American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

July  2009, 23(3): 973-990. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.973

Dynamic materials for an optimal design problem under the two-dimensional wave equation

 1 Departamento de Matemáticas, ETSI Industriales, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain 2 E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha

Received  January 2008 Revised  August 2008 Published  November 2008

In this work, we analyze a 3-d dynamic optimal design problem in conductivity governed by the two-dimensional wave equation. Under this dynamic perspective, the optimal design problem consists in seeking the time-dependent optimal layout of two isotropic materials on a 2-d domain ($\Omega\subsetR^2$); this is done by minimizing a cost functional depending on the square of the gradient of the state function involving coefficients which can depend on time, space and design. The lack of classical solutions of this type of problem is well-known, so that a relaxation must be sought. We utilize a specially appropriate characterization of 3-d ($(t,x)\inR\timesR^2$) divergence free vector fields through Clebsh potentials; this lets us transform the optimal design problem into a typical non-convex vector variational problem, to which Young measure theory can be applied to compute explicitly the "constrained quasiconvexification" of the cost density. Moreover this relaxation is recovered by dynamic (time-space) first- or second-order laminates. There are two main concerns in this work: the 2-d hyperbolic state law, and the vector character of the problem. Though these two ingredients have been previously considered separately, we put them together in this work.
Citation: Faustino Maestre, Pablo Pedregal. Dynamic materials for an optimal design problem under the two-dimensional wave equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 23 (3) : 973-990. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.973
 [1] Pablo Pedregal. Fully explicit quasiconvexification of the mean-square deviation of the gradient of the state in optimal design. Electronic Research Announcements, 2001, 7: 72-78. [2] José C. Bellido, Pablo Pedregal. Explicit quasiconvexification for some cost functionals depending on derivatives of the state in optimal designing. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (4) : 967-982. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.967 [3] Hyeon Je Cho, Ganguk Hwang. Optimal design for dynamic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks under Rayleigh fading. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (4) : 821-840. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.821 [4] Alice Fiaschi. Rate-independent phase transitions in elastic materials: A Young-measure approach. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (2) : 257-298. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.257 [5] Alice Fiaschi. Young-measure quasi-static damage evolution: The nonconvex and the brittle cases. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (1) : 17-42. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.17 [6] Yan Chen, Kewei Zhang. Young measure solutions of the two-dimensional Perona-Malik equation in image processing. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2006, 5 (3) : 617-637. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2006.5.617 [7] H. T. Banks, R. A. Everett, Neha Murad, R. D. White, J. E. Banks, Bodil N. Cass, Jay A. Rosenheim. Optimal design for dynamical modeling of pest populations. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (4) : 993-1010. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018044 [8] K.F.C. Yiu, K.L. Mak, K. L. Teo. Airfoil design via optimal control theory. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (1) : 133-148. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.133 [9] Boris P. Belinskiy. Optimal design of an optical length of a rod with the given mass. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 85-91. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.85 [10] Xueling Zhou, Bingo Wing-Kuen Ling, Hai Huyen Dam, Kok-Lay Teo. Optimal design of window functions for filter window bank. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (3) : 1119-1145. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020014 [11] Yannick Privat, Emmanuel Trélat. Optimal design of sensors for a damped wave equation. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 936-944. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0936 [12] Wei Xu, Liying Yu, Gui-Hua Lin, Zhi Guo Feng. Optimal switching signal design with a cost on switching action. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (5) : 2531-2549. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019068 [13] Bin Li, Kok Lay Teo, Cheng-Chew Lim, Guang Ren Duan. An optimal PID controller design for nonlinear constrained optimal control problems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (4) : 1101-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.1101 [14] Leszek Gasiński, Nikolaos S. Papageorgiou. Relaxation of optimal control problems driven by nonlinear evolution equations. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2020, 9 (4) : 1027-1040. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020050 [15] Qiang Du, Jingyan Zhang. Asymptotic analysis of a diffuse interface relaxation to a nonlocal optimal partition problem. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (4) : 1443-1461. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1443 [16] Tomasz R. Bielecki, Igor Cialenco, Marcin Pitera. A survey of time consistency of dynamic risk measures and dynamic performance measures in discrete time: LM-measure perspective. Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk, 2017, 2 (0) : 3-. doi: 10.1186/s41546-017-0012-9 [17] Stefano Luzzatto, Marks Ruziboev. Young towers for product systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (3) : 1465-1491. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1465 [18] Alexis De Vos, Yvan Van Rentergem. Young subgroups for reversible computers. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (2) : 183-200. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.183 [19] Lars Grüne, Manuela Sigurani. Numerical event-based ISS controller design via a dynamic game approach. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2015, 2 (1) : 65-81. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2015.2.65 [20] Ramasamy Kavikumar, Boomipalagan Kaviarasan, Yong-Gwon Lee, Oh-Min Kwon, Rathinasamy Sakthivel, Seong-Gon Choi. Robust dynamic sliding mode control design for interval type-2 fuzzy systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022, 15 (7) : 1839-1858. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022014

2021 Impact Factor: 1.588