# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

## Qualitative analysis of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator

 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China 2 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China 3 Hubei Key Laboratory of Engineering Modeling and Science Computing, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

* Corresponding author: Xiao-Song Yang

Received  November 2019 Revised  July 2020 Published  November 2020

Fund Project: The first author is supported by NSFC grant 51979116

In this paper, we analyze the qualitative dynamics of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator with two parameters varying in certain scope. We show that if a solution of this oscillator will not tend to the invariant manifold $\{(x,y,z)\in \mathbb R^3|x = 0,y = 0\}$, it must pass through the plane $z = 0$ infinite times. Especially, every invariant set of this oscillator must have intersection with the plane $z = 0$. In addition, we show that if a solution is quasiperiodic, it must pass through at least five quadrants of $\mathbb R^3$.

Citation: Qianqian Han, Xiao-Song Yang. Qualitative analysis of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020346
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The grid is part of $S_{1}$ and the shadow is part of $S_{2}$
The shadow is the projection of the region $I$ on the plane $z = 0$
$A_{1}\rightarrow A_{2}$ means there are solutions from $A_{1}$ to $A_{2}$, $B_{1}\dashrightarrow A_{2}$ means there are solutions from $B_{1}$ to $A_{2}$ and these solutions have intersection with $X$-axis or $Y$-axis
From right to left are $l_{10}$ and $l_{20}$
From right to left are $l_{01}$, $l_{02}$, $l_{03}$ and $l_{04}$
 [1] Bixiang Wang. Mean-square random invariant manifolds for stochastic differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (3) : 1449-1468. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020324 [2] Jingjing Wang, Zaiyun Peng, Zhi Lin, Daqiong Zhou. On the stability of solutions for the generalized vector quasi-equilibrium problems via free-disposal set. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 869-887. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020002 [3] Yukihiko Nakata. Existence of a period two solution of a delay differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 1103-1110. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020392 [4] Kevin Li. Dynamic transitions of the Swift-Hohenberg equation with third-order dispersion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021003 [5] Skyler Simmons. Stability of broucke's isosceles orbit. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021015 [6] Yangjian Sun, Changjian Liu. The Poincaré bifurcation of a SD oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1565-1577. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020173 [7] Siyang Cai, Yongmei Cai, Xuerong Mao. A stochastic differential equation SIS epidemic model with regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020317 [8] Ryuji Kajikiya. Existence of nodal solutions for the sublinear Moore-Nehari differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (3) : 1483-1506. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020326 [9] Tetsuya Ishiwata, Young Chol Yang. Numerical and mathematical analysis of blow-up problems for a stochastic differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 909-918. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020391 [10] Leilei Wei, Yinnian He. A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reaction-diffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319 [11] Lihong Zhang, Wenwen Hou, Bashir Ahmad, Guotao Wang. Radial symmetry for logarithmic Choquard equation involving a generalized tempered fractional $p$-Laplacian. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020445 [12] Xuefei He, Kun Wang, Liwei Xu. Efficient finite difference methods for the nonlinear Helmholtz equation in Kerr medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1503-1528. doi: 10.3934/era.2020079 [13] Thierry Cazenave, Ivan Naumkin. Local smooth solutions of the nonlinear Klein-gordon equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020448 [14] Vo Van Au, Hossein Jafari, Zakia Hammouch, Nguyen Huy Tuan. On a final value problem for a nonlinear fractional pseudo-parabolic equation. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1709-1734. doi: 10.3934/era.2020088 [15] Patrick Martinez, Judith Vancostenoble. Lipschitz stability for the growth rate coefficients in a nonlinear Fisher-KPP equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (2) : 695-721. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020362 [16] Editorial Office. Retraction: Xiao-Qian Jiang and Lun-Chuan Zhang, A pricing option approach based on backward stochastic differential equation theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 969-969. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019065 [17] Kihoon Seong. Low regularity a priori estimates for the fourth order cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5437-5473. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020247 [18] José Luis López. A quantum approach to Keller-Segel dynamics via a dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020376 [19] Claudianor O. Alves, Rodrigo C. M. Nemer, Sergio H. Monari Soares. The use of the Morse theory to estimate the number of nontrivial solutions of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a magnetic field. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 449-465. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020276 [20] Alex H. Ardila, Mykael Cardoso. Blow-up solutions and strong instability of ground states for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 101-119. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020259

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27