American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
September  2010, 14(2): 495-513. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.495

Zero, one and two-switch models of gene regulation

Somkid Intep 1, and  Desmond J. Higham 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XH, Scotland, United Kingdom, United Kingdom

Received  June 2009 Revised  August 2009 Published  June 2010

We compare a hierarchy of three stochastic models in gene regulation. In each case, genes produce mRNA molecules which in turn produce protein. The simplest model, as described by Thattai and Van Oudenaarden (Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2001), assumes that a gene is always active, and uses a first-order chemical kinetics framework in the continuous-time, discrete-space Markov jump (Gillespie) setting. The second model, proposed by Raser and O'Shea (Science, 2004), generalizes the first by allowing the gene to switch randomly between active and inactive states. Our third model accounts for other effects, such as the binding/unbinding of a transcription factor, by using two independent on/off switches operating in AND mode. We focus first on the noise strength, which has been defined in the biological literature as the ratio of the variance to the mean at steady state. We show that the steady state variance in the mRNA and protein for the three models can either increase or decrease when switches are incorporated, depending on the rate constants and initial conditions. Despite this, we also find that the overall noise strength is always greater when switches are added, in the sense that one or two switches are always noisier than none. On the other hand, moving from one to two switches may either increase or decrease the noise strength. Moreover, the steady state values may not reflect the relative noise levels in the transient phase. We then look at a hybrid version of the two-switch model that uses stochastic differential equations to describe the evolution of mRNA and protein. This is a simple example of a multiscale modelling approach that allows for cheaper numerical simulations. Although the underlying chemical kinetics appears to be second order, we show that it is possible to analyse the first and second moments of the mRNA and protein levels by applying a generalized version of Ito's lemma. We find that the hybrid model matches the moments of underlying Markov jump model for all time. By contrast, further simplifying the model by removing the diffusion in order to obtain an ordinary differential equation driven by a switch causes the mRNA and protein variances to be underestimated.
Keywords: multiscale, translation., Markov jump process, intrinsic noise, diffusion, transcription, stochastic differential equation, Fano factor, Gillespie algorithm.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C3.
Citation: Somkid Intep, Desmond J. Higham. Zero, one and two-switch models of gene regulation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 495-513. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.495
[1]

Kamil Rajdl, Petr Lansky. Fano factor estimation. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (1) : 105-123. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.105
[2]

Qi Wang, Lifang Huang, Kunwen Wen, Jianshe Yu. The mean and noise of stochastic gene transcription with cell division. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (5) : 1255-1270. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018058
[3]

Daoyi Xu, Yumei Huang, Zhiguo Yang. Existence theorems for periodic Markov process and stochastic functional differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 24 (3) : 1005-1023. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.24.1005
[4]

Jun Moon. Linear-quadratic mean-field type stackelberg differential games for stochastic jump-diffusion systems. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2022, 12 (2) : 371-404. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021026
[5]

Xingchun Wang. Pricing path-dependent options under the Hawkes jump diffusion process. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022024
[6]

Chuchu Chen, Jialin Hong, Yulan Lu. Stochastic differential equation with piecewise continuous arguments: Markov property, invariant measure and numerical approximation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022098
[7]

Yan Wang, Lei Wang, Yanxiang Zhao, Aimin Song, Yanping Ma. A stochastic model for microbial fermentation process under Gaussian white noise environment. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2015, 5 (4) : 381-392. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.381
[8]

Michael C. Fu, Bingqing Li, Rongwen Wu, Tianqi Zhang. Option pricing under a discrete-time Markov switching stochastic volatility with co-jump model. Frontiers of Mathematical Finance, 2022, 1 (1) : 137-160. doi: 10.3934/fmf.2021005
[9]

Qing-Qing Yang, Wai-Ki Ching, Wanhua He, Tak-Kuen Siu. Pricing vulnerable options under a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model with fire sales. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 293-318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018044
[10]

Wei Wang, Linyi Qian, Xiaonan Su. Pricing and hedging catastrophe equity put options under a Markov-modulated jump diffusion model. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 493-514. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.493
[11]

Isabelle Kuhwald, Ilya Pavlyukevich. Bistable behaviour of a jump-diffusion driven by a periodic stable-like additive process. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (9) : 3175-3190. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016092
[12]

Wuyuan Jiang. The maximum surplus before ruin in a jump-diffusion insurance risk process with dependence. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (7) : 3037-3050. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018298
[13]

Donny Citra Lesmana, Song Wang. A numerical scheme for pricing American options with transaction costs under a jump diffusion process. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1793-1813. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017019
[14]

Ziheng Chen, Siqing Gan, Xiaojie Wang. Mean-square approximations of Lévy noise driven SDEs with super-linearly growing diffusion and jump coefficients. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 4513-4545. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019154
[15]

Lukáš Adam, Jiří Outrata. On optimal control of a sweeping process coupled with an ordinary differential equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (9) : 2709-2738. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2709
[16]

Hongjun Gao, Fei Liang. On the stochastic beam equation driven by a Non-Gaussian Lévy process. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (4) : 1027-1045. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.1027
[17]

Zhen Li, Jicheng Liu. Synchronization for stochastic differential equations with nonlinear multiplicative noise in the mean square sense. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (10) : 5709-5736. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019103
[18]

Tomasz Kosmala, Markus Riedle. Variational solutions of stochastic partial differential equations with cylindrical Lévy noise. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 2879-2898. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020209
[19]

Kexue Li, Jigen Peng, Junxiong Jia. Explosive solutions of parabolic stochastic partial differential equations with lévy noise. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (10) : 5105-5125. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017221
[20]

David Lipshutz. Exit time asymptotics for small noise stochastic delay differential equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (6) : 3099-3138. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018135

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (77)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (3)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy