Improving E. Cartan considerations on the invariance of nonholonomic mechanics

${author.authorNameEn}; ${author.authorNameEn}

doi:10.3934/jgm.2019022

Article Contents

2019, Volume 11, Issue 3: 439-446. Doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019022

This issue Previous Article Relative periodic solutions of the

$ n $

-vortex problem on the sphere Next Article

Improving E. Cartan considerations on the invariance of nonholonomic mechanics

^1,2, and
^3,

1.
Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Center for Mathematical Analysis, Geometry and Dynamical Systems, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
2.
Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Rua do Matão, 1010, 05508-090 São Paulo, Brazil
3.
Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Departamento de Matemática, Rua do Matão, 1010, 05508-090 São Paulo, Brazil

Received: January 31, 2019

Published: August 2019

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Related Papers Cited by

Abstract

This paper concerns an intrinsic formulation of nonholonomic mechanics. Our point of departure is the paper [6], by Koiller et al., revisiting E. Cartan's address at the International Congress of Mathematics held in 1928 at Bologna, Italy ([3]). Two notions of equivalence for nonholonomic mechanical systems $ ( {\mathsf{{M}}}, {{\mathsf{{g}}}}, {\mathscr{D}}) $ are introduced and studied. According to [6], the notions of equivalence considered in this paper coincide. A counterexample is presented here showing that this coincidence is not always true.

Keywords:

Nonholonomic systems,
Cartan's equivalence method.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37J60, 70F25; Secondary: 70G45.

Citation:

FullText(HTML)

Related Papers

Cited by

References

[1]	A. Bakša, The geometrization of the motion of certain nonholonomic systems, Mat. Vesnik, 12 (1975), 233-240.
[2]	D. I. Barrett, R. Biggs, C. C. Remsing and O. Rossi, Invariant nonholonomic Riemannian structures on three-dimensional Lie groups, J. Geom. Mech., 8 (2016), 139-167. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016001.
[3]	É. Cartan, Sur la represéntation géométrique des systmes matériels non holonomes, in Proc Int Congr Math, 4, Bologna, 1928, 253–261.
[4]	V. Dragović and B. Gajić, The Wagner curvature tensor in nonholonomic mechanics, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 8 (2003), 105-123. doi: 10.1070/RD2003v008n01ABEH000229.
[5]	K. Ehlers and J. Koiller, Cartan meets Chaplygin, Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 46 (2019), 15-46. doi: 10.2298/TAM190116006E.
[6]	J. Koiller, P. R. Rodrigues and P. Pitanga, Non-holonomic connections following Élie Cartan, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Cincias, 73 (2001), 165–190, http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652001000200003&nrm=iso. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652001000200003.
[7]	W. M. Oliva, Geometric Mechanics, vol. 1798 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 2002. doi: 10.1007/b84214.
[8]	J. N. Tavares, About Cartan geometrization of non-holonomic mechanics, J. Geom. Phys., 45 (2003), 1-23. doi: 10.1016/S0393-0440(02)00118-3.
[9]	G. Terra, The parallel derivative, Revista Matemática Contemporânea, 29 (2005), 157-170.