Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species

Fathalla A. Rihan; Hebatallah J. Alsakaji

doi:10.3934/dcdss.2020468

Previous Article
Anisotropic singular double phase Dirichlet problems
DCDS-S Home
This Issue
Next Article
Bayesian topological signal processing

doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020468

Online First

Online First articles are published articles within a journal that have not yet been assigned to a formal issue. This means they do not yet have a volume number, issue number, or page numbers assigned to them, however, they can still be found and cited using their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Online First publication benefits the research community by making new scientific discoveries known as quickly as possible.

Readers can access Online First articles via the “Online First” tab for the selected journal.

Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species

Fathalla A. Rihan ^, and Hebatallah J. Alsakaji

Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Science, UAE University, Al Ain, 15551, UAE

^* Corresponding author: F.A. Rihan (frihan@uaeu.ac.ae)

Received April 2020 Revised September 2020 Early access November 2020

Fund Project: This work supported by UPAR-Project (Code # G00003440)

Environmental factors and random variation have strong effects on the dynamics of biological and ecological systems. In this paper, we propose a stochastic delay differential model of two-prey, one-predator system with cooperation among prey species against predator. The model has a global positive solution. Sufficient conditions of existence and uniqueness of an ergodic stationary distribution of the positive solution are provided, by constructing suitable Lyapunov functionals. Sufficient conditions for possible extinction of the predator populations are also obtained. The conditions are expressed in terms of a threshold parameter $ {\mathcal R}_0^s $ that relies on the environmental noise. Illustrative examples and numerical simulations, using Milstein's scheme, are carried out to illustrate the theoretical results. A small scale of noise can promote survival of the species. While relative large noises can lead to possible extinction of the species in such an environment.

Keywords: DDEs, Extinction; Stationary distribution and ergodicity; Stochastic prey-predator model; Stochastic DDEs; Time-delays.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 34D20, 34F05, 92B05.

Citation: Fathalla A. Rihan, Hebatallah J. Alsakaji. Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020468

References:

[1]	J. Alebraheem and Y. A. Hasan, Dynamics of a two predator–one prey system, Computational and Applied Mathematics, 33 (2014), 767-780. doi: 10.1007/s40314-013-0093-8. Google Scholar
[2]	A. Bahar and X. Mao, Stochastic delay Lotka-Volterra model, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 292 (2004), 364-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.12.004. Google Scholar
[3]	Y. Bai and Y. Li, Stability and Hopf bifurcation for a stage-structured predator–prey model incorporating refuge for prey and additional food for predator, Advances in Difference Equations, 2019 (2019), 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-1979-6. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Bao and C. Yuan, Stochastic population dynamics driven by Lévy noise, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 391 (2012), 363-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.02.043. Google Scholar
[5]	G. A. Bocharov and F. A. Rihan, Numerical modelling in biosciences using delay differential equations, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 125 (2000), 183-199. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00468-4. Google Scholar
[6]	E. Buckwar, Introduction to the numerical analysis of stochastic delay differential equations, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 125 (2000), 297-307. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00475-1. Google Scholar
[7]	B. Dubey and A. Kumar, Dynamics of prey–predator model with stage structure in prey including maturation and gestation delays, Nonlinear Dynamics, 96 (2019), 2653-2679. doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-04951-5. Google Scholar
[8]	M. F. Elettreby, Two-prey one-predator model, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 39 (2009), 2018-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.058. Google Scholar
[9]	T. C. Gard, Persistence in stochastic food web models, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 46 (1984), 357-370. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8240(84)80044-0. Google Scholar
[10]	D. J. Higham, An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations, SIAM Review, 43 (2001), 525-546. doi: 10.1137/S0036144500378302. Google Scholar
[11]	R. Khasminskii, Stochastic Stability of Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23280-0. Google Scholar
[12]	P. E. Kloeden and T. Shardlow, The Milstein scheme for stochastic delay differential equations without using anticipative calculus, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 30 (2012), 181-202. doi: 10.1080/07362994.2012.628907. Google Scholar
[13]	S. Kundu and S. Maitra, Dynamical behaviour of a delayed three species predator–prey model with cooperation among the prey species, Nonlinear Dynamics, 92 (2018), 627-643. doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4079-3. Google Scholar
[14]	D. Li, S. Liu and J. Cui, Threshold dynamics and ergodicity of an SIRS epidemic model with Markovian switching, Journal of Differential Equations, 263 (2017), 8873-8915. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.08.066. Google Scholar
[15]	R. S. Liptser, A strong law of large numbers for local martingales, Stochastics, 3 (1980), 217-228. doi: 10.1080/17442508008833146. Google Scholar
[16]	Z. Liu and R. Tan, Impulsive harvesting and stocking in a monod–haldane functional response predator–prey system, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 34 (2007), 454-464. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.054. Google Scholar
[17]	Q. Liu, D. Jiang, T. Hayat and A. Alsaedi, Stationary distribution and extinction of a stochastic predator–prey model with herd behavior, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 355 (2018), 8177-8193. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.09.013. Google Scholar
[18]	A. J. Lotka, Elements of Physical Biology, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1925. Google Scholar
[19]	X. Mao, Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications, Elsevier, 2008. doi: 10.1533/9780857099402. Google Scholar
[20]	X. Mao, G. Marion and E. Renshaw, Environmental Brownian noise suppresses explosions in population dynamics, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 97 (2002), 95-110. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4149(01)00126-0. Google Scholar
[21]	X. Mao, S. Sabanis and E. Renshaw, Asymptotic behaviour of the stochastic Lotka-Volterra model, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 287 (2003), 141-156. doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00539-0. Google Scholar
[22]	J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, Springer New york, 1993. doi: 10.1007/b98869. Google Scholar
[23]	R. Rakkiyappan, A. Chandrasekar, F. A. Rihan and S. Lakshmanan, Exponential state estimation of Markovian jumping genetic regulatory networks with mode-dependent probabilistic time-varying delays, Mathematical Biosciences, 25 (2014), 30-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2014.02.008. Google Scholar
[24]	R Rakkiyappan, G. Velmurugan, F. A. Rihan and and S. Lakshmanan, Stability analysis of memristor-based complex-valued recurrent neural networks with time delays, Complexity, 21 (2015), 14-39. doi: 10.1002/cplx.21618. Google Scholar
[25]	F. A. Rihan, S. Lakshmanan, A. H. Hashish, R. Rakkiyappan and E. Ahmed, Fractional-order delayed predator–prey systems with {Holling type-II} functional response, Nonlinear Dynamics, 80 (2015), 777-789. doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-1905-8. Google Scholar
[26]	F. A. Rihan, H. J. Alsakaji and C. Rajivganthi, Stability and Hopf bifurcation of three-species prey-predator system with time delays and Allee effect, Complexity, 2020 (2020), 7306412. doi: 10.1155/2020/7306412. Google Scholar
[27]	F. A. Rihan, A. A. Azamov and H. J. Al-Sakaji, An inverse problem for delay differential equations: Parameter estimation, nonlinearity, sensitivity, Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 12 (2018), 63-74. doi: 10.18576/amis/120106. Google Scholar
[28]	F. A. Rihan and H. J. Alsakaji, Persistence and extinction for stochastic delay differential model of prey-predator system with hunting cooperation in predators, Advances in Difference Equations, 124 (2020), 1-22. doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02579-z. Google Scholar
[29]	F.A. Rihan, H.J. Alsakaji and C. Rajivganthi, Stochastic SIRC epidemic model with time-delay for COVID-19, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02964-8. Google Scholar
[30]	F. A. Rihan, C. Rajivganthi and P. Muthukumar, Fractional stochastic differential equations with Hilfer fractional derivative: Poisson jumps and optimal control, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2017 (2017), Art. ID 5394528, 11 pp. doi: 10.1155/2017/5394528. Google Scholar
[31]	T. Saha and M. Bandyopadhyay, Dynamical analysis of a delayed ratio-dependent prey–predator model within fluctuating environment, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 196 (2008), 458-478. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.06.017. Google Scholar
[32]	G. Tang, S. Tang and R. A. Cheke, Global analysis of a holling type II predator–prey model with a constant prey refuge, Nonlinear Dynamics, 76 (2014), 635-647. doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-1157-4. Google Scholar
[33]	D. A. Vasseuri and P. Yodzis, The color of environmental noise, Ecology, 85 (2004), 1146-1152. Google Scholar
[34]	V. Volterra, Variazioni e Fluttuazioni Del Numero D'individui in Specie Animali Conviventi, C. Ferrari, 1927. Google Scholar
[35]	X. Mao, C. Yuan and J. Zou, Stochastic differential delay equations of population dynamics, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 304 (2005), 296-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.09.027. Google Scholar
[36]	X. Zhao and Z. Zeng, Stationary distribution and extinction of a stochastic ratio-dependent predator–prey system with stage structure for the predator, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 545 (2020), 123310, 17 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123310. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	J. Alebraheem and Y. A. Hasan, Dynamics of a two predator–one prey system, Computational and Applied Mathematics, 33 (2014), 767-780. doi: 10.1007/s40314-013-0093-8. Google Scholar
[2]	A. Bahar and X. Mao, Stochastic delay Lotka-Volterra model, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 292 (2004), 364-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.12.004. Google Scholar
[3]	Y. Bai and Y. Li, Stability and Hopf bifurcation for a stage-structured predator–prey model incorporating refuge for prey and additional food for predator, Advances in Difference Equations, 2019 (2019), 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-1979-6. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Bao and C. Yuan, Stochastic population dynamics driven by Lévy noise, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 391 (2012), 363-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.02.043. Google Scholar
[5]	G. A. Bocharov and F. A. Rihan, Numerical modelling in biosciences using delay differential equations, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 125 (2000), 183-199. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00468-4. Google Scholar
[6]	E. Buckwar, Introduction to the numerical analysis of stochastic delay differential equations, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 125 (2000), 297-307. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00475-1. Google Scholar
[7]	B. Dubey and A. Kumar, Dynamics of prey–predator model with stage structure in prey including maturation and gestation delays, Nonlinear Dynamics, 96 (2019), 2653-2679. doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-04951-5. Google Scholar
[8]	M. F. Elettreby, Two-prey one-predator model, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 39 (2009), 2018-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.058. Google Scholar
[9]	T. C. Gard, Persistence in stochastic food web models, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 46 (1984), 357-370. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8240(84)80044-0. Google Scholar
[10]	D. J. Higham, An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations, SIAM Review, 43 (2001), 525-546. doi: 10.1137/S0036144500378302. Google Scholar
[11]	R. Khasminskii, Stochastic Stability of Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23280-0. Google Scholar
[12]	P. E. Kloeden and T. Shardlow, The Milstein scheme for stochastic delay differential equations without using anticipative calculus, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 30 (2012), 181-202. doi: 10.1080/07362994.2012.628907. Google Scholar
[13]	S. Kundu and S. Maitra, Dynamical behaviour of a delayed three species predator–prey model with cooperation among the prey species, Nonlinear Dynamics, 92 (2018), 627-643. doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4079-3. Google Scholar
[14]	D. Li, S. Liu and J. Cui, Threshold dynamics and ergodicity of an SIRS epidemic model with Markovian switching, Journal of Differential Equations, 263 (2017), 8873-8915. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.08.066. Google Scholar
[15]	R. S. Liptser, A strong law of large numbers for local martingales, Stochastics, 3 (1980), 217-228. doi: 10.1080/17442508008833146. Google Scholar
[16]	Z. Liu and R. Tan, Impulsive harvesting and stocking in a monod–haldane functional response predator–prey system, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 34 (2007), 454-464. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.054. Google Scholar
[17]	Q. Liu, D. Jiang, T. Hayat and A. Alsaedi, Stationary distribution and extinction of a stochastic predator–prey model with herd behavior, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 355 (2018), 8177-8193. doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.09.013. Google Scholar
[18]	A. J. Lotka, Elements of Physical Biology, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1925. Google Scholar
[19]	X. Mao, Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications, Elsevier, 2008. doi: 10.1533/9780857099402. Google Scholar
[20]	X. Mao, G. Marion and E. Renshaw, Environmental Brownian noise suppresses explosions in population dynamics, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 97 (2002), 95-110. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4149(01)00126-0. Google Scholar
[21]	X. Mao, S. Sabanis and E. Renshaw, Asymptotic behaviour of the stochastic Lotka-Volterra model, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 287 (2003), 141-156. doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00539-0. Google Scholar
[22]	J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, Springer New york, 1993. doi: 10.1007/b98869. Google Scholar
[23]	R. Rakkiyappan, A. Chandrasekar, F. A. Rihan and S. Lakshmanan, Exponential state estimation of Markovian jumping genetic regulatory networks with mode-dependent probabilistic time-varying delays, Mathematical Biosciences, 25 (2014), 30-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2014.02.008. Google Scholar
[24]	R Rakkiyappan, G. Velmurugan, F. A. Rihan and and S. Lakshmanan, Stability analysis of memristor-based complex-valued recurrent neural networks with time delays, Complexity, 21 (2015), 14-39. doi: 10.1002/cplx.21618. Google Scholar
[25]	F. A. Rihan, S. Lakshmanan, A. H. Hashish, R. Rakkiyappan and E. Ahmed, Fractional-order delayed predator–prey systems with {Holling type-II} functional response, Nonlinear Dynamics, 80 (2015), 777-789. doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-1905-8. Google Scholar
[26]	F. A. Rihan, H. J. Alsakaji and C. Rajivganthi, Stability and Hopf bifurcation of three-species prey-predator system with time delays and Allee effect, Complexity, 2020 (2020), 7306412. doi: 10.1155/2020/7306412. Google Scholar
[27]	F. A. Rihan, A. A. Azamov and H. J. Al-Sakaji, An inverse problem for delay differential equations: Parameter estimation, nonlinearity, sensitivity, Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 12 (2018), 63-74. doi: 10.18576/amis/120106. Google Scholar
[28]	F. A. Rihan and H. J. Alsakaji, Persistence and extinction for stochastic delay differential model of prey-predator system with hunting cooperation in predators, Advances in Difference Equations, 124 (2020), 1-22. doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02579-z. Google Scholar
[29]	F.A. Rihan, H.J. Alsakaji and C. Rajivganthi, Stochastic SIRC epidemic model with time-delay for COVID-19, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02964-8. Google Scholar
[30]	F. A. Rihan, C. Rajivganthi and P. Muthukumar, Fractional stochastic differential equations with Hilfer fractional derivative: Poisson jumps and optimal control, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2017 (2017), Art. ID 5394528, 11 pp. doi: 10.1155/2017/5394528. Google Scholar
[31]	T. Saha and M. Bandyopadhyay, Dynamical analysis of a delayed ratio-dependent prey–predator model within fluctuating environment, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 196 (2008), 458-478. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.06.017. Google Scholar
[32]	G. Tang, S. Tang and R. A. Cheke, Global analysis of a holling type II predator–prey model with a constant prey refuge, Nonlinear Dynamics, 76 (2014), 635-647. doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-1157-4. Google Scholar
[33]	D. A. Vasseuri and P. Yodzis, The color of environmental noise, Ecology, 85 (2004), 1146-1152. Google Scholar
[34]	V. Volterra, Variazioni e Fluttuazioni Del Numero D'individui in Specie Animali Conviventi, C. Ferrari, 1927. Google Scholar
[35]	X. Mao, C. Yuan and J. Zou, Stochastic differential delay equations of population dynamics, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 304 (2005), 296-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.09.027. Google Scholar
[36]	X. Zhao and Z. Zeng, Stationary distribution and extinction of a stochastic ratio-dependent predator–prey system with stage structure for the predator, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 545 (2020), 123310, 17 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123310. Google Scholar

