American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
October  2015, 35(10): 4931-4954. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4931

Wavefronts of a stage structured model with state--dependent delay

Yunfei Lv 1, , Rong Yuan 2, and  Yuan He 3,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
2. 

School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Laboratory of Mathematics and Complex Systems, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875
3. 

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China

Received  July 2013 Revised  January 2015 Published  April 2015

This paper deals with a diffusive stage structured model with state-dependent delay which is assumed to be an increasing function of the population density. Compared with the constant delay, the state--dependent delay makes the dynamic behavior more complex. For the state--dependent delay system, the dynamic behavior is dependent of the diffusion coefficients, while the equilibrium state of constant delay system is not destabilized by diffusion. Through calculating the minimum wave speed, we find that the wave is slowed down by the state-dependent delay. Then, the existence of traveling waves is obtained by constructing a pair of upper--lower solutions and using Schauder's fixed point theorem. Finally, the traveling wavefront solutions for large wave speed are also discussed, and the fronts appear to be all monotone, regardless of the state dependent delay. This is an interesting property, since many findings are frequently reported that delay causes a loss of monotonicity, with the front developing a prominent hump in some other delay models.
Keywords: Schauder's fixed point theorem., traveling wave fronts, stage structured model, State--dependent delay, stability.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 92D25, 34D23, 34K20, 35K5.
Citation: Yunfei Lv, Rong Yuan, Yuan He. Wavefronts of a stage structured model with state--dependent delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (10) : 4931-4954. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4931
References:
[1]

SIAM J. Appl. Math., 70 (2010), 1611-1633. doi: 10.1137/080742713.  Google Scholar

[2]

Math. Biosci, 101 (1990), 139-153. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(90)90019-U.  Google Scholar

[3]

SIAM J. Appl. Math, 52 (1992), 855-869. doi: 10.1137/0152048.  Google Scholar

[4]

SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63 (2003), 2063-2086. doi: 10.1137/S0036139902416500.  Google Scholar

[5]

Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 6 (2005), 13-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2004.04.002.  Google Scholar

[6]

Int. J. Math. Analysis, 1 (2007), 391-407.  Google Scholar

[7]

University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1954, p. 370. Google Scholar

[8]

Ecol. Model, 11 (1980), 157-166. Google Scholar

[9]

J. Funct. Space Appl., (2013), Art. ID 863561, 7 pp.  Google Scholar

[10]

IBM J. Res. Develop., 17 (1973), 307-313. doi: 10.1147/rd.174.0307.  Google Scholar

[11]

Ecol. Model., 215 (2008), 69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.019.  Google Scholar

[12]

in Antarctica (eds. W. Bonner and D. Walton), Pergamon Press, New York, 1985, 223-241. Google Scholar

[13]

Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 459 (2003), 1563-1579. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2002.1094.  Google Scholar

[14]

J. Animal Ecol., 52 (1983), 479-485. doi: 10.2307/4567.  Google Scholar

[15]

Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.  Google Scholar

[16]

in Handbook of Differential Equations: Ordinary Differential Equations. Vol. III (eds. A. Canada, P. Drabek and A. Fonda), Elsevier Science B. V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2006, 435-545. doi: 10.1016/S1874-5725(06)80009-X.  Google Scholar

[17]

Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 14 (2013), 83-103. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.05.004.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. Math. Anal. Appl., 399 (2013), 133-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.09.058.  Google Scholar

[19]

J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 33 (1976), 2829-2833. doi: 10.1139/f76-338.  Google Scholar

[20]

Discret. Contin. Dyn. S., 9 (2003), 993-1028. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.993.  Google Scholar

[21]

preprint, November 30, 2014, arXiv:1412.0219. Google Scholar

[22]

Academic, New York, 1993.  Google Scholar

[23]

Bull. Math. Biol., 37 (1975), 11-17. Google Scholar

[24]

Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 60 (2007), 1-40; Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 61 (2008), 137-138 (erratum). doi: 10.1002/cpa.20221.  Google Scholar

[25]

Nonlinear Anal., 16 (1991), 131-142. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(91)90164-V.  Google Scholar

[26]

Springer, 1989. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-08539-4.  Google Scholar

[27]

J. Comput. Appl. Math., 190 (2006), 99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2005.01.047.  Google Scholar

[28]

McGraw-Hill, 1991.  Google Scholar

[29]

Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 302 (1987), 587-615. doi: 10.2307/2000859.  Google Scholar

[30]

Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 456 (2000), 2365-2386. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2000.0616.  Google Scholar

[31]

Math. Biosci., 25 (1975), 195-204. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(75)90002-4.  Google Scholar

[32]

Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 200 (1974), 395-418. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1974-0382808-3.  Google Scholar

[33]

J. Differential Equations, 247 (2009), 887-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.04.002.  Google Scholar

[34]

IMA J. Math. Appl. in Medicine and Biology, 6 (1989), 47-68. doi: 10.1093/imammb/6.1.47.  Google Scholar

[35]

Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4050-1.  Google Scholar

[36]

Appl. Math. Comput., 214 (2009), 228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.078.  Google Scholar

[37]

Second edition, China Science Publishing Group, 2011. Google Scholar

[38]

Appl. Math. Comput., 77 (1996), 185-194. doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(95)00212-X.  Google Scholar

[39]

Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 1021-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.09.007.  Google Scholar

[40]

Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 13 (2012), 1429-1440. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.11.007.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

SIAM J. Appl. Math., 70 (2010), 1611-1633. doi: 10.1137/080742713.  Google Scholar

[2]

Math. Biosci, 101 (1990), 139-153. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(90)90019-U.  Google Scholar

[3]

SIAM J. Appl. Math, 52 (1992), 855-869. doi: 10.1137/0152048.  Google Scholar

[4]

SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63 (2003), 2063-2086. doi: 10.1137/S0036139902416500.  Google Scholar

[5]

Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 6 (2005), 13-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2004.04.002.  Google Scholar

[6]

Int. J. Math. Analysis, 1 (2007), 391-407.  Google Scholar

[7]

University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1954, p. 370. Google Scholar

[8]

Ecol. Model, 11 (1980), 157-166. Google Scholar

[9]

J. Funct. Space Appl., (2013), Art. ID 863561, 7 pp.  Google Scholar

[10]

IBM J. Res. Develop., 17 (1973), 307-313. doi: 10.1147/rd.174.0307.  Google Scholar

[11]

Ecol. Model., 215 (2008), 69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.019.  Google Scholar

[12]

in Antarctica (eds. W. Bonner and D. Walton), Pergamon Press, New York, 1985, 223-241. Google Scholar

[13]

Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 459 (2003), 1563-1579. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2002.1094.  Google Scholar

[14]

J. Animal Ecol., 52 (1983), 479-485. doi: 10.2307/4567.  Google Scholar

[15]

Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.  Google Scholar

[16]

in Handbook of Differential Equations: Ordinary Differential Equations. Vol. III (eds. A. Canada, P. Drabek and A. Fonda), Elsevier Science B. V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2006, 435-545. doi: 10.1016/S1874-5725(06)80009-X.  Google Scholar

[17]

Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 14 (2013), 83-103. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.05.004.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. Math. Anal. Appl., 399 (2013), 133-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.09.058.  Google Scholar

[19]

J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 33 (1976), 2829-2833. doi: 10.1139/f76-338.  Google Scholar

[20]

Discret. Contin. Dyn. S., 9 (2003), 993-1028. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.993.  Google Scholar

[21]

preprint, November 30, 2014, arXiv:1412.0219. Google Scholar

[22]

Academic, New York, 1993.  Google Scholar

[23]

Bull. Math. Biol., 37 (1975), 11-17. Google Scholar

[24]

Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 60 (2007), 1-40; Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 61 (2008), 137-138 (erratum). doi: 10.1002/cpa.20221.  Google Scholar

[25]

Nonlinear Anal., 16 (1991), 131-142. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(91)90164-V.  Google Scholar

[26]

Springer, 1989. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-08539-4.  Google Scholar

[27]

J. Comput. Appl. Math., 190 (2006), 99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2005.01.047.  Google Scholar

[28]

McGraw-Hill, 1991.  Google Scholar

[29]

Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 302 (1987), 587-615. doi: 10.2307/2000859.  Google Scholar

[30]

Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 456 (2000), 2365-2386. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2000.0616.  Google Scholar

[31]

Math. Biosci., 25 (1975), 195-204. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(75)90002-4.  Google Scholar

[32]

Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 200 (1974), 395-418. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1974-0382808-3.  Google Scholar

[33]

J. Differential Equations, 247 (2009), 887-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.04.002.  Google Scholar

[34]

IMA J. Math. Appl. in Medicine and Biology, 6 (1989), 47-68. doi: 10.1093/imammb/6.1.47.  Google Scholar

[35]

Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4050-1.  Google Scholar

[36]

Appl. Math. Comput., 214 (2009), 228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.078.  Google Scholar

[37]

Second edition, China Science Publishing Group, 2011. Google Scholar

[38]

Appl. Math. Comput., 77 (1996), 185-194. doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(95)00212-X.  Google Scholar

[39]

Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 1021-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.09.007.  Google Scholar

[40]

Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 13 (2012), 1429-1440. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.11.007.  Google Scholar

[1]

Azeddine Elmajidi, Elhoussine Elmazoudi, Jamila Elalami, Noureddine Elalami. Dependent delay stability characterization for a polynomial T-S Carbon Dioxide model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021035
[2]

Yu Yang, Jinling Zhou, Cheng-Hsiung Hsu. Critical traveling wave solutions for a vaccination model with general incidence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021087
[3]

Prabir Panja, Soovoojeet Jana, Shyamal kumar Mondal. Dynamics of a stage structure prey-predator model with ratio-dependent functional response and anti-predator behavior of adult prey. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (3) : 391-405. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020033
[4]

Rui Hu, Yuan Yuan. Stability, bifurcation analysis in a neural network model with delay and diffusion. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 367-376. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.367
[5]

Ugo Bessi. Another point of view on Kusuoka's measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (7) : 3241-3271. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020404
[6]

Jian Yang, Bendong Lou. Traveling wave solutions of competitive models with free boundaries. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (3) : 817-826. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.817
[7]

Skyler Simmons. Stability of Broucke's isosceles orbit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (8) : 3759-3779. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021015
[8]

Omer Gursoy, Kamal Adli Mehr, Nail Akar. Steady-state and first passage time distributions for waiting times in the $ MAP/M/s+G $ queueing model with generally distributed patience times. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021078
[9]

Kazeem Olalekan Aremu, Chinedu Izuchukwu, Grace Nnenanya Ogwo, Oluwatosin Temitope Mewomo. Multi-step iterative algorithm for minimization and fixed point problems in p-uniformly convex metric spaces. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 2161-2180. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020063
[10]

Wei-Jian Bo, Guo Lin, Shigui Ruan. Traveling wave solutions for time periodic reaction-diffusion systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (9) : 4329-4351. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018189
[11]

Pengfei Wang, Mengyi Zhang, Huan Su. Input-to-state stability of infinite-dimensional stochastic nonlinear systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021066
[12]

Chin-Chin Wu. Existence of traveling wavefront for discrete bistable competition model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (3) : 973-984. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.973
[13]

Linlin Li, Bedreddine Ainseba. Large-time behavior of matured population in an age-structured model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2561-2580. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020195
[14]

Guirong Jiang, Qishao Lu. The dynamics of a Prey-Predator model with impulsive state feedback control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (6) : 1301-1320. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1301
[15]

Yinsong Bai, Lin He, Huijiang Zhao. Nonlinear stability of rarefaction waves for a hyperbolic system with Cattaneo's law. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021049
[16]

Yuanqing Xu, Xiaoxiao Zheng, Jie Xin. New explicit and exact traveling wave solutions of (3+1)-dimensional KP equation. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mfc.2021006
[17]

Emanuela R. S. Coelho, Valéria N. Domingos Cavalcanti, Vinicius A. Peralta. Exponential stability for a transmission problem of a nonlinear viscoelastic wave equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021055
[18]

Peter Benner, Jens Saak, M. Monir Uddin. Balancing based model reduction for structured index-2 unstable descriptor systems with application to flow control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 1-20. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.1
[19]

Michael Grinfeld, Amy Novick-Cohen. Some remarks on stability for a phase field model with memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (4) : 1089-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.1089
[20]

Masahiro Ikeda, Ziheng Tu, Kyouhei Wakasa. Small data blow-up of semi-linear wave equation with scattering dissipation and time-dependent mass. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021011

2019 Impact Factor: 1.338

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (77)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (4)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences