American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2006, 16(2): 307-327. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.307

Existence of stable manifolds for nonuniformly hyperbolic $c^1$ dynamics

Luis Barreira 1, and  Claudia Valls 2,

1. 

Departamento de Matemática, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa
2. 

Departamento de Matemática, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa

Received  June 2005 Revised  July 2005 Published  July 2006

The existence of stable manifolds for nonuniformly hyperbolic trajectories is well know in the case of $C^{1+\alpha}$ dynamics, as proven by Pesin in the late 1970's. On the other hand, Pugh constructed a $C^1$ diffeomorphism that is not of class $C^{1+\alpha}$ for any $\alpha$ and for which there exists no stable manifold. The $C^{1+\alpha}$ hypothesis appears to be crucial in some parts of smooth ergodic theory, such as for the absolute continuity property and thus in the study of the ergodic properties of the dynamics. Nevertheless, we establish the existence of invariant stable manifolds for nonuniformly hyperbolic trajectories of a large family of maps of class at most $C^1$, by providing a condition which is weaker than the $C^{1+\alpha}$ hypothesis but which is still sufficient to establish a stable manifold theorem. We also consider the more general case of sequences of maps, which corresponds to a nonautonomous dynamics with discrete time. We note that our proof of the stable manifold theorem is new even in the case of $C^{1+\alpha}$ nonuniformly hyperbolic dynamics. In particular, the optimal $C^1$ smoothness of the invariant manifolds is obtained by constructing an invariant family of cones.
Keywords: Invariant manifolds, hyperbolicity..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37D10, 37D2.
Citation: Luis Barreira, Claudia Valls. Existence of stable manifolds for nonuniformly hyperbolic $c^1$ dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 16 (2) : 307-327. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.307
[1]

Andy Hammerlindl, Jana Rodriguez Hertz, Raúl Ures. Ergodicity and partial hyperbolicity on Seifert manifolds. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2020, 0: 331-348. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2020012
[2]

Luis Barreira, Claudia Valls. Regularity of center manifolds under nonuniform hyperbolicity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (1) : 55-76. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.55
[3]

Rovella Alvaro, Vilamajó Francesc, Romero Neptalí. Invariant manifolds for delay endomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 35-50. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.35
[4]

Y. Latushkin, B. Layton. The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (2) : 233-268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233
[5]

Boris Kalinin, Anatole Katok. Measure rigidity beyond uniform hyperbolicity: invariant measures for cartan actions on tori. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2007, 1 (1) : 123-146. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2007.1.123
[6]

José F. Alves, Davide Azevedo. Statistical properties of diffeomorphisms with weak invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (1) : 1-41. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1
[7]

George Osipenko. Indestructibility of invariant locally non-unique manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (2) : 203-219. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.203
[8]

Henk Broer, Aaron Hagen, Gert Vegter. Numerical approximation of normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 133-140. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.133
[9]

Christopher K. R. T. Jones, Siu-Kei Tin. Generalized exchange lemmas and orbits heteroclinic to invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 967-1023. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.967
[10]

Bernd Aulbach, Martin Rasmussen, Stefan Siegmund. Invariant manifolds as pullback attractors of nonautonomous differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (2) : 579-596. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.579
[11]

Arturo Echeverría-Enríquez, Alberto Ibort, Miguel C. Muñoz-Lecanda, Narciso Román-Roy. Invariant forms and automorphisms of locally homogeneous multisymplectic manifolds. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (4) : 397-419. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.397
[12]

Roberto Castelli. Efficient representation of invariant manifolds of periodic orbits in the CRTBP. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 563-586. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018197
[13]

Pablo Aguirre, Bernd Krauskopf, Hinke M. Osinga. Global invariant manifolds near a Shilnikov homoclinic bifurcation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1 (1) : 1-38. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.1
[14]

Clara Cufí-Cabré, Ernest Fontich. Differentiable invariant manifolds of nilpotent parabolic points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (10) : 4667-4704. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021053
[15]

Alexey Gorshkov. Stable invariant manifolds with application to control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021040
[16]

Boris Kalinin, Anatole Katok, Federico Rodriguez Hertz. Errata to "Measure rigidity beyond uniform hyperbolicity: Invariant measures for Cartan actions on tori" and "Uniqueness of large invariant measures for $\Zk$ actions with Cartan homotopy data". Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (1) : 207-209. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.207
[17]

Paweł Lubowiecki, Henryk Żołądek. The Hess-Appelrot system. I. Invariant torus and its normal hyperbolicity. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (4) : 443-467. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.443
[18]

Jun Shen, Kening Lu, Bixiang Wang. Invariant manifolds and foliations for random differential equations driven by colored noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (11) : 6201-6246. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020276
[19]

I. Baldomá, Àlex Haro. One dimensional invariant manifolds of Gevrey type in real-analytic maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 10 (2&3, September) : 295-322. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.295
[20]

Bixiang Wang. Mean-square random invariant manifolds for stochastic differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (3) : 1449-1468. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020324

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (76)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (4)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy