American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
July  2005, 12(4): 675-686. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.675

A new cubic system having eleven limit cycles

Maoan Han 1, , Yuhai Wu 2, and  Ping Bi 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
2. 

Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Normal University, Tempe, Shanghai 200234, China, China

Received  September 2003 Revised  November 2004 Published  January 2005

This paper concerns with the number and distribution of limit cycles of a perturbed cubic Hamiltonian system which has 5 centers and 4 saddle points. The stability analysis and bifurcation methods of differential equations are applied to study the homoclinic loop bifurcation under $Z_2$-equivariant cubic perturbation. It is proved that the perturbed system can have 11 limit cycles with two different distributions, one of which is already known, the other is new.
Keywords: Saddle connection, homoclinic loop, stability..
Mathematics Subject Classification: 34G10, 47D06, 58F11, 92D2.
Citation: Maoan Han, Yuhai Wu, Ping Bi. A new cubic system having eleven limit cycles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 12 (4) : 675-686. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.675
[1]

Rui Dilão, András Volford. Excitability in a model with a saddle-node homoclinic bifurcation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (2) : 419-434. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.419
[2]

Jon Chaika, Donald Robertson. Uniform distribution of saddle connection lengths (with an appendix by Daniel El-Baz and Bingrong Huang). Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2019, 15: 329-343. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2019023
[3]

Flaviano Battelli. Saddle-node bifurcation of homoclinic orbits in singular systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 203-218. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.203
[4]

Héctor Barge. Čech cohomology, homoclinic trajectories and robustness of non-saddle sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (6) : 2677-2698. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020381
[5]

Oksana Koltsova, Lev Lerman. Hamiltonian dynamics near nontransverse homoclinic orbit to saddle-focus equilibrium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 25 (3) : 883-913. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.883
[6]

Flaviano Battelli, Ken Palmer. A remark about Sil'nikov saddle-focus homoclinic orbits. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (3) : 817-830. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.817
[7]

W.-J. Beyn, Y.-K Zou. Discretizations of dynamical systems with a saddle-node homoclinic orbit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (3) : 351-365. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.351
[8]

Xiao-Biao Lin, Changrong Zhu. Saddle-node bifurcations of multiple homoclinic solutions in ODES. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (4) : 1435-1460. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017069
[9]

Xingbo Liu, Deming Zhu. On the stability of homoclinic loops with higher dimension. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (3) : 915-932. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.915
[10]

Lijun Wei, Xiang Zhang. Limit cycle bifurcations near generalized homoclinic loop in piecewise smooth differential systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (5) : 2803-2825. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.2803
[11]

Roderick S. C. Wong, H. Y. Zhang. On the connection formulas of the third Painlevé transcendent. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 541-560. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.541
[12]

Otávio J. N. T. N. dos Santos, Emerson L. Monte Carmelo. A connection between sumsets and covering codes of a module. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2018, 12 (3) : 595-605. doi: 10.3934/amc.2018035
[13]

C. Alonso-González, M. I. Camacho, F. Cano. Topological classification of multiple saddle connections. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (2) : 395-414. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.395
[14]

Benjamin Dozier. Equidistribution of saddle connections on translation surfaces. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2019, 14: 87-120. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2019004
[15]

Shunfu Jin, Wuyi Yue, Zhanqiang Huo. Performance evaluation for connection oriented service in the next generation Internet. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (4) : 749-761. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.749
[16]

Pavel I. Etingof. Galois groups and connection matrices of q-difference equations. Electronic Research Announcements, 1995, 1: 1-9.

[17]

Flank D. M. Bezerra, Rodiak N. Figueroa-López, Marcelo J. D. Nascimento. Fractional oscillon equations; solvability and connection with classical oscillon equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (6) : 2257-2277. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021067
[18]

Xiao Wen. Structurally stable homoclinic classes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (3) : 1693-1707. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1693
[19]

Victoria Rayskin. Homoclinic tangencies in $R^n$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 12 (3) : 465-480. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.465
[20]

Christian Bonatti, Shaobo Gan, Dawei Yang. On the hyperbolicity of homoclinic classes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 25 (4) : 1143-1162. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.1143

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (60)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (19)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy