This manuscript examines the dynamics of a predator-prey model of the Beddington-DeAngelis type with strong Allee effect on prey growth function. Conditions for the existence and equilibria types are established. By taking Allee effect, predation rate of the prey and growth rate of the predator as bifurcation parameters, different potential bifurcations are explored, including codimension one bifurcations: fold bifurcation, transcritical bifurcation, Hopf bifurcation, and codimension two bifurcations: cusp bifurcation, Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation, and Bautin bifurcation. In addition, to confirm the dynamic behavior of the system, bifurcation diagrams are given in different parameter spaces and phase portraits are also presented to provide corresponding interpretation. The findings indicate that the dynamics of our system is much richer than the system with no strong Allee effect.
Citation: |
Figure 2. Number of interior equilibria. (A) Three equilibria at $ M = 0.05, \alpha_1 = 0.1, \alpha_2 = 0.4, A = 0.3, \beta = 0.3, \gamma = 0.1 $. (B) Two equilibria at $ M = 0.1, \alpha_1 = 0.1, \alpha_2 = 0.4, A = 0.3, \beta = 0.3, \gamma = 0.1 $. (C) Unique equilibrium at $ M = 0.02, \alpha_1 = 0.174293, \alpha_2 = 0.4, A = 0.3, \beta = 0.4, \gamma = 0.1 $
Figure 3. Phase portrait of three interior equilibria $ E_i^* $ ($ i = 1, 2, 3 $) and three boundary equilibria $ E_j $ ($ j = 0, 1, 2 $) at $ M = 0.07, \alpha_1 = 0.1, \alpha_2 = 0.4, A = 0.3, \beta = 0.3, \gamma = 0.1 $. $ E_3^* $ is stable hyperbolic focus, $ E_2^* $, $ E_2 $ and $ E_1 $ are saddles nodes, $ E_1^* $ is an unstable node and $ E_0 $ is stable node
Figure 5. Phase portrait of the limit cycle and corresponding time diagram of Hopf bifurcation in Figure 4(B). (A) Stable limit cycle generated by supercritical Hopf bifurcation at $ M = 0.6666 $. (B) Time diagram of stable limit cycle
Figure 7. Neighborhood of $ BT $ and $ GH $ points in Figure 6. (A) and (C) The neighborhood of $ BT $ point in Figure 6 (A) and (B). (B) and (D) The neighborhood of $ GH $ point in Figure 6 (A) and (D)
Figure 8. Phase portraits in the neighborhood of Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation point $ BT $ in Figure 7(A). (A) No interior equilibria. (B) Unstable hyperbolic focus. (C) Unstable limit cycle enclosing a stable hyperbolic focus
Figure 9. Phase portraits in the neighborhood of $ GH $ point ($ l_2>0 $) in Figure 7(B). (A) Single stable hyperbolic focus. (B) Unique and stable limit cycle enclosing unstable hyperbolic focus. (C) Two limit cycles (the inner one is unstable and the outer is stable) enclosing stable hyperbolic focus. (D) Unstable limit cycle enclosing stable hyperbolic focus
Figure 10. Phase portraits in the neighborhood of Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation point $ BT $ in Figure 7(A). (A) No interior equilibria. (B) Unstable hyperbolic focus. (C) Unstable limit cycle enclosing a stable hyperbolic focus
Figure 11. Phase portraits for the neighborhood of generalized Hopf bifurcation $ GH $ ($ l_2<0 $) in Figure 7(D). (A) Single stable equilibrium. (B) Unique and stable limit cycle enclosing unstable hyperbolic focus. (C) Two limit cycles (the inner one is unstable and the outer is stable) enclosing an stable hyperbolic focus. (D) Unstable limit cycle enclosing stable hyperbolic focus
[1] |
W. C. Allee, Animal Aggregations, University of Chicago Press, USA, 1931.
![]() |
[2] |
C. Arancibia-Ibarra, J. D. Flores, G. Pettet and P. Van Heijster, A Holling-Tanner predator-prey model with strong Allee effect, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg., 29 (2019), 1930032, 16 pp.
doi: 10.1142/S0218127419300325.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[3] |
A. Arsie, C. Kottegoda and C. H. Shan, A predator-prey system with generalized Holling type Ⅳ functional response and Allee effects in prey, J. Diff. Equ., 309 (2022), 704-740.
doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2021.11.041.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[4] |
J. R. Beddington, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, J. Anim. Ecol., 44 (1975), 331-340.
![]() |
[5] |
G. Birkhoff and G. C. Rota, Ordinary Differential Equations, 4$^{th}$ edition, Boston, Mass.-New York-Toronto 1962.
![]() ![]() |
[6] |
R. S. Cantrell and C. Cosner, On the dynamics of predator-prey models with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 257 (2001), 206-222.
doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7343.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[7] |
D. L. DeAngelis, R. A. Goldstein and R. V. O'Neill, A model for tropic interaction, Ecology, 56 (1975), 881-892.
![]() |
[8] |
D. T. Dimitrov and H. V. Kojouharov, Complete mathematical analysis of predator-prey models with linear prey growth and Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Appl. Math. Comput., 162 (2005), 523-538.
doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.106.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[9] |
M. Fan and Y. Kuang, Dynamics of a nonautonomous predator-prey system with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 295 (2004), 15-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.038.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[10] |
K. Garain, U. Kumar and P. S. Mandal, Global dynamics in Beddington-DeAngelis prey-predator model with density dependent death rate of predator, Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst., 29 (2021), 265-283.
doi: 10.1007/s12591-019-00469-9.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[11] |
M. Haque, A detailed study of the Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey model, Math. Biosci., 234 (2011), 1-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.07.003.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[12] |
T. W. Hwang, Uniqueness of limit cycles of the predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 290 (2004), 113-122.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.09.073.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[13] |
T. W. Hwang, Global analysis of the predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 281 (2003), 395-401.
![]() ![]() |
[14] |
Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 2$^{nd}$ edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
![]() ![]() |
[15] |
S. Liu, E. Beretta and D. Breda, Predator-prey model of Beddington-DeAngelis type with maturation and gestation delays, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 11 (2010), 4072-4091.
doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.03.013.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[16] |
M. Lorenzon, A. Pozzebon and C. Duso, Effects of potential food sources on biological and demographic parameters of the predatory mites Kampimodromus aberrans, Typhlodromus pyri and Amblyseius andersoni, Exp. Appl. Acarol., 58 (2012), 259-278.
![]() |
[17] |
A. J. Lotka, Elements of Physical Biology, 1$^{st}$ edition, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1925.
![]() |
[18] |
R. K. Naji and A. T. Balasim, Dynamical behavior of a three species food chain model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 32 (2007), 1853-1866.
doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.12.019.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[19] |
K. Negi and S. Gakkhar, Dynamics in a Beddington-DeAngelis prey-predator system with impulsive harvesting, Ecol. Modell., 206 (2007), 421-430.
![]() |
[20] |
L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 2$^{nd}$ edition, Springer, New York, 1996.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0249-0.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[21] |
Z. Shang and Y. Qiao, Bifurcation analysis of a Leslie-type predator-prey system with simplified Holling type Ⅳ functional response and strong Allee effect on prey, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 64 (2022), 103453.
doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2021.103453.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[22] |
A. N. Shoshitaishvili, Bifurcations of topological type of a vector field near a singular point, Trudy Semin. Im. I. G. Petrovskogo, 1 (1975), 279-309.
![]() |
[23] |
X. Song and L. Chen, Optimal harvesting and stability for a two-species competitive system with stage structure, Math. Biosci., 170 (2001), 173-186.
doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(00)00068-7.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[24] |
J. P. Tripathi, D. Jana and V. Tiwari, A Beddington-DeAngelis type one-prey two-predator competitive system with help, Nonlinear Dyn., 94 (2018), 553-573.
![]() |
[25] |
V. Volterra, Fluctuations in the abundance of species, considered mathematically, Nature, 118 (1926), 558-560.
![]() |
[26] |
J. Wang, J. Shi and J. Wei, Predator-prey system with strong Allee effect in prey, J. Math. Biol., 62 (2011), 291-331.
doi: 10.1007/s00285-010-0332-1.![]() ![]() ![]() |
[27] |
X. Zhang, Q. L. Zhang and V. Sreeram, Bifurcation analysis and control of a discrete harvested prey-predator system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Franklin Inst., 347 (2010), 1076-1096.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.03.016.![]() ![]() ![]() |
Real roots of the polynomial
Number of interior equilibria. (A) Three equilibria at
Phase portrait of three interior equilibria
(A) Transcritical bifurcation around
Phase portrait of the limit cycle and corresponding time diagram of Hopf bifurcation in Figure 4(B). (A) Stable limit cycle generated by supercritical Hopf bifurcation at
Codimension two bifurcation diagrams of system (3). (A) In
Neighborhood of
Phase portraits in the neighborhood of Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation point
Phase portraits in the neighborhood of
Phase portraits in the neighborhood of Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation point
Phase portraits for the neighborhood of generalized Hopf bifurcation