American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Memorized relaxation with singular and non-singular memory kernels for basic relaxation of dielectric vis-à-vis Curie-von Schweidler & Kohlrausch relaxation laws
• DCDS-S Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Fractional calculus and applications of family of extended generalized Gauss hypergeometric functions
March  2020, 13(3): 561-574. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020031

A novel predictor-corrector scheme for solving variable-order fractional delay differential equations involving operators with Mittag-Leffler kernel

 1 Tecnológico Nacional de México/CENIDET, Interior Internado Palmira S/N, Col. Palmira, C.P. 62490, Cuernavaca Morelos, México 2 CONACyT-Tecnológico Nacional de México/CENIDET, Interior Internado Palmira S/N, Col. Palmira, C.P. 62490, Cuernavaca Morelos, México

* Corresponding author: J. F. Gómez-Aguilar

Received  April 2018 Revised  May 2018 Published  March 2019

Fund Project: The first author is supported by by CONACyT through the assignment doctoral fellowship.

In this work we present a numerical method based on the Adams-Bashforth-Moulton scheme to solve numerically fractional delay differential equations. We focus in the fractional derivative with Mittag-Leffler kernel of type Liouville-Caputo with variable-order and the Liouville-Caputo fractional derivative with variable-order. Numerical examples are presented to show the applicability and efficiency of this novel method.

Citation: Antonio Coronel-Escamilla, José Francisco Gómez-Aguilar. A novel predictor-corrector scheme for solving variable-order fractional delay differential equations involving operators with Mittag-Leffler kernel. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 561-574. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020031
References:

show all references

References:
Numerical solution of Eq. (26); using ABC derivative, in (a) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ when $\alpha = 1$, in (b) we obtain the phase diagram when $\alpha = 1$. Using Liouville-Caputo derivative, in (c) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ when $\alpha = 1$ and in (d) we obtain the phase diagram when $\alpha = 1$
Numerical solution of Eq. (26); using ABC derivative, in (a) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ when $\alpha = 0.85$, in (b) we obtain the phase diagram when $\alpha = 0.85$. Using Liouville-Caputo derivative, in (c) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ when $\alpha = 0.85$ and in (d) we obtain the phase diagram when $\alpha = 0.85$
Numerical solution of Eq. (27). In (a)-(c)-(e) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ using ABC derivative. In (b)-(d)-(f) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ using Liouville-Caputo derivative
Numerical solution of Eq. (27). In (a)-(c)-(e) we show the phase diagram $y(t)$ vs. $y(t-2)$ using ABC derivative. In (b)-(d)-(f) we show phase diagram $y(t)$ vs. $y(t-2)$ using Liouville-Caputo derivative
Numerical solution of Eq. (28); using ABC derivative, in (a)-(c) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ and the phase diagram $y(t)$ vs. $y(t-2)$, when $\alpha(t) = \dfrac{1-\cos(2t)}{3}$, respectively; using Liouville-Caputo derivative, in (b)-(d) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ and the phase diagram $y(t)$ vs. $y(t-2)$, when $\alpha(t) = \dfrac{1-\cos(2t)}{3}$, respectively
Numerical solution of Eq. (29); using ABC derivative, in (a)-(c) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ and the phase diagram $y(t)$ vs. $y(t-2)$, when $\alpha(t) = \dfrac{1-\cos(2t)}{3}$, respectively; using Liouville-Caputo derivative, in (b)-(d) we show the evolution of $y(t)$ and the phase diagram $y(t)$ vs. $y(t-2)$, when $\alpha(t) = \dfrac{1-\cos(2t)}{3}$, respectively
 [1] Ndolane Sene. Mittag-Leffler input stability of fractional differential equations and its applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 867-880. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020050 [2] Mehmet Yavuz, Necati Özdemir. Comparing the new fractional derivative operators involving exponential and Mittag-Leffler kernel. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 995-1006. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020058 [3] Jean Daniel Djida, Juan J. Nieto, Iván Area. Parabolic problem with fractional time derivative with nonlocal and nonsingular Mittag-Leffler kernel. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 609-627. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020033 [4] Raziye Mert, Thabet Abdeljawad, Allan Peterson. A Sturm-Liouville approach for continuous and discrete Mittag-Leffler kernel fractional operators. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (7) : 2417-2434. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020171 [5] Behzad Ghanbari, Devendra Kumar, Jagdev Singh. An efficient numerical method for fractional model of allelopathic stimulatory phytoplankton species with Mittag-Leffler law. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (10) : 3577-3587. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020428 [6] Ricardo Almeida, M. Luísa Morgado. Optimality conditions involving the Mittag–Leffler tempered fractional derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021149 [7] Ali Akgül. Analysis and new applications of fractal fractional differential equations with power law kernel. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (10) : 3401-3417. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020423 [8] Ebenezer Bonyah, Samuel Kwesi Asiedu. Analysis of a Lymphatic filariasis-schistosomiasis coinfection with public health dynamics: Model obtained through Mittag-Leffler function. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 519-537. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020029 [9] Jiaohui Xu, Tomás Caraballo. Long time behavior of fractional impulsive stochastic differential equations with infinite delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (6) : 2719-2743. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018272 [10] Sertan Alkan. A new solution method for nonlinear fractional integro-differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1065-1077. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1065 [11] Francesco Mainardi. On some properties of the Mittag-Leffler function $\mathbf{E_\alpha(-t^\alpha)}$, completely monotone for $\mathbf{t> 0}$ with $\mathbf{0<\alpha<1}$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (7) : 2267-2278. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2267 [12] Abdon Atangana, Ali Akgül. On solutions of fractal fractional differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (10) : 3441-3457. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020421 [13] Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (10) : 3337-3349. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443 [14] Hasib Khan, Cemil Tunc, Aziz Khan. Green function's properties and existence theorems for nonlinear singular-delay-fractional differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (9) : 2475-2487. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020139 [15] Yousef Alnafisah, Hamdy M. Ahmed. Neutral delay Hilfer fractional integrodifferential equations with fractional brownian motion. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021031 [16] Berat Karaagac. New exact solutions for some fractional order differential equations via improved sub-equation method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (3) : 447-454. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019029 [17] Yin Yang, Sujuan Kang, Vasiliy I. Vasil'ev. The Jacobi spectral collocation method for fractional integro-differential equations with non-smooth solutions. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (3) : 1161-1189. doi: 10.3934/era.2020064 [18] C. M. Groothedde, J. D. Mireles James. Parameterization method for unstable manifolds of delay differential equations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2017, 4 (1&2) : 21-70. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2017002 [19] Yejuan Wang, Tongtong Liang. Mild solutions to the time fractional Navier-Stokes delay differential inclusions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 3713-3740. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018312 [20] Yaozhong Hu, Yanghui Liu, David Nualart. Taylor schemes for rough differential equations and fractional diffusions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (9) : 3115-3162. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016090

2020 Impact Factor: 2.425

Metrics

• HTML views (780)
• Cited by (0)

• on AIMS