American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
September  2017, 37(9): 4611-4623. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017198

Polynomial approximation of self-similar measures and the spectrum of the transfer operator

Christoph Bandt and  Helena PeÑa

Institute of Mathematics, University of Greifswald, Germany

Received  November 2016 Published  June 2017

We consider self-similar measures on $\mathbb{R}.$ The Hutchinson operator $H$ acts on measures and is the dual of the transfer operator $T$ which acts on continuous functions. We determine polynomial eigenfunctions of $T.$ As a consequence, we obtain eigenvalues of $H$ and natural polynomial approximations of the self-similar measure. Bernoulli convolutions are studied as an example.

Keywords: Self-similar measure, iterated function system, transfer operator, Bernoulli convolution, spectrum of Hutchinson operator.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 28A80; Secondary: 37D20, 41A10.
Citation: Christoph Bandt, Helena PeÑa. Polynomial approximation of self-similar measures and the spectrum of the transfer operator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (9) : 4611-4623. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017198
References:
[1]

D. H. Bailey, J. M. Borwein, R. E. Crandall and M. G. Rose, Expectations on fractal sets, Appl. Math. Comput., 220 (2013), 695-721.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.06.078.  Google Scholar

[2]

K. Barański, Dimension of the graphs of the weierstrass-type functions, in Fractal Geometry and Stochastics V (eds. C. Bandt, K. Falconer and M. Zähle), vol. 70 of Progress in Probability, Springer International Publishing, 2015, 77-91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18660-3_5.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. Barnsley and S. Demko, Iterated function systems and the global construction of fractals, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 399 (1985), 243-275.  doi: 10.1098/rspa.1985.0057.  Google Scholar

[4]

B. Beckermann, The condition number of real Vandermonde, Krylov and positive definite Hankel matrices, Numerische Mathematik, 85 (2000), 553-577.  doi: 10.1007/PL00005392.  Google Scholar

[5]

M.-D. Choi, Tricks or treats with the Hilbert matrix, Amer. Math. Monthly, 90 (1983), 301-312.  doi: 10.2307/2975779.  Google Scholar

[6]

D. J. Driebe, The bernoulli map, in Fully Chaotic Maps and Broken Time Symmetry, vol. 4 of Nonlinear Phenomena and Complex Systems, Springer Netherlands, 1999, 19-43. Google Scholar

[7]

K. J. Falconer, Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications 3rd edition, J. Wiley & sons, 2014.  Google Scholar

[8]

D. Hilbert, Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des Legendre'schen Polynoms, Acta Mathematica, 18 (1894), 155-159.  doi: 10.1007/BF02418278.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. E. Hutchinson, Fractals and self-similarity, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 30 (1981), 713-747.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1981.30.30055.  Google Scholar

[10]

T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators Classics in Mathematics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. Shmerkin, On the exceptional set for absolute continuity of Bernoulli convolutions, Geometric and Functional Analysis, 24 (2014), 946-958.  doi: 10.1007/s00039-014-0285-4.  Google Scholar

[12]

J. Shohat and J. Tamarkin, The Problem of Moments Mathematical surveys and monographs, American Mathematical Society, 1943.  Google Scholar

[13]

B. Solomyak, Notes on Bernoulli convolutions, in Fractal Geometry and Applications: A Jubilee of Benoît Mandelbrot, Part 1, vol. 72 of Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, AMS, 2004,207-230.  Google Scholar

[14]

B. Solomyak, Y. Peres and W. Schlag, Sixty years of Bernoulli convolutions, Progress in Probability, 46 (2000), 39-65.   Google Scholar

[15]

T. Tao, An Epsilon of Room I Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 2010. doi: 10.1090/gsm/117.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

D. H. Bailey, J. M. Borwein, R. E. Crandall and M. G. Rose, Expectations on fractal sets, Appl. Math. Comput., 220 (2013), 695-721.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.06.078.  Google Scholar

[2]

K. Barański, Dimension of the graphs of the weierstrass-type functions, in Fractal Geometry and Stochastics V (eds. C. Bandt, K. Falconer and M. Zähle), vol. 70 of Progress in Probability, Springer International Publishing, 2015, 77-91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18660-3_5.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. Barnsley and S. Demko, Iterated function systems and the global construction of fractals, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 399 (1985), 243-275.  doi: 10.1098/rspa.1985.0057.  Google Scholar

[4]

B. Beckermann, The condition number of real Vandermonde, Krylov and positive definite Hankel matrices, Numerische Mathematik, 85 (2000), 553-577.  doi: 10.1007/PL00005392.  Google Scholar

[5]

M.-D. Choi, Tricks or treats with the Hilbert matrix, Amer. Math. Monthly, 90 (1983), 301-312.  doi: 10.2307/2975779.  Google Scholar

[6]

D. J. Driebe, The bernoulli map, in Fully Chaotic Maps and Broken Time Symmetry, vol. 4 of Nonlinear Phenomena and Complex Systems, Springer Netherlands, 1999, 19-43. Google Scholar

[7]

K. J. Falconer, Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications 3rd edition, J. Wiley & sons, 2014.  Google Scholar

[8]

D. Hilbert, Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des Legendre'schen Polynoms, Acta Mathematica, 18 (1894), 155-159.  doi: 10.1007/BF02418278.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. E. Hutchinson, Fractals and self-similarity, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 30 (1981), 713-747.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.1981.30.30055.  Google Scholar

[10]

T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators Classics in Mathematics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. Shmerkin, On the exceptional set for absolute continuity of Bernoulli convolutions, Geometric and Functional Analysis, 24 (2014), 946-958.  doi: 10.1007/s00039-014-0285-4.  Google Scholar

[12]

J. Shohat and J. Tamarkin, The Problem of Moments Mathematical surveys and monographs, American Mathematical Society, 1943.  Google Scholar

[13]

B. Solomyak, Notes on Bernoulli convolutions, in Fractal Geometry and Applications: A Jubilee of Benoît Mandelbrot, Part 1, vol. 72 of Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, AMS, 2004,207-230.  Google Scholar

[14]

B. Solomyak, Y. Peres and W. Schlag, Sixty years of Bernoulli convolutions, Progress in Probability, 46 (2000), 39-65.   Google Scholar

[15]

T. Tao, An Epsilon of Room I Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 2010. doi: 10.1090/gsm/117.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Eigenvalues of two matrix approximations of the Hutchinson operator for the Bernoulli convolution with $t=0.8.$ The matrix size, $N=499$ and 500, does not influence the leading eigenvalues $t^k, k=0,...,3$ while virtually all remaining eigenvalues are different. The circle has radius $\frac12 .$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Polynomial approximations $v_{t,n}$ of the Bernoulli convolution measure $\nu_t$ in the smooth case $t=0.8$ (left) and the more fractal case $t=0.6$ (right). In the left picture, one could not distinguish at this scale between the approximations of degree $n\geq 8$. The gray line shows a histogram with 2000 bins based on $2^{20}$ points generated by the 'chaos game' algorithm.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Above: leading left eigenvectors $e_0,e_1,e_2$ of $T_N$ for the Bernoulli convolution with $t=0.8$ and $N=500.$ Below: scaled eigenvector $e_3,$ integral of $e_2$ and iterated integral of $e_3.$ The latter two coincide with $e_1,$ up to a constant. Thus $e_1,e_2,e_3$ are the first 3 derivatives of the density $e_0$ of the self-similar measure.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  $\beta=1/t=1.84$ was chosen near the Pisot parameter 1.8393... Below: the self-similar measure. Above: cumulative sum of second eigenvector. Although $\nu$ is not a differentiable function, the second eigenvector looks like a derivative of $\nu .$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.">Figure 5.  Right eigenvectors are polynomials for $\lambda>\frac12 .$ First eigenvector with $|\lambda|<\frac12$ shown for comparison. Parameters as in Figure 3.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Rostislav Grigorchuk, Volodymyr Nekrashevych. Self-similar groups, operator algebras and Schur complement. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2007, 1 (3) : 323-370. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2007.1.323
[2]

Weronika Biedrzycka, Marta Tyran-Kamińska. Self-similar solutions of fragmentation equations revisited. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 13-27. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018002
[3]

Marco Cannone, Grzegorz Karch. On self-similar solutions to the homogeneous Boltzmann equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2013, 6 (4) : 801-808. doi: 10.3934/krm.2013.6.801
[4]

Hideo Kubo, Kotaro Tsugawa. Global solutions and self-similar solutions of the coupled system of semilinear wave equations in three space dimensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (2) : 471-482. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.471
[5]

Adrien Blanchet, Philippe Laurençot. Finite mass self-similar blowing-up solutions of a chemotaxis system with non-linear diffusion. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 47-60. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.47
[6]

Francis Hounkpe, Gregory Seregin. An approximation of forward self-similar solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (10) : 4823-4846. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021059
[7]

Dieter Mayer, Tobias Mühlenbruch, Fredrik Strömberg. The transfer operator for the Hecke triangle groups. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (7) : 2453-2484. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2453
[8]

Anna Chiara Lai, Paola Loreti. Self-similar control systems and applications to zygodactyl bird's foot. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (2) : 401-419. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.401
[9]

Kin Ming Hui. Existence of self-similar solutions of the inverse mean curvature flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (2) : 863-880. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019036
[10]

D. G. Aronson. Self-similar focusing in porous media: An explicit calculation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 1685-1691. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1685
[11]

G. A. Braga, Frederico Furtado, Vincenzo Isaia. Renormalization group calculation of asymptotically self-similar dynamics. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 131-141. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.131
[12]

Qiaolin He. Numerical simulation and self-similar analysis of singular solutions of Prandtl equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (1) : 101-116. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.101
[13]

Bendong Lou. Self-similar solutions in a sector for a quasilinear parabolic equation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (4) : 857-879. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.857
[14]

F. Berezovskaya, G. Karev. Bifurcations of self-similar solutions of the Fokker-Plank equations. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 91-99. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.91
[15]

Shota Sato, Eiji Yanagida. Singular backward self-similar solutions of a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (4) : 897-906. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.897
[16]

Alberto Bressan, Wen Shen. A posteriori error estimates for self-similar solutions to the Euler equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (1) : 113-130. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020168
[17]

Shota Sato, Eiji Yanagida. Forward self-similar solution with a moving singularity for a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 26 (1) : 313-331. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.313
[18]

L. Olsen. Rates of convergence towards the boundary of a self-similar set. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 19 (4) : 799-811. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.799
[19]

Marek Fila, Michael Winkler, Eiji Yanagida. Convergence to self-similar solutions for a semilinear parabolic equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 21 (3) : 703-716. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.703
[20]

Hyungjin Huh. Self-similar solutions to nonlinear Dirac equations and an application to nonuniqueness. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (1) : 53-60. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018003

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (102)
  • HTML views (62)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences