American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
September  2009, 25(3): 883-913. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.883

Hamiltonian dynamics near nontransverse homoclinic orbit to saddle-focus equilibrium

Oksana Koltsova 1, and  Lev Lerman 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, London, United Kingdom
2. 

Research Inst. for Applied Math. and Cybernetics, and Dept. of Diff. Equat., Nizhny Novgorod State University, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation

Received  October 2008 Revised  April 2009 Published  August 2009

An orbit behavior of a Hamiltonian system in two degrees of freedom in a neighborhood of a quadratically tangent homoclinic orbit to a saddle-focus equilibrium is studied, the orbit structure within the level of the saddle-focus is described. We show the existence of an intrinsic parameter (a modulus) which determines types of invariant nonuniform hyperbolic subsets. These subsets are described by means of symbolic dynamics with countably many states. Multi-round tangent and transversal homoclinic orbits to the saddle-focus have also shown to exist.
Keywords: modulus., saddle-focus, tangent homoclinic orbit, Hamiltonian systems, nonuniformly hyperbolic sets.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37D05, 37D25; Secondary: 70H0.
Citation: Oksana Koltsova, Lev Lerman. Hamiltonian dynamics near nontransverse homoclinic orbit to saddle-focus equilibrium. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 25 (3) : 883-913. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.883
[1]

Flaviano Battelli, Ken Palmer. A remark about Sil'nikov saddle-focus homoclinic orbits. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (3) : 817-830. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.817
[2]

W.-J. Beyn, Y.-K Zou. Discretizations of dynamical systems with a saddle-node homoclinic orbit. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (3) : 351-365. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.351
[3]

Héctor Barge. Čech cohomology, homoclinic trajectories and robustness of non-saddle sets. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (6) : 2677-2698. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020381
[4]

Zheng Yin, Ercai Chen. Conditional variational principle for the irregular set in some nonuniformly hyperbolic systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (11) : 6581-6597. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016085
[5]

S. Bautista, C. Morales, M. J. Pacifico. On the intersection of homoclinic classes on singular-hyperbolic sets. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 19 (4) : 761-775. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.761
[6]

Flaviano Battelli. Saddle-node bifurcation of homoclinic orbits in singular systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 203-218. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.203
[7]

Ying Lv, Yan-Fang Xue, Chun-Lei Tang. Homoclinic orbits for a class of asymptotically quadratic Hamiltonian systems. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (5) : 2855-2878. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019128
[8]

S. Secchi, C. A. Stuart. Global bifurcation of homoclinic solutions of Hamiltonian systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (6) : 1493-1518. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1493
[9]

Matteo Tanzi, Lai-Sang Young. Nonuniformly hyperbolic systems arising from coupling of chaotic and gradient-like systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (10) : 6015-6041. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020257
[10]

Enrique R. Pujals. Density of hyperbolicity and homoclinic bifurcations for attracting topologically hyperbolic sets. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 20 (2) : 335-405. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.20.335
[11]

Qihuai Liu, Pedro J. Torres. Orbital dynamics on invariant sets of contact Hamiltonian systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021297
[12]

Addolorata Salvatore. Multiple homoclinic orbits for a class of second order perturbed Hamiltonian systems. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 778-787. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.778
[13]

Qinqin Zhang. Homoclinic orbits for discrete Hamiltonian systems with indefinite linear part. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (5) : 1929-1940. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.1929
[14]

Juntao Sun, Jifeng Chu, Zhaosheng Feng. Homoclinic orbits for first order periodic Hamiltonian systems with spectrum point zero. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (8) : 3807-3824. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3807
[15]

Qinqin Zhang. Homoclinic orbits for discrete Hamiltonian systems with local super-quadratic conditions. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (1) : 425-434. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019021
[16]

Jun Wang, Junxiang Xu, Fubao Zhang. Homoclinic orbits for a class of Hamiltonian systems with superquadratic or asymptotically quadratic potentials. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (1) : 269-286. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.269
[17]

Cyril Joel Batkam. Homoclinic orbits of first-order superquadratic Hamiltonian systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (9) : 3353-3369. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.3353
[18]

Fuzhong Cong, Yong Li. Invariant hyperbolic tori for Hamiltonian systems with degeneracy. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1997, 3 (3) : 371-382. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.371
[19]

Andrew D. Barwell, Chris Good, Piotr Oprocha, Brian E. Raines. Characterizations of $\omega$-limit sets in topologically hyperbolic systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (5) : 1819-1833. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1819
[20]

Sonja Hohloch, Joseph Palmer. A family of compact semitoric systems with two focus-focus singularities. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2018, 10 (3) : 331-357. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2018012

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (68)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (4)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy