# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

March  2021, 14(3): 1063-1078. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020230

## Theoretical and numerical studies for energy estimates of the shallow water equations with a transmission boundary condition

 1 Division of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh 3 Japan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO, Kawaguchi 332-0012, Japan

* Corresponding author: Md. Masum Murshed

Received  January 2019 Revised  June 2019 Published  December 2019

Energy estimates of the shallow water equations (SWEs) with a transmission boundary condition are studied theoretically and numerically. In the theoretical part, using a suitable energy, we begin with deriving an equality which implies an energy estimate of the SWEs with the Dirichlet and the slip boundary conditions. For the SWEs with a transmission boundary condition, an inequality for the energy estimate is proved under some assumptions to be satisfied in practical computation. In the numerical part, based on the theoretical results, the energy estimate of the SWEs with a transmission boundary condition is confirmed numerically by a finite difference method (FDM). The choice of a positive constant $c_0$ used in the transmission boundary condition is investigated additionally. Furthermore, we present numerical results by a Lagrange-Galerkin scheme, which are similar to those by the FDM. The theoretical results along with the numerical results strongly recommend that the transmission boundary condition is suitable for the boundaries in the open sea.

Citation: Md. Masum Murshed, Kouta Futai, Masato Kimura, Hirofumi Notsu. Theoretical and numerical studies for energy estimates of the shallow water equations with a transmission boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 1063-1078. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020230
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The Bay of Bengal and the coastal region of Bangladesh
Model domain
Color contours of $\eta_h^k$ by finite difference scheme (25) for the five cases $(i)$-$(v)$ discussed in Subsection 4.2
Graphs of $E_h^k$ (left), $\sum_{i = 1}^4 I_{hi}^k \approx \frac{d}{dt} E(t)$ (center) and $I_{hi}^k$, $i = 1, \ldots, 4$, (right) versus $t = t^k\; (\ge 0, k\in \mathbb{Z})$ for the five cases $(i)$-$(v)$
Color contours of $\eta_h^k$ by Lagrange-Galerkin scheme (26) for the five cases $(i)$-$(v)$ discussed in Section 5
Maximum and minimum values of $I_{hi}^k$, $i = 1,\ldots, 4$, with respect to the number of transmission boundaries
 $\varGamma_T$ $\varGamma_D$ $I_{h1}$ $I_{h2}$ $I_{h3}$ $I_{h4}$ 0 4 Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 $-8.63 \times 10^{-7}$ 1 3 Max $1.10 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $1.44 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-2.59 \times 10^{-3}$ $-3.37$ $-1.25\times 10^{-9}$ $-3.76\times 10^{-7}$ 2 2 Max $1.86 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $1.72 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-3.38 \times 10^{-3}$ -6.27 $-2.50 \times 10^{-9}$ $-2.31 \times 10^{-7}$ 3 1 Max $1.43 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $2.58 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-5.06 \times 10^{-3}$ $-9.40$ $-3.75 \times 10^{-9}$ $-1.74 \times 10^{-7}$ 4 0 Max $2.87 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $3.47 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-6.75 \times 10^{-3}$ $-12.54$ $-5.01 \times 10^{-9}$ $-1.14 \times 10^{-7}$
 $\varGamma_T$ $\varGamma_D$ $I_{h1}$ $I_{h2}$ $I_{h3}$ $I_{h4}$ 0 4 Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 $-8.63 \times 10^{-7}$ 1 3 Max $1.10 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $1.44 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-2.59 \times 10^{-3}$ $-3.37$ $-1.25\times 10^{-9}$ $-3.76\times 10^{-7}$ 2 2 Max $1.86 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $1.72 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-3.38 \times 10^{-3}$ -6.27 $-2.50 \times 10^{-9}$ $-2.31 \times 10^{-7}$ 3 1 Max $1.43 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $2.58 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-5.06 \times 10^{-3}$ $-9.40$ $-3.75 \times 10^{-9}$ $-1.74 \times 10^{-7}$ 4 0 Max $2.87 \times 10^{-4}$ 0.00 $3.47 \times 10^{-9}$ 0.00 Min $-6.75 \times 10^{-3}$ $-12.54$ $-5.01 \times 10^{-9}$ $-1.14 \times 10^{-7}$
$c_0$ and $\mathcal{S}_h(c_0)$
 $c_0$ $\mathcal{S}_h(c_0)$ Case Ⅰ Case Ⅱ Case Ⅲ Case Ⅳ Case Ⅴ Case Ⅵ 0.1 12.17 8.53 8.14 5.47 44.48 44.49 0.2 9.89 6.97 6.35 4.04 34.36 34.37 0.3 8.84 6.24 5.52 3.35 28.74 28.75 0.4 8.27 5.85 5.08 2.98 25.23 25.24 0.5 7.93 5.61 4.84 2.79 22.82 22.83 0.6 7.71 5.46 4.71 2.69 21.05 21.06 0.7 7.58 5.37 4.65 2.66 19.69 19.69 0.8 7.51 5.32 4.63 2.67 18.60 18.61 0.9 7.4805 5.2969 4.64 2.70 17.71 17.72 1.0 7.4807 5.2977 4.68 2.76 16.98 16.98 1.1 7.50 5.32 4.73 2.82 16.36 16.36 1.2 7.55 5.35 4.79 2.89 15.83 15.84 1.5 7.75 5.49 5.02 3.12 14.66 14.66
 $c_0$ $\mathcal{S}_h(c_0)$ Case Ⅰ Case Ⅱ Case Ⅲ Case Ⅳ Case Ⅴ Case Ⅵ 0.1 12.17 8.53 8.14 5.47 44.48 44.49 0.2 9.89 6.97 6.35 4.04 34.36 34.37 0.3 8.84 6.24 5.52 3.35 28.74 28.75 0.4 8.27 5.85 5.08 2.98 25.23 25.24 0.5 7.93 5.61 4.84 2.79 22.82 22.83 0.6 7.71 5.46 4.71 2.69 21.05 21.06 0.7 7.58 5.37 4.65 2.66 19.69 19.69 0.8 7.51 5.32 4.63 2.67 18.60 18.61 0.9 7.4805 5.2969 4.64 2.70 17.71 17.72 1.0 7.4807 5.2977 4.68 2.76 16.98 16.98 1.1 7.50 5.32 4.73 2.82 16.36 16.36 1.2 7.55 5.35 4.79 2.89 15.83 15.84 1.5 7.75 5.49 5.02 3.12 14.66 14.66
 [1] Madalina Petcu, Roger Temam. The one dimensional shallow water equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions on the velocity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (1) : 209-222. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.209 [2] Lunji Song, Wenya Qi, Kaifang Liu, Qingxian Gu. A new over-penalized weak galerkin finite element method. Part Ⅱ: Elliptic interface problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2581-2598. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020196 [3] Murat Uzunca, Ayşe Sarıaydın-Filibelioǧlu. Adaptive discontinuous galerkin finite elements for advective Allen-Cahn equation. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 269-281. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020025 [4] Ying Yang. Global classical solutions to two-dimensional chemotaxis-shallow water system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2625-2643. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020198 [5] Yizhuo Wang, Shangjiang Guo. A SIS reaction-diffusion model with a free boundary condition and nonhomogeneous coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (4) : 1627-1652. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018223 [6] Guangying Lv, Jinlong Wei, Guang-an Zou. Noise and stability in reaction-diffusion equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021005 [7] Kaifang Liu, Lunji Song, Shan Zhao. A new over-penalized weak galerkin method. Part Ⅰ: Second-order elliptic problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2411-2428. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020184 [8] Zengyun Wang, Jinde Cao, Zuowei Cai, Lihong Huang. Finite-time stability of impulsive differential inclusion: Applications to discontinuous impulsive neural networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2677-2692. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020200 [9] Qiang Guo, Dong Liang. An adaptive wavelet method and its analysis for parabolic equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (2) : 327-345. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.327 [10] Scipio Cuccagna, Masaya Maeda. A survey on asymptotic stability of ground states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations II. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (5) : 1693-1716. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020450 [11] Zhiming Guo, Zhi-Chun Yang, Xingfu Zou. Existence and uniqueness of positive solution to a non-local differential equation with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition---A non-monotone case. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (5) : 1825-1838. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1825 [12] Boris Kramer, John R. Singler. A POD projection method for large-scale algebraic Riccati equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (4) : 413-435. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016018 [13] Jiangxing Wang. Convergence analysis of an accurate and efficient method for nonlinear Maxwell's equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2429-2440. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020185 [14] Carlos Fresneda-Portillo, Sergey E. Mikhailov. Analysis of Boundary-Domain Integral Equations to the mixed BVP for a compressible stokes system with variable viscosity. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (6) : 3059-3088. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019137 [15] Lorenzo Freddi. Optimal control of the transmission rate in compartmental epidemics. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021007 [16] Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056 [17] Y. Latushkin, B. Layton. The optimal gap condition for invariant manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1999, 5 (2) : 233-268. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.233 [18] Caifang Wang, Tie Zhou. The order of convergence for Landweber Scheme with $\alpha,\beta$-rule. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (1) : 133-146. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.133 [19] Arseny Egorov. Morse coding for a Fuchsian group of finite covolume. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (4) : 637-646. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.637 [20] Carlos Gutierrez, Nguyen Van Chau. A remark on an eigenvalue condition for the global injectivity of differentiable maps of $R^2$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2007, 17 (2) : 397-402. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2007.17.397

2019 Impact Factor: 1.233