# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
The effect of surface pattern property on the advancing motion of three-dimensional droplets
• DCDS-B Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Existence and stability of generalized transition waves for time-dependent reaction-diffusion systems

## Optimal control strategies for an online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure

 School of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China

* Corresponding author: Tingting Li

Received  May 2020 Revised  August 2020 Published  November 2020

Fund Project: The second author is supported by the Basic Competence Promotion Project for Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Guangxi, China (2019KY0269)

In this paper, we establish a new online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure. With the help of the next generation matrix, the basic reproduction number $R_{0}$ is obtained. By constructing a suitable Lyapunov function, the equilibria of the model are Globally Asymptotically Stable. We use the optimal control theory to study the optimal solution problem with three kinds of control measures (isolation, education and treatment) and get the expression of optimal control. In the simulation, we first verify the Globally Asymptotical Stability of Disease-Free Equilibrium and Endemic Equilibrium, and obtain that the different trajectories with different initial values converges to the equilibria. Then the simulations of nine control strategies are obtained by forward-backward sweep method, and they are compared with the situation of without control respectively. The results show that we should implement the three kinds of control measures according to the optimal control strategy at the same time, which can effectively reduce the situation of game addiction.

Citation: Youming Guo, Tingting Li. Optimal control strategies for an online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020347
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Transfer diagram of model
DFE $D_{0} = (829,0,0,0,0,0)$ is Globally Asymptotically Stable when $R_{0} = 0.5778 < 1$ and $\beta = 0.2$
EE $D^{*} = (358.829, 20.903, 31.354, 67.916, 25.648,324.35)$ is Globally Asymptotically Stable when $R_{0} = 2.3111 > 1$ and $\beta = 0.8$
Dynamical behavior of infected when $R_{0} = 0.5778$ and $\beta = 0.2$
Dynamical behavior of infected when $R_{0} = 2.3111$ and $\beta = 0.8$
Graphical results for strategy A
Graphical results for strategy B
Graphical results for strategy C
Graphical results for strategy D
Graphical results for strategy E
Graphical results for strategy F
Graphical results for strategy G
Graphical results for strategy H
Graphical results for strategy I
Estimation of parameters
 Parameters Descriptions Values $\mu$ Natural supplementary and death rate 0.05 per week $\theta$ Proportion of individuals who became low risk exposed 0.4 per week $\beta$ Contact transmission rate 0.1$\sim$ 0.8 per week $v_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become infected 0.2 per week $v_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.2 per week $w_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{2}$ who become infected 0.3 per week $w_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.1 per week $k_{1}$ Proportion of $I$ who become quitting 0.05 per week $k_{2}$ Proportion of $I$ who become professional 0.1 per week $\delta$ Proportion of $P$ who become quitting 0.5 per week $u_{1}$ The decreased proportion by isolation Variable $u_{2}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{1}$ by prevention Variable $u_{3}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{2}$ by prevention Variable $u_{4}$ The decreased proportion in $I$ by treatment Variable
 Parameters Descriptions Values $\mu$ Natural supplementary and death rate 0.05 per week $\theta$ Proportion of individuals who became low risk exposed 0.4 per week $\beta$ Contact transmission rate 0.1$\sim$ 0.8 per week $v_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become infected 0.2 per week $v_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.2 per week $w_{1}$ Proportion of $E_{2}$ who become infected 0.3 per week $w_{2}$ Proportion of $E_{1}$ who become professional 0.1 per week $k_{1}$ Proportion of $I$ who become quitting 0.05 per week $k_{2}$ Proportion of $I$ who become professional 0.1 per week $\delta$ Proportion of $P$ who become quitting 0.5 per week $u_{1}$ The decreased proportion by isolation Variable $u_{2}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{1}$ by prevention Variable $u_{3}$ The decreased proportion in $E_{2}$ by prevention Variable $u_{4}$ The decreased proportion in $I$ by treatment Variable
Results of different control strategies
 Strategy Total infectious individuals ($\int_{0}^{t_f}(E_{1}+E_{2}+I)dt)$ Averted infectious individuals Objective function $J$ Without control 7461.1302 $-$ $8.5947\times 10^{6}$ Strategy A 526.3468 6934.7835 $1.3646\times 10^{6}$ Strategy B 1426.9073 6034.2229 $2.5242\times 10^{6}$ Strategy C 701.3874 6759.7428 $1.7413\times 10^{6}$ Strategy D 524.2143 6936.9159 $1.3592\times 10^{6}$ Strategy E 525.4126 6935.7176 $1.3619\times 10^{6}$ Strategy F 525.0718 6936.0585 $1.3618\times 10^{6}$ Strategy G 579.8124 6881.3178 $4.784\times 10^{6}$ Strategy H 1626.7971 5834.3331 $2.7511\times 10^{6}$ Strategy I 658.0017 6803.1286 $2.6232\times 10^{6}$
 Strategy Total infectious individuals ($\int_{0}^{t_f}(E_{1}+E_{2}+I)dt)$ Averted infectious individuals Objective function $J$ Without control 7461.1302 $-$ $8.5947\times 10^{6}$ Strategy A 526.3468 6934.7835 $1.3646\times 10^{6}$ Strategy B 1426.9073 6034.2229 $2.5242\times 10^{6}$ Strategy C 701.3874 6759.7428 $1.7413\times 10^{6}$ Strategy D 524.2143 6936.9159 $1.3592\times 10^{6}$ Strategy E 525.4126 6935.7176 $1.3619\times 10^{6}$ Strategy F 525.0718 6936.0585 $1.3618\times 10^{6}$ Strategy G 579.8124 6881.3178 $4.784\times 10^{6}$ Strategy H 1626.7971 5834.3331 $2.7511\times 10^{6}$ Strategy I 658.0017 6803.1286 $2.6232\times 10^{6}$
 [1] Hong Niu, Zhijiang Feng, Qijin Xiao, Yajun Zhang. A PID control method based on optimal control strategy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 117-126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020019 [2] Yueyang Zheng, Jingtao Shi. A stackelberg game of backward stochastic differential equations with partial information. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020047 [3] Sishu Shankar Muni, Robert I. McLachlan, David J. W. Simpson. Homoclinic tangencies with infinitely many asymptotically stable single-round periodic solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021010 [4] Qingfeng Zhu, Yufeng Shi. Nonzero-sum differential game of backward doubly stochastic systems with delay and applications. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 73-94. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020028 [5] Bernard Bonnard, Jérémy Rouot. Geometric optimal techniques to control the muscular force response to functional electrical stimulation using a non-isometric force-fatigue model. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020032 [6] Zuliang Lu, Fei Huang, Xiankui Wu, Lin Li, Shang Liu. Convergence and quasi-optimality of $L^2-$norms based an adaptive finite element method for nonlinear optimal control problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1459-1486. doi: 10.3934/era.2020077 [7] Musen Xue, Guowei Zhu. Partial myopia vs. forward-looking behaviors in a dynamic pricing and replenishment model for perishable items. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 633-648. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019126 [8] Lars Grüne, Matthias A. Müller, Christopher M. Kellett, Steven R. Weller. Strict dissipativity for discrete time discounted optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020046 [9] Hai Huang, Xianlong Fu. Optimal control problems for a neutral integro-differential system with infinite delay. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020107 [10] Vaibhav Mehandiratta, Mani Mehra, Günter Leugering. Fractional optimal control problems on a star graph: Optimality system and numerical solution. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 189-209. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020033 [11] Christian Clason, Vu Huu Nhu, Arnd Rösch. Optimal control of a non-smooth quasilinear elliptic equation. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020052 [12] Hongbo Guan, Yong Yang, Huiqing Zhu. A nonuniform anisotropic FEM for elliptic boundary layer optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1711-1722. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020179 [13] Yuan Tan, Qingyuan Cao, Lan Li, Tianshi Hu, Min Su. A chance-constrained stochastic model predictive control problem with disturbance feedback. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 67-79. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019099 [14] Mikhail I. Belishev, Sergey A. Simonov. A canonical model of the one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system with boundary control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021003 [15] Mahir Demir, Suzanne Lenhart. A spatial food chain model for the Black Sea Anchovy, and its optimal fishery. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 155-171. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020373 [16] Ming Chen, Hao Wang. Dynamics of a discrete-time stoichiometric optimal foraging model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 107-120. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020264 [17] Xiuli Xu, Xueke Pu. Optimal convergence rates of the magnetohydrodynamic model for quantum plasmas with potential force. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 987-1010. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020150 [18] Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Jürgen Sprekels. Deep quench approximation and optimal control of general Cahn–Hilliard systems with fractional operators and double obstacle potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 243-271. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020213 [19] Stefan Doboszczak, Manil T. Mohan, Sivaguru S. Sritharan. Pontryagin maximum principle for the optimal control of linearized compressible navier-stokes equations with state constraints. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020110 [20] Elimhan N. Mahmudov. Infimal convolution and duality in convex optimal control problems with second order evolution differential inclusions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 37-59. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020051

2019 Impact Factor: 1.27