American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
October  2006, 14(4): 845-855. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.845

Unique ergodicity, stable ergodicity, and the Mautner phenomenon for diffeomorphisms

Charles Pugh 1, , Michael Shub 2, and  Alexander Starkov 3,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, 40 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, Canada
2. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, 40 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada
3. 

All-Russian Institute of Electrotechnics, Istra, Moscow region, Russian Federation

Received  October 2004 Revised  August 2005 Published  January 2006

In 1954, F. Mautner gave a simple representation theoretic argument that for compact surfaces of constant negative curvature, invariance of a function along the geodesic flow implies invariance along the horocycle flows (these are facts which imply ergodicity of the geodesic flow itself), [M]. Many generalizations of this Mautner phenomenon exist in representation theory, [St1]. Here, we establish a new generalization, Theorem 2.1, whose novelty is mostly its method of proof, namely the Anosov-Hopf ergodicity argument from dynamical systems. Using some structural properties of Lie groups, we also show that stable ergodicity is equivalent to the unique ergodicity of the strong stable manifold foliations in the context of affine diffeomorphisms.
Keywords: manifold foliations, affine diffeomorphisms., stable ergodicity, Representation theory, the Anosov-Hopf ergodicity, Lie groups, unique ergodicity.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 53D25, 37A2.
Citation: Charles Pugh, Michael Shub, Alexander Starkov. Unique ergodicity, stable ergodicity, and the Mautner phenomenon for diffeomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 14 (4) : 845-855. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.845
[1]

Mark Pollicott. Ergodicity of stable manifolds for nilpotent extensions of Anosov flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (3) : 599-604. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.599
[2]

Jon Chaika, Rodrigo Treviño. Logarithmic laws and unique ergodicity. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2017, 11: 563-588. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2017022
[3]

Henk Bruin, Gregory Clack. Inducing and unique ergodicity of double rotations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (12) : 4133-4147. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.4133
[4]

F. Rodriguez Hertz, M. A. Rodriguez Hertz, A. Tahzibi and R. Ures. A criterion for ergodicity for non-uniformly hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Electronic Research Announcements, 2007, 14: 74-81. doi: 10.3934/era.2007.14.74
[5]

Yunhua Zhou. The local $C^1$-density of stable ergodicity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (7) : 2621-2629. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2621
[6]

François Ledrappier, Omri Sarig. Unique ergodicity for non-uniquely ergodic horocycle flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 16 (2) : 411-433. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.411
[7]

Keith Burns, Dmitry Dolgopyat, Yakov Pesin, Mark Pollicott. Stable ergodicity for partially hyperbolic attractors with negative central exponents. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (1) : 63-81. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.63
[8]

C.P. Walkden. Stable ergodicity of skew products of one-dimensional hyperbolic flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (4) : 897-904. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.897
[9]

Carlos H. Vásquez. Stable ergodicity for partially hyperbolic attractors with positive central Lyapunov exponents. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (2) : 233-251. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.233
[10]

Gabriel Rivière. Remarks on quantum ergodicity. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2013, 7 (1) : 119-133. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2013.7.119
[11]

Andy Hammerlindl, Jana Rodriguez Hertz, Raúl Ures. Ergodicity and partial hyperbolicity on Seifert manifolds. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2020, 0: 331-348. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2020012
[12]

Karl Grill, Christian Tutschka. Ergodicity of two particles with attractive interaction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (10) : 4831-4838. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4831
[13]

Dubi Kelmer. Quantum ergodicity for products of hyperbolic planes. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (2) : 287-313. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.287
[14]

Federico Rodriguez Hertz, María Alejandra Rodriguez Hertz, Raúl Ures. Partial hyperbolicity and ergodicity in dimension three. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (2) : 187-208. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.187
[15]

Zhenzhong Zhang, Enhua Zhang, Jinying Tong. Necessary and sufficient conditions for ergodicity of CIR model driven by stable processes with Markov switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (6) : 2433-2455. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018053
[16]

Tianlong Shen, Jianhua Huang. Ergodicity of the stochastic coupled fractional Ginzburg-Landau equations driven by α-stable noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (2) : 605-625. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017029
[17]

Jan Philipp Schröder. Ergodicity and topological entropy of geodesic flows on surfaces. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2015, 9: 147-167. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2015.9.147
[18]

Marianne Akian, Stéphane Gaubert, Antoine Hochart. Ergodicity conditions for zero-sum games. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (9) : 3901-3931. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3901
[19]

David Ralston, Serge Troubetzkoy. Ergodicity of certain cocycles over certain interval exchanges. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (6) : 2523-2529. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2523
[20]

Jon Aaronson, Michael Bromberg, Nishant Chandgotia. Rational ergodicity of step function skew products. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2018, 13: 1-42. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2018012

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (58)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences