American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Topological methods in the instability problem of Hamiltonian systems
  • DCDS Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Homoclinic and heteroclinic transfer trajectories between planar Lyapunov orbits in the sun-earth and earth-moon systems
April  2006, 14(2): 281-293. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.281

Covering relations and non-autonomous perturbations of ODEs

Maciej J. Capiński 1, and  Piotr Zgliczyński 2,

1. 

Jagiellonian University, Institute of Mathematics, Reymonta 4, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
2. 

Jagiellonian University, Institute of Computer Science, Nawojki 11, 30-072 Kraków, Poland

Received  September 2003 Revised  October 2004 Published  November 2005

Covering relations are a topological tool for detecting periodic orbits, symbolic dynamics and chaotic behavior for autonomous ODE. We extend the method of the covering relations onto systems with a time dependent perturbation. As an example we apply the method to non-autonomous perturbations of the Rössler equations to show that for small perturbation they possess symbolic dynamics.
Keywords: chaotic behavior., Covering relations, non-autonomous ODEs.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37B10, 37B55; Secondary: 37B3.
Citation: Maciej J. Capiński, Piotr Zgliczyński. Covering relations and non-autonomous perturbations of ODEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 14 (2) : 281-293. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.281
[1]

José-Luis Bravo, Manuel Fernández. Limit cycles of non-autonomous scalar ODEs with two summands. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (2) : 1091-1102. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.1091
[2]

Guowei Liu, Rui Xue. Pullback dynamic behavior for a non-autonomous incompressible non-Newtonian fluid. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (6) : 2193-2216. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018231
[3]

Alexandre N. Carvalho, José A. Langa, James C. Robinson. Non-autonomous dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (3) : 703-747. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.703
[4]

Michael Khanevsky. Non-autonomous curves on surfaces. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2021, 17: 305-317. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2021010
[5]

Dingshi Li, Xiaohu Wang. Asymptotic behavior of stochastic complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with deterministic non-autonomous forcing on thin domains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 449-465. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018181
[6]

Lingyu Li, Zhang Chen. Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous random Ginzburg-Landau equation driven by colored noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3303-3333. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020233
[7]

Xiaoyue Li, Xuerong Mao. Population dynamical behavior of non-autonomous Lotka-Volterra competitive system with random perturbation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 24 (2) : 523-545. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.24.523
[8]

Lin Shi, Xuemin Wang, Dingshi Li. Limiting behavior of non-autonomous stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with colored noise on unbounded thin domains. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5367-5386. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020242
[9]

Stefano Bosia. Well-posedness and long term behavior of a simplified Ericksen-Leslie non-autonomous system for nematic liquid crystal flows. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (2) : 407-441. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.407
[10]

Thorsten Hüls, Yongkui Zou. On computing heteroclinic trajectories of non-autonomous maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (1) : 79-99. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.79
[11]

Mark Comerford, Todd Woodard. Orbit portraits in non-autonomous iteration. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (8) : 2253-2277. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019144
[12]

Thorsten Hüls. A model function for non-autonomous bifurcations of maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 7 (2) : 351-363. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.7.351
[13]

Pablo G. Barrientos, Abbas Fakhari. Ergodicity of non-autonomous discrete systems with non-uniform expansion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (4) : 1361-1382. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019231
[14]

Mark Comerford, Rich Stankewitz, Hiroki Sumi. Hereditarily non uniformly perfect non-autonomous Julia sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (1) : 33-46. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020002
[15]

Xinyuan Liao, Caidi Zhao, Shengfan Zhou. Compact uniform attractors for dissipative non-autonomous lattice dynamical systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (4) : 1087-1111. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.1087
[16]

Joaquim P. Mateus, Paulo Rebelo, Silvério Rosa, César M. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres. Optimal control of non-autonomous SEIRS models with vaccination and treatment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1179-1199. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018067
[17]

Yang Lu, Xia Wang, Shengqiang Liu. A non-autonomous predator-prey model with infected prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (9) : 3817-3836. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018082
[18]

Carmen Núñez, Rafael Obaya. A non-autonomous bifurcation theory for deterministic scalar differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (3&4, May) : 701-730. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.701
[19]

Cung The Anh, Tang Quoc Bao. Dynamics of non-autonomous nonclassical diffusion equations on $R^n$. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (3) : 1231-1252. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1231
[20]

Tomás Caraballo, P.E. Kloeden. Non-autonomous attractors for integro-differential evolution equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (1) : 17-36. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.17

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (50)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences