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (2) : 403-431. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020042
[15]

Boling Guo, Bixiang Wang. Gevrey regularity and approximate inertial manifolds for the derivative Ginzburg-Landau equation in two spatial dimensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (4) : 455-466. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.455
[16]

James C. Robinson. Computing inertial manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (4) : 815-833. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.815
[17]

José M. Arrieta, Esperanza Santamaría. Estimates on the distance of inertial manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (10) : 3921-3944. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.3921
[18]

James C. Robinson. Inertial manifolds with and without delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (4) : 813-824. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.813
[19]

Pengyu Chen, Xuping Zhang. Approximate controllability of nonlocal problem for non-autonomous stochastic evolution equations. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (3) : 471-489. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020076
[20]

Yucheng Bu, Yujun Dong. Existence of solutions for nonlinear operator equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (8) : 4429-4441. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019180

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (65)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (6)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences