# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

November  2009, 3(4): 599-624. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.599

## Regularized D-bar method for the inverse conductivity problem

 1 Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 68 (Gustaf Hallstromin katu 2b) FI-00014 3 Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523,, United States 4 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Finland

Received  January 2009 Revised  September 2009 Published  October 2009

A strategy for regularizing the inversion procedure for the two-dimensional D-bar reconstruction algorithm based on the global uniqueness proof of Nachman [Ann. Math. 143 (1996)] for the ill-posed inverse conductivity problem is presented. The strategy utilizes truncation of the boundary integral equation and the scattering transform. It is shown that this leads to a bound on the error in the scattering transform and a stable reconstruction of the conductivity; an explicit rate of convergence in appropriate Banach spaces is derived as well. Numerical results are also included, demonstrating the convergence of the reconstructed conductivity to the true conductivity as the noise level tends to zero. The results provide a link between two traditions of inverse problems research: theory of regularization and inversion methods based on complex geometrical optics. Also, the procedure is a novel regularized imaging method for electrical impedance tomography.
Citation: Kim Knudsen, Matti Lassas, Jennifer L. Mueller, Samuli Siltanen. Regularized D-bar method for the inverse conductivity problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2009, 3 (4) : 599-624. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.599
 [1] Luca Rondi. On the regularization of the inverse conductivity problem with discontinuous conductivities. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (3) : 397-409. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.397 [2] Ye Zhang, Bernd Hofmann. Two new non-negativity preserving iterative regularization methods for ill-posed inverse problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (2) : 229-256. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020062 [3] Misha Perepelitsa. An ill-posed problem for the Navier-Stokes equations for compressible flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 26 (2) : 609-623. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.609 [4] Victor Isakov. On uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with local data. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2007, 1 (1) : 95-105. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.95 [5] Ke Zhang, Maokun Li, Fan Yang, Shenheng Xu, Aria Abubakar. Electrical impedance tomography with multiplicative regularization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (6) : 1139-1159. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019051 [6] Alfredo Lorenzi, Luca Lorenzi. A strongly ill-posed integrodifferential singular parabolic problem in the unit cube of $\mathbb{R}^n$. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (3) : 499-524. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.499 [7] Ville Kolehmainen, Matti Lassas, Petri Ola, Samuli Siltanen. Recovering boundary shape and conductivity in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 217-242. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.217 [8] Albert Clop, Daniel Faraco, Alberto Ruiz. Stability of Calderón's inverse conductivity problem in the plane for discontinuous conductivities. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2010, 4 (1) : 49-91. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2010.4.49 [9] Jie Chen, Maarten de Hoop. The inverse problem for electroseismic conversion: Stable recovery of the conductivity and the electrokinetic mobility parameter. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (3) : 641-658. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016015 [10] Sergiy Zhuk. Inverse problems for linear ill-posed differential-algebraic equations with uncertain parameters. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1467-1476. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1467 [11] Peter I. Kogut, Olha P. Kupenko. On optimal control problem for an ill-posed strongly nonlinear elliptic equation with $p$-Laplace operator and $L^1$-type of nonlinearity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (3) : 1273-1295. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019016 [12] Christodoulos E. Athanasiadis, Vassilios Sevroglou, Konstantinos I. Skourogiannis. The inverse electromagnetic scattering problem by a mixed impedance screen in chiral media. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 951-970. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.951 [13] Matthew A. Fury. Regularization for ill-posed inhomogeneous evolution problems in a Hilbert space. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 259-272. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.259 [14] Dong liu, Ville Kolehmainen, Samuli Siltanen, Anne-maria Laukkanen, Aku Seppänen. Estimation of conductivity changes in a region of interest with electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (1) : 211-229. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.211 [15] Gen Nakamura, Päivi Ronkanen, Samuli Siltanen, Kazumi Tanuma. Recovering conductivity at the boundary in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (2) : 485-510. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.485 [16] Fabrice Delbary, Rainer Kress. Electrical impedance tomography using a point electrode inverse scheme for complete electrode data. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (2) : 355-369. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.355 [17] Hiroshi Isozaki. Inverse boundary value problems in the horosphere - A link between hyperbolic geometry and electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2007, 1 (1) : 107-134. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.107 [18] Victor Isakov, Joseph Myers. On the inverse doping profile problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (3) : 465-486. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.465 [19] Felix Lucka, Katharina Proksch, Christoph Brune, Nicolai Bissantz, Martin Burger, Holger Dette, Frank Wübbeling. Risk estimators for choosing regularization parameters in ill-posed problems - properties and limitations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2018, 12 (5) : 1121-1155. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2018047 [20] Guozhi Dong, Bert Jüttler, Otmar Scherzer, Thomas Takacs. Convergence of Tikhonov regularization for solving ill-posed operator equations with solutions defined on surfaces. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (2) : 221-246. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017011

2020 Impact Factor: 1.639