American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
April  2020, 25(4): 1497-1515. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019237

An SICR rumor spreading model in heterogeneous networks

Jinxian Li 1,2,, , Ning Ren 1, and  Zhen Jin 2,3,

1. 

School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
2. 

Shanxi Key Laboratory of Mathematical Techniques and Big Data Analysis on Disease Control and Prevention, Taiyuan 030006, China
3. 

Complex System Research Center, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

* Corresponding author: lijinxian@sxu.edu.cn

Received  December 2018 Revised  July 2019 Published  November 2019

This article discusses the spread of rumors in heterogeneous networks. Using the probability generating function method and the approximation theory, we establish an SICR rumor model and calculate the threshold conditions for the outbreak of the rumor. We also compare the speed of the rumors spreading with different initial conditions. The numerical simulations of the SICR model in this paper fit well with the stochastic simulations, which means that the model is reliable. Moreover the effects of the parameters in the model on the transmission of rumors are studied numerically.

Keywords: Rumor spreading, SICR model, heterogeneous networks, counterattack, probability generating function.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 05C80, 37N25; Secondary: 92D25.
Citation: Jinxian Li, Ning Ren, Zhen Jin. An SICR rumor spreading model in heterogeneous networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (4) : 1497-1515. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019237
References:
[1]

L. Buzna, K. Peters and D. Helbing, Modelling the dynamics of disaster spreading in networks, Physica A, 363 (2006), 132-140.   Google Scholar

[2]

D. J. Daley and D. G. Kendall, Stochastic rumours, Ima Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1 (1965), 42-55.  doi: 10.1093/imamat/1.1.42.  Google Scholar

[3]

L.-A. Huo, P. Q. Huang and X. Fang, An interplay model for authorities' actions and rumor spreading in emergency event, Physica A, 390 (2011), 3267-3274.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.05.008.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. A. Huo, L. Wang, N. X. Song, C. Y. Ma and B. He, Rumor spreading model considering the activity of spreaders in the homogeneous network, Physica A, 468 (2017), 855-865.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.039.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. L. Jie, J. Qiao, G. J. Xu and Y. Y. Meng, A study on the interaction between two rumors in homogeneous complex networks under symmetric conditions, Physica A, 454 (2016), 129-142.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.02.048.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Lefévre and P. Picard, Distribution of the final extent of a rumour process, Journal of Applied Probability, 31 (1994), 244-249.  doi: 10.2307/3215250.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. X. Li, J. Wang and Z. Jin, SIR dynamics in random networks with communities, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 77 (2018), 1117-1151.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-018-1247-5.  Google Scholar

[8]

Q. M. Liu, T. Li and M. C. Su, The analysis of an SEIR rumor propagation model on heterogeneous network, Physica A, 469 (2017), 372-380.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.067.  Google Scholar

[9]

K. Ma, W. H. Li, Q. T. Guo, X. Q. Zheng, Z. M. Zheng, C. Gao and S. T. Tang, Information spreading in complex networks with participation of independent spreaders, Physica A, 492 (2018), 21-27.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.052.  Google Scholar

[10]

H. Matsuda, N. Ogita, A. Sasaki and K. Sato, Statistical mechanics of population: The lattice Lotka-Volterra model, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 88 (1992), 1035-1049.  doi: 10.1143/ptp/88.6.1035.  Google Scholar

[11]

Y. Moreno, M. Nekovee and A. Pacheco, Dynamics of rumor spreading in complex networks, Physical Review E, 69 (2004), 066130. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066130.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. Nekovee, Y. Moreno, G. Bianconi and M. Marsili, Theory of rumour spreading in complex social networks, Physica A, 374 (2007), 457-470.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.07.017.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. E. J. Newman, S. Forrest and J. Balthrop, Email networks and the spread of computer viruses, Physical Review E, 66 (2002), 035101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.035101.  Google Scholar

[14]

Z. Qian, S. T. Tang, X. Zhang and Z. M. Zheng, The independent spreaders involved SIR Rumor model in complex networks, Physica A, 429 (2015), 95-102.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.02.022.  Google Scholar

[15]

F. Roshani and Y. Naimi, Effects of degree-biased transmission rate and nonlinear infectivity on rumor spreading in complex social networks, Physical Review E, 85 (2012), 036109. Google Scholar

[16]

Z. Y. Ruan, M. Tang and Z. H. Liu, Epidemic spreading with information-driven vaccination, Physical Review E, 86 (2012), 036117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036117.  Google Scholar

[17]

E. Volz, SIR dynamics in random networks with heterogeneous connectivity, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 56 (2008), 293-310.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-007-0116-4.  Google Scholar

[18]

C. Wan, T. Li and Y. Wang, Rumor Spreading of a SICS Model on complex social networks with counter mechanism, Open Access Library Journal, 03 (2016), 1-11.   Google Scholar

[19]

J. J. Wang, L. J. Zhao and R. B. Huang, 2SI2R rumor spreading model in homogeneous networks, Physica A, 413 (2014), 153-161.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.053.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. J. Wang, L. J. Zhao and R. B. Huang, SIRaRu rumor spreading model in complex networks, Physica A, 398 (2014), 43-55.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.12.004.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. Wang, X. Yang and Y. Han, Rumor spreading model with trust mechanism in complex social networks, Communications in Theoretical Physics, 59 (2013), 510-516.   Google Scholar

[22]

L.-L. Xia, G.-P. Jiang, B. Song and Y.-R. Song, Rumor spreading model considering hesitating mechanism in complex social networks, Physica A, 437 (2015), 295-303.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.05.113.  Google Scholar

[23]

Y. L. Zan, J. L. Wu, P. Li and Q. L. Yu, SICR rumor spreading model in complex networks: Counterattack and self-resistance, Physica A, 405 (2014), 159-170.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.03.021.  Google Scholar

[24]

D. H. Zanette, Critical behavior of propagation on small-world networks, Physical Review E, 64 (2001), 050901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.050901.  Google Scholar

[25]

D. H. Zanette, Dynamics of rumor propagation on small-world networks, Physical Review E, 65 (2002), 041908. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.041908.  Google Scholar

[26]

L. J. Zhao, X. Y. Qiu, X. L. Wang and J. J. Wang, Rumor spreading model considering forgetting and remembering mechanisms in inhomogeneous networks, Physica A, 392 (2013), 987-994.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2012.10.031.  Google Scholar

[27]

L. J. Zhao, J. J. Wang, Y. C. Chen, Q. Wang, J. J. Cheng and H. X. Cui, SIHR rumor spreading model in social networks, Physica A, 391 (2012), 2444-2453.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.12.008.  Google Scholar

[28]

L. Zhu and Y. G. Wang, Rumor spreading model with noise interference in complex social networks, Physica A, 469 (2017), 750-760.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.119.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

L. Buzna, K. Peters and D. Helbing, Modelling the dynamics of disaster spreading in networks, Physica A, 363 (2006), 132-140.   Google Scholar

[2]

D. J. Daley and D. G. Kendall, Stochastic rumours, Ima Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1 (1965), 42-55.  doi: 10.1093/imamat/1.1.42.  Google Scholar

[3]

L.-A. Huo, P. Q. Huang and X. Fang, An interplay model for authorities' actions and rumor spreading in emergency event, Physica A, 390 (2011), 3267-3274.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.05.008.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. A. Huo, L. Wang, N. X. Song, C. Y. Ma and B. He, Rumor spreading model considering the activity of spreaders in the homogeneous network, Physica A, 468 (2017), 855-865.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.039.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. L. Jie, J. Qiao, G. J. Xu and Y. Y. Meng, A study on the interaction between two rumors in homogeneous complex networks under symmetric conditions, Physica A, 454 (2016), 129-142.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.02.048.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Lefévre and P. Picard, Distribution of the final extent of a rumour process, Journal of Applied Probability, 31 (1994), 244-249.  doi: 10.2307/3215250.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. X. Li, J. Wang and Z. Jin, SIR dynamics in random networks with communities, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 77 (2018), 1117-1151.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-018-1247-5.  Google Scholar

[8]

Q. M. Liu, T. Li and M. C. Su, The analysis of an SEIR rumor propagation model on heterogeneous network, Physica A, 469 (2017), 372-380.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.067.  Google Scholar

[9]

K. Ma, W. H. Li, Q. T. Guo, X. Q. Zheng, Z. M. Zheng, C. Gao and S. T. Tang, Information spreading in complex networks with participation of independent spreaders, Physica A, 492 (2018), 21-27.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.052.  Google Scholar

[10]

H. Matsuda, N. Ogita, A. Sasaki and K. Sato, Statistical mechanics of population: The lattice Lotka-Volterra model, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 88 (1992), 1035-1049.  doi: 10.1143/ptp/88.6.1035.  Google Scholar

[11]

Y. Moreno, M. Nekovee and A. Pacheco, Dynamics of rumor spreading in complex networks, Physical Review E, 69 (2004), 066130. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066130.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. Nekovee, Y. Moreno, G. Bianconi and M. Marsili, Theory of rumour spreading in complex social networks, Physica A, 374 (2007), 457-470.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.07.017.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. E. J. Newman, S. Forrest and J. Balthrop, Email networks and the spread of computer viruses, Physical Review E, 66 (2002), 035101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.035101.  Google Scholar

[14]

Z. Qian, S. T. Tang, X. Zhang and Z. M. Zheng, The independent spreaders involved SIR Rumor model in complex networks, Physica A, 429 (2015), 95-102.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.02.022.  Google Scholar

[15]

F. Roshani and Y. Naimi, Effects of degree-biased transmission rate and nonlinear infectivity on rumor spreading in complex social networks, Physical Review E, 85 (2012), 036109. Google Scholar

[16]

Z. Y. Ruan, M. Tang and Z. H. Liu, Epidemic spreading with information-driven vaccination, Physical Review E, 86 (2012), 036117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036117.  Google Scholar

[17]

E. Volz, SIR dynamics in random networks with heterogeneous connectivity, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 56 (2008), 293-310.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-007-0116-4.  Google Scholar

[18]

C. Wan, T. Li and Y. Wang, Rumor Spreading of a SICS Model on complex social networks with counter mechanism, Open Access Library Journal, 03 (2016), 1-11.   Google Scholar

[19]

J. J. Wang, L. J. Zhao and R. B. Huang, 2SI2R rumor spreading model in homogeneous networks, Physica A, 413 (2014), 153-161.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.053.  Google Scholar

[20]

J. J. Wang, L. J. Zhao and R. B. Huang, SIRaRu rumor spreading model in complex networks, Physica A, 398 (2014), 43-55.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.12.004.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. Wang, X. Yang and Y. Han, Rumor spreading model with trust mechanism in complex social networks, Communications in Theoretical Physics, 59 (2013), 510-516.   Google Scholar

[22]

L.-L. Xia, G.-P. Jiang, B. Song and Y.-R. Song, Rumor spreading model considering hesitating mechanism in complex social networks, Physica A, 437 (2015), 295-303.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.05.113.  Google Scholar

[23]

Y. L. Zan, J. L. Wu, P. Li and Q. L. Yu, SICR rumor spreading model in complex networks: Counterattack and self-resistance, Physica A, 405 (2014), 159-170.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.03.021.  Google Scholar

[24]

D. H. Zanette, Critical behavior of propagation on small-world networks, Physical Review E, 64 (2001), 050901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.050901.  Google Scholar

[25]

D. H. Zanette, Dynamics of rumor propagation on small-world networks, Physical Review E, 65 (2002), 041908. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.041908.  Google Scholar

[26]

L. J. Zhao, X. Y. Qiu, X. L. Wang and J. J. Wang, Rumor spreading model considering forgetting and remembering mechanisms in inhomogeneous networks, Physica A, 392 (2013), 987-994.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2012.10.031.  Google Scholar

[27]

L. J. Zhao, J. J. Wang, Y. C. Chen, Q. Wang, J. J. Cheng and H. X. Cui, SIHR rumor spreading model in social networks, Physica A, 391 (2012), 2444-2453.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.12.008.  Google Scholar

[28]

L. Zhu and Y. G. Wang, Rumor spreading model with noise interference in complex social networks, Physica A, 469 (2017), 750-760.  doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.119.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Structure of the rumor spreading process
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Simulation with $ \alpha = 0.7 $, $ \beta = 0.1 $, $ \delta = 0.2 $, $ \gamma = 0.5 $, $ \eta = 0.8 $. The blue dotted lines correspond to 100 random simulations for an SICR rumor model in a network with the Poisson degree distribution. The red solid lines show the numerical simulation based on the model (1). The green solid lines show the numerical simulation based on the mean field system in Zan [23]. (a) the trajectories of the densities of the infective. (b) the trajectories of the densities of the final size
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Degree distribution of generated Power-law networks
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Simulations with $ \alpha = 0.7 $, $ \beta = 0.1 $, $ \delta = 0.2 $, $ \gamma = 0.5 $, $ \eta = 0.8 $. The blue dotted lines correspond to 100 random simulations for an SICR rumor model in a network with the power law degree destribution. The red solid lines show the numerical simulation based on the model (1). The green solid lines show the numerical simulation based on the mean field system in Zan [23]. (a) the trajectories of the densities of the infective. (b) the trajectories of the densities of the final size
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Numerical simulations of the model (1) with $ \alpha = 0.7 $, $ \beta = 0.1 $, $ \delta = 0.2 $, $ \gamma = 0.5 $, $ \eta = 0.8 $ in the networks with different degree distribution but with the same averaged degree. The red dotted lines and the blue solid lines correspond to numerical simulations trajectories based on the model (1) in a network with the refined power-law degree distribution and the Poisson degree distribution, respectively. (a) the trajectories of the densities of the infective. (b) the trajectories of the densities of the final size
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  (a) Time evolutions of the speeds of the rumor spreading $ v $ in the complex network with poisson degree distribution and Power-law distribution, respectively. (b) Degree distriutions
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Time evolutions of the speeds of the rumor spreading in the nodes with degree $ k = 5, 10, 15. $, i.e. $ v_k $. (a) In network with Poisson ditribution. (b) In network with Power Law distribution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Time evolutions of the relative propagation velocity in the nodes with degree $ k = 5, 10, 15. $, i.e. $ \hat{v}_k $. (a) In network with Poisson ditribution. (b) In network with Power Law distribution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  numerical simulations with $ \alpha = 0.7 $, $ \beta = 0.1 $, $ \delta = 0.2 $, $ \gamma = 0.2 $. (a) the trajectories of the densities of the infective over time under different persuading rate $ \eta $. (b) the trajectories of the densities of the final size over time under different persuading rate $ \eta $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Numerical simulations with $ \beta = 0.2 $, $ \gamma = 0.5 $, $ \eta = 0.8 $. (a) the trajectories of the densities of the susceptible over time under different spreading rate $ \alpha $ and refuting rate $ \delta $. (b) the trajectories of the densities of the infective over time under different spreading rate $ \alpha $ and refuting rate $ \delta $. (c) the trajectories of the densities of the final size over time under different spreading rate $ \alpha $ and refuting rate $ \delta $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11.  Numerical simulation of SIR model that compare the infective nodes recover by themselves and recover by the structure of the network. (a) the trajectories of the densities of the susceptible. (b) the trajectories of the densities of the infective. (c) the trajectories of the densities of the final size
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Key variables and parameters
Series Symbol Series Description
$ \alpha $ Spreading rate. The constant rate at which a susceptible node
becomes an infective node when it contacts an infective node
$ \beta $ Ignoring rate. The constant rate at which a susceptible node becomes
a refractory node when it contacts an infective node
$ \delta $ Refuting rate. The constant rate at which a susceptible node becomes
a counterattack node when it contacts an infective node
$ \gamma $ Stifling rate. The constant rate at which an infective node becomes
a refractory node when it contacts another infective or
refractory node
$ \eta $ Persuading rate. The constant rate at which an infective node
becomes a refractory node when it contacts a counterattack node
$ p_k $ The probability that a node will have degree $ k $
$ g(x) $ The probability generating function for the degree distribution $ \{p_k\} $
$ P_X^Y $ The probability that an arc with an ego in set X has an alter in Y
$ \mathcal{A}_X $ Set of arcs (ego, alter) such that node ego is in set $ X $
$ M_X $ Fraction of arcs in set $ \mathcal{A}_X $
$ \mathcal{A}_{XY} $ Set of arcs (ego, alter) s.t ego$ \in X $ and alter$ \in Y $
$ M_{XY} $ Fraction of arcs in set $ \mathcal{A}_{XY} $
Table Options

Download as excel

Series Symbol Series Description
$ \alpha $ Spreading rate. The constant rate at which a susceptible node
becomes an infective node when it contacts an infective node
$ \beta $ Ignoring rate. The constant rate at which a susceptible node becomes
a refractory node when it contacts an infective node
$ \delta $ Refuting rate. The constant rate at which a susceptible node becomes
a counterattack node when it contacts an infective node
$ \gamma $ Stifling rate. The constant rate at which an infective node becomes
a refractory node when it contacts another infective or
refractory node
$ \eta $ Persuading rate. The constant rate at which an infective node
becomes a refractory node when it contacts a counterattack node
$ p_k $ The probability that a node will have degree $ k $
$ g(x) $ The probability generating function for the degree distribution $ \{p_k\} $
$ P_X^Y $ The probability that an arc with an ego in set X has an alter in Y
$ \mathcal{A}_X $ Set of arcs (ego, alter) such that node ego is in set $ X $
$ M_X $ Fraction of arcs in set $ \mathcal{A}_X $
$ \mathcal{A}_{XY} $ Set of arcs (ego, alter) s.t ego$ \in X $ and alter$ \in Y $
$ M_{XY} $ Fraction of arcs in set $ \mathcal{A}_{XY} $
[1]

Yuxin Zhang. The spatially heterogeneous diffusive rabies model and its shadow system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020357
[2]

Philippe Laurençot, Christoph Walker. Variational solutions to an evolution model for MEMS with heterogeneous dielectric properties. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (2) : 677-694. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020360
[3]

Pedro Aceves-Sanchez, Benjamin Aymard, Diane Peurichard, Pol Kennel, Anne Lorsignol, Franck Plouraboué, Louis Casteilla, Pierre Degond. A new model for the emergence of blood capillary networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2020  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021001
[4]

Raimund Bürger, Christophe Chalons, Rafael Ordoñez, Luis Miguel Villada. A multiclass Lighthill-Whitham-Richards traffic model with a discontinuous velocity function. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2021  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021004
[5]

Ömer Arslan, Selçuk Kürşat İşleyen. A model and two heuristic methods for The Multi-Product Inventory-Location-Routing Problem with heterogeneous fleet. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021002
[6]

Björn Augner, Dieter Bothe. The fast-sorption and fast-surface-reaction limit of a heterogeneous catalysis model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (2) : 533-574. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020406
[7]

Guillaume Cantin, M. A. Aziz-Alaoui. Dimension estimate of attractors for complex networks of reaction-diffusion systems applied to an ecological model. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020283
[8]

Xiaoxian Tang, Jie Wang. Bistability of sequestration networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1337-1357. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020165
[9]

Qian Liu, Shuang Liu, King-Yeung Lam. Asymptotic spreading of interacting species with multiple fronts Ⅰ: A geometric optics approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3683-3714. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020050
[10]

Yu Yuan, Zhibin Liang, Xia Han. Optimal investment and reinsurance to minimize the probability of drawdown with borrowing costs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021003
[11]

Bing Liu, Ming Zhou. Robust portfolio selection for individuals: Minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 937-952. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020005
[12]

Yifan Chen, Thomas Y. Hou. Function approximation via the subsampled Poincaré inequality. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 169-199. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020296
[13]

Lei Yang, Lianzhang Bao. Numerical study of vanishing and spreading dynamics of chemotaxis systems with logistic source and a free boundary. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 1083-1109. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020154
[14]

D. R. Michiel Renger, Johannes Zimmer. Orthogonality of fluxes in general nonlinear reaction networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 205-217. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020346
[15]

Bernold Fiedler. Global Hopf bifurcation in networks with fast feedback cycles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 177-203. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020344
[16]

Lars Grüne. Computing Lyapunov functions using deep neural networks. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021006
[17]

Leslaw Skrzypek, Yuncheng You. Feedback synchronization of FHN cellular neural networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021001
[18]

Arthur Fleig, Lars Grüne. Strict dissipativity analysis for classes of optimal control problems involving probability density functions. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020053
[19]

Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443
[20]

Liping Tang, Ying Gao. Some properties of nonconvex oriented distance function and applications to vector optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 485-500. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020117

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences