American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Phase pattern in a Ginzburg-Landau model with a discontinuous coefficient in a ring
  • DCDS Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Behaviors of solutions to a scalar-field equation involving the critical Sobolev exponent with the Robin condition
January  2006, 14(1): 135-148. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.135

Bifurcation structures of positive stationary solutions for a Lotka-Volterra competition model with diffusion II: Global structure

Yukio Kan-On 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Ehime University, Matsuyama, 790-8577

Received  October 2004 Revised  February 2005 Published  October 2005

In this paper, we consider a Lotka-Volterra competition model with diffusion, and show that the global bifurcation structure of positive stationary solutions for the model is similar to that for a certain scalar reaction-diffusion equation. To do this, the comparison principle, the bifurcation theory, and the numerical verification are employed.
Keywords: Bifurcation structure, numerical verification., comparison principle.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35B3.
Citation: Yukio Kan-On. Bifurcation structures of positive stationary solutions for a Lotka-Volterra competition model with diffusion II: Global structure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 14 (1) : 135-148. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.135
[1]

Timothy Blass, Rafael De La Llave, Enrico Valdinoci. A comparison principle for a Sobolev gradient semi-flow. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (1) : 69-91. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.69
[2]

Joseph A. Connolly, Neville J. Ford. Comparison of numerical methods for fractional differential equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (2) : 289-307. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.289
[3]

Nicolas Forcadel, Mamdouh Zaydan. A comparison principle for Hamilton-Jacobi equation with moving in time boundary. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (3) : 543-565. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019026
[4]

Shigeaki Koike, Takahiro Kosugi. Remarks on the comparison principle for quasilinear PDE with no zeroth order terms. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (1) : 133-142. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.133
[5]

Xiaowei Tang, Xilin Fu. New comparison principle with Razumikhin condition for impulsive infinite delay differential systems. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 739-743. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.739
[6]

Thomas Leroy. Relativistic transfer equations: Comparison principle and convergence to the non-equilibrium regime. Kinetic & Related Models, 2015, 8 (4) : 725-763. doi: 10.3934/krm.2015.8.725
[7]

Maria Francesca Betta, Rosaria Di Nardo, Anna Mercaldo, Adamaria Perrotta. Gradient estimates and comparison principle for some nonlinear elliptic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (3) : 897-922. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.897
[8]

Mohamed Badreddine, Thomas K. DeLillo, Saman Sahraei. A Comparison of some numerical conformal mapping methods for simply and multiply connected domains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (1) : 55-82. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018100
[9]

Patrick Henning, Johan Wärnegård. Numerical comparison of mass-conservative schemes for the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (6) : 1247-1271. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019048
[10]

L’ubomír Baňas, Amy Novick-Cohen, Robert Nürnberg. The degenerate and non-degenerate deep quench obstacle problem: A numerical comparison. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (1) : 37-64. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.37
[11]

Asif Yokus, Mehmet Yavuz. Novel comparison of numerical and analytical methods for fractional Burger–Fisher equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (7) : 2591-2606. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020258
[12]

Bernd Kawohl, Vasilii Kurta. A Liouville comparison principle for solutions of singular quasilinear elliptic second-order partial differential inequalities. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (6) : 1747-1762. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1747
[13]

Shuxia Pan. Asymptotic spreading in a delayed dispersal predator-prey system without comparison principle. Electronic Research Archive, 2019, 27: 89-99. doi: 10.3934/era.2019011
[14]

Rachel Kuske, Peter Borowski. Survival of subthreshold oscillations: The interplay of noise, bifurcation structure, and return mechanism. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 873-895. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.873
[15]

Kousuke Kuto, Tohru Tsujikawa. Bifurcation structure of steady-states for bistable equations with nonlocal constraint. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 467-476. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.467
[16]

Pengmiao Hao, Xuechen Wang, Junjie Wei. Global Hopf bifurcation of a population model with stage structure and strong Allee effect. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (5) : 973-993. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017051
[17]

Yukio Kan-On. Global bifurcation structure of stationary solutions for a Lotka-Volterra competition model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (1) : 147-162. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.147
[18]

Qiang Long, Xue Wu, Changzhi Wu. Non-dominated sorting methods for multi-objective optimization: Review and numerical comparison. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 1001-1023. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020009
[19]

Hideaki Takaichi, Izumi Takagi, Shoji Yotsutani. Global bifurcation structure on a shadow system with a source term - Representation of all solutions-. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1344-1350. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1344
[20]

Anastasiia Panchuk, Frank Westerhoff. Speculative behavior and chaotic asset price dynamics: On the emergence of a bandcount accretion bifurcation structure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021117

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (46)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (3)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences