American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    A derivative-free method for linearly constrained nonsmooth optimization
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Convergence of optimal values of quadratic penalty problems for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints
July  2006, 2(3): 297-318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.297

The impact of alternative performance measures on single-period inventory policy

Alexander O. Brown 1, and  Christopher S. Tang 2,

1. 

Xilinx Inc., United States
2. 

The Anderson School, UCLA, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States

Received  August 2004 Revised  July 2005 Published  July 2006

While many firms and researchers have developed various supply chain solutions, there are many underlying reasons why these solutions have not been adopted in practice. Some key reasons, as articulated by Lee and Billington (1992), include organizational barriers, coordination challenges among marketing, manufacturing, and logistics, technical challenges in the area of information systems, as well as conflicting supply chain performance metrics. Other key reasons are due to alternative performance measures besides total expected relevant cost, which include sales target, product substitution, product clearance, sales per square foot, etc. In order to understand how these alternative performance measures affect the supply chain solution, we make an initial attempt to analyze how alternative measures would affect the simplest form of inventory policy, namely, the newsvendor solution. To identify various alternative measures and to explore how such order decisions are made, we conducted a simple experiment by giving a single-period inventory problem to 250 MBA students and 6 professional buyers who order fashion items. We observed that both groups select their order quantities less than the newsvendor solution and made their ordering decisions based on various specific performance metrics besides total expected cost. These observations have motivated us to analyze how these performance metrics would affect the ordering decision. Our analysis indicates that, under these performance metrics, it is rational for the decision maker to order less than the newsvendor solution.
Keywords: performance measures., Supply chain management.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37C35; Secondary: 34C25, 37C25, 28D05, 34C3.
Citation: Alexander O. Brown, Christopher S. Tang. The impact of alternative performance measures on single-period inventory policy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (3) : 297-318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.297
[1]

Juliang Zhang, Jian Chen. Information sharing in a make-to-stock supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 1169-1189. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.1169
[2]

Benrong Zheng, Xianpei Hong. Effects of take-back legislation on pricing and coordination in a closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021035
[3]

Reza Lotfi, Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi, Mir Saman Pishvaee, Ahmad Sadeghieh, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. A robust optimization model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at risk. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 221-253. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020023
[4]

Christopher Bose, Rua Murray. Minimum 'energy' approximations of invariant measures for nonsingular transformations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (3) : 597-615. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.597
[5]

Manfred Einsiedler, Elon Lindenstrauss. On measures invariant under diagonalizable actions: the Rank-One case and the general Low-Entropy method. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (1) : 83-128. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.83
[6]

Wen-Bin Yang, Yan-Ling Li, Jianhua Wu, Hai-Xia Li. Dynamics of a food chain model with ratio-dependent and modified Leslie-Gower functional responses. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (7) : 2269-2290. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.2269

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (112)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (43)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences