# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

November  2015, 9(4): 1171-1191. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1171

## Iterative choice of the optimal regularization parameter in TV image restoration

 1 CREATIS, CNRS UMR 5220; INSERM U1044; INSA de Lyon; Université de Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, 69621, Villeurbanne Cedex, France, France, France

Received  June 2014 Revised  April 2015 Published  October 2015

We present iterative methods for choosing the optimal regularization parameter for linear inverse problems with Total Variation regularization. This approach is based on the Morozov discrepancy principle or on a damped version of this principle and on an approximating model function for the data term. The theoretical convergence of the method of choice of the regularization parameter is demonstrated. The choice of the optimal parameter is refined with a Newton method. The efficiency of the method is illustrated on deconvolution and super-resolution experiments on different types of images. Results are provided for different levels of blur, noise and loss of spatial resolution. The damped Morozov discrepancy principle often outerperforms the approaches based on the classical Morozov principle and on the Unbiased Predictive Risk Estimator. Moreover, the proposed methods are fast schemes to select the best parameter for TV regularization.
Citation: Alina Toma, Bruno Sixou, Françoise Peyrin. Iterative choice of the optimal regularization parameter in TV image restoration. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 1171-1191. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1171
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] You-Wei Wen, Raymond Honfu Chan. Using generalized cross validation to select regularization parameter for total variation regularization problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2018, 12 (5) : 1103-1120. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2018046 [2] J. Mead. $\chi^2$ test for total variation regularization parameter selection. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (3) : 401-421. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020019 [3] Juan Carlos De los Reyes, Estefanía Loayza-Romero. Total generalized variation regularization in data assimilation for Burgers' equation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (4) : 755-786. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019035 [4] Yuyuan Ouyang, Yunmei Chen, Ying Wu. Total variation and wavelet regularization of orientation distribution functions in diffusion MRI. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (2) : 565-583. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.565 [5] Gabriel Peyré, Sébastien Bougleux, Laurent Cohen. Non-local regularization of inverse problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (2) : 511-530. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.511 [6] Philipp Hungerländer, Barbara Kaltenbacher, Franz Rendl. Regularization of inverse problems via box constrained minimization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (3) : 437-461. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020021 [7] Bernadette N. Hahn. Dynamic linear inverse problems with moderate movements of the object: Ill-posedness and regularization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (2) : 395-413. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.395 [8] Raymond H. Chan, Haixia Liang, Suhua Wei, Mila Nikolova, Xue-Cheng Tai. High-order total variation regularization approach for axially symmetric object tomography from a single radiograph. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (1) : 55-77. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.55 [9] Abhishake Rastogi. Tikhonov regularization with oversmoothing penalty for nonlinear statistical inverse problems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (8) : 4111-4126. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020183 [10] Kha Van Huynh, Barbara Kaltenbacher. Some application examples of minimization based formulations of inverse problems and their regularization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (3) : 415-443. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020074 [11] Matteo Negri. Crack propagation by a regularization of the principle of local symmetry. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (1) : 147-165. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.147 [12] Vinicius Albani, Adriano De Cezaro. A connection between uniqueness of minimizers in Tikhonov-type regularization and Morozov-like discrepancy principles. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (1) : 211-229. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019012 [13] Armin Lechleiter, Marcel Rennoch. Non-linear Tikhonov regularization in Banach spaces for inverse scattering from anisotropic penetrable media. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (1) : 151-176. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017008 [14] Bruno Sixou, Cyril Mory. Kullback-Leibler residual and regularization for inverse problems with noisy data and noisy operator. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (5) : 1113-1137. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019050 [15] Ye Zhang, Bernd Hofmann. Two new non-negativity preserving iterative regularization methods for ill-posed inverse problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (2) : 229-256. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020062 [16] Thorsten Hohage, Mihaela Pricop. Nonlinear Tikhonov regularization in Hilbert scales for inverse boundary value problems with random noise. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (2) : 271-290. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.271 [17] Luca Rondi. On the regularization of the inverse conductivity problem with discontinuous conductivities. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (3) : 397-409. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.397 [18] Frank Pörner, Daniel Wachsmuth. Tikhonov regularization of optimal control problems governed by semi-linear partial differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 315-335. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018013 [19] Xiangtuan Xiong, Jinmei Li, Jin Wen. Some novel linear regularization methods for a deblurring problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (2) : 403-426. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017019 [20] Vinicius Albani, Adriano De Cezaro, Jorge P. Zubelli. On the choice of the Tikhonov regularization parameter and the discretization level: A discrepancy-based strategy. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (1) : 1-25. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016.10.1

2020 Impact Factor: 1.639