Figure 1. Shows numerical simulations of deterministic DDEs (1) (left) and SDDEs (2) (right), when $ \tau_1 = 1.25 $, $ \tau_2 = 0.6 $ and $ \tau_3 = 0.5 $, with noise intensities $ \sigma_1^2 = 0.08 $, $ \sigma_2^2 = 0.1 $, $ \sigma_3^2 = 0.06 $, and parameter values: $ r_1 = 0.2 $, $ r_2 = 0.6 $, $ K_1 = 0.7 $, $ K_2 = 0.8 $, $ \alpha_1 = 0.3 $, $ \alpha_2 = 0.6 $, $ \alpha_3 = 0.8 $, $ \beta = 0.1 $, $ \delta = 0.8 $, $ a_1 = 1 $, $ a_2 = 1.4 $. For $ {\mathcal R}_0^s>1 $, the stochastic model has a unique ergodic stationary distribution $ \pi(.) $ of stochastic system (2)

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. Numerical simulations of deterministic DDEs (1) (left) and SDDEs (2) (right), with parameter values given in Example 2, with noise intensities: $ \sigma_1^2 = 0.03 $, $ \sigma_2^2 = 0.02 $ and $ \sigma_3^2 = 1.4 $. When $ {\mathcal R}_0^s<1 $, we can clearly see that the predator goes to extinct

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2, but with noise intensities $ \sigma_1^2 = 1.2 $, $ \sigma_2^2 = 1.2 $ and $ \sigma_3^2 = 0.5 $. When $ r_1<\frac{\sigma_1^2}{2} $, $ r_2<\frac{\sigma_2^2}{2} $ and $ {\mathcal R}_0^s<1 $, we can clearly see that all the species goes to extinct. A strong intensity of noise can be a cause for extinction of the prey species, which will also drive predator population to extinct">Figure 3. Shows numerical simulations of deterministic DDEs (1) (left) and SDDEs (2) (right), with the same parameter values of Figure 2, but with noise intensities $ \sigma_1^2 = 1.2 $, $ \sigma_2^2 = 1.2 $ and $ \sigma_3^2 = 0.5 $. When $ r_1<\frac{\sigma_1^2}{2} $, $ r_2<\frac{\sigma_2^2}{2} $ and $ {\mathcal R}_0^s<1 $, we can clearly see that all the species goes to extinct. A strong intensity of noise can be a cause for extinction of the prey species, which will also drive predator population to extinct

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 1, but with $ \tau_1 = 10 $, $ \tau_2 = 0.1 $ and $ \tau_3 = 0.1 $, under the noise intensities $ \sigma_1^2 = 0.2 $, $ \sigma_2^2 = 0.2 $ and $ \sigma_3^2 = 0.2 $. Clearly, time-delays can lead to Hopf-type bifurcations of deterministic systems">Figure 4. Numerical simulations of deterministic DDEs (1) (left) and SDDEs (2) (right), with parameter values of Figure 1, but with $ \tau_1 = 10 $, $ \tau_2 = 0.1 $ and $ \tau_3 = 0.1 $, under the noise intensities $ \sigma_1^2 = 0.2 $, $ \sigma_2^2 = 0.2 $ and $ \sigma_3^2 = 0.2 $. Clearly, time-delays can lead to Hopf-type bifurcations of deterministic systems

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 1, there is an explosion of population with deterministic model (left); While the noise prevent such explosion of the population (right)">Figure 5. Shows the effect of white noise to prevent the explosion of the population. When $ \beta = 0.5 $, with the same parameter values of Figure 1, there is an explosion of population with deterministic model (left); While the noise prevent such explosion of the population (right)

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1. One biological meaning for the parameters of model (2)

Parameters	Description
$ r_1 $, $ r_2 $	intrinsic growth rate for x and y
$ k_1 $, $ k_2 $	carrying capacity for x and y
$ \alpha_1 $, $ \alpha_2 $	rate of predation of preys x and y
$ \beta $	rate of cooperation of preys x and y against predator z
$ \delta $	Predator death rate
$ \alpha_3 $	rate of intra-species competition within the predators
$ a_1 $, $ a_2 $	transformation rate of predator to preys $ x $ and $ y $.

Table Options

Download as excel

Parameters	Description
$ r_1 $, $ r_2 $	intrinsic growth rate for x and y
$ k_1 $, $ k_2 $	carrying capacity for x and y
$ \alpha_1 $, $ \alpha_2 $	rate of predation of preys x and y
$ \beta $	rate of cooperation of preys x and y against predator z
$ \delta $	Predator death rate
$ \alpha_3 $	rate of intra-species competition within the predators
$ a_1 $, $ a_2 $	transformation rate of predator to preys $ x $ and $ y $.

[1]	Miljana JovanoviĆ, Marija KrstiĆ. Extinction in stochastic predator-prey population model with Allee effect on prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (7) : 2651-2667. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017129
[2]	Xiaoling Zou, Dejun Fan, Ke Wang. Stationary distribution and stochastic Hopf bifurcation for a predator-prey system with noises. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (5) : 1507-1519. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1507
[3]	Li Zu, Daqing Jiang, Donal O'Regan. Persistence and stationary distribution of a stochastic predator-prey model under regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (5) : 2881-2897. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017124
[4]	Isam Al-Darabsah, Xianhua Tang, Yuan Yuan. A prey-predator model with migrations and delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (3) : 737-761. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.737
[5]	Sampurna Sengupta, Pritha Das, Debasis Mukherjee. Stochastic non-autonomous Holling type-Ⅲ prey-predator model with predator's intra-specific competition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (8) : 3275-3296. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018244
[6]	Chengjun Guo, Chengxian Guo, Sameed Ahmed, Xinfeng Liu. Moment stability for nonlinear stochastic growth kinetics of breast cancer stem cells with time-delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (8) : 2473-2489. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016056
[7]	Kexin Wang. Influence of feedback controls on the global stability of a stochastic predator-prey model with Holling type Ⅱ response and infinite delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (5) : 1699-1714. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019247
[8]	Yanan Zhao, Yuguo Lin, Daqing Jiang, Xuerong Mao, Yong Li. Stationary distribution of stochastic SIRS epidemic model with standard incidence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2363-2378. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016051
[9]	Meng Liu, Chuanzhi Bai, Yi Jin. Population dynamical behavior of a two-predator one-prey stochastic model with time delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (5) : 2513-2538. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017108
[10]	Meng Zhao, Wan-Tong Li, Jia-Feng Cao. A prey-predator model with a free boundary and sign-changing coefficient in time-periodic environment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (9) : 3295-3316. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017138
[11]	R. P. Gupta, Peeyush Chandra, Malay Banerjee. Dynamical complexity of a prey-predator model with nonlinear predator harvesting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (2) : 423-443. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.423
[12]	Malay Banerjee, Nayana Mukherjee, Vitaly Volpert. Prey-predator model with nonlocal and global consumption in the prey dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (8) : 2109-2120. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020180
[13]	Gianni Gilioli, Sara Pasquali, Fabrizio Ruggeri. Nonlinear functional response parameter estimation in a stochastic predator-prey model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (1) : 75-96. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.75
[14]	Aniello Buonocore, Luigia Caputo, Enrica Pirozzi, Amelia G. Nobile. A non-autonomous stochastic predator-prey model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (2) : 167-188. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.167
[15]	Guirong Jiang, Qishao Lu. The dynamics of a Prey-Predator model with impulsive state feedback control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (6) : 1301-1320. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1301
[16]	Xinfu Chen, Yuanwei Qi, Mingxin Wang. Steady states of a strongly coupled prey-predator model. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 173-180. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.173
[17]	Kousuke Kuto, Yoshio Yamada. Coexistence states for a prey-predator model with cross-diffusion. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 536-545. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.536
[18]	Mingxin Wang, Peter Y. H. Pang. Qualitative analysis of a diffusive variable-territory prey-predator model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 23 (3) : 1061-1072. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.1061
[19]	Rui Xu, M.A.J. Chaplain, F.A. Davidson. Periodic solutions of a discrete nonautonomous Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with time delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (3) : 823-831. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.823
[20]	Guanqi Liu, Yuwen Wang. Stochastic spatiotemporal diffusive predator-prey systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (1) : 67-84. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018005

2020 Impact Factor: 2.425

Tools

Metrics

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 2.425

Tools

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 2.425

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

Tools

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Stochastic delay differential equations of three-species prey-predator system with cooperation among prey species

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Tools

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Other articles
by authors

Other articles
by authors