The regularity of pullback attractor for a non-autonomous <i>p</i>-Laplacian equation with dynamical boundary condition

Previous Article
Cosymmetry approach and mathematical modeling of species coexistence in a heterogeneous habitat
DCDS-B Home
This Issue
Next Article
Bistable waves of a recursive system arising from seasonal age-structured population models

February 2019, 24(2): 529-546. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018194

The regularity of pullback attractor for a non-autonomous p-Laplacian equation with dynamical boundary condition

1.	School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China
2.	Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China

Received June 2016 Revised March 2018 Published February 2019 Early access June 2018

Fund Project: The author was supported by NSF of China (Grant No. 11471148, Grant No. 11522109, Grant No. 11571240) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M633101).

In this paper, we investigate the asymptotic regularity of the minimal pullback attractor of a non-autonomous quasi-linear parabolic $p$-Laplacian equation with dynamical boundary condition. First, we establish the higher-order integrability of the difference of solutions near the initial time. Then we show that, under the assumption that the time-depending forcing terms only satisfy some $L^2$ integrability, the $L^2(Ω)× L^2(\partialΩ)$ pullback $\mathscr{D}$-attractor can actually attract the $L^2(Ω)× L^2(\partialΩ)$-bounded set in $L^{2+δ}(Ω)× L^{2+δ}(\partialΩ)$-norm for any $δ∈[0,∞)$.

Keywords: Pullback attractor, asymptotic regularity, dynamical boundary condition, higher-order attraction.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35K57, 35B40, 35B41.

Citation: Wen Tan. The regularity of pullback attractor for a non-autonomous p-Laplacian equation with dynamical boundary condition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 529-546. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018194

References:

[1]	M. Anguiano, P. Marín-Rubio and J. Real, Pullback attractors for non-autonomous reaction-diffusion equations with dynamical boundary conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 383 (2011), 608-618. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.05.046.
[2]	J. M. Arriteta, P. Quittner and A. Rodrguez-Bernal, Parabolic problems with nonlinear dynamical boundary conditions and singular initial data, Diffential Integral Equations, 14 (2001), 1487-1510.
[3]	H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Universitext, Springer, 2011.
[4]	D. Cao, C. Sun and M. Yang, Dynamical for a stochastic reaction-diffusion equation with additive noise, J. Differential Equations, 259 (2015), 838-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.02.020.
[5]	T. Caraballo, G. Łukaszewicz and J. Real, Pullback attractors for asymptotically compact non-autonomous dynamical systems, Nonlinear Anal., 64 (2006), 484-498. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2005.03.111.
[6]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Attractors for Infinite-dimensional Non-autonomous Dynamical Systems, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 182. Springer, New York, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4581-4.
[7]	V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors for Equations of Mathematical Physics, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., Vol. 49, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.
[8]	J. W. Cholewa and T. Dlotko, Global Attractors in Abstract Parabolic Problems, Cambridge University Press, 2000. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511526404.
[9]	I. Chueshov and B. Schmalfuß, Parabolic stochastic partial differential equations with dynamical boundary conditions, Differential Integral Equations, 17 (2004), 751-780.
[10]	H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 100 (1994), 365-393. doi: 10.1007/BF01193705.
[11]	C. G. Gal, On a class of degenerate parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions, J. Differential Equations, 253 (2012), 126-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2012.02.010.
[12]	C. G. Gal and M. Meyries, Nonlinear elliptic problems with dynamical boundary conditions of reactive and reactive-diffusive type, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 108 (2014), 1351-1380. doi: 10.1112/plms/pdt057.
[13]	C. G. Gal and M. Warma, Well-posedness and long term behavior of quasilinear parabolic equations with nonlinear dynamic boundary conditions, Differential Integral Equations, 23 (2010), 327-358.
[14]	C. G. Gal and J. Shomberg, Coleman-Gurtin type equations with dynamic boundary conditions, Phys. D, 292 (2015), 29-45. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2014.10.008.
[15]	G. R. Goldstein, Derivation and physical interpretation of general boundary conditions, Adv. Differential Equations, 11 (2006), 457-480.
[16]	P. E. Kloeden and M. Rasmussen, Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Vol. 176, 2011. doi: 10.1090/surv/176.
[17]	G. Leoni, A First Course in Sobolev Spaces, Grad. Stud. Math., vol. 105, Amer. Math. Soc., 2009. doi: 10.1090/gsm/105.
[18]	G. Łukaszewicz, On pullback attractors in $H_0^1$ for nonautonomous reaction-diffusion equations, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos, 20 (2010), 2637-2644. doi: 10.1142/S0218127410027258.
[19]	G. Łukaszewicz, On pullback attractors in $L^p$ for nonautonomous reaction-diffusion equations, Nonlinear Anal., 73 (2010), 350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.023.
[20]	A. Rodrguez-Bernal, Attractors for parabolic equations with nonlinear boundary conditions, critical exponents and singular initial data, J. Differential Equations, 181 (2002), 165-196. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4072.
[21]	C. Sun and Y. Yuan, $L^p$-type pullback attractors for a semilinear heat equation on time-varying domains, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 145 (2015), 1029-1052. doi: 10.1017/S0308210515000177.
[22]	L. Tartar, An Introduction to Sobolev Spaces and Interpolation Spaces, Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana, Springer, 2007.
[23]	R. Temam, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Springer, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0645-3.
[24]	L. Yang and M. Yang, Long-time behavior of reaction-diffusion equations with dynamical boundary condition, Nonlinear Anal., 74 (2011), 3876-3883. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.02.022.
[25]	L. Yang, M. Yang and P. E. Kloeden, Pullback attractors for non-autonomous quasilinear parabolic equations with dynamical boundary conditions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 17 (2012), 2635-2651. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2635.

show all references

References:

[1]	M. Anguiano, P. Marín-Rubio and J. Real, Pullback attractors for non-autonomous reaction-diffusion equations with dynamical boundary conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 383 (2011), 608-618. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.05.046.
[2]	J. M. Arriteta, P. Quittner and A. Rodrguez-Bernal, Parabolic problems with nonlinear dynamical boundary conditions and singular initial data, Diffential Integral Equations, 14 (2001), 1487-1510.
[3]	H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Universitext, Springer, 2011.
[4]	D. Cao, C. Sun and M. Yang, Dynamical for a stochastic reaction-diffusion equation with additive noise, J. Differential Equations, 259 (2015), 838-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.02.020.
[5]	T. Caraballo, G. Łukaszewicz and J. Real, Pullback attractors for asymptotically compact non-autonomous dynamical systems, Nonlinear Anal., 64 (2006), 484-498. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2005.03.111.
[6]	A. N. Carvalho, J. A. Langa and J. C. Robinson, Attractors for Infinite-dimensional Non-autonomous Dynamical Systems, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 182. Springer, New York, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4581-4.
[7]	V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors for Equations of Mathematical Physics, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., Vol. 49, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.
[8]	J. W. Cholewa and T. Dlotko, Global Attractors in Abstract Parabolic Problems, Cambridge University Press, 2000. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511526404.
[9]	I. Chueshov and B. Schmalfuß, Parabolic stochastic partial differential equations with dynamical boundary conditions, Differential Integral Equations, 17 (2004), 751-780.
[10]	H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 100 (1994), 365-393. doi: 10.1007/BF01193705.
[11]	C. G. Gal, On a class of degenerate parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions, J. Differential Equations, 253 (2012), 126-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2012.02.010.
[12]	C. G. Gal and M. Meyries, Nonlinear elliptic problems with dynamical boundary conditions of reactive and reactive-diffusive type, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 108 (2014), 1351-1380. doi: 10.1112/plms/pdt057.
[13]	C. G. Gal and M. Warma, Well-posedness and long term behavior of quasilinear parabolic equations with nonlinear dynamic boundary conditions, Differential Integral Equations, 23 (2010), 327-358.
[14]	C. G. Gal and J. Shomberg, Coleman-Gurtin type equations with dynamic boundary conditions, Phys. D, 292 (2015), 29-45. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2014.10.008.
[15]	G. R. Goldstein, Derivation and physical interpretation of general boundary conditions, Adv. Differential Equations, 11 (2006), 457-480.
[16]	P. E. Kloeden and M. Rasmussen, Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Vol. 176, 2011. doi: 10.1090/surv/176.
[17]	G. Leoni, A First Course in Sobolev Spaces, Grad. Stud. Math., vol. 105, Amer. Math. Soc., 2009. doi: 10.1090/gsm/105.
[18]	G. Łukaszewicz, On pullback attractors in $H_0^1$ for nonautonomous reaction-diffusion equations, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos, 20 (2010), 2637-2644. doi: 10.1142/S0218127410027258.
[19]	G. Łukaszewicz, On pullback attractors in $L^p$ for nonautonomous reaction-diffusion equations, Nonlinear Anal., 73 (2010), 350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.023.
[20]	A. Rodrguez-Bernal, Attractors for parabolic equations with nonlinear boundary conditions, critical exponents and singular initial data, J. Differential Equations, 181 (2002), 165-196. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4072.
[21]	C. Sun and Y. Yuan, $L^p$-type pullback attractors for a semilinear heat equation on time-varying domains, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 145 (2015), 1029-1052. doi: 10.1017/S0308210515000177.
[22]	L. Tartar, An Introduction to Sobolev Spaces and Interpolation Spaces, Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana, Springer, 2007.
[23]	R. Temam, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Springer, New York, 1997. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0645-3.
[24]	L. Yang and M. Yang, Long-time behavior of reaction-diffusion equations with dynamical boundary condition, Nonlinear Anal., 74 (2011), 3876-3883. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.02.022.
[25]	L. Yang, M. Yang and P. E. Kloeden, Pullback attractors for non-autonomous quasilinear parabolic equations with dynamical boundary conditions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 17 (2012), 2635-2651. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2635.

[1]	Adam Larios, E. S. Titi. On the higher-order global regularity of the inviscid Voigt-regularization of three-dimensional hydrodynamic models. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 603-627. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.603
[2]	Zdeněk Skalák. On the asymptotic decay of higher-order norms of the solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in R³. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2010, 3 (2) : 361-370. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.361
[3]	Mamoru Okamoto. Asymptotic behavior of solutions to a higher-order KdV-type equation with critical nonlinearity. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2019, 8 (3) : 567-601. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019027
[4]	Eduardo Martínez. Higher-order variational calculus on Lie algebroids. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2015, 7 (1) : 81-108. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2015.7.81
[5]	Mustapha Yebdri. Existence of $ \mathcal{D}- $pullback attractor for an infinite dimensional dynamical system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022, 27 (1) : 167-198. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021036
[6]	Weisheng Niu, Yao Xu. Convergence rates in homogenization of higher-order parabolic systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (8) : 4203-4229. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018183
[7]	Simão P. S. Santos, Natália Martins, Delfim F. M. Torres. Noether's theorem for higher-order variational problems of Herglotz type. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 990-999. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.990
[8]	Xinmin Yang, Xiaoqi Yang, Kok Lay Teo. Higher-order symmetric duality in multiobjective programming with invexity. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (2) : 385-391. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.385
[9]	Pedro D. Prieto-Martínez, Narciso Román-Roy. Higher-order mechanics: Variational principles and other topics. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2013, 5 (4) : 493-510. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2013.5.493
[10]	George J. Bautista, Ademir F. Pazoto. Decay of solutions for a dissipative higher-order Boussinesq system on a periodic domain. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (2) : 747-769. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020035
[11]	Feliz Minhós, Hugo Carrasco. Solvability of higher-order BVPs in the half-line with unbounded nonlinearities. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 841-850. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0841
[12]	Clesh Deseskel Elion Ekohela, Daniel Moukoko. On higher-order anisotropic perturbed Caginalp phase field systems. Electronic Research Announcements, 2019, 26: 36-53. doi: 10.3934/era.2019.26.004
[13]	Robert Jankowski, Barbara Łupińska, Magdalena Nockowska-Rosiak, Ewa Schmeidel. Monotonic solutions of a higher-order neutral difference system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 253-261. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018017
[14]	Anthony Bloch, Leonardo Colombo, Fernando Jiménez. The variational discretization of the constrained higher-order Lagrange-Poincaré equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (1) : 309-344. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019013
[15]	Feng Wang, Fengquan Li, Zhijun Qiao. On the Cauchy problem for a higher-order μ-Camassa-Holm equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (8) : 4163-4187. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018181
[16]	Qilin Wang, S. J. Li. Higher-order sensitivity analysis in nonconvex vector optimization. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (2) : 381-392. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.381
[17]	Daomin Cao, Guolin Qin. Liouville type theorems for fractional and higher-order fractional systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (5) : 2269-2283. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020361
[18]	Liping Tang, Xinmin Yang, Ying Gao. Higher-order symmetric duality for multiobjective programming with cone constraints. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1873-1884. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019033
[19]	Aliang Xia, Jianfu Yang. Normalized solutions of higher-order Schrödinger equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (1) : 447-462. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019018
[20]	David F. Parker. Higher-order shallow water equations and the Camassa-Holm equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 7 (3) : 629-641. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.7.629

2021 Impact Factor: 1.497

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Wen Tan
on Google Scholar
Wen Tan

2021 Impact Factor: 1.497

Tools

Article outline

2021 Impact Factor: 1.497

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Wen Tan
on Google Scholar
Wen Tan

[Back to Top]