American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
February  2002, 2(1): 95-108. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2002.2.95

Finite element analysis and approximations of phase-lock equations of superconductivity

Mei-Qin Zhan 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States

Received  March 2001 Revised  September 2001 Published  November 2001

In [22], the author introduced the phase-lock equations and established existences of both strong and weak solutions of the equations. We also investigated the relations between phase-lock equations and Ginzburg-Landau equations of Superconductivity. In this paper, we present finite element analysis and computations of phase-lock equations. We derive the error estimates for both semi-discrete and fully discrete equations, including optimal $L^2$ and $H^1$ error estimates. In the fully discrete case, we use backward Euler method to discretize the time variable.
Keywords: Time Dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) Equations, error estimates, finite element, phase-pock equations, optimal convergence, backward Euler method., discrete equations.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35B05, 35B30, 35B6.
Citation: Mei-Qin Zhan. Finite element analysis and approximations of phase-lock equations of superconductivity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2002, 2 (1) : 95-108. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2002.2.95
[1]

N. I. Karachalios, H. E. Nistazakis, A. N. Yannacopoulos. Remarks on the asymptotic behavior of solutions of complex discrete Ginzburg-Landau equations. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 476-486. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.476
[2]

Dingshi Li, Lin Shi, Xiaohu Wang. Long term behavior of stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with time delays in weighted spaces. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (9) : 5121-5148. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019046
[3]

Dmitry Turaev, Sergey Zelik. Analytical proof of space-time chaos in Ginzburg-Landau equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 28 (4) : 1713-1751. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1713
[4]

Hans G. Kaper, Bixiang Wang, Shouhong Wang. Determining nodes for the Ginzburg-Landau equations of superconductivity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1998, 4 (2) : 205-224. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.205
[5]

N. I. Karachalios, Hector E. Nistazakis, Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of complex discrete evolution equations: The discrete Ginzburg-Landau equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2007, 19 (4) : 711-736. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.19.711
[6]

Dmitry Glotov, P. J. McKenna. Numerical mountain pass solutions of Ginzburg-Landau type equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2008, 7 (6) : 1345-1359. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.1345
[7]

Kolade M. Owolabi, Edson Pindza. Numerical simulation of multidimensional nonlinear fractional Ginzburg-Landau equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 835-851. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020048
[8]

Noboru Okazawa, Tomomi Yokota. Smoothing effect for generalized complex Ginzburg-Landau equations in unbounded domains. Conference Publications, 2001, 2001 (Special) : 280-288. doi: 10.3934/proc.2001.2001.280
[9]

Yuta Kugo, Motohiro Sobajima, Toshiyuki Suzuki, Tomomi Yokota, Kentarou Yoshii. Solvability of a class of complex Ginzburg-Landau equations in periodic Sobolev spaces. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 754-763. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0754
[10]

Bixiang Wang, Shouhong Wang. Gevrey class regularity for the solutions of the Ginzburg-Landau equations of superconductivity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1998, 4 (3) : 507-522. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.507
[11]

Gregory A. Chechkin, Vladimir V. Chepyzhov, Leonid S. Pankratov. Homogenization of trajectory attractors of Ginzburg-Landau equations with randomly oscillating terms. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (3) : 1133-1154. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018145
[12]

Lu Zhang, Aihong Zou, Tao Yan, Ji Shu. Weak pullback attractors for stochastic Ginzburg-Landau equations in Bochner spaces. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022, 27 (2) : 749-768. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021063
[13]

Francisco Guillén-González, Mouhamadou Samsidy Goudiaby. Stability and convergence at infinite time of several fully discrete schemes for a Ginzburg-Landau model for nematic liquid crystal flows. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (12) : 4229-4246. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.4229
[14]

Yueqiang Shang, Qihui Zhang. A subgrid stabilizing postprocessed mixed finite element method for the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3119-3142. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020222
[15]

Kun Wang, Yinnian He, Yueqiang Shang. Fully discrete finite element method for the viscoelastic fluid motion equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (3) : 665-684. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.665
[16]

Liupeng Wang, Yunqing Huang. Error estimates for second-order SAV finite element method to phase field crystal model. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1735-1752. doi: 10.3934/era.2020089
[17]

Weidong Zhao, Jinlei Wang, Shige Peng. Error estimates of the $\theta$-scheme for backward stochastic differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (4) : 905-924. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.905
[18]

Martin Burger, José A. Carrillo, Marie-Therese Wolfram. A mixed finite element method for nonlinear diffusion equations. Kinetic and Related Models, 2010, 3 (1) : 59-83. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.59
[19]

Iuliana Oprea, Gerhard Dangelmayr. A period doubling route to spatiotemporal chaos in a system of Ginzburg-Landau equations for nematic electroconvection. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (1) : 273-296. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018095
[20]

Dingshi Li, Xiaohu Wang. Asymptotic behavior of stochastic complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with deterministic non-autonomous forcing on thin domains. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 449-465. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018181

2021 Impact Factor: 1.497

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (110)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy