American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
February  2004, 4(1): 187-201. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.187

A mathematical model of prostate tumor growth and androgen-independent relapse

T.L. Jackson 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Received  December 2002 Revised  April 2003 Published  November 2003

A mathematical model is developed that investigates polyclonality and decreased apoptosis as mechanisms for the androgen-independent relapse of human prostate cancer. The tumor is treated as a continuum of two types of cells (androgen-dependent and androgen- independent) whose proliferation and apoptotic death rates differ in response to androgen rich and androgen poor conditions. Insight into the tumor's response to therapies which both partially and completely block androgen production is gained by applying a combination of analytical and numerical techniques to the model equations. The analysis predicts that androgen deprivation therapy can only be successful for a small range of the biological parameters no matter how completely androgen production is blocked. Numerical simulations show that the model captures all three experimentally observed phases of human prostate cancer progression including exponential growth prior to treatment, androgen sensitivity immediately following therapy, and the eventual androgen-independent relapse of the tumor. Simulations also agree with experimental evidence that androgen-independent relapse is associated with a decrease in apoptosis without an increase in proliferation.
Keywords: mathematical model., Prostate cancer, partial-differential equations.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 92C6.
Citation: T.L. Jackson. A mathematical model of prostate tumor growth and androgen-independent relapse. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 187-201. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.187
[1]

Avner Friedman, Harsh Vardhan Jain. A partial differential equation model of metastasized prostatic cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 591-608. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.591
[2]

Alacia M. Voth, John G. Alford, Edward W. Swim. Mathematical modeling of continuous and intermittent androgen suppression for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (3) : 777-804. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017043
[3]

Erica M. Rutter, Yang Kuang. Global dynamics of a model of joint hormone treatment with dendritic cell vaccine for prostate cancer. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (3) : 1001-1021. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017050
[4]

Tania Biswas, Elisabetta Rocca. Long time dynamics of a phase-field model of prostate cancer growth with chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy effects. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022, 27 (5) : 2455-2469. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021140
[5]

Hsiu-Chuan Wei. Mathematical and numerical analysis of a mathematical model of mixed immunotherapy and chemotherapy of cancer. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (4) : 1279-1295. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.1279
[6]

J. Ignacio Tello. On a mathematical model of tumor growth based on cancer stem cells. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (1) : 263-278. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.263
[7]

Marcello Delitala, Tommaso Lorenzi. Recognition and learning in a mathematical model for immune response against cancer. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (4) : 891-914. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.891
[8]

Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control of a mathematical model for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1223-1240. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016040
[9]

Harsh Vardhan Jain, Avner Friedman. Modeling prostate cancer response to continuous versus intermittent androgen ablation therapy. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (4) : 945-967. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.945
[10]

Ebraheem O. Alzahrani, Muhammad Altaf Khan. Androgen driven evolutionary population dynamics in prostate cancer growth. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (10) : 3419-3440. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020426
[11]

Frederic Abergel, Remi Tachet. A nonlinear partial integro-differential equation from mathematical finance. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (3) : 907-917. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.907
[12]

Herbert Koch. Partial differential equations with non-Euclidean geometries. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2008, 1 (3) : 481-504. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2008.1.481
[13]

Lorenzo Zambotti. A brief and personal history of stochastic partial differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (1) : 471-487. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020264
[14]

Wilhelm Schlag. Spectral theory and nonlinear partial differential equations: A survey. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (3) : 703-723. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.703
[15]

Eugenia N. Petropoulou, Panayiotis D. Siafarikas. Polynomial solutions of linear partial differential equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (3) : 1053-1065. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.1053
[16]

Arnulf Jentzen. Taylor expansions of solutions of stochastic partial differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 515-557. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.515
[17]

Barbara Abraham-Shrauner. Exact solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 577-582. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018032
[18]

Nguyen Thieu Huy, Ngo Quy Dang. Dichotomy and periodic solutions to partial functional differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (8) : 3127-3144. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017167
[19]

Runzhang Xu. Preface: Special issue on advances in partial differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (12) : i-i. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021137
[20]

Avner Friedman. A hierarchy of cancer models and their mathematical challenges. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 147-159. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.147

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (395)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (43)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy