# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
$N-$Laplacian problems with critical double exponential nonlinearities
• DCDS Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Low Mach number limit for the compressible inertial Qian-Sheng model of liquid crystals: Convergence for classical solutions
February  2021, 41(2): 967-985. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020305

## Geometric singular perturbation analysis of Degasperis-Procesi equation with distributed delay

 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

* Corresponding author: Ji Li, liji@hust.edu.cn

Received  April 2020 Published  February 2021 Early access  August 2020

Fund Project: The corresponding author is supported by NSFC grant 11771161

In this paper we consider the Degasperis-Procesi equation, which is an approximation to the incompressible Euler equation in shallow water regime. First we provide the existence of solitary wave solutions for the original DP equation and the general theory of geometric singular perturbation. Then we prove the existence of solitary wave solutions for the equation with a special local delay convolution kernel and a special nonlocal delay convolution kernel by using the geometric singular perturbation theory and invariant manifold theory. According to the relationship between solitary wave and homoclinic orbit, the Degasperis-Procesi equation is transformed into the slow-fast system by using the traveling wave transformation. It is proved that the perturbed equation also has a homoclinic orbit, which corresponds to a solitary wave solution of the delayed Degasperis-Procesi equation.

Citation: Feifei Cheng, Ji Li. Geometric singular perturbation analysis of Degasperis-Procesi equation with distributed delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (2) : 967-985. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020305
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The homoclinic orbit within $\phi<c-\frac{2}{3}k$
local delay, k = 1
noncocal delay, k = 1
 [1] Rui Liu. Several new types of solitary wave solutions for the generalized Camassa-Holm-Degasperis-Procesi equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (1) : 77-90. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.77 [2] Yong Chen, Hongjun Gao. Global existence for the stochastic Degasperis-Procesi equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (11) : 5171-5184. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5171 [3] A. Alexandrou Himonas, Curtis Holliman. On well-posedness of the Degasperis-Procesi equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 31 (2) : 469-488. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.469 [4] Fei Guo, Bao-Feng Feng, Hongjun Gao, Yue Liu. On the initial-value problem to the Degasperis-Procesi equation with linear dispersion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 26 (4) : 1269-1290. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.1269 [5] Guenbo Hwang, Byungsoo Moon. Global existence and propagation speed for a Degasperis-Procesi equation with both dissipation and dispersion. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (1) : 15-25. doi: 10.3934/era.2020002 [6] Shuyin Wu, Joachim Escher, Zhaoyang Yin. Global existence and blow-up phenomena for a weakly dissipative Degasperis-Procesi equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (3) : 633-645. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.633 [7] Ying Fu, Changzheng Qu, Yichen Ma. Well-posedness and blow-up phenomena for the interacting system of the Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (3) : 1025-1035. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1025 [8] John Guckenheimer, Christian Kuehn. Homoclinic orbits of the FitzHugh-Nagumo equation: The singular-limit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 851-872. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.851 [9] John Boyd. Strongly nonlinear perturbation theory for solitary waves and bions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (1) : 1-29. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019001 [10] Ilona Gucwa, Peter Szmolyan. Geometric singular perturbation analysis of an autocatalator model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (4) : 783-806. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.783 [11] Jerry L. Bona, Didier Pilod. Stability of solitary-wave solutions to the Hirota-Satsuma equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (4) : 1391-1413. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1391 [12] V. Afraimovich, T.R. Young. Multipliers of homoclinic orbits on surfaces and characteristics of associated invariant sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2000, 6 (3) : 691-704. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.691 [13] Shi Jin, Dongsheng Yin. Computational high frequency wave diffraction by a corner via the Liouville equation and geometric theory of diffraction. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (1) : 295-316. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.295 [14] Flaviano Battelli. Saddle-node bifurcation of homoclinic orbits in singular systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2001, 7 (1) : 203-218. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.203 [15] Aurore Back, Emmanuel Frénod. Geometric two-scale convergence on manifold and applications to the Vlasov equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (1) : 223-241. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.223 [16] Xiaowan Li, Zengji Du, Shuguan Ji. Existence results of solitary wave solutions for a delayed Camassa-Holm-KP equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (6) : 2961-2981. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019132 [17] Mathias Nikolai Arnesen. Existence of solitary-wave solutions to nonlocal equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (7) : 3483-3510. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.3483 [18] Fabio Camilli, Annalisa Cesaroni. A note on singular perturbation problems via Aubry-Mather theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 17 (4) : 807-819. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.807 [19] Wei Wang, Yan Lv. Limit behavior of nonlinear stochastic wave equations with singular perturbation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (1) : 175-193. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.175 [20] Anna Doubova, Enrique Fernández-Cara. Some geometric inverse problems for the linear wave equation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (2) : 371-393. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.371

2020 Impact Factor: 1.392