# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

September  2020, 12(3): 455-505. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020021

## Angular momentum coupling, Dirac oscillators, and quantum band rearrangements in the presence of momentum reversal symmetries

 1 Department of Applied Mathematics and Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan 2 Department of Physics, Université du Littoral——Côte d'Opale, 59140 Dunkerque, France

* Corresponding author: Boris I. Zhilinskií

Dedicated to James Montaldi

Received  September 2019 Revised  February 2020 Published  July 2020

We investigate the elementary rearrangements of energy bands in slow-fast one-parameter families of systems whose fast subsystem possesses a half-integer spin. Beginning with a simple case without any time-reversal symmetries, we analyze and compare increasingly sophisticated model Hamiltonians with these symmetries. The models are inspired by the time-reversal modification of the Berry phase setup which uses a family of quadratic spin-quadrupole Hamiltonians of Mead [Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 161–164 (1987)] and Avron et al [Commun. Math. Phys. 124(4), 595–627 (1989)]. An explicit correspondence between the typical quantum energy level patterns in the energy band rearrangements of the finite particle systems with compact slow phase space and those of the Dirac oscillator is found in the limit of linearization near the conical degeneracy point of the semi-quantum eigenvalues.

Citation: Toshihiro Iwai, Dmitrií A. Sadovskií, Boris I. Zhilinskií. Angular momentum coupling, Dirac oscillators, and quantum band rearrangements in the presence of momentum reversal symmetries. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020, 12 (3) : 455-505. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020021
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Spectrum of the Dirac oscillator with $S = \frac12$ as function of formal control parameter $\mu$. The energies of the bulk states (blue and green) and of the edge state (red) are given by (13)
Correlation diagram of the deformed spin-orbit system with spin $S = \frac12$ and $N\gg S$ as function of formal coupling control parameter $\gamma$. Bold solid lines represent the energies of the bulk states (blue and green) and the edge state (red). When the value of $\gamma$ varies, one single state (edge) changes bands, while all other states (bulk) remain within the same band
Spectrum of the $N,S = \frac12$ system (two coupled angular momenta of conserved lengths) with Hamiltonian $\hat{H}_\gamma$ (22) as function of parameter $\gamma$ (scaled magnetic field strength). Green and red solid lines represent the "bulk" states of the lower and upper band (multiplet); blue solid line marks the energy of the single "edge" state redistributed at $\gamma = \frac12$
Correlation diagram of the deformed spin-orbit system with Hamiltonian (29), spin $S = \frac12$, and $N\gg S$ as function of formal coupling control parameter $\gamma$. In comparison to the diagram in fig. 4, the domain of $\gamma$ is extended from $[0,1]$ to $[-1,1]$; the $\gamma>0$ parts of both diagrams are identical. The value $0$ of $\gamma$ corresponds to the uncoupled system (two bands of equal number of states), while the values $-1$ and $+1$ correspond to the coupled spin-orbit system with negative and positive coupling Hamiltonian (2). Bold solid lines represent the energies of the bulk states (blue and green) and the edge states (red). When the value of $\gamma$ varies, two single states (edge) change bands, while all other states (bulk) remain within the same bands
Correlation diagram of the spin-orbit system with the conjectured ${\mathcal{T}}$-equivariant deformation, spin $S = \frac12$, and $N\gg S$ as function of formal coupling control parameter $\alpha$. In comparison to the diagram in fig. 2, the $[-\frac12,\frac12]$ part of the domain of $\gamma$ is shrunk to $0$, while the endpoints of the two diagrams are identical. There is no uncoupled system, the values $-1$ and $+1$ of $\alpha$ correspond to the coupled spin-orbit system with isotropic negative and positive coupling Hamiltonian (2). Bold solid lines represent the energies of the bulk states (blue and green) and one Kramers doublet edge state (red)
Spectrum of the $N,S = \frac12$ system (two coupled angular momenta of conserved lengths) with ${\mathcal{T}}$-invariant Hamiltonian (31) as function of scaled spin-orbit coupling parameter $\alpha$. Each solid line represents a Kramers doublet quantum state. Energies of the bulk states (red and green solid lines) are given by (34), while the solid blue line represents the edge state. Dotted lines indicate critical values of the semi-quantum energies (33)
Spectrum of the system with Hamiltonian (36b) obtained as linearization of ${\mathcal{T}}$-reversal ${\boldsymbol{{N}}}{\boldsymbol{{S}}}$, $S = \frac12$ Hamiltonian (32) for coupling parameter $\alpha\in[-1,1]$. Compare to fig. 1 and 6. The bulk state energies (red and green lines) are given by (39)
Correlation diagram for the quadratic dynamical spin-quadrupole system in sec. 2.3.2 with the conjectured ${\mathcal{T}}_S\times {\mathcal{T}}_N$-equivariant deformation in sec. 5, spin $S = \frac32$, and $N\gg S$ as function of formal control parameter $\alpha$ of the isotropic quadrupolar coupling term (18). The values $\pm1$ of $\alpha$ correspond to the coupled system with Hamiltonian (18) times $\pm1$. Bold solid lines represent the energies of the bulk states (blue and green) and of the two Kramers doublet edge states (red) exchanged in opposite directions. Unlike the indices $c_1$ in fig. 2 and 4 which can be computed in the standard way for the $\Lambda_{1,2}$ bundles on ${\mathbb{S}}^2_N$ (see sec. 1.2 and 2.1), the values of $c_1$ in this diagram are conjectured so that they agree with the number of states in each band. See text for more detail
Spectrum of the Kramers degenerate ${\mathcal{T}}_N\times {\mathcal{T}}_S$-invariant axially symmetric system of coupled angular momenta ${\boldsymbol{{S}}}$ (fast) and ${\boldsymbol{{N}}}$ (slow) of conserved lengths $S = \frac32$ and $N = 5$ with Hamiltonian (40) as function of the "quaternionic" spin-orbit coupling parameter $\alpha_0$. Solid color lines represent quantum Kramers doublet states. Specifically, the bulk state energies are depicted in blue and green, while red and purple correspond to the two edge state doublets. For the end values $\pm1$ of $\alpha_0$, the levels within each band reassemble visibly into multiplets with conserved length $J$ of the total angular momentum ${\boldsymbol{{N}}}+{\boldsymbol{{S}}}$ and the respective values of $J$ are marked along the left and right vertical axes, cf. sec. 2.3.3. The edge states are distinguished by the conserved value of $J_1$ displayed near the $\alpha_0 = -1$ end of the plot. The boundaries of the lightly shaded semi-quantum energy domains (gray lines) are given by (42) where $N_1$ takes one of the critical values $\{N,0\}$ and with $N$ replaced by $N_{\rm classical} = N+\frac12$
Joint spectrum of the ${{\varepsilon}}$-term of the quadratic spin-orbit Hamiltonian (40) and $\hat{J}_1$. The values of spin $S = \frac32$ and slow angular momentum $N = 5$ correspond to fig. 9. Bold solid bars represent the bulk states (blue and green) and two Kramers doublet edge states (red). Above the energy-momentum diagram, we show the composition of the two multiplets in each superband of the spectrum of the isotropic term in sec. 2.3.3. Red arrows indicate which of the subbands takes in the particular edge states, see proposition 1
Circles $C_{\rho}$ and $C_r$ of respective radii $\rho$ and $r$ form the boundary of the annulus $W_{\rho,r}$, and $C_{\rho}$ is also the boundary of disk $D_{\rho}$
Base spaces ${\mathbb{R}}^2_\mu$ and ${\mathbb{S}}^2_r$ of the $\Lambda_\pm$ and $\Delta_\pm$ eigenvector bundles, respectively, in the parameter space ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ of the Dirac oscillator (sec. 2.2). The spaces intersect on the ${\mathbb{S}}^1$ circle $C_{\!\rho}$ involved in the Chern index calculus, see sec. A.4 for details, and compare to fig 11
 [1] Felix Finster, Jürg Fröhlich, Marco Oppio, Claudio F. Paganini. Causal fermion systems and the ETH approach to quantum theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020451 [2] José Luis López. A quantum approach to Keller-Segel dynamics via a dissipative nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020376 [3] Gökhan Mutlu. On the quotient quantum graph with respect to the regular representation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020295 [4] Yi-Long Luo, Yangjun Ma. Low Mach number limit for the compressible inertial Qian-Sheng model of liquid crystals: Convergence for classical solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (2) : 921-966. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020304 [5] Xiuli Xu, Xueke Pu. Optimal convergence rates of the magnetohydrodynamic model for quantum plasmas with potential force. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 987-1010. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020150 [6] Qian Liu, Shuang Liu, King-Yeung Lam. Asymptotic spreading of interacting species with multiple fronts Ⅰ: A geometric optics approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3683-3714. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020050 [7] João Vitor da Silva, Hernán Vivas. Sharp regularity for degenerate obstacle type problems: A geometric approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (3) : 1359-1385. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020321 [8] Thabet Abdeljawad, Mohammad Esmael Samei. Applying quantum calculus for the existence of solution of $q$-integro-differential equations with three criteria. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020440 [9] Pedro Branco. A post-quantum UC-commitment scheme in the global random oracle model from code-based assumptions. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021, 15 (1) : 113-130. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020046 [10] Angelica Pachon, Federico Polito, Costantino Ricciuti. On discrete-time semi-Markov processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1499-1529. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020170 [11] Yangjian Sun, Changjian Liu. The Poincaré bifurcation of a SD oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1565-1577. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020173 [12] Reza Lotfi, Zahra Yadegari, Seyed Hossein Hosseini, Amir Hossein Khameneh, Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. A robust time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study for a bridge construction project. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020158 [13] Manuel del Pino, Monica Musso, Juncheng Wei, Yifu Zhou. Type Ⅱ finite time blow-up for the energy critical heat equation in $\mathbb{R}^4$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3327-3355. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020052 [14] Thomas Bartsch, Tian Xu. Strongly localized semiclassical states for nonlinear Dirac equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 29-60. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020297 [15] Lingyu Li, Jianfu Yang, Jinge Yang. Solutions to Chern-Simons-Schrödinger systems with external potential. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021008 [16] Qianqian Han, Xiao-Song Yang. Qualitative analysis of a generalized Nosé-Hoover oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020346 [17] Mikhail I. Belishev, Sergey A. Simonov. A canonical model of the one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system with boundary control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021003 [18] Shuang Chen, Jinqiao Duan, Ji Li. Effective reduction of a three-dimensional circadian oscillator model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020349 [19] Yancong Xu, Lijun Wei, Xiaoyu Jiang, Zirui Zhu. Complex dynamics of a SIRS epidemic model with the influence of hospital bed number. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021016 [20] Xiaoxiao Li, Yingjing Shi, Rui Li, Shida Cao. Energy management method for an unpowered landing. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020180

2019 Impact Factor: 0.649