American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
January  2012, 32(1): 1-26. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1

Lipschitz regularity of solution map of control systems with multiple state constraints

Piernicola Bettiol 1, and  Hélène Frankowska 2,

1. 

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2BT, United Kingdom
2. 

CNRS and Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu, UMR 7586, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France

Received  July 2010 Revised  March 2011 Published  September 2011

Consider a closed subset $K \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ and $f:[0,T]\times \mathbb{R}^n\times U \to \mathbb{R}^n$, where $U$ is a complete separable metric space. We associate to these data the control system under a state constraint \begin{equation*}\label{dm400} \left \{ \begin{array}{lll} x'(t) &=&f(t,x(t),u(t)), \; \; u(t)\in U \quad\; \mbox{ a.e. in }\; [0,T] \\ x(t) & \in & K \quad\; \mbox{ for all }\; t \in [0,T]\\ x(0)& = &x_0 . \end{array} \right. \end{equation*} When the boundary of $K$ is smooth, then an inward pointing condition guarantees that under standard assumptions on $f$ (measurable in $t$, Lipschitz in $x$, continuous in $u$) the sets of solutions to the above system depend on the initial state $x_0$ in a Lipschitz way. This follows from the so-called Neighboring Feasible Trajectories (NFT) theorems. Some recent counterexamples imply that NFT theorems are not valid when $f$ is discontinuous in time and $K$ is a finite intersection of sets with smooth boundaries, that is in the presence of multiple state constraints.
    In this paper we prove that for multiple state constraints the inward pointing condition yields local Lipschitz dependence of solution sets on the initial states from the interior of $K$. Furthermore we relax the usual inward pointing condition. The novelty of our approach lies in an application of a generalized inverse mapping theorem to investigate feasible solutions of control systems. Our results also imply a viability theorem without convexity of right-hand sides for initial states taken in the interior of $K$.
Keywords: inverse mapping theorem., state constraints, metric regularity, control system, Lipschitz dependence on initial conditions, Differential inclusion.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34A60, 34H05, 54C60, 93C15; Secondary: 49K15, 49K2.
Citation: Piernicola Bettiol, Hélène Frankowska. Lipschitz regularity of solution map of control systems with multiple state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (1) : 1-26. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1
References:
[1]

J.-P. Aubin, Lipschitz behavior of solutions to convex minimization problems, Mathematics of Oper. Res., 9 (1984), 87-111. doi: 10.1287/moor.9.1.87.  Google Scholar

[2]

J.-P. Aubin and A. Cellina, "Differential Inclusions,'' Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.  Google Scholar

[3]

J.-P. Aubin and H. Frankowska, "Set-valued Analysis," Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1990.  Google Scholar

[4]

P. Bettiol, P. Cardaliaguet and M. Quincampoix, Zero-sum state constrained differential games: Existence of value for Bolza problem, International Journal of Game Theory, 34 (2006), 495-527. doi: 10.1007/s00182-006-0030-9.  Google Scholar

[5]

P. Bettiol, A. Bressan and R. B. Vinter, On trajectories satisfying a state constraint: $W^{1,1}$ estimates and counter-examples, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 48 (2010), 4664-4679. doi: 10.1137/090769788.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Bettiol, A. Bressan and R. B. Vinter, Estimates for trajectories confined to a cone in $\mathbbR^n$, SIAM J. Control Optimization, 49 (2011), 21-42. doi: 10.1137/09077240X.  Google Scholar

[7]

P. Bettiol and H. Frankowska, Regularity of solution maps of differential inclusions under state constraints, Set-Valued Analysis, 15 (2007), 21-45. doi: 10.1007/s11228-006-0018-4.  Google Scholar

[8]

P. Bettiol and H. Frankowska, Normality of the maximum principle for nonconvex constrained Bolza problems, J. Differential Equations, 243 (2007), 256-269.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Bettiol and R. B. Vinter, Sensitivity interpretations of the costate variable for optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 48 (2010), 3297-3317. doi: 10.1137/080732614.  Google Scholar

[10]

A. Cernea and H. Frankowska, A connection between the maximum principle and dynamic programming for constrained control problems, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 44 (2005), 673-703.  Google Scholar

[11]

M. C. Delfour and J. P. Zolesio, Oriented distance function and its evolution equation for initial sets with thin boundary, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 42 (2004), 2286-2304. doi: 10.1137/S0363012902411945.  Google Scholar

[12]

A. L. Dontchev and R. T. Rockafellar, "Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings," Springer Mathematics Monographs, Springer, Dodrecht, 2009.  Google Scholar

[13]

H. Federer, Curvature measures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 93 (1959), 418-491. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1959-0110078-1.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. F. Filippov, Classical solutions of differential equations with multi-valued right-hand side, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 5 (1967), 609-621. doi: 10.1137/0305040.  Google Scholar

[15]

F. Forcellini and F. Rampazzo, On non-convex differential inclusions whose state is constrained in the closure of an open set. Applications to dynamic programming, J. Differential Integral Equations, 12 (1999), 471-497.  Google Scholar

[16]

H. Frankowska, A priori estimates for operational differential inclusions, J. Differential Equations, 84 (1990), 100-128.  Google Scholar

[17]

H. Frankowska, Some inverse mapping theorems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 7 (1990), 183-234.  Google Scholar

[18]

H. Frankowska, Regularity of minimizers and of adjoint states in optimal control under state constraints, J. of Convex Analysis, 13 (2006), 299-328.  Google Scholar

[19]

H. Frankowska, Normality of the maximum principle for absolutely continuous solutions to Bolza problems under state constraints, Control and Cybernetics, 38 (2009), 1327-1340. Google Scholar

[20]

H. Frankowska and E. Marchini, Lipschitzianity of optimal trajectories for the Bolza optimal control problem, Calculus of Variations and PDE's, 27 (2006), 467-492.  Google Scholar

[21]

H. Frankowska and S. Plaskacz, A measurable upper semicontinuous viability theorem for tubes, J. of Nonlinear Analysis, TMA, 26 (1996), 565-582. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(94)00299-W.  Google Scholar

[22]

H. Frankowska and F. Rampazzo, Filippov's and Filippov-Wazewski's theorems on closed domains, J. Differential Equations, 161 (2000), 449-478.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. Frankowska and R. B. Vinter, Existence of neighbouring feasible trajectories: Applications to dynamic programming for state-constrained optimal control problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 104 (2000), 21-40. doi: 10.1023/A:1004668504089.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. D. Ioffe, Metric regularity and subdifferential calculus, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 55 (2000), 103-162; English translation Math. Surveys, 55 (2000), 501-558.  Google Scholar

[25]

R. A. Poliquin, R. T. Rockafellar and L. Thibault, Local differentiability of distance functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352 (2000), 5231-5249. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02550-2.  Google Scholar

[26]

F. Rampazzo and R. B. Vinter, A theorem on existence of neighbouring trajectories satisfying a state constraint, with applications to optimal control, IMA J. Math. Control Inform, 16 (1999), 335-351. doi: 10.1093/imamci/16.4.335.  Google Scholar

[27]

F. Rampazzo and R. B. Vinter, Degenerate optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 39 (2000), 989-1007. doi: 10.1137/S0363012998340223.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. M. Soner, Optimal control problems with state-space constraints, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 24 (1986), 552-561. doi: 10.1137/0324032.  Google Scholar

[29]

R. B. Vinter, "Optimal Control,'' Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 2000.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

J.-P. Aubin, Lipschitz behavior of solutions to convex minimization problems, Mathematics of Oper. Res., 9 (1984), 87-111. doi: 10.1287/moor.9.1.87.  Google Scholar

[2]

J.-P. Aubin and A. Cellina, "Differential Inclusions,'' Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.  Google Scholar

[3]

J.-P. Aubin and H. Frankowska, "Set-valued Analysis," Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1990.  Google Scholar

[4]

