American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
May  2007, 19(2): 447-467. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.447

On domains and their indexes with applications to semilinear elliptic equations

Hwai-Chiuan Wang 1,

1. 

Department of Applied Mathematics, Hsuan Chuang University, Hsinchu

Received  May 2005 Revised  October 2005 Published  July 2007

Let $\Omega$ be a domain in $\mathbb{R}^{N}$, $N\geq1$, and $2^$∗$=\infty$ if $N=1,2$, $2^$∗$=\frac{2N}{N-2}$ if $N>2$, $2 < p < 2^$∗. Consider the semilinear elliptic equation $ -\Delta u+u=|u|^{p-2}u\text{ in }\Omega; u\in H_{0}^{1}(\Omega). $ The existence, the nonexistence, and the multiplicity of positive solutions of the equation are affected by the geometry and the topology of the domain $\Omega$. In the article, we first present various analyses and use them to characterize which domain $\Omega$ is a ground state domain or a non-ground state domain. Secondly, for a $y$-symmetric domain $\Omega$, we study their index $\alpha(\Omega)$ and $y$-symmetric index $\alpha_{s}(\Omega)$. We determine whether $\alpha(\Omega)=\alpha_{s}(\Omega)$ or $\alpha (\Omega)<\alpha_{s}(\Omega)$. In case that $\alpha(\Omega)<\alpha_{s}(\Omega)$ and that both $\alpha(\Omega)$ and $\alpha_{s}(\Omega)$ admits ground state solutions, then we obtain that in $\Omega$, the equation has three positive solutions, of which one is $y$-symmetric and other two are not $y$-symmetric.
Keywords: Palais-Smale condition, three solutions., ground state domain, index, ground state solution, y-symmetric domain, y-symmetric index.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35J20, 35J2.
Citation: Hwai-Chiuan Wang. On domains and their indexes with applications to semilinear elliptic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 19 (2) : 447-467. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.447
[1]

Antonio Azzollini. On a functional satisfying a weak Palais-Smale condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (5) : 1829-1840. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1829
[2]

Scott Nollet, Frederico Xavier. Global inversion via the Palais-Smale condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (1) : 17-28. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.17
[3]

Sitong Chen, Xianhua Tang. Existence of ground state solutions for the planar axially symmetric Schrödinger-Poisson system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (9) : 4685-4702. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018329
[4]

A. Azzollini. Erratum to: "On a functional satisfying a weak Palais-Smale condition". Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (11) : 4987-4987. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4987
[5]

Chao Ji. Ground state solutions of fractional Schrödinger equations with potentials and weak monotonicity condition on the nonlinear term. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (11) : 6071-6089. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019131
[6]

Haiyang He. Asymptotic behavior of the ground state Solutions for Hénon equation with Robin boundary condition. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (6) : 2393-2408. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2393
[7]

Yanjun Liu, Chungen Liu. Ground state solution and multiple solutions to elliptic equations with exponential growth and singular term. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (5) : 2819-2838. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020123
[8]

Claudianor O. Alves, Geilson F. Germano. Existence of ground state solution and concentration of maxima for a class of indefinite variational problems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (5) : 2887-2906. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020126
[9]

Yu Su. Ground state solution of critical Schrödinger equation with singular potential. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (10) : 3347-3371. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021108
[10]

Marco A. S. Souto, Sérgio H. M. Soares. Ground state solutions for quasilinear stationary Schrödinger equations with critical growth. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (1) : 99-116. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.99
[11]

Zhanping Liang, Yuanmin Song, Fuyi Li. Positive ground state solutions of a quadratically coupled schrödinger system. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (3) : 999-1012. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017048
[12]

Norihisa Ikoma. Existence of ground state solutions to the nonlinear Kirchhoff type equations with potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (3) : 943-966. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.943
[13]

C. Cortázar, Marta García-Huidobro. On the uniqueness of ground state solutions of a semilinear equation containing a weighted Laplacian. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (4) : 813-826. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.813
[14]

Jian Zhang, Wen Zhang, Xianhua Tang. Ground state solutions for Hamiltonian elliptic system with inverse square potential. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (8) : 4565-4583. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017195
[15]

C. Cortázar, Marta García-Huidobro. On the uniqueness of ground state solutions of a semilinear equation containing a weighted Laplacian. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (1) : 71-84. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.71
[16]

Yinbin Deng, Wentao Huang. Positive ground state solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equation with critical exponent. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (8) : 4213-4230. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017179
[17]

Kaimin Teng, Xiumei He. Ground state solutions for fractional Schrödinger equations with critical Sobolev exponent. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (3) : 991-1008. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.991
[18]

Yongpeng Chen, Yuxia Guo, Zhongwei Tang. Concentration of ground state solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger systems with critical exponents. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (5) : 2693-2715. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019120
[19]

Xiao-Jing Zhong, Chun-Lei Tang. The existence and nonexistence results of ground state nodal solutions for a Kirchhoff type problem. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (2) : 611-628. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017030
[20]

Jian Zhang, Wen Zhang. Existence and decay property of ground state solutions for Hamiltonian elliptic system. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (5) : 2433-2455. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019110

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (47)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy