American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2019, 24(6): 2799-2810. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018275

Distribution profiles in gene transcription activated by the cross-talking pathway

Feng Jiao 1,2, , Qiwen Sun 1,2, , Genghong Lin 1,2, and  Jianshe Yu 1,,

1. 

Center for Applied Mathematics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2. 

School of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

* Corresponding author: Jianshe Yu, Email: jsyu@gzhu.edu.cn

Received  April 2018 Revised  May 2018 Published  June 2019 Early access  October 2018

Fund Project: This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China grants (11631005, 11501138), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2016A030313542), Program for Guangzhou Municipal College and University (1201630273), and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_16R16).

Gene transcription is a stochastic process, manifested by the heterogeneous mRNA distribution in an isogenic cell population. Bimodal distribution has been observed in the transcription of stress responsive genes which have evolved to be easily turned on and easily turned off. This is against the conclusion in the classical two-state model that bimodality occurs only when the gene is hardly turned on and hardly turned off. In this paper, we extend the gene activation process in the two-state model by introducing the cross-talking pathway that involves the random selection between a spontaneous weak basal pathway and a stress-induced strong signaling pathway. By deriving exact forms of mRNA distribution at steady-state, we find that the cross-talking pathway is much more likely to trigger the bimodal distribution. Our further analysis reveals an observed transition among the decaying, bimodal and unimodal mRNA distribution for stress gene upon enhanced stimulations. Especially, the bimodality occurs when the stress-induced signalling pathway is more frequently selected, reinforcing the assertion that bimodal transcription is a general feature of stress genes in response to environmental change.

Keywords: Stochastic gene transcription, cross-talking pathway, bimodal distribution.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34F05, 37H10, 60J20; Secondary: 92C37, 92C40.
Citation: Feng Jiao, Qiwen Sun, Genghong Lin, Jianshe Yu. Distribution profiles in gene transcription activated by the cross-talking pathway. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (6) : 2799-2810. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018275
References:
[1]

W. Chu and W. Zhang, Transformations of Kummer-type for 2F2-series and their q-analogues, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 216 (2008), 467-473.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.05.024.  Google Scholar

[2]

P. L. Felmer, Random dynamics of gene transcription activation in single cells, J. Differential Equations, 247 (2009), 1796-1816.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.06.006.  Google Scholar

[3]

I. Golding, J. Paulsson, S. M. Zawilski and E. C. Cox, Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria, Cell, 123 (2005), 1025-1036.  doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.031.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Iyer-Biswas, F. Hayot and C. Jayaprakash, Stochasticity of gene products from transcriptional pulsing, Phys. Rev. E, 79 (2009), 031911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.031911.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. Jiao, Q. Sun, M. Tang, J. Yu and B. Zheng, Distribution modes and their corresponding parameter regions in stochastic gene transcription, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 75 (2015), 2396-2420.  doi: 10.1137/151005567.  Google Scholar

[6]

F. Jiao, M. Tang and J. Yu, Distribution profiles and their dynamic transition in stochastic gene transcription, J. Differential Equations, 254 (2013), 3307-3328.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2013.01.019.  Google Scholar

[7]

D. L. Jones, R. C. Brewster and R. Phillips, Promoter architecture dictates cell-to-cell variability in gene expression, Science, 346 (2014), 1533-1536.  doi: 10.1126/science.1255301.  Google Scholar

[8]

M. Kaern, T. C. Elston, W. J. Blake and J. J. Collins, Stochasticity in gene expression: From theories to phenotypes, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6 (2005), 451-464.  doi: 10.1038/nrg1615.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. Kuang, M. Tang and J. Yu, The mean and noise of protein numbers in stochastic gene expression, J. Math. Biol., 67 (2013), 261-291.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0551-8.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. R. Larson, C. Fritzsch, L. Sun, X. Meng, D. S. Lawrence and R. H. Singer, Direct observation of frequency modulated transcription in single cells using light activation, eLife, 2 (2013), e00750. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00750.  Google Scholar

[11]

Q. Li, L. Huang and J. Yu, Modulation of first-passage time for bursty gene expression via random signals, Math. Biosci. Eng., 14 (2017), 1261-1277.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017065.  Google Scholar

[12]

Y. Li, M. Tang and J. Yu, Transcription dynamics of inducible genes modulated by negative regulations, Math. Med. Biol., 32 (2015), 115-136.  doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqt019.  Google Scholar

[13]

G. Lin, J. Yu, Z. Zhou, Q. Sun and F. Jiao, Fluctuations of mRNA distributions in multiple pathway activated transcription, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. B, (2018), in press. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018219.  Google Scholar

[14]

J. Macia, S. Regot, T. Peeters, N. Conde, R. Sol$\acute{e}$ and F. Posas, Dynamic signaling in the Hog1 MAPK pathway relies on high basal signal transduction, Sci. Signal, 2 (2009), ra13. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000056.  Google Scholar

[15]

C. Miller et al., Dynamic transcriptome analysis measures rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in yeast, Mol. Syst. Biol., 7 (2011), 458. Google Scholar

[16]

B. Munsky, G. Neuert and A. van Oudenaarden, Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation, Science, 336 (2012), 183-187.  doi: 10.1126/science.1216379.  Google Scholar

[17]

E. Nadal, G. Ammerer and F. Posas, Controlling gene expression in response to stress, Nat. Rev. Genet., 12 (2011), 833-845.  doi: 10.1038/nrg3055.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. Paliwal, MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast, Nature, 446 (2007), 46-51.   Google Scholar

[19]

R. B. Paris, A Kummer-type transformation for a 2F2 hypergeometric function, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 173 (2005), 379-382.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.05.005.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. Peccoud and B. Ycart, Markovian modelling of gene-product synthesis, Theor. Popul. Biol., 48 (1995), 222-234.   Google Scholar

[21]

V. Pelechano, S. Chávez and J.E. Pérez-Ortín, A complete set of nascent transcription rates for yeast genes, Plos One, 5 (2010), e15442. Google Scholar

[22]

S. Pelet, Transient activation of the HOG MAPK pathway regulates bimodal Gene expression, Science, 332 (2011), 732-735.   Google Scholar

[23]

A. Raj, C.S. Peskin, D. Tranchina, D.Y. Vargas and S. Tyagi, Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells, PLoS Biol., 4 (2006), e309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309.  Google Scholar

[24]

J. Ren, F. Jiao, Q. Sun, M. Tang and J. Yu, The dynamics of gene transcription in random environments, AIMS, 23 (2018), 3167-3194.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018224.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Sanchez and I. Golding, Genetic determinants and cellular constraints in noisy gene expression, Science, 342 (2013), 1188-1193.  doi: 10.1126/science.1242975.  Google Scholar

[26]

Q. Sun, M. Tang and J. Yu, Modulation of gene transcription noise by competing transcription factors, J. Math. Biol., 64 (2012), 469-494.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-011-0420-x.  Google Scholar

[27]

Q. Sun, M. Tang and J. Yu, Temporal profile of gene transcription noise modulated by cross-talking signal transduction pathways, Bull. Math. Biol., 74 (2012), 375-398.  doi: 10.1007/s11538-011-9683-z.  Google Scholar

[28]

M. Tang, The mean and noise of stochastic gene transcription, J. Theor. Biol., 253 (2008), 271-280.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.03.023.  Google Scholar

[29]

Q. Wang, L. Huang, K. Wen and J. Yu, The mean and noise of stochastic gene transcription with cell division, Math. Biosci. Eng., 15 (2018), 1255-1270.   Google Scholar

[30]

J. Yu and X. Liu, Monotonic dynamics of mRNA degradation by two pathways, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 7 (2017), 1598-1612.   Google Scholar

[31]

J. Yu, Q. Sun and M. Tang, The nonlinear dynamics and fluctuations of mRNA levels in cross-talking pathway activated transcription, J. Theor. Biol., 363 (2014), 223-234.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.08.024.  Google Scholar

[32]

D. Zenklusen, D. R. Larson and R. H. Singer, Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 15 (2008), 1263-1271.   Google Scholar

[33]

T. Zhou and J. Zhang, Analytical results for a multistate gene model, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 72 (2012), 789-818.  doi: 10.1137/110852887.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

W. Chu and W. Zhang, Transformations of Kummer-type for 2F2-series and their q-analogues, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 216 (2008), 467-473.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.05.024.  Google Scholar

[2]

P. L. Felmer, Random dynamics of gene transcription activation in single cells, J. Differential Equations, 247 (2009), 1796-1816.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.06.006.  Google Scholar

[3]

I. Golding, J. Paulsson, S. M. Zawilski and E. C. Cox, Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria, Cell, 123 (2005), 1025-1036.  doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.031.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Iyer-Biswas, F. Hayot and C. Jayaprakash, Stochasticity of gene products from transcriptional pulsing, Phys. Rev. E, 79 (2009), 031911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.031911.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. Jiao, Q. Sun, M. Tang, J. Yu and B. Zheng, Distribution modes and their corresponding parameter regions in stochastic gene transcription, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 75 (2015), 2396-2420.  doi: 10.1137/151005567.  Google Scholar

[6]

F. Jiao, M. Tang and J. Yu, Distribution profiles and their dynamic transition in stochastic gene transcription, J. Differential Equations, 254 (2013), 3307-3328.  doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2013.01.019.  Google Scholar

[7]

D. L. Jones, R. C. Brewster and R. Phillips, Promoter architecture dictates cell-to-cell variability in gene expression, Science, 346 (2014), 1533-1536.  doi: 10.1126/science.1255301.  Google Scholar

[8]

M. Kaern, T. C. Elston, W. J. Blake and J. J. Collins, Stochasticity in gene expression: From theories to phenotypes, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6 (2005), 451-464.  doi: 10.1038/nrg1615.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. Kuang, M. Tang and J. Yu, The mean and noise of protein numbers in stochastic gene expression, J. Math. Biol., 67 (2013), 261-291.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0551-8.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. R. Larson, C. Fritzsch, L. Sun, X. Meng, D. S. Lawrence and R. H. Singer, Direct observation of frequency modulated transcription in single cells using light activation, eLife, 2 (2013), e00750. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00750.  Google Scholar

[11]

Q. Li, L. Huang and J. Yu, Modulation of first-passage time for bursty gene expression via random signals, Math. Biosci. Eng., 14 (2017), 1261-1277.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017065.  Google Scholar

[12]

Y. Li, M. Tang and J. Yu, Transcription dynamics of inducible genes modulated by negative regulations, Math. Med. Biol., 32 (2015), 115-136.  doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqt019.  Google Scholar

[13]

G. Lin, J. Yu, Z. Zhou, Q. Sun and F. Jiao, Fluctuations of mRNA distributions in multiple pathway activated transcription, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. B, (2018), in press. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018219.  Google Scholar

[14]

J. Macia, S. Regot, T. Peeters, N. Conde, R. Sol$\acute{e}$ and F. Posas, Dynamic signaling in the Hog1 MAPK pathway relies on high basal signal transduction, Sci. Signal, 2 (2009), ra13. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000056.  Google Scholar

[15]

C. Miller et al., Dynamic transcriptome analysis measures rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in yeast, Mol. Syst. Biol., 7 (2011), 458. Google Scholar

[16]

B. Munsky, G. Neuert and A. van Oudenaarden, Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation, Science, 336 (2012), 183-187.  doi: 10.1126/science.1216379.  Google Scholar

[17]

E. Nadal, G. Ammerer and F. Posas, Controlling gene expression in response to stress, Nat. Rev. Genet., 12 (2011), 833-845.  doi: 10.1038/nrg3055.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. Paliwal, MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast, Nature, 446 (2007), 46-51.   Google Scholar

[19]

R. B. Paris, A Kummer-type transformation for a 2F2 hypergeometric function, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 173 (2005), 379-382.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.05.005.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. Peccoud and B. Ycart, Markovian modelling of gene-product synthesis, Theor. Popul. Biol., 48 (1995), 222-234.   Google Scholar

[21]

V. Pelechano, S. Chávez and J.E. Pérez-Ortín, A complete set of nascent transcription rates for yeast genes, Plos One, 5 (2010), e15442. Google Scholar

[22]

S. Pelet, Transient activation of the HOG MAPK pathway regulates bimodal Gene expression, Science, 332 (2011), 732-735.   Google Scholar

[23]

A. Raj, C.S. Peskin, D. Tranchina, D.Y. Vargas and S. Tyagi, Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells, PLoS Biol., 4 (2006), e309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309.  Google Scholar

[24]

J. Ren, F. Jiao, Q. Sun, M. Tang and J. Yu, The dynamics of gene transcription in random environments, AIMS, 23 (2018), 3167-3194.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018224.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Sanchez and I. Golding, Genetic determinants and cellular constraints in noisy gene expression, Science, 342 (2013), 1188-1193.  doi: 10.1126/science.1242975.  Google Scholar

[26]

Q. Sun, M. Tang and J. Yu, Modulation of gene transcription noise by competing transcription factors, J. Math. Biol., 64 (2012), 469-494.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-011-0420-x.  Google Scholar

[27]

Q. Sun, M. Tang and J. Yu, Temporal profile of gene transcription noise modulated by cross-talking signal transduction pathways, Bull. Math. Biol., 74 (2012), 375-398.  doi: 10.1007/s11538-011-9683-z.  Google Scholar

[28]

M. Tang, The mean and noise of stochastic gene transcription, J. Theor. Biol., 253 (2008), 271-280.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.03.023.  Google Scholar

[29]

Q. Wang, L. Huang, K. Wen and J. Yu, The mean and noise of stochastic gene transcription with cell division, Math. Biosci. Eng., 15 (2018), 1255-1270.   Google Scholar

[30]

J. Yu and X. Liu, Monotonic dynamics of mRNA degradation by two pathways, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 7 (2017), 1598-1612.   Google Scholar

[31]

J. Yu, Q. Sun and M. Tang, The nonlinear dynamics and fluctuations of mRNA levels in cross-talking pathway activated transcription, J. Theor. Biol., 363 (2014), 223-234.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.08.024.  Google Scholar

[32]

D. Zenklusen, D. R. Larson and R. H. Singer, Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 15 (2008), 1263-1271.   Google Scholar

[33]

T. Zhou and J. Zhang, Analytical results for a multistate gene model, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 72 (2012), 789-818.  doi: 10.1137/110852887.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Three modes of mRNA distribution generated by the two-state modal. (a) The decaying distribution for which $P_m$ deceases in $m$ for $m = 0, 1, 2, \cdots$. (b) The unimodal distribution for which $P_m$ takes exactly one peak at some $m>0$. (c) The bimodal distribution for which $P_m$ takes exactly two peaks with the first one at $m = 0$, and the other one at some $m > 0$. The parameter sets $(k_{on}, k_{off}, k_b, k_d)$ in (a), (b), and (c) are chosen as $(0.5, 1.5, 20, 1), (2, 2, 10, 1)$, and $(0.1, 0.2, 15, 1)$, respectively
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

31]">Figure 2.  Gene transcription modulated by the cross-talking pathway [31]
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Cross-talking pathway can generate bimodal distribution when the gene is (a) easily turned on (${\rm T}_{{\rm off}}<1$) and easily turned off (${\rm T}_{{\rm on}}<1$); (b) easily turned on (${\rm T}_{{\rm off}}<1$) but hardly turned off (${\rm T}_{{\rm on}}>1$); and (c) hardly turned on (${\rm T}_{{\rm off}}<1$) and hardly turned off (${\rm T}_{{\rm on}}>1$). mRNA synthesis rate $v = 30$ and the other parameters are set to be $(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \gamma, q_1) = (0.6, 6, 2, 0.2)$ in (a), $(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \gamma, q_1) = (0.2, 4, 0.2, 0.1)$ in (b), and $(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \gamma, q_1) = (0.2, 4, 0.2, 0.2)$ in (c)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

22]. (a) At low salt concentrations (below 0.05 M NaCl solution), the weak basal pathway is more frequently selected, and therefore most cells are off, giving rise to the decaying distribution. (b) At intermediate salt concentrations, the stress-induced strong signaling pathway is more likely to be activated, leading to the bimodal distribution with two distinct cell identities representing silent and highly expressed cells. (c) At the highest salt concentrations (above 0.15 M NaCl solution), the strong pathway dominates the gene activation, giving rise to the most on cells and the unimodal distribution.">Figure 4.  The transcriptional transition pattern of osmostress-responsive genes in yeast [22]. (a) At low salt concentrations (below 0.05 M NaCl solution), the weak basal pathway is more frequently selected, and therefore most cells are off, giving rise to the decaying distribution. (b) At intermediate salt concentrations, the stress-induced strong signaling pathway is more likely to be activated, leading to the bimodal distribution with two distinct cell identities representing silent and highly expressed cells. (c) At the highest salt concentrations (above 0.15 M NaCl solution), the strong pathway dominates the gene activation, giving rise to the most on cells and the unimodal distribution.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Qi Wang, Lifang Huang, Kunwen Wen, Jianshe Yu. The mean and noise of stochastic gene transcription with cell division. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (5) : 1255-1270. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018058
[2]

Jian Ren, Feng Jiao, Qiwen Sun, Moxun Tang, Jianshe Yu. The dynamics of gene transcription in random environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (8) : 3167-3194. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018224
[3]

Genghong Lin, Jianshe Yu, Zhan Zhou, Qiwen Sun, Feng Jiao. Fluctuations of mRNA distributions in multiple pathway activated transcription. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (4) : 1543-1568. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018219
[4]

Edson Vargas. Fibonacci bimodal maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 22 (3) : 807-815. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.22.807
[5]

Victor Berdichevsky. Distribution of minimum values of stochastic functionals. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (3) : 437-460. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.437
[6]

Yanan Zhao, Yuguo Lin, Daqing Jiang, Xuerong Mao, Yong Li. Stationary distribution of stochastic SIRS epidemic model with standard incidence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2363-2378. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016051
[7]

Xiaoling Zou, Dejun Fan, Ke Wang. Stationary distribution and stochastic Hopf bifurcation for a predator-prey system with noises. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (5) : 1507-1519. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1507
[8]

Xuan Zhang, Huiqin Jin, Zhuoqin Yang, Jinzhi Lei. Effects of elongation delay in transcription dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (6) : 1431-1448. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1431
[9]

Peter W. Bates, Yu Liang, Alexander W. Shingleton. Growth regulation and the insulin signaling pathway. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (1) : 65-78. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.65
[10]

Yuhua Sun, Zilong Wang, Hui Li, Tongjiang Yan. The cross-correlation distribution of a $p$-ary $m$-sequence of period $p^{2k}-1$ and its decimated sequence by $\frac{(p^{k}+1)^{2}}{2(p^{e}+1)}$. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2013, 7 (4) : 409-424. doi: 10.3934/amc.2013.7.409
[11]

Yaxian Xu, Ajay Jasra. Particle filters for inference of high-dimensional multivariate stochastic volatility models with cross-leverage effects. Foundations of Data Science, 2019, 1 (1) : 61-85. doi: 10.3934/fods.2019003
[12]

Li Zu, Daqing Jiang, Donal O'Regan. Persistence and stationary distribution of a stochastic predator-prey model under regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (5) : 2881-2897. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017124
[13]

Kevin Ford. The distribution of totients. Electronic Research Announcements, 1998, 4: 27-34.

[14]

Ö. Uğur, G. W. Weber. Optimization and dynamics of gene-environment networks with intervals. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (2) : 357-379. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.357
[15]

Erik Kropat, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee. Foundations of semialgebraic gene-environment networks. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2020, 7 (4) : 253-268. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2020018
[16]

Ying Hao, Fanwen Meng. A new method on gene selection for tissue classification. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (4) : 739-748. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.739
[17]

Jaroslaw Smieja, Marzena Dolbniak. Sensitivity of signaling pathway dynamics to plasmid transfection and its consequences. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1207-1222. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016039
[18]

Peter Hinow, Edward A. Rietman, Sara Ibrahim Omar, Jack A. Tuszyński. Algebraic and topological indices of molecular pathway networks in human cancers. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (6) : 1289-1302. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1289
[19]

Floriane Lignet, Vincent Calvez, Emmanuel Grenier, Benjamin Ribba. A structural model of the VEGF signalling pathway: Emergence of robustness and redundancy properties. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (1) : 167-184. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.167
[20]

Tiejun Li, Tongkai Li, Shaoying Lu. No-oscillation theorem for the transient dynamics of the linear signal transduction pathway and beyond. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (7) : 2749-2774. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020030

2020 Impact Factor: 1.327

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (218)
  • HTML views (523)
  • Cited by (3)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy