American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2019, 6(1): 69-94. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019003

Convergence of a generalized Weighted Flow Algorithm for stochastic particle coagulation

Lee DeVille 1, , Nicole Riemer 2, and  Matthew West 3,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1409 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
2. 

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1301 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
3. 

Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1206 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

Published  March 2019

We introduce a general family of Weighted Flow Algorithms for simulating particle coagulation, generate a method to optimally tune these methods, and prove their consistency and convergence under general assumptions. These methods are especially effective when the size distribution of the particle population spans many orders of magnitude, or in cases where the concentration of those particles that significantly drive the population evolution is small relative to the background density. We also present a family of simulations demonstrating the efficacy of the method.

Keywords: Stochastic simulation, Martingales, particle coagulation, Smoluchowski equation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65C35, 60K35; Secondary: 60J28.
Citation: Lee DeVille, Nicole Riemer, Matthew West. Convergence of a generalized Weighted Flow Algorithm for stochastic particle coagulation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2019, 6 (1) : 69-94. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019003
References:
[1]

H. Babovsky, On a Monte Carlo scheme for Smoluchowski's coagulation equation, Monte Carlo Methods and Appl., 5 (1999), 1-18.  doi: 10.1515/mcma.1999.5.1.1.  Google Scholar

[2]

K. V Beard, Terminal velocity and shape of cloud and precipitation drops aloft, J. Atmos. Sci., 33 (1976), 851-864.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0851:TVASOC>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Bott, A flux method for the numerical solution of the stochastic collection equation, J. Atmos. Sci., 55 (1998), 2284-2293.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<2284:AFMFTN>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[4]

J. H. Curtis, M. D. Michelotti, N. Riemer, M. Heath and M. West, Accelerated simulation of stochastic particle removal processes in particle-resolved aerosol models, J. Comput. Phys., 322 (2016), 21-32.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.029.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. H. A. Davis, Markov Models and Optimization, Chapman and Hall, Boundary Row, London, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4483-2.  Google Scholar

[6]

E. Debry, B. Sportisse and B. Jourdain, A stochastic approach for the numerical simulation of the general dynamics equations for aerosols, J. Comput. Phys., 184 (2003), 649-669.  doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00041-4.  Google Scholar

[7]

L. DeVille, N. Riemer and M. West, Weighted flow algorithms (WFA) for stochastic particle coagulation, J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), 8427-8451.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.027.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. L. Doob, Stochastic Processes, Wiley Classics Library. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1990. ISBN 0-471-52369-0. Reprint of the 1953 original, A Wiley-Interscience Publication.  Google Scholar

[9]

Y. Efendiev and M. R. Zachariah, Hybrid Monte Carlo method for simulation of two-component aerosol coagulation and phase segregation, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 249 (2002), 30-43.  doi: 10.1006/jcis.2001.8114.  Google Scholar

[10]

Y. Efendiev, H. Struchtrup, M. Luskin and M. R. Zachariah, A hybrid sectional-moment model for coagulation and phase segregation in binary liquid nanodroplets, J. Nanopart. Res., 4 (2002), 61-72.  doi: 10.1023/A:1020122403428.  Google Scholar

[11]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, An efficient stochastic algorithm for studying coagulation dynamics and gelation phenomena, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 22 (2000), 802-821.  doi: 10.1137/S1064827599353488.  Google Scholar

[12]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, Approximative solution of the coagulation-fragmentation equation by stochastic particle systems, Stochastic Anal. Appl., 18 (2000), 921-948.  doi: 10.1080/07362990008809704.  Google Scholar

[13]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, Stochastic particle approximations for Smoluchoski's coagulation equation, Ann. Appl. Probab., 11 (2001), 1137-1165.  doi: 10.1214/aoap/1015345398.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, Stochastic interacting particle systems and nonlinear kinetic equations, Ann. Appl. Probab., 13 (2003), 845-889.  doi: 10.1214/aoap/1060202829.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. T. Gillespie, The stochastic coalescence model for cloud droplet growth, J. Atmos. Sci., 29 (1972), 1496-1510.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1496:TSCMFC>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[16]

D. T. Gillespie, An exact method for numerically simulating the stochastic coalescence process in a cloud, J. Atmos. Sci., 32 (1975), 1977-1989.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1977:AEMFNS>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[17]

D. T. Gillespie, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, J. Comput. Phys., 22 (1976), 403-434.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-3.  Google Scholar

[18]

D. T. Gillespie, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions, J. Phys. Chem., 81 (1977), 2340-2361.  doi: 10.1021/j100540a008.  Google Scholar

[19] D. T. Gillespie, Markov Processes: An Introduction for Physical Scientists, Academic Press, 1992.   Google Scholar
[20]

W. D. Hall, A detailed microphysical model within a two-dimensional dynamic framework: Model description and preliminary results, J. Atmos. Sci., 37 (1980), 2486-2507.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2486:ADMMWA>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[21]

L. E. Hatch, J. M. Creamean, A. P. Ault, J. D. Surratt, M. N. Chan, J. H. Seinfeld, E. S. Edgerton, Y. Su and K. A. Prather, Measurements of isoprene-derived organosulfates in ambient aerosols by aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry-part 1: Single particle atmospheric observations in Atlanta, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45 (2011), 5105-5111.  doi: 10.1021/es103944a.  Google Scholar

[22]

L. M. Hildemann, G. R. Markowski, M. C. Jones and G. R. Cass, Submicrometer aerosol mass distributions of emissions from boilers, fireplaces, automobiles, diesel trucks, and meat-cooking operations, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 14 (1991), 138-152.  doi: 10.1080/02786829108959478.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Hughes, J. K. Kodros, J. R. Pierce, M. West and N. Riemer, Machine learning to predict the global distribution of aerosol mixing state metrics, Atmosphere, 9 (2018), 15. doi: 10.3390/atmos9010015.  Google Scholar

[24]

R. Irizarry, Fast Monte Carlo methodology for multivariate particulate systems-Ⅰ: Point ensemble Monte Carlo, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63 (2008), 95-110.  doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.007.  Google Scholar

[25]

R. Irizarry, Fast Monte Carlo methodology for multivariate particulate systems-Ⅱ: $\tau$-PEMC, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63 (2008), 111-121.  doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.006.  Google Scholar

[26] M. Z. Jacobson, Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling, Cambridge University Press, 2005.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165389.  Google Scholar
[27]

M. Z. Jacobson, R. P. Turco, E. J. Jensen and O. B. Toon, Modeling coagulation among particles of different composition and size, Atmos. Environ., 28 (1994), 1327-1338.  doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)90280-1.  Google Scholar

[28]

A. Kolodko and K. Sabelfeld, Stochastic particle methods for Smoluchowski coagulation equation: Variance reduction and error estimations, Monte Carlo Methods Appl., 9 (2003), 315-339.  doi: 10.1515/156939603322601950.  Google Scholar

[29]

A. B. Kostinski and R. A. Shaw, Fluctuations and luck in droplet growth by coalescence, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86 (2005), 235-244.  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-86-2-235.  Google Scholar

[30]

G. Kotalczyk and F. E. Kruis, A Monte Carlo method for the simulation of coagulation and nucleation based on weighted particles and the concepts of stochastic resolution and merging, J. Comput. Phys., 340 (2017), 276-296.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.03.041.  Google Scholar

[31]

T. G. Kurtz, Strong approximation theorems for density dependent Markov chains, Stochastic Processes Appl., 6 (1977/78), 223-240.  doi: 10.1016/0304-4149(78)90020-0.  Google Scholar

[32]

A. Maisels, F. E. Kruis and H. Fissan, Direct simulation Monte Carlo for simultaneous nucleation, coagulation, and surface growth in dispersed systems, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59 (2004), 2231-2239.  doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.02.015.  Google Scholar

[33]

R. McGraw and D. L. Wright, Chemically resolved aersol dynamics for internal mixtures by the quadrature method of moments, J. Aerosol Sci., 34 (2003), 189-209.  doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00157-X.  Google Scholar

[34]

B. Øksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations, Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, sixth edition, 2003. ISBN 3-540-04758-1. An introduction with applications. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14394-6.  Google Scholar

[35]

R. I. A. Patterson, W. Wagner and M. Kraft, Stochastic weighted particle methods for population balance equations, J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), 7456-7472.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.06.011.  Google Scholar

[36]

A. Petzold, J. A. Ogren, M. Fiebig, P. Laj, S.-M. Li, U. Baltensperger, T. Holzer-Popp, S. Kinne, G. Pappalardo, N. Sugimoto and et al., Recommendations for reporting "black carbon" measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13 (2013), 8365-8379.  doi: 10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013.  Google Scholar

[37]

X. Qin, K. A. Pratt, L. G. Shields, S. M. Toner and K. A. Prather, Seasonal comparisons of single-particle chemical mixing state in Riverside, CA, Atmos. Environ., 59 (2012), 587-596.  doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.032.  Google Scholar

[38]

N. Riemer, H. Vogel, B. Vogel and F. Fiedler, Modeling aerosols on the mesoscale $\gamma$, part Ⅰ: Treatment of soot aerosol and its radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 108 (2003), 4601. doi: 10.1029/2003JD003448.  Google Scholar

[39]

N. Riemer, M. West, R. A. Zaveri and R. C. Easter, Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle-resolved aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., (2009), D09202. doi: 10.1029/2008JD011073.  Google Scholar

[40]

J. H. Seinfeld and S. Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Wiley, 2016. Google Scholar

[41]

S. Shima, K. Kusano, A. Kawano, T. Sugiyama and S. Kawahara, The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 135 (2009), 1307-1320.  doi: 10.1002/qj.441.  Google Scholar

[42]

A. Shwartz and A. Weiss, Large Deviations for Performance Analysis, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.  Google Scholar

[43]

J. Tian, N. Riemer, M. West, L. Pfaffenberger, H. Schlager and A. Petzold, Modeling the evolution of aerosol particles in a ship plume using PartMC-MOSAIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14 (2014), 5327-5347.  doi: 10.5194/acp-14-5327-2014.  Google Scholar

[44]

C. G. Wells and M. Kraft, Direct simulation and mass flow stochastic algorithms to solve a sintering-coagulation equation, Monte Carlo Methods Appl., 11 (2005), 175-197.  doi: 10.1515/156939605777585980.  Google Scholar

[45]

M. West, N. Riemer, J. Curtis, M. Michelotti and J. Tian, PartMC: Particle-resolved Monte-Carlo atmospheric aerosol simulation, version 2.5.0, 2018. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1490925.  Google Scholar

[46]

C. Yoon and R. McGraw, Representation of generally mixed multivariate aerosols by the quadrature method of moments: Ⅱ. Aerosol dynamics, J. Aerosol Sci., 35 (2004), 577-598.  doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.11.012.  Google Scholar

[47]

H. Zhao and C. Zheng, Correcting the Multi-Monte Carlo Method for particle coagulation, Powder Technol., 193 (2009), 120-123.  doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.01.019.  Google Scholar

[48]

H. Zhao, C. Zheng and M. Xu, Multi-Monte Carlo Method for coagulation and condensation/evaporation in dispersed systems, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 286 (2005), 195-208.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.12.037.  Google Scholar

[49]

H. Zhao, F. E. Kruis and C. Zheng, Reducing statistical noise and extending the size spectrum by applying weighted simulation particles in Monte Carlo simulation of coagulation, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43 (2009), 781-793.  doi: 10.1080/02786820902939708.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

H. Babovsky, On a Monte Carlo scheme for Smoluchowski's coagulation equation, Monte Carlo Methods and Appl., 5 (1999), 1-18.  doi: 10.1515/mcma.1999.5.1.1.  Google Scholar

[2]

K. V Beard, Terminal velocity and shape of cloud and precipitation drops aloft, J. Atmos. Sci., 33 (1976), 851-864.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0851:TVASOC>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Bott, A flux method for the numerical solution of the stochastic collection equation, J. Atmos. Sci., 55 (1998), 2284-2293.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<2284:AFMFTN>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[4]

J. H. Curtis, M. D. Michelotti, N. Riemer, M. Heath and M. West, Accelerated simulation of stochastic particle removal processes in particle-resolved aerosol models, J. Comput. Phys., 322 (2016), 21-32.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.029.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. H. A. Davis, Markov Models and Optimization, Chapman and Hall, Boundary Row, London, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4483-2.  Google Scholar

[6]

E. Debry, B. Sportisse and B. Jourdain, A stochastic approach for the numerical simulation of the general dynamics equations for aerosols, J. Comput. Phys., 184 (2003), 649-669.  doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00041-4.  Google Scholar

[7]

L. DeVille, N. Riemer and M. West, Weighted flow algorithms (WFA) for stochastic particle coagulation, J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), 8427-8451.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.027.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. L. Doob, Stochastic Processes, Wiley Classics Library. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1990. ISBN 0-471-52369-0. Reprint of the 1953 original, A Wiley-Interscience Publication.  Google Scholar

[9]

Y. Efendiev and M. R. Zachariah, Hybrid Monte Carlo method for simulation of two-component aerosol coagulation and phase segregation, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 249 (2002), 30-43.  doi: 10.1006/jcis.2001.8114.  Google Scholar

[10]

Y. Efendiev, H. Struchtrup, M. Luskin and M. R. Zachariah, A hybrid sectional-moment model for coagulation and phase segregation in binary liquid nanodroplets, J. Nanopart. Res., 4 (2002), 61-72.  doi: 10.1023/A:1020122403428.  Google Scholar

[11]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, An efficient stochastic algorithm for studying coagulation dynamics and gelation phenomena, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 22 (2000), 802-821.  doi: 10.1137/S1064827599353488.  Google Scholar

[12]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, Approximative solution of the coagulation-fragmentation equation by stochastic particle systems, Stochastic Anal. Appl., 18 (2000), 921-948.  doi: 10.1080/07362990008809704.  Google Scholar

[13]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, Stochastic particle approximations for Smoluchoski's coagulation equation, Ann. Appl. Probab., 11 (2001), 1137-1165.  doi: 10.1214/aoap/1015345398.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. Eibeck and W. Wagner, Stochastic interacting particle systems and nonlinear kinetic equations, Ann. Appl. Probab., 13 (2003), 845-889.  doi: 10.1214/aoap/1060202829.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. T. Gillespie, The stochastic coalescence model for cloud droplet growth, J. Atmos. Sci., 29 (1972), 1496-1510.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1496:TSCMFC>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[16]

D. T. Gillespie, An exact method for numerically simulating the stochastic coalescence process in a cloud, J. Atmos. Sci., 32 (1975), 1977-1989.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1977:AEMFNS>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[17]

D. T. Gillespie, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, J. Comput. Phys., 22 (1976), 403-434.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-3.  Google Scholar

[18]

D. T. Gillespie, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions, J. Phys. Chem., 81 (1977), 2340-2361.  doi: 10.1021/j100540a008.  Google Scholar

[19] D. T. Gillespie, Markov Processes: An Introduction for Physical Scientists, Academic Press, 1992.   Google Scholar
[20]

W. D. Hall, A detailed microphysical model within a two-dimensional dynamic framework: Model description and preliminary results, J. Atmos. Sci., 37 (1980), 2486-2507.  doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2486:ADMMWA>2.0.CO;2.  Google Scholar

[21]

L. E. Hatch, J. M. Creamean, A. P. Ault, J. D. Surratt, M. N. Chan, J. H. Seinfeld, E. S. Edgerton, Y. Su and K. A. Prather, Measurements of isoprene-derived organosulfates in ambient aerosols by aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry-part 1: Single particle atmospheric observations in Atlanta, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45 (2011), 5105-5111.  doi: 10.1021/es103944a.  Google Scholar

[22]

L. M. Hildemann, G. R. Markowski, M. C. Jones and G. R. Cass, Submicrometer aerosol mass distributions of emissions from boilers, fireplaces, automobiles, diesel trucks, and meat-cooking operations, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 14 (1991), 138-152.  doi: 10.1080/02786829108959478.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Hughes, J. K. Kodros, J. R. Pierce, M. West and N. Riemer, Machine learning to predict the global distribution of aerosol mixing state metrics, Atmosphere, 9 (2018), 15. doi: 10.3390/atmos9010015.  Google Scholar

[24]

R. Irizarry, Fast Monte Carlo methodology for multivariate particulate systems-Ⅰ: Point ensemble Monte Carlo, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63 (2008), 95-110.  doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.007.  Google Scholar

[25]

R. Irizarry, Fast Monte Carlo methodology for multivariate particulate systems-Ⅱ: $\tau$-PEMC, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63 (2008), 111-121.  doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.006.  Google Scholar

[26] M. Z. Jacobson, Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling, Cambridge University Press, 2005.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165389.  Google Scholar
[27]

M. Z. Jacobson, R. P. Turco, E. J. Jensen and O. B. Toon, Modeling coagulation among particles of different composition and size, Atmos. Environ., 28 (1994), 1327-1338.  doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)90280-1.  Google Scholar

[28]

A. Kolodko and K. Sabelfeld, Stochastic particle methods for Smoluchowski coagulation equation: Variance reduction and error estimations, Monte Carlo Methods Appl., 9 (2003), 315-339.  doi: 10.1515/156939603322601950.  Google Scholar

[29]

A. B. Kostinski and R. A. Shaw, Fluctuations and luck in droplet growth by coalescence, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86 (2005), 235-244.  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-86-2-235.  Google Scholar

[30]

G. Kotalczyk and F. E. Kruis, A Monte Carlo method for the simulation of coagulation and nucleation based on weighted particles and the concepts of stochastic resolution and merging, J. Comput. Phys., 340 (2017), 276-296.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.03.041.  Google Scholar

[31]

T. G. Kurtz, Strong approximation theorems for density dependent Markov chains, Stochastic Processes Appl., 6 (1977/78), 223-240.  doi: 10.1016/0304-4149(78)90020-0.  Google Scholar

[32]

A. Maisels, F. E. Kruis and H. Fissan, Direct simulation Monte Carlo for simultaneous nucleation, coagulation, and surface growth in dispersed systems, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59 (2004), 2231-2239.  doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.02.015.  Google Scholar

[33]

R. McGraw and D. L. Wright, Chemically resolved aersol dynamics for internal mixtures by the quadrature method of moments, J. Aerosol Sci., 34 (2003), 189-209.  doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00157-X.  Google Scholar

[34]

B. Øksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations, Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, sixth edition, 2003. ISBN 3-540-04758-1. An introduction with applications. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14394-6.  Google Scholar

[35]

R. I. A. Patterson, W. Wagner and M. Kraft, Stochastic weighted particle methods for population balance equations, J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), 7456-7472.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.06.011.  Google Scholar

[36]

A. Petzold, J. A. Ogren, M. Fiebig, P. Laj, S.-M. Li, U. Baltensperger, T. Holzer-Popp, S. Kinne, G. Pappalardo, N. Sugimoto and et al., Recommendations for reporting "black carbon" measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13 (2013), 8365-8379.  doi: 10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013.  Google Scholar

[37]

X. Qin, K. A. Pratt, L. G. Shields, S. M. Toner and K. A. Prather, Seasonal comparisons of single-particle chemical mixing state in Riverside, CA, Atmos. Environ., 59 (2012), 587-596.  doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.032.  Google Scholar

[38]

N. Riemer, H. Vogel, B. Vogel and F. Fiedler, Modeling aerosols on the mesoscale $\gamma$, part Ⅰ: Treatment of soot aerosol and its radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 108 (2003), 4601. doi: 10.1029/2003JD003448.  Google Scholar

[39]

N. Riemer, M. West, R. A. Zaveri and R. C. Easter, Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle-resolved aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., (2009), D09202. doi: 10.1029/2008JD011073.  Google Scholar

[40]

J. H. Seinfeld and S. Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Wiley, 2016. Google Scholar

[41]

S. Shima, K. Kusano, A. Kawano, T. Sugiyama and S. Kawahara, The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 135 (2009), 1307-1320.  doi: 10.1002/qj.441.  Google Scholar

[42]

A. Shwartz and A. Weiss, Large Deviations for Performance Analysis, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.  Google Scholar

[43]

J. Tian, N. Riemer, M. West, L. Pfaffenberger, H. Schlager and A. Petzold, Modeling the evolution of aerosol particles in a ship plume using PartMC-MOSAIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14 (2014), 5327-5347.  doi: 10.5194/acp-14-5327-2014.  Google Scholar

[44]

C. G. Wells and M. Kraft, Direct simulation and mass flow stochastic algorithms to solve a sintering-coagulation equation, Monte Carlo Methods Appl., 11 (2005), 175-197.  doi: 10.1515/156939605777585980.  Google Scholar

[45]

M. West, N. Riemer, J. Curtis, M. Michelotti and J. Tian, PartMC: Particle-resolved Monte-Carlo atmospheric aerosol simulation, version 2.5.0, 2018. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1490925.  Google Scholar

[46]

C. Yoon and R. McGraw, Representation of generally mixed multivariate aerosols by the quadrature method of moments: Ⅱ. Aerosol dynamics, J. Aerosol Sci., 35 (2004), 577-598.  doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.11.012.  Google Scholar

[47]

H. Zhao and C. Zheng, Correcting the Multi-Monte Carlo Method for particle coagulation, Powder Technol., 193 (2009), 120-123.  doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.01.019.  Google Scholar

[48]

H. Zhao, C. Zheng and M. Xu, Multi-Monte Carlo Method for coagulation and condensation/evaporation in dispersed systems, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 286 (2005), 195-208.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.12.037.  Google Scholar

[49]

H. Zhao, F. E. Kruis and C. Zheng, Reducing statistical noise and extending the size spectrum by applying weighted simulation particles in Monte Carlo simulation of coagulation, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43 (2009), 781-793.  doi: 10.1080/02786820902939708.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Size distributions for two particle sub-populations using the scheme described in Section 6.1 with $ N_{\rm p} = 10^3 $ particles. Top: equal weightings for both distributions. Bottom: equal computational number for each distribution. The points are the mean of the particle process, while the error bars show 95% spread of realizations, not confidence intervals for the mean. The solid lines are very accurate finite-volume solutions. Using an equal-number rather than equal-weight weighting reduces sub-population 2 expected error by about 17 times, with an increase in sub-population 1 expected error of only about 1.4 times
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Errors for two particle sub-populations for varying number of particles $ N_{\rm p} $. The weight ratio $ r = w^1/w^2 $ is $ 1 $, $ 10 $, $ 10^2 $, $ 10^3 $, $ 10^4 $, $ 10^5 $, and $ 10^6 $, moving from upper-left to down and to the right on each line. The circle points correspond to equal weights for both sub-populations (top panel in Figure 1), while the square points correspond to equal numbers of computational particles for each sub-population (bottom panel in Figure 1). Error bars are not shown as they are visually negligible
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Convergence of the size distribution using the weighting scheme from Section 6.1 for different weight ratios $ r $ for the distribution of group $ a = 1 $ particles and group $ a = 2 $ particles. The baseline for computing the error is a very accurate finite-volume solution $ n_{\rm fv} $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Size distributions (left column: number, right column: mass) for a sedimentation kernel computed using three different weighting schemes and $ N_{\rm p} = 10^3 $ particles. Top row: flat weighting. Center row: inverse-mass weighting. Bottom row: Combined flat-and-inverse-mass weighting as described in Section 6.2. The blue and red circles show the particle solution at times $ t = 0 $ and $ t = 10\rm\ min $, respectively, while the solid lines are very accurate finite-volume solutions. Observe that the combined weighting scheme accurately captures both the number and mass size distributions
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Number and mass errors for the sedimentation simulations described in Section 6.2 shown in Figure 4 for varying number of particles $ N_{\rm p} $. The solid lines show size-weighted simulations with varying weight exponent $ \alpha \in \{0, -1, -2, -3\} $ (ordered from top to bottom). The filled circles are combined flat-and-inverse-mass weighted simulations
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Convergence of the number and mass size distribution using the weighting scheme from Section 6.2 for different weight exponents $ \alpha $ and for the combined weighting. The baseline for computing the error is a very accurate finite-volume solution with number distribution $ n_{\rm fv} $ and mass distribution $ m_{\rm fv} $. The exponents $ \alpha = -1 $ and $ \alpha = -2 $ have similar behavior (not plotted)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Size distributions (left column: number, right column: mass) for a Brownian kernel simulation with two particle classes (blue and red), with the same parameters as in Figure 1. Top row: flat size weighting ($ \alpha = 0 $) with equal weights in each class ($ r = 1 $). Second row: flat size weighting ($ \alpha = 0 $) with equal number in each class ($ r = 10^3 $). Third row: combined $ \alpha = 0 $ and $ \alpha = -3 $ size weighting with equal weights in each class ($ r = 1 $). Bottom row: combined $ \alpha = 0 $ and $ \alpha = -3 $ size weighting with equal number in each class ($ r = 10^3 $)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Notation and variable ranges
Variables Meaning Range
$ a,b,c,d $ physical particle class $ \mathbb{M} = \{1,2,3,\ldots,M\} $
$ \alpha,\beta,\gamma $ event outcomes $ \{0,1\} $
$ e $ basis vector $ \mathbb{M} \times \mathbb{N}_1 \to \mathbb{Z} $
$ i,j,k $ physical particle size $ \mathbb{N}_1 = \{1,2,3,\ldots\} $
$ K $ coagulation kernel $ [0,\infty) $
$ \lambda $ event rate $ [0,\infty) $
$ N $ physical number concentration $ [0,\infty) $
$ N_{\rm p} $ total number of computational particles $ \mathbb{N}_0 = \{0,1,2,\ldots\} $
$ p $ probability $ [0,1] $
$ q,Q $ number of computational particles $ \mathbb{N}_0 = \{0,1,2,\ldots\} $
$ \rho $ event rate $ [0,\infty) $
$ T $ selection rate function $ [0,\infty) $
$ V $ computational volume $ (0,\infty) $
$ w $ weighting function $ (0,\infty) $
$ x,X $ physical particle concentration $ [0,\infty) $
$ y,Y $ computational particle concentration $ [0,\infty) $
$ \zeta $ event jump $ \mathbb{M} \times \mathbb{N}_1 \to \mathbb{Z} $
Table Options

Download as excel

Variables Meaning Range
$ a,b,c,d $ physical particle class $ \mathbb{M} = \{1,2,3,\ldots,M\} $
$ \alpha,\beta,\gamma $ event outcomes $ \{0,1\} $
$ e $ basis vector $ \mathbb{M} \times \mathbb{N}_1 \to \mathbb{Z} $
$ i,j,k $ physical particle size $ \mathbb{N}_1 = \{1,2,3,\ldots\} $
$ K $ coagulation kernel $ [0,\infty) $
$ \lambda $ event rate $ [0,\infty) $
$ N $ physical number concentration $ [0,\infty) $
$ N_{\rm p} $ total number of computational particles $ \mathbb{N}_0 = \{0,1,2,\ldots\} $
$ p $ probability $ [0,1] $
$ q,Q $ number of computational particles $ \mathbb{N}_0 = \{0,1,2,\ldots\} $
$ \rho $ event rate $ [0,\infty) $
$ T $ selection rate function $ [0,\infty) $
$ V $ computational volume $ (0,\infty) $
$ w $ weighting function $ (0,\infty) $
$ x,X $ physical particle concentration $ [0,\infty) $
$ y,Y $ computational particle concentration $ [0,\infty) $
$ \zeta $ event jump $ \mathbb{M} \times \mathbb{N}_1 \to \mathbb{Z} $
[1]

Siyang Cai, Yongmei Cai, Xuerong Mao. A stochastic differential equation SIS epidemic model with regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020317
[2]

Reza Chaharpashlou, Abdon Atangana, Reza Saadati. On the fuzzy stability results for fractional stochastic Volterra integral equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020432
[3]

Shang Wu, Pengfei Xu, Jianhua Huang, Wei Yan. Ergodicity of stochastic damped Ostrovsky equation driven by white noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1615-1626. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020175
[4]

Tetsuya Ishiwata, Young Chol Yang. Numerical and mathematical analysis of blow-up problems for a stochastic differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 909-918. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020391
[5]

Leanne Dong. Random attractors for stochastic Navier-Stokes equation on a 2D rotating sphere with stable Lévy noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020352
[6]

Michal Beneš, Pavel Eichler, Jakub Klinkovský, Miroslav Kolář, Jakub Solovský, Pavel Strachota, Alexandr Žák. Numerical simulation of fluidization for application in oxyfuel combustion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 769-783. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020232
[7]

Editorial Office. Retraction: Xiao-Qian Jiang and Lun-Chuan Zhang, A pricing option approach based on backward stochastic differential equation theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 969-969. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019065
[8]

Linhao Xu, Marya Claire Zdechlik, Melissa C. Smith, Min B. Rayamajhi, Don L. DeAngelis, Bo Zhang. Simulation of post-hurricane impact on invasive species with biological control management. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 4059-4071. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020038
[9]

Riadh Chteoui, Abdulrahman F. Aljohani, Anouar Ben Mabrouk. Classification and simulation of chaotic behaviour of the solutions of a mixed nonlinear Schrödinger system. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2021002
[10]

Jean-Paul Chehab. Damping, stabilization, and numerical filtering for the modeling and the simulation of time dependent PDEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021002
[11]

Omid Nikan, Seyedeh Mahboubeh Molavi-Arabshai, Hossein Jafari. Numerical simulation of the nonlinear fractional regularized long-wave model arising in ion acoustic plasma waves. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020466
[12]

Zhenzhen Wang, Tianshou Zhou. Asymptotic behaviors and stochastic traveling waves in stochastic Fisher-KPP equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020323
[13]

Ténan Yeo. Stochastic and deterministic SIS patch model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021012
[14]

Lorenzo Zambotti. A brief and personal history of stochastic partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 471-487. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020264
[15]

Jing Qin, Shuang Li, Deanna Needell, Anna Ma, Rachel Grotheer, Chenxi Huang, Natalie Durgin. Stochastic greedy algorithms for multiple measurement vectors. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (1) : 79-107. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020066
[16]

Marc Homs-Dones. A generalization of the Babbage functional equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (2) : 899-919. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020303
[17]

Xuhui Peng, Rangrang Zhang. Approximations of stochastic 3D tamed Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5337-5365. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020241
[18]

Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi. A new methodology for solving bi-criterion fractional stochastic programming. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/naco.2020054
[19]

Yueyang Zheng, Jingtao Shi. A stackelberg game of backward stochastic differential equations with partial information. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020047
[20]

Giuseppina Guatteri, Federica Masiero. Stochastic maximum principle for problems with delay with dependence on the past through general measures. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020048

 Impact Factor: 

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (123)
  • HTML views (992)
  • Cited by (2)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences