American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
April  2005, 13(3): 701-719. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.701

Attractors for nonautonomous 2d Navier-Stokes equations with normal external forces

Songsong Lu 1, , Hongqing Wu 1, and  Chengkui Zhong 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China, China

Received  September 2004 Revised  February 2005 Published  May 2005

The existence and structure of uniform attractors in $V$ is proved for nonautonomous 2D Navier-stokes equations on bounded domain with a new class of external forces, termed normal in $L_{l o c}^2(\mathbb R; H)$ (see Definition 3.1), which are translation bounded but not translation compact in $L_{l o c}^2(\mathbb R; H)$. To this end, some abstract results are established. First, a characterization on the existence of uniform attractor for a family of processes is presented by the concept of measure of noncompactness as well as a method to verify it. Then, the structure of the uniform attractor is obtained by constructing skew product flow on the extended phase space with weak topology. Finally, the uniform attractor of a process is identified with that of a family of processes with symbols in the closure of the translation family of the original symbol in a Banach space with weak topology.
Keywords: nonautonomous equation, uniform Condition (C), uniformly $\omega$-limit compact, process, normal function., Uniform attractor, Navier-Stokes equations.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35B40, 35B41, 35Q30, 76D0.
Citation: Songsong Lu, Hongqing Wu, Chengkui Zhong. Attractors for nonautonomous 2d Navier-Stokes equations with normal external forces. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 13 (3) : 701-719. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.701
[1]

Fuzhi Li, Dongmei Xu, Jiali Yu. Regular measurable backward compact random attractor for $ g $-Navier-Stokes equation. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (6) : 3137-3157. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020136
[2]

Jean-Pierre Raymond. Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations with a nonhomogeneous divergence condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (4) : 1537-1564. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1537
[3]

Alain Miranville, Xiaoming Wang. Upper bound on the dimension of the attractor for nonhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (1) : 95-110. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.95
[4]

Yejuan Wang, Peter E. Kloeden. The uniform attractor of a multi-valued process generated by reaction-diffusion delay equations on an unbounded domain. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (10) : 4343-4370. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4343
[5]

C. Foias, M. S Jolly, I. Kukavica, E. S. Titi. The Lorenz equation as a metaphor for the Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (2) : 403-429. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.403
[6]

Vena Pearl Bongolan-walsh, David Cheban, Jinqiao Duan. Recurrent motions in the nonautonomous Navier-Stokes system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2003, 3 (2) : 255-262. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2003.3.255
[7]

Zhiting Ma. Navier-Stokes limit of globally hyperbolic moment equations. Kinetic and Related Models, 2021, 14 (1) : 175-197. doi: 10.3934/krm.2021001
[8]

Cedric Galusinski, Serguei Zelik. Uniform Gevrey regularity for the attractor of a damped wave equation. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 305-312. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.305
[9]

Fabio Ramos, Edriss S. Titi. Invariant measures for the $3$D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations and their Navier-Stokes limit. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 28 (1) : 375-403. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.375
[10]

Hamid Bellout, Jiří Neustupa, Patrick Penel. On a $\nu$-continuous family of strong solutions to the Euler or Navier-Stokes equations with the Navier-Type boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (4) : 1353-1373. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1353
[11]

Cung The Anh, Dang Thi Phuong Thanh, Nguyen Duong Toan. Uniform attractors of 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with memory and singularly oscillating external forces. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 1-23. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020039
[12]

Linjie Xiong. Incompressible Limit of isentropic Navier-Stokes equations with Navier-slip boundary. Kinetic and Related Models, 2018, 11 (3) : 469-490. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018021
[13]

Matthew Paddick. The strong inviscid limit of the isentropic compressible Navier-Stokes equations with Navier boundary conditions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (5) : 2673-2709. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.2673
[14]

Alexei Ilyin, Kavita Patni, Sergey Zelik. Upper bounds for the attractor dimension of damped Navier-Stokes equations in $\mathbb R^2$. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (4) : 2085-2102. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.2085
[15]

Ciprian Foias, Ricardo Rosa, Roger Temam. Topological properties of the weak global attractor of the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (4) : 1611-1631. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1611
[16]

Yong Yang, Bingsheng Zhang. On the Kolmogorov entropy of the weak global attractor of 3D Navier-Stokes equations:Ⅰ. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (6) : 2339-2350. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017101
[17]

Pavel I. Plotnikov, Jan Sokolowski. Compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 602-611. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.602
[18]

Jan W. Cholewa, Tomasz Dlotko. Fractional Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (8) : 2967-2988. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017149
[19]

Jie Liao, Xiao-Ping Wang. Stability of an efficient Navier-Stokes solver with Navier boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (1) : 153-171. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.153
[20]

Yangrong Li, Lianbing She, Jinyan Yin. Longtime robustness and semi-uniform compactness of a pullback attractor via nonautonomous PDE. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (4) : 1535-1557. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018058

2021 Impact Factor: 1.588

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (146)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (90)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy