Extended sampling method for interior inverse scattering problems

Previous Article
Saturation-Value Total Variation model for chromatic aberration correction
IPI Home
This Issue
Next Article
Reconstruction of the derivative of the conductivity at the boundary

August 2020, 14(4): 719-731. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020033

Extended sampling method for interior inverse scattering problems

College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

^* Corresponding author: fzeng@cqu.edu.cn

Received September 2019 Revised February 2020 Published May 2020

We consider an interior inverse scattering problem of reconstructing the shape of a cavity. The measurements are the scattered fields on a curve inside the cavity due to only one point source. In this paper, we employ the extending sampling method to reconstruct the cavity based on limited data. Numerical examples are provided to show the effectiveness of the method.

Keywords: Inverse scattering problem, interior measurements, extended sampling method, single point source, reference cavities.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 45Q05, 65N20, 74J20.

Citation: Fang Zeng. Extended sampling method for interior inverse scattering problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (4) : 719-731. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020033

References:

[1]	F. Cakoni and D. Colton, A Qualitative Approach to Inverse Scattering Theory, Springer, New York, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8827-9. Google Scholar
[2]	F. Cakoni, D. Colton and S. Meng, The inverse scattering problem for a penetrable cavity with internal measurements, Contemp. Math., 615 (2014), 71-88. doi: 10.1090/conm/615/12246. Google Scholar
[3]	D. L. Colton and R. Kress, Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1983. Google Scholar
[4]	D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, 2$^{nd}$ edition, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 93, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03537-5. Google Scholar
[5]	J. Elschner and G. Hu, Global uniqueness in determining polygonal periodic structures with a minimal number of incident plane waves, Inverse Problems, 26 (2010), 115002, 23 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/11/115002. Google Scholar
[6]	J. Liu, X. Liu and J. Sun, Extended sampling method for inverse elastic scattering problems using one incident wave, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 12 (2019), 874-892. doi: 10.1137/19M1237788. Google Scholar
[7]	S. Meng, H. Haddar and F. Cakoni, The factorization method for a cavity in an inhomogeneous medium, Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 045008, 20 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/4/045008. Google Scholar
[8]	Y. Hu, F. Cakoni and J. Liu, The inverse scattering problem for a partially coated cavity with interior measurements, Appl. Anal., 93 (2013), 936-956. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2013.801458. Google Scholar
[9]	G. Hu and X. Liu, Unique determination of balls and polyhedral scatterers with a single point source wave, Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 065010, 14 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/6/065010. Google Scholar
[10]	P. Jakubik and R. Potthast, Testing the integrity of some cavity – the Cauchy problem and the range test, Appl. Numer. Math., 58 (2008), 899-914. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2007.04.007. Google Scholar
[11]	X. Liu, The factorization method for cavities, Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 015006, 18 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/1/015006. Google Scholar
[12]	J. Liu and J. Sun, Extended sampling method in inverse scattering, Inverse Problems, 34 (2018), 085007, 17 pp. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/aaca90. Google Scholar
[13]	P. Li and Y. Wang, Near-field imaging of interior cavities, Commun. Comput. Phys., 17 (2015), 542-563. doi: 10.4208/cicp.010414.250914a. Google Scholar
[14]	H.-H. Qin and F. Cakoni, Nonlinear integral equations for shape reconstruction in the inverse interior scattering problem, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 035005, 17 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/27/3/035005. Google Scholar
[15]	H.-H. Qin and D. Colton, The inverse scattering problem for cavities, Appl. Numer. Math., 62 (2012), 699-708. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2010.10.011. Google Scholar
[16]	H.-H. Qin and D. Colton, The inverse scattering problem for cavities with impedance boundary condition, Adv. Comput. Math., 36 (2012), 157-174. doi: 10.1007/s10444-011-9179-2. Google Scholar
[17]	H.-H. Qin and X. Liu, The interior inverse scattering problem for cavities with an artificial obstacle, Appl. Numer. Math., 88 (2015), 18-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2014.10.002. Google Scholar
[18]	Y. Sun, Y. Guo and F. Ma, The reciprocity gap functional method for the inverse scattering problem for cavities, Appl. Anal., 95 (2016), 1327-1346. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2015.1064519. Google Scholar
[19]	F. Zeng, F. Cakoni and J. Sun, An inverse electromagnetic scattering problem for a cavity, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 125002, 17 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/27/12/125002. Google Scholar
[20]	F. Zeng, P. Suarez and J. Sun, A decomposition method for an interior inverse scattering problem, Inverse Probl. and Imaging, 7 (2013), 291-303. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.291. Google Scholar
[21]	F. Zeng, X. Liu, J. Sun and L. Xu, The reciprocity gap method for a cavity in an inhomogeneous medium, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 10 (2016), 855-868. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016024. Google Scholar
[22]	F. Zeng, X. Liu, J. Sun and L. Xu, Reciprocity gap method for an interior inverse scattering problem, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 25 (2017), 57-68. doi: 10.1515/jiip-2015-0064. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	F. Cakoni and D. Colton, A Qualitative Approach to Inverse Scattering Theory, Springer, New York, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8827-9. Google Scholar
[2]	F. Cakoni, D. Colton and S. Meng, The inverse scattering problem for a penetrable cavity with internal measurements, Contemp. Math., 615 (2014), 71-88. doi: 10.1090/conm/615/12246. Google Scholar
[3]	D. L. Colton and R. Kress, Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1983. Google Scholar
[4]	D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, 2$^{nd}$ edition, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 93, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03537-5. Google Scholar
[5]	J. Elschner and G. Hu, Global uniqueness in determining polygonal periodic structures with a minimal number of incident plane waves, Inverse Problems, 26 (2010), 115002, 23 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/11/115002. Google Scholar
[6]	J. Liu, X. Liu and J. Sun, Extended sampling method for inverse elastic scattering problems using one incident wave, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 12 (2019), 874-892. doi: 10.1137/19M1237788. Google Scholar
[7]	S. Meng, H. Haddar and F. Cakoni, The factorization method for a cavity in an inhomogeneous medium, Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 045008, 20 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/4/045008. Google Scholar
[8]	Y. Hu, F. Cakoni and J. Liu, The inverse scattering problem for a partially coated cavity with interior measurements, Appl. Anal., 93 (2013), 936-956. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2013.801458. Google Scholar
[9]	G. Hu and X. Liu, Unique determination of balls and polyhedral scatterers with a single point source wave, Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 065010, 14 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/6/065010. Google Scholar
[10]	P. Jakubik and R. Potthast, Testing the integrity of some cavity – the Cauchy problem and the range test, Appl. Numer. Math., 58 (2008), 899-914. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2007.04.007. Google Scholar
[11]	X. Liu, The factorization method for cavities, Inverse Problems, 30 (2014), 015006, 18 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/1/015006. Google Scholar
[12]	J. Liu and J. Sun, Extended sampling method in inverse scattering, Inverse Problems, 34 (2018), 085007, 17 pp. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/aaca90. Google Scholar
[13]	P. Li and Y. Wang, Near-field imaging of interior cavities, Commun. Comput. Phys., 17 (2015), 542-563. doi: 10.4208/cicp.010414.250914a. Google Scholar
[14]	H.-H. Qin and F. Cakoni, Nonlinear integral equations for shape reconstruction in the inverse interior scattering problem, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 035005, 17 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/27/3/035005. Google Scholar
[15]	H.-H. Qin and D. Colton, The inverse scattering problem for cavities, Appl. Numer. Math., 62 (2012), 699-708. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2010.10.011. Google Scholar
[16]	H.-H. Qin and D. Colton, The inverse scattering problem for cavities with impedance boundary condition, Adv. Comput. Math., 36 (2012), 157-174. doi: 10.1007/s10444-011-9179-2. Google Scholar
[17]	H.-H. Qin and X. Liu, The interior inverse scattering problem for cavities with an artificial obstacle, Appl. Numer. Math., 88 (2015), 18-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2014.10.002. Google Scholar
[18]	Y. Sun, Y. Guo and F. Ma, The reciprocity gap functional method for the inverse scattering problem for cavities, Appl. Anal., 95 (2016), 1327-1346. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2015.1064519. Google Scholar
[19]	F. Zeng, F. Cakoni and J. Sun, An inverse electromagnetic scattering problem for a cavity, Inverse Problems, 27 (2011), 125002, 17 pp. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/27/12/125002. Google Scholar
[20]	F. Zeng, P. Suarez and J. Sun, A decomposition method for an interior inverse scattering problem, Inverse Probl. and Imaging, 7 (2013), 291-303. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.291. Google Scholar
[21]	F. Zeng, X. Liu, J. Sun and L. Xu, The reciprocity gap method for a cavity in an inhomogeneous medium, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 10 (2016), 855-868. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016024. Google Scholar
[22]	F. Zeng, X. Liu, J. Sun and L. Xu, Reciprocity gap method for an interior inverse scattering problem, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 25 (2017), 57-68. doi: 10.1515/jiip-2015-0064. Google Scholar

Figure 1. Explicative figure. Relative location of the reference cavities $ B_z $ and $ D $

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. Explicative figure. The reference cavities $ B_z $ marked with different sampling points $ z $ along different (left side) or same (right side) polar angle direction

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 13. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 14. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $ (left) and $ I_2(z) $ (right). Exact boundary $ \partial D $, measurement location $ C $ and point source $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 15. The contour plots of the indicator functions $ I_1(z) $. Exact boundaries $ \partial D $, measurement locations $ C $ and point sources $ x_0 $ are shown in red

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]	Weishi Yin, Jiawei Ge, Pinchao Meng, Fuheng Qu. A neural network method for the inverse scattering problem of impenetrable cavities. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (2) : 1123-1142. doi: 10.3934/era.2020062
[2]	Fang Zeng, Pablo Suarez, Jiguang Sun. A decomposition method for an interior inverse scattering problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 291-303. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.291
[3]	Jingzhi Li, Jun Zou. A direct sampling method for inverse scattering using far-field data. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (3) : 757-775. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.757
[4]	Jianliang Li, Jiaqing Yang, Bo Zhang. A linear sampling method for inverse acoustic scattering by a locally rough interface. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (5) : 1247-1267. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021036
[5]	Jun Lai, Ming Li, Peijun Li, Wei Li. A fast direct imaging method for the inverse obstacle scattering problem with nonlinear point scatterers. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2018, 12 (3) : 635-665. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2018027
[6]	Brian Sleeman. The inverse acoustic obstacle scattering problem and its interior dual. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2009, 3 (2) : 211-229. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.211
[7]	Guanghui Hu, Andrea Mantile, Mourad Sini, Tao Yin. Direct and inverse time-harmonic elastic scattering from point-like and extended obstacles. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1025-1056. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020054
[8]	Peijun Li, Ganghua Yuan. Increasing stability for the inverse source scattering problem with multi-frequencies. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (4) : 745-759. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017035
[9]	Amin Boumenir, Vu Kim Tuan, Nguyen Hoang. The recovery of a parabolic equation from measurements at a single point. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (2) : 197-216. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018010
[10]	Lekbir Afraites, Chorouk Masnaoui, Mourad Nachaoui. Shape optimization method for an inverse geometric source problem and stability at critical shape. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021006
[11]	Masaru Ikehata. The enclosure method for inverse obstacle scattering using a single electromagnetic wave in time domain. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (1) : 131-163. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016.10.131
[12]	Alexey Penenko. Convergence analysis of the adjoint ensemble method in inverse source problems for advection-diffusion-reaction models with image-type measurements. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (5) : 757-782. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020035
[13]	Andreas Kirsch, Albert Ruiz. The Factorization Method for an inverse fluid-solid interaction scattering problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (4) : 681-695. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.681
[14]	Jiangfeng Huang, Zhiliang Deng, Liwei Xu. A Bayesian level set method for an inverse medium scattering problem in acoustics. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (5) : 1077-1097. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021029
[15]	De-Han Chen, Daijun Jiang, Irwin Yousept, Jun Zou. Variational source conditions for inverse Robin and flux problems by partial measurements. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021050
[16]	Peter Monk, Virginia Selgas. Sampling type methods for an inverse waveguide problem. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (4) : 709-747. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.709
[17]	Deyue Zhang, Yukun Guo, Fenglin Sun, Hongyu Liu. Unique determinations in inverse scattering problems with phaseless near-field measurements. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (3) : 569-582. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020026
[18]	Mourad Sini, Nguyen Trung Thành. Inverse acoustic obstacle scattering problems using multifrequency measurements. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (4) : 749-773. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.749
[19]	Michael V. Klibanov, Dinh-Liem Nguyen, Loc H. Nguyen, Hui Liu. A globally convergent numerical method for a 3D coefficient inverse problem with a single measurement of multi-frequency data. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2018, 12 (2) : 493-523. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2018021
[20]	Zhousheng Ruan, Sen Zhang, Sican Xiong. Solving an inverse source problem for a time fractional diffusion equation by a modified quasi-boundary value method. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (4) : 669-682. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018032

2020 Impact Factor: 1.639

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Fang Zeng
on Google Scholar
Fang Zeng

2020 Impact Factor: 1.639

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 1.639

Tools

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 1.639

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

on AIMS
Fang Zeng
on Google Scholar
Fang Zeng

[Back to Top]