P. Bettiol, P. Cardaliaguet and M. Quincampoix, Zero-sum state constrained differential games: Existence of value for Bolza problem, International Journal of Game Theory, 34 (2006), 495-527. doi: 10.1007/s00182-006-0030-9.  Google Scholar

[5]

P. Bettiol, A. Bressan and R. B. Vinter, On trajectories satisfying a state constraint: $W^{1,1}$ estimates and counter-examples, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 48 (2010), 4664-4679. doi: 10.1137/090769788.  Google Scholar

[6]

P. Bettiol, A. Bressan and R. B. Vinter, Estimates for trajectories confined to a cone in $\mathbbR^n$, SIAM J. Control Optimization, 49 (2011), 21-42. doi: 10.1137/09077240X.  Google Scholar

[7]

P. Bettiol and H. Frankowska, Regularity of solution maps of differential inclusions under state constraints, Set-Valued Analysis, 15 (2007), 21-45. doi: 10.1007/s11228-006-0018-4.  Google Scholar

[8]

P. Bettiol and H. Frankowska, Normality of the maximum principle for nonconvex constrained Bolza problems, J. Differential Equations, 243 (2007), 256-269.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Bettiol and R. B. Vinter, Sensitivity interpretations of the costate variable for optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 48 (2010), 3297-3317. doi: 10.1137/080732614.  Google Scholar

[10]

A. Cernea and H. Frankowska, A connection between the maximum principle and dynamic programming for constrained control problems, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 44 (2005), 673-703.  Google Scholar

[11]

M. C. Delfour and J. P. Zolesio, Oriented distance function and its evolution equation for initial sets with thin boundary, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 42 (2004), 2286-2304. doi: 10.1137/S0363012902411945.  Google Scholar

[12]

A. L. Dontchev and R. T. Rockafellar, "Implicit Functions and Solution Mappings," Springer Mathematics Monographs, Springer, Dodrecht, 2009.  Google Scholar

[13]

H. Federer, Curvature measures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 93 (1959), 418-491. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1959-0110078-1.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. F. Filippov, Classical solutions of differential equations with multi-valued right-hand side, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 5 (1967), 609-621. doi: 10.1137/0305040.  Google Scholar

[15]

F. Forcellini and F. Rampazzo, On non-convex differential inclusions whose state is constrained in the closure of an open set. Applications to dynamic programming, J. Differential Integral Equations, 12 (1999), 471-497.  Google Scholar

[16]

H. Frankowska, A priori estimates for operational differential inclusions, J. Differential Equations, 84 (1990), 100-128.  Google Scholar

[17]

H. Frankowska, Some inverse mapping theorems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 7 (1990), 183-234.  Google Scholar

[18]

H. Frankowska, Regularity of minimizers and of adjoint states in optimal control under state constraints, J. of Convex Analysis, 13 (2006), 299-328.  Google Scholar

[19]

H. Frankowska, Normality of the maximum principle for absolutely continuous solutions to Bolza problems under state constraints, Control and Cybernetics, 38 (2009), 1327-1340. Google Scholar

[20]

H. Frankowska and E. Marchini, Lipschitzianity of optimal trajectories for the Bolza optimal control problem, Calculus of Variations and PDE's, 27 (2006), 467-492.  Google Scholar

[21]

H. Frankowska and S. Plaskacz, A measurable upper semicontinuous viability theorem for tubes, J. of Nonlinear Analysis, TMA, 26 (1996), 565-582. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(94)00299-W.  Google Scholar

[22]

H. Frankowska and F. Rampazzo, Filippov's and Filippov-Wazewski's theorems on closed domains, J. Differential Equations, 161 (2000), 449-478.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. Frankowska and R. B. Vinter, Existence of neighbouring feasible trajectories: Applications to dynamic programming for state-constrained optimal control problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 104 (2000), 21-40. doi: 10.1023/A:1004668504089.  Google Scholar

[24]

A. D. Ioffe, Metric regularity and subdifferential calculus, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 55 (2000), 103-162; English translation Math. Surveys, 55 (2000), 501-558.  Google Scholar

[25]

R. A. Poliquin, R. T. Rockafellar and L. Thibault, Local differentiability of distance functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352 (2000), 5231-5249. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02550-2.  Google Scholar

[26]

F. Rampazzo and R. B. Vinter, A theorem on existence of neighbouring trajectories satisfying a state constraint, with applications to optimal control, IMA J. Math. Control Inform, 16 (1999), 335-351. doi: 10.1093/imamci/16.4.335.  Google Scholar

[27]

F. Rampazzo and R. B. Vinter, Degenerate optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 39 (2000), 989-1007. doi: 10.1137/S0363012998340223.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. M. Soner, Optimal control problems with state-space constraints, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 24 (1986), 552-561. doi: 10.1137/0324032.  Google Scholar

[29]

R. B. Vinter, "Optimal Control,'' Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 2000.  Google Scholar

[1]

Fabrizio Colombo, Irene Sabadini, Frank Sommen. The inverse Fueter mapping theorem. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (4) : 1165-1181. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1165
[2]

Vincenzo Basco, Piermarco Cannarsa, Hélène Frankowska. Necessary conditions for infinite horizon optimal control problems with state constraints. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 535-555. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018022
[3]

Maria do Rosário de Pinho, Ilya Shvartsman. Lipschitz continuity of optimal control and Lagrange multipliers in a problem with mixed and pure state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (2) : 505-522. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.505
[4]

J.-P. Raymond, F. Tröltzsch. Second order sufficient optimality conditions for nonlinear parabolic control problems with state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2000, 6 (2) : 431-450. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.431
[5]

Jianquan Li, Yiqun Li, Yali Yang. Epidemic characteristics of two classic models and the dependence on the initial conditions. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (5) : 999-1010. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016027
[6]

Elimhan N. Mahmudov. Optimal control of second order delay-discrete and delay-differential inclusions with state constraints. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (3) : 501-529. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018024
[7]

Thomas Lorenz. Partial differential inclusions of transport type with state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1309-1340. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019018
[8]

M. Arisawa, P.-L. Lions. Continuity of admissible trajectories for state constraints control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (3) : 297-305. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.297
[9]

Mikhail Gusev. On reachability analysis for nonlinear control systems with state constraints. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 579-587. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0579
[10]

Francis Clarke. A general theorem on necessary conditions in optimal control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (2) : 485-503. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.485
[11]

Eduardo Casas, Fredi Tröltzsch. Sparse optimal control for the heat equation with mixed control-state constraints. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020, 10 (3) : 471-491. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020007
[12]

Wojciech Kryszewski, Dorota Gabor, Jakub Siemianowski. The Krasnosel'skii formula for parabolic differential inclusions with state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 295-329. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018021
[13]

H. O. Fattorini. The maximum principle for linear infinite dimensional control systems with state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1995, 1 (1) : 77-101. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.77
[14]

J.-P. Raymond. Nonlinear boundary control of semilinear parabolic problems with pointwise state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1997, 3 (3) : 341-370. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1997.3.341
[15]

Luís Tiago Paiva, Fernando A. C. C. Fontes. Adaptive time--mesh refinement in optimal control problems with state constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (9) : 4553-4572. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4553
[16]

Theodore Tachim-Medjo. Optimal control of a two-phase flow model with state constraints. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (2) : 335-362. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016006
[17]

Ovide Arino, Eva Sánchez. A saddle point theorem for functional state-dependent delay differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 12 (4) : 687-722. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.687
[18]

El Mustapha Ait Ben Hassi, Salah-Eddine Chorfi, Lahcen Maniar, Omar Oukdach. Lipschitz stability for an inverse source problem in anisotropic parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020094
[19]

Zhenjie Li, Ze Cheng, Dongsheng Li. The Liouville type theorem and local regularity results for nonlinear differential and integral systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (2) : 565-576. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.565
[20]

Peiguang Wang, Xiran Wu, Huina Liu. Higher order convergence for a class of set differential equations with initial conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020342

2019 Impact Factor: 1.338

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (71)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (5)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences