American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    A unified finite difference Chebyshev wavelet method for numerically solving time fractional Burgers' equation
  • DCDS-S Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    On the existence and uniqueness of the solution of an optimal control problem for Schrödinger equation
June  2019, 12(3): 513-531. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019034

Weak Galerkin mixed finite element methods for parabolic equations with memory

Xiaomeng Li , Qiang Xu , and  Ailing Zhu ,

School of Mathematical and Statistics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China

* Corresponding author: Qiang Xu, Ailing Zhu.

Received  June 2017 Revised  September 2017 Published  September 2018

Fund Project: Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2014AM033).

We develop a semidiscrete and a backward Euler fully discrete weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for a parabolic differential equation with memory. The optimal order error estimates in both $ |\|·|\| $ and $ L^2 $ norms are established based on a generalized elliptic projection. In the numerical experiments, the equation is solved by the weak Galerkin schemes with spaces $ \{[P_{k}(T)]^2, P_{k}(e), P_{k+1}(T)\} $ for $ k = 0 $ and the numerical convergence rates confirm the theoretical results.

Keywords: Weak Galerkin, mixed finite element, discrete weak divergence, integro-differential equations, error estimates.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65N15, 65N30; Secondary: 65R20.
Citation: Xiaomeng Li, Qiang Xu, Ailing Zhu. Weak Galerkin mixed finite element methods for parabolic equations with memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (3) : 513-531. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019034
References:
[1]

H. Che, Z. Zhou, Z. Jiang and Y. Wang, $ H^1 $-Galerkin expanded mixed finite element methods for nonlinear pseudo-parabolic integro-differential equations, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 29 (2013), 799-817.  doi: 10.1002/num.21731.  Google Scholar

[2]

Z. Jiang, $ L^∞(L^2) $ and $ L^∞(L^∞) $ error estimates for mixed methods for integro-differential equations of parabolic type, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 33 (1999), 531-546.  doi: 10.1051/m2an:1999151.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Mu, J. Wang, Y. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for biharmonic equations, in Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Algorithms, and Their Applications, Springer Press, 45 (2013), 247-277. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7172-1_13.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. Mu, J. Wang and X. Ye, A hybridized formulation for the weak Galerkin mixed finite element method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 307 (2016), 335-345.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.01.004.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. K. Pani and G. Fairweather, $ H^1 $-Galerkin mixed finite element methods for parabolic partial integro-differential equations, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 22 (2002), 231-252.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/22.2.231.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. K. Sinha, R. E. Ewing and R. D. Lazarov, Mixed finite element approximations of parabolic integro-differential equations with nonsmooth initial data, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 47 (2009), 3269-3292.  doi: 10.1137/080740490.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin finite element methods for elliptic problems, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 241 (2013), 103-115.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.003.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for second-order elliptic problems, Math. Comp., 83 (2014), 2101-2126.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-2014-02852-4.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin finite element method for the Stokes equations, Adv. Comput. Math., 42 (2016), 155-174.  doi: 10.1007/s10444-015-9415-2.  Google Scholar

[10]

E. G. Yanik and G. Fairweather, Finite element methods for parabolic and hyperbolic partial integro-differential equations, Nonlinear Anal., 12 (1988), 785-809.  doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(88)90039-9.  Google Scholar

[11]

Q. Zhang and R. Zhang, A weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for second-order elliptic equations with Robin boundary conditions, J. Comput. Math., 34 (2016), 532-548.  doi: 10.4208/jcm.1604-m2015-0413.  Google Scholar

[12]

C. Zhou, Y. Zou, S. Chai, Q. Zhang and H. Zhu, Weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for heat equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 123 (2018), 180-199.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2017.08.009.  Google Scholar

[13]

Z. Zhou, An H1-Galerkin mixed finite element method for a class of heat transport equations, Appl. Math. Model., 34 (2010), 2414-2425.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.11.007.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. Zhu, Discontinuous mixed covolume methods for linear parabolic integrodifferential problems, J. Appl. Math. , 2014 (2014), Art. ID 649468, 8 pp. doi: 10.1155/2014/649468.  Google Scholar

[15]

A. Zhu, T. Xu and Q. Xu, Weak Galerkin finite element methods for linear parabolic integro-differential equations, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 32 (2016), 1357-1377.  doi: 10.1002/num.22053.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

H. Che, Z. Zhou, Z. Jiang and Y. Wang, $ H^1 $-Galerkin expanded mixed finite element methods for nonlinear pseudo-parabolic integro-differential equations, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 29 (2013), 799-817.  doi: 10.1002/num.21731.  Google Scholar

[2]

Z. Jiang, $ L^∞(L^2) $ and $ L^∞(L^∞) $ error estimates for mixed methods for integro-differential equations of parabolic type, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 33 (1999), 531-546.  doi: 10.1051/m2an:1999151.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Mu, J. Wang, Y. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for biharmonic equations, in Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Algorithms, and Their Applications, Springer Press, 45 (2013), 247-277. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7172-1_13.  Google Scholar

[4]

L. Mu, J. Wang and X. Ye, A hybridized formulation for the weak Galerkin mixed finite element method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 307 (2016), 335-345.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.01.004.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. K. Pani and G. Fairweather, $ H^1 $-Galerkin mixed finite element methods for parabolic partial integro-differential equations, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 22 (2002), 231-252.  doi: 10.1093/imanum/22.2.231.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. K. Sinha, R. E. Ewing and R. D. Lazarov, Mixed finite element approximations of parabolic integro-differential equations with nonsmooth initial data, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 47 (2009), 3269-3292.  doi: 10.1137/080740490.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin finite element methods for elliptic problems, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 241 (2013), 103-115.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.003.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for second-order elliptic problems, Math. Comp., 83 (2014), 2101-2126.  doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-2014-02852-4.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. Wang and X. Ye, A weak Galerkin finite element method for the Stokes equations, Adv. Comput. Math., 42 (2016), 155-174.  doi: 10.1007/s10444-015-9415-2.  Google Scholar

[10]

E. G. Yanik and G. Fairweather, Finite element methods for parabolic and hyperbolic partial integro-differential equations, Nonlinear Anal., 12 (1988), 785-809.  doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(88)90039-9.  Google Scholar

[11]

Q. Zhang and R. Zhang, A weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for second-order elliptic equations with Robin boundary conditions, J. Comput. Math., 34 (2016), 532-548.  doi: 10.4208/jcm.1604-m2015-0413.  Google Scholar

[12]

C. Zhou, Y. Zou, S. Chai, Q. Zhang and H. Zhu, Weak Galerkin mixed finite element method for heat equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 123 (2018), 180-199.  doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2017.08.009.  Google Scholar

[13]

Z. Zhou, An H1-Galerkin mixed finite element method for a class of heat transport equations, Appl. Math. Model., 34 (2010), 2414-2425.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.11.007.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. Zhu, Discontinuous mixed covolume methods for linear parabolic integrodifferential problems, J. Appl. Math. , 2014 (2014), Art. ID 649468, 8 pp. doi: 10.1155/2014/649468.  Google Scholar

[15]

A. Zhu, T. Xu and Q. Xu, Weak Galerkin finite element methods for linear parabolic integro-differential equations, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 32 (2016), 1357-1377.  doi: 10.1002/num.22053.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  A typical uniform mesh on $(0, 1)\times(0, 1)$ with $h = 1/8$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Error behaviors of FWG-MFEM for the first example with $\Delta t = 4h^2$
$h$ $|||e_{h}|||$ $\mbox{order}\approx$$\|\varepsilon_{h}\|$ $\mbox{order}\approx$
$2^{-3}$4.8132e-002-1.7834e-003-
$2^{-4}$2.3657e-0021.02474.3564e-0042.0334
$2^{-5}$1.1823e-0021.00071.0872e-0042.0026
$2^{-6}$5.9209e-0030.99772.7312e-0051.9929
$2^{-7}$2.9583e-0031.00106.8160e-0062.0026
Table Options

Download as excel

$h$ $|||e_{h}|||$ $\mbox{order}\approx$$\|\varepsilon_{h}\|$ $\mbox{order}\approx$
$2^{-3}$4.8132e-002-1.7834e-003-
$2^{-4}$2.3657e-0021.02474.3564e-0042.0334
$2^{-5}$1.1823e-0021.00071.0872e-0042.0026
$2^{-6}$5.9209e-0030.99772.7312e-0051.9929
$2^{-7}$2.9583e-0031.00106.8160e-0062.0026
Table 2.  Error behaviors of FWG-MFEM for the second example with $\Delta t = 4h^2$
$h$ $|||e_{h}|||$ $\mbox{order}\approx$$\|\varepsilon_{h}\|$ $\mbox{order}\approx$
$2^{-3}$1.0576e-000-2.1024e-002-
$2^{-4}$5.1613e-0011.03504.8443e-0032.1177
$2^{-5}$2.5868e-0010.99661.2043e-0032.0081
$2^{-6}$1.2929e-0011.00063.0093e-0042.0007
$2^{-7}$6.4627e-0021.00047.5140e-0052.0018
Table Options

Download as excel

$h$ $|||e_{h}|||$ $\mbox{order}\approx$$\|\varepsilon_{h}\|$ $\mbox{order}\approx$
$2^{-3}$1.0576e-000-2.1024e-002-
$2^{-4}$5.1613e-0011.03504.8443e-0032.1177
$2^{-5}$2.5868e-0010.99661.2043e-0032.0081
$2^{-6}$1.2929e-0011.00063.0093e-0042.0007
$2^{-7}$6.4627e-0021.00047.5140e-0052.0018
[1]

Jiwei Jia, Young-Ju Lee, Yue Feng, Zichan Wang, Zhongshu Zhao. Hybridized weak Galerkin finite element methods for Brinkman equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (3) : 2489-2516. doi: 10.3934/era.2020126
[2]

Changling Xu, Tianliang Hou. Superclose analysis of a two-grid finite element scheme for semilinear parabolic integro-differential equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (2) : 897-910. doi: 10.3934/era.2020047
[3]

Xiu Ye, Shangyou Zhang, Peng Zhu. A weak Galerkin finite element method for nonlinear conservation laws. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1897-1923. doi: 10.3934/era.2020097
[4]

Bin Wang, Lin Mu. Viscosity robust weak Galerkin finite element methods for Stokes problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1881-1895. doi: 10.3934/era.2020096
[5]

Patricio Felmer, Ying Wang. Qualitative properties of positive solutions for mixed integro-differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (1) : 369-393. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019015
[6]

Tianling Jin, Jingang Xiong. Schauder estimates for solutions of linear parabolic integro-differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (12) : 5977-5998. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.5977
[7]

Shenglan Xie, Maoan Han, Peng Zhu. A posteriori error estimate of weak Galerkin fem for second order elliptic problem with mixed boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (10) : 5217-5226. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020340
[8]

Thanh-Anh Nguyen, Dinh-Ke Tran, Nhu-Quan Nguyen. Weak stability for integro-differential inclusions of diffusion-wave type involving infinite delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (10) : 3637-3654. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016114
[9]

Lunji Song, Wenya Qi, Kaifang Liu, Qingxian Gu. A new over-penalized weak galerkin finite element method. Part Ⅱ: Elliptic interface problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2581-2598. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020196
[10]

Guanrong Li, Yanping Chen, Yunqing Huang. A hybridized weak Galerkin finite element scheme for general second-order elliptic problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (2) : 821-836. doi: 10.3934/era.2020042
[11]

Olivier Bonnefon, Jérôme Coville, Jimmy Garnier, Lionel Roques. Inside dynamics of solutions of integro-differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (10) : 3057-3085. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.3057
[12]

Mohammed Al Horani, Angelo Favini, Hiroki Tanabe. Singular integro-differential equations with applications. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021051
[13]

Ruishu Wang, Lin Mu, Xiu Ye. A locking free Reissner-Mindlin element with weak Galerkin rotations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (1) : 351-361. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018086
[14]

Samir K. Bhowmik, Dugald B. Duncan, Michael Grinfeld, Gabriel J. Lord. Finite to infinite steady state solutions, bifurcations of an integro-differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 57-71. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.57
[15]

Lijuan Wang, Jun Zou. Error estimates of finite element methods for parameter identifications in elliptic and parabolic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (4) : 1641-1670. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1641
[16]

Jie Shen, Xiaofeng Yang. Error estimates for finite element approximations of consistent splitting schemes for incompressible flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (3) : 663-676. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.663
[17]

Hui Peng, Qilong Zhai. Weak Galerkin method for the Stokes equations with damping. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021112
[18]

Martin Burger, José A. Carrillo, Marie-Therese Wolfram. A mixed finite element method for nonlinear diffusion equations. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (1) : 59-83. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.59
[19]

Wolf-Jüergen Beyn, Janosch Rieger. Galerkin finite element methods for semilinear elliptic differential inclusions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (2) : 295-312. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.295
[20]

Tomás Caraballo, P.E. Kloeden. Non-autonomous attractors for integro-differential evolution equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (1) : 17-36. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.17

2020 Impact Factor: 2.425

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (292)
  • HTML views (191)
  • Cited by (3)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy