Free mobility of capital and Labor force in a two-country model: The dynamic game for growth

${author.authorNameEn}; ${author.authorNameEn}; ${author.authorNameEn}; ${author.authorNameEn}

doi:10.3934/jdg.2019013

Article Contents

2019, Volume 6, Issue 3: 179-194. Doi: 10.3934/jdg.2019013

This issue Previous Article Next Article Cooperative dynamic advertising via state-dependent payoff weights

Free mobility of capital and Labor force in a two-country model: The dynamic game for growth

^1, ,,
^2,,
^3, and
^4,

1.
Facultad de Economía UASLP, Av. Pintores S7N, San Luis Potosí, CP 78280, México
2.
DESP University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy and Research member at UAdeC, México
3.
Ministry of Economy and Finance, Italy
4.
School of Public Administration, Universiry of Gothemburg, Sweden

^* Corresponding author: Elvio Accinelli
^* Corresponding author: Elvio Accinelli

Received: November 30, 2018

Published: August 2019

The authors would like to thank Alejandro Neme as well as an anonymous referee for their useful comments and suggestions to improve this work. Opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure(2) Related Papers Cited by

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a two-country and two-sector economy, where firms can choose to be innovative or not innovative, and workers to be skilled or unskilled. Using a dynamic game, we argue that exploiting the comparative advantages a country has in producing goods that use the most abundant factor of production, free mobility of capital and labor is beneficial for economic growth. However, if a country has a comparative advantage in a sector that uses intensely unskilled labor (which is the case of several underdeveloped economies), a poverty trap may arise. For this reason we argue that national Governments must ensure the technological development to improve competitiveness and therefore a social optimal use of the comparative advantages.

Keywords:

Mathematics Subject Classification: C70, C73, F12, F16, F20, F42, O30.

Citation:

Full Text(HTML)

Figure 1. Two countries each one with two specialized industries

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. A country in poverty trap

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Related Papers

Cited by

References

[1]	E. Accinelli, B. Bazzano, F. Robledo and P. Romero, Nash Equilibrium in Evolutionary Competitive Models of Firms and workers, Journal of Dynamics and Games., 2 (2015), 1-32. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2015.2.1.
[2]	E. Accinelli and E. Sánchez Carrera, Strategic complementarities between innovative firms and skilled workers: The poverty trap and the policymaker's intervention, Structural Change Economic Dynamics, 22 (2011), 30-40.
[3]	E. Accinelli, J. G. Brida and E. Sánchez Carrera, Imitative behavior in a two-population model in advances in dynamic games, Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, (2010).
[4]	T. Agémon, Who gets what: The MNE, the national state and the distributional effects of globalization, Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (2003), 416-427.
[5]	H. Fofack, Technology Trap And Poverty Trap In Sub-Saharan Africa, Policy Research Working Papers, 2008.
[6]	R. Gibbons and L. Katz, Does unmeasured ability explain inter-industry wage differentials, The Review of Economic Studies, 59 (1992), 515-535.
[7]	J. R. Harris and M. P. Todaro, (1970), Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis, The American Economic Review, 60 (1992), 126-142.
[8]	A. S. Herbert, A behavioral model of rational choice, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1955), 99-118.
[9]	A. B. Krueger and L. H. Summers, Efficiency wages and the inter-industry wage structure, Econometrica, 56 (1988), 259-293.
[10]	K. A. Lawler and H. Seddighi, International Economics: Theories, Themes, and Debates, Pearson Education, 2001.
[11]	B. Ohlin, Interregional and International Trade, Harvard University press, 1933.
[12]	D. Ricardo, On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1 ed.), London: John Murray, 1817.
[13]	A. Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 1 (1 ed.), London: W. Strahan, 1776, Retrieved 2012-12-07, volume 2.
[14]	Y.-C. Wang and P. Wang, Barriers to Health and the Poverty Trap, NBER Working paper, 2013.