American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
May  2021, 26(5): 2721-2737. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020202

Properties of basins of attraction for planar discrete cooperative maps

M. R. S. Kulenović , , J. Marcotte and  O. Merino

Department of Mathematics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881-0816, USA

* Corresponding author: M. R. S. Kulenović

Received  January 2020 Revised  March 2020 Published  June 2020

It is shown that locally asymptotically stable equilibria of planar cooperative or competitive maps have basin of attraction $ \mathcal{B} $ with relatively simple geometry: the boundary of each component of $ \mathcal{B} $ consists of the union of two unordered curves, and the components of $ \mathcal{B} $ are not comparable as sets. The boundary curves are Lipschitz if the map is of class $ C^1 $. Further, if a periodic point is in $ \partial \mathcal{B} $, then $ \partial\mathcal{B} $ is tangential to the line through the point with direction given by the eigenvector associated with the smaller characteristic value of the map at the point. Examples are given.

Keywords: Basin of attraction, competitive, cooperative, difference equation, invariant sets, stable manifold, unstable manifold.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37C70, 37D05, 37D10; Secondary: 39A23, 39A30.
Citation: M. R. S. Kulenović, J. Marcotte, O. Merino. Properties of basins of attraction for planar discrete cooperative maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2721-2737. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020202
References:
[1]

A. Berger and A. Duh, Global saddle-type dynamics for convex second-order difference equations, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 23 (2017), 1807-1823.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2017.1367390.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. Brett and M. R. S. Kulenović, Basins of attraction of equilibrium points of monotone difference equations, Sarajevo J. Math., 5 (2009), 211-233.   Google Scholar

[3]

A. Cima, A. Gasull and V. Mañosa, Basin of attraction of triangular maps with applications, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 20 (2014), 423-437.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2013.852187.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Elaydi, E. Kwessi and G. Livadiotis, Hierarchical competition models with the Allee effect III: Multispecies, J. Biol. Dyn., 12 (2018), 271-287.  doi: 10.1080/17513758.2018.1439537.  Google Scholar

[5]

S. Elaydi, An Introduction to Difference Equations, Third edition, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2005.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Garić-Demirović, M. R. S. Kulenović and M. Nurkanović, Basins of attraction of certain homogeneous second order quadratic fractional difference equation, J. Concr. Appl. Math., 13 (2015), 35-50.   Google Scholar

[7]

J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 42. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.  Google Scholar

[8]

P. Hess, Periodic-Parabolic Boundary Value Problems and Positivity, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 247. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, copublished in the United States with John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.  Google Scholar

[9]

M. W. Hirsch and H. Smith, Monotone dynamical systems, Handbook of Differential Equations: Ordinary Differential Equations, Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2 (2005), 239-357.   Google Scholar

[10]

M. W. Hirsch and H. Smith, Monotone maps: A review, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 11 (2005), 379-398.  doi: 10.1080/10236190412331335445.  Google Scholar

[11]

G. L. Karakostas, The dynamics of a cooperative difference system with coefficient a Metzler matrix, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 20 (2014), 685-693.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2013.799153.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. R. S. Kulenović and O. Merino, Global bifurcations for competitive systems in the plane, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 12 (2009), 133-149.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.133.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. R. S. Kulenović and O. Merino, Invariant manifolds for planar competitive and cooperative maps, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 24 (2018), 898-915.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2018.1438418.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. R. S. Kulenović, O. Merino and M. Nurkanović, Global dynamics of certain competitive system in the plane, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 18 (2012), 1951-1966.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2011.605357.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. R. S. Kulenović, S. Moranjkić and Z. Nurkanović, Global dynamics and bifurcation of a perturbed sigmoid Beverton-Holt difference equation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 2696-2715.  doi: 10.1002/mma.3722.  Google Scholar

[16]

G. Livadiotis, L. Assas, S. Elaydi, E. Kwessi and D. Ribble, Competition models with the Allee effect, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 20 (2015), 1127-1151.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2014.897341.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. W. McDonald, C. Grebogi, E. Ott and J. A. Yorke, Fractal basin boundaries, Phys. D, 17 (1985), 125-153.  doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(85)90001-6.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. W. Milnor, Attractor, Scholarpedia, 1 (2006), 1815. Google Scholar

[19]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, Basins of attraction, Science, 271 (1996), 1376-1380.  doi: 10.1126/science.271.5254.1376.  Google Scholar

[20]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, The structure of basins of attraction and their trapping regions, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 17 (1997), 463-481.  doi: 10.1017/S0143385797069782.  Google Scholar

[21]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, Characterizing the basins with the most entangled boundaries, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 23 (2003), 895-906.  doi: 10.1017/S0143385702001360.  Google Scholar

[22]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, Bifurcations of basins of attraction from the view point of prime ends, Topology Appl., 154 (2007), 2567-2579.  doi: 10.1016/j.topol.2006.07.019.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. L. Smith, Planar competitive and cooperative difference equations, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 3 (1998), 335-357.  doi: 10.1080/10236199708808108.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

A. Berger and A. Duh, Global saddle-type dynamics for convex second-order difference equations, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 23 (2017), 1807-1823.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2017.1367390.  Google Scholar

[2]

A. Brett and M. R. S. Kulenović, Basins of attraction of equilibrium points of monotone difference equations, Sarajevo J. Math., 5 (2009), 211-233.   Google Scholar

[3]

A. Cima, A. Gasull and V. Mañosa, Basin of attraction of triangular maps with applications, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 20 (2014), 423-437.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2013.852187.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Elaydi, E. Kwessi and G. Livadiotis, Hierarchical competition models with the Allee effect III: Multispecies, J. Biol. Dyn., 12 (2018), 271-287.  doi: 10.1080/17513758.2018.1439537.  Google Scholar

[5]

S. Elaydi, An Introduction to Difference Equations, Third edition, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2005.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Garić-Demirović, M. R. S. Kulenović and M. Nurkanović, Basins of attraction of certain homogeneous second order quadratic fractional difference equation, J. Concr. Appl. Math., 13 (2015), 35-50.   Google Scholar

[7]

J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 42. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.  Google Scholar

[8]

P. Hess, Periodic-Parabolic Boundary Value Problems and Positivity, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 247. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, copublished in the United States with John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.  Google Scholar

[9]

M. W. Hirsch and H. Smith, Monotone dynamical systems, Handbook of Differential Equations: Ordinary Differential Equations, Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2 (2005), 239-357.   Google Scholar

[10]

M. W. Hirsch and H. Smith, Monotone maps: A review, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 11 (2005), 379-398.  doi: 10.1080/10236190412331335445.  Google Scholar

[11]

G. L. Karakostas, The dynamics of a cooperative difference system with coefficient a Metzler matrix, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 20 (2014), 685-693.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2013.799153.  Google Scholar

[12]

M. R. S. Kulenović and O. Merino, Global bifurcations for competitive systems in the plane, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 12 (2009), 133-149.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.133.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. R. S. Kulenović and O. Merino, Invariant manifolds for planar competitive and cooperative maps, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 24 (2018), 898-915.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2018.1438418.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. R. S. Kulenović, O. Merino and M. Nurkanović, Global dynamics of certain competitive system in the plane, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 18 (2012), 1951-1966.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2011.605357.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. R. S. Kulenović, S. Moranjkić and Z. Nurkanović, Global dynamics and bifurcation of a perturbed sigmoid Beverton-Holt difference equation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 2696-2715.  doi: 10.1002/mma.3722.  Google Scholar

[16]

G. Livadiotis, L. Assas, S. Elaydi, E. Kwessi and D. Ribble, Competition models with the Allee effect, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 20 (2015), 1127-1151.  doi: 10.1080/10236198.2014.897341.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. W. McDonald, C. Grebogi, E. Ott and J. A. Yorke, Fractal basin boundaries, Phys. D, 17 (1985), 125-153.  doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(85)90001-6.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. W. Milnor, Attractor, Scholarpedia, 1 (2006), 1815. Google Scholar

[19]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, Basins of attraction, Science, 271 (1996), 1376-1380.  doi: 10.1126/science.271.5254.1376.  Google Scholar

[20]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, The structure of basins of attraction and their trapping regions, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 17 (1997), 463-481.  doi: 10.1017/S0143385797069782.  Google Scholar

[21]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, Characterizing the basins with the most entangled boundaries, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 23 (2003), 895-906.  doi: 10.1017/S0143385702001360.  Google Scholar

[22]

H. E. Nusse and J. A. Yorke, Bifurcations of basins of attraction from the view point of prime ends, Topology Appl., 154 (2007), 2567-2579.  doi: 10.1016/j.topol.2006.07.019.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. L. Smith, Planar competitive and cooperative difference equations, J. Difference Equ. Appl., 3 (1998), 335-357.  doi: 10.1080/10236199708808108.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  (a) The basin of attraction $ \mathcal{B} $ of the zero fixed point $ \mathrm o $ of the map $ T(x, y) = (y, x^3+y^3) $. Note that $ \mathcal{B} $ is unbounded, and $ \partial \mathcal{B} $ contains two fixed points $ \mathrm{p}_1 $ and $ \mathrm{p}_2 $ which are saddle points. The union of the stable manifolds of $ \mathrm{p}_1 $ and $ \mathrm{p}_2 $ gives $ \partial \mathcal{B} $. (b) The basin of attraction $ \mathcal{B} $ of the zero fixed point of the map $ T(x, y) = (y^3, x^3+y^3) $. The set $ \mathcal{B} $ is bounded, and $ \partial \mathcal{B} $ contains two fixed points $ \mathrm{p}_1 $ and $ \mathrm{p}_2 $ (saddles) and a repelling minimal period-two point $ {\mathrm q}_1 $ and $ {\mathrm q}_2 $. The union of the stable manifolds of $ \mathrm{p}_1 $ and $ \mathrm{p}_2 $ gives $ \partial \mathcal{B} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  (a) the basin $ \mathcal{B} $ of the fixed point $ \bar{\mathrm{x}} $ has three components $ \mathcal{B}^\prime $, $ \mathcal{B}_* $, $ \mathcal{B}^{\prime\prime} $ whose closure is in $ \mbox{int}(\mathcal{R}) $ and such that $ \mathcal{B}^\prime <\!\!<_{se}\mathcal{B}_* <\!\!<_{se}\mathcal{B}^{\prime\prime} $. Each component has boundary curves $ \mathcal{C}_+ $ and $ \mathcal{C}_- $. (b) The set $ \mathcal{B} $ has only one component, which has part of its boundary in $ \partial \mathcal{R} $. Also, $ \bar{\mathrm{x}} \in \partial \mathcal{R} $. The point $ \mathrm{p} $ is an endpoint of both boundary curves $ \mathcal{C}_- $ and $ \mathcal{C}_+ $. The point $ \mathrm{p} $ is a fixed point of $ T $.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Basin of attraction of the origin $ \mathrm{o} $ for the map $ U $ in (8)]Basin of attraction of the origin $ \mathrm{o} $ for the map $ U $ in (8). The points $ \mathrm{p} $ and $ \mathrm{q} $ are saddle fixed points.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Graphs of $ \phi $ from (12) and the identity function on the nonnegative semi axis.]Graphs of $ \phi $ from (12) and the identity function on the nonnegative semi axis. $ \phi $ has locally asymptotically stable fixed points $ 0 $, $ b = 2.06 $, and a repelling fixed point $ a = 0.95 $. The real numbers $ c = 6.03 $ and $ d = 12.80 $ are pre-images of $ a $. The basin of attraction of $ 0 $ on the semi-axis consists of the intervals $ 0\leq t < a $ and $ c< t < d $. All decimal numbers have been rounded to two decimals
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  The partial derivatives of $ V(x, y) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  (a) Three components of the basin of attraction of the zero fixed point $ \mathrm o $ of the map $ V(x, y) $ in Example 1. Here $ \mathrm r $, $ \mathrm s $ are saddle fixed points, $ {\mathrm p}_1 $ and $ {\mathrm q}_1 $ are a saddle period-two point, $ {\mathrm p}_2 $ and $ {\mathrm q}_2 $ are repelling fixed points, and $ {\mathrm p}_3 $, $ {\mathrm p}_4 $, $ {\mathrm q}_3 $, $ {\mathrm q}_4 $ are eventual period-two points. The boundary of the invariant part of the basin of attraction consist of stable manifolds of saddle fixed points with a period-two endpoints. In addition, there are two eventually period-two points which are end points of another piece of the basin of attraction which is mapped into the invariant part. (b) The invariant component of the basin of attraction of the origin $ \mathrm o $.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Global dynamics for map (13) as given in Proposition 1. Here $ \alpha = 0.4 $ and $ \delta = 0.7 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  The four cases in the definition of $ \mathcal{C}_\pm $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Marian Gidea, Rafael de la Llave, Tere M. Seara. A general mechanism of instability in Hamiltonian systems: Skipping along a normally hyperbolic invariant manifold. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (12) : 6795-6813. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020166
[2]

M. Phani Sudheer, Ravi S. Nanjundiah, A. S. Vasudeva Murthy. Revisiting the slow manifold of the Lorenz-Krishnamurthy quintet. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (6) : 1403-1416. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1403
[3]

Dingheng Pi. Periodic orbits for double regularization of piecewise smooth systems with a switching manifold of codimension two. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021080
[4]

Yosra Soussi. Stable recovery of a non-compactly supported coefficient of a Schrödinger equation on an infinite waveguide. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021022
[5]

Yohei Yamazaki. Center stable manifolds around line solitary waves of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation with critical speed. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (8) : 3579-3614. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021008
[6]

İsmail Özcan, Sirma Zeynep Alparslan Gök. On cooperative fuzzy bubbly games. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021010
[7]

Jian Yang, Bendong Lou. Traveling wave solutions of competitive models with free boundaries. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (3) : 817-826. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.817
[8]

Tian Hou, Yi Wang, Xizhuang Xie. Instability and bifurcation of a cooperative system with periodic coefficients. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2021026
[9]

Johannes Kellendonk, Lorenzo Sadun. Conjugacies of model sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (7) : 3805-3830. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017161
[10]

Jesús A. Álvarez López, Ramón Barral Lijó, John Hunton, Hiraku Nozawa, John R. Parker. Chaotic Delone sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (8) : 3781-3796. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021016
[11]

Y. Latushkin, B. Layton. The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (2) : 233-268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233
[12]

Peter Benner, Jens Saak, M. Monir Uddin. Balancing based model reduction for structured index-2 unstable descriptor systems with application to flow control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 1-20. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.1
[13]

Yongkun Wang, Fengshou He, Xiaobo Deng. Multi-aircraft cooperative path planning for maneuvering target detection. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021050
[14]

Christopher Bose, Rua Murray. Minimum 'energy' approximations of invariant measures for nonsingular transformations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 14 (3) : 597-615. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.597
[15]

Zhang Chen, Xiliang Li, Bixiang Wang. Invariant measures of stochastic delay lattice systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3235-3269. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020226
[16]

Clara Cufí-Cabré, Ernest Fontich. Differentiable invariant manifolds of nilpotent parabolic points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021053
[17]

Mats Gyllenberg, Jifa Jiang, Lei Niu, Ping Yan. On the classification of generalized competitive Atkinson-Allen models via the dynamics on the boundary of the carrying simplex. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (2) : 615-650. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018027
[18]

Nouressadat Touafek, Durhasan Turgut Tollu, Youssouf Akrour. On a general homogeneous three-dimensional system of difference equations. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2021017
[19]

Ruchika Sehgal, Aparna Mehra. Worst-case analysis of Gini mean difference safety measure. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1613-1637. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020037
[20]

Sishu Shankar Muni, Robert I. McLachlan, David J. W. Simpson. Homoclinic tangencies with infinitely many asymptotically stable single-round periodic solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (8) : 3629-3650. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021010

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (79)
  • HTML views (312)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences