# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Pricing credit derivatives under a correlated regime-switching hazard processes model
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Queue length analysis of a Markov-modulated vacation queue with dependent arrival and service processes and exhaustive service policy
July  2017, 13(3): 1383-1394. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016078

## Inertial accelerated algorithms for solving a split feasibility problem

 1 School of Management, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia

* Corresponding author:Yazheng Dang. The reviewing process of the paper was handled by Changzhi Wu as a Guest Editor

Received  February 2015 Published  October 2016

Inspired by the inertial proximal algorithms for finding a zero of a maximal monotone operator, in this paper, we propose two inertial accelerated algorithms to solve the split feasibility problem. One is an inertial relaxed-CQ algorithm constructed by applying inertial technique to a relaxed-CQ algorithm, the other is a modified inertial relaxed-CQ algorithm which combines the KM method with the inertial relaxed-CQ algorithm. We prove their asymptotical convergence under some suitable conditions. Numerical results are reported to show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

Citation: Yazheng Dang, Jie Sun, Honglei Xu. Inertial accelerated algorithms for solving a split feasibility problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1383-1394. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016078
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The numerical results of example 5.1
 Initiative point R-Iter Iner-R-Iter $x^{0}=(3.2, 4.2, 5.2)$ $k=74; s =0.068$ $k=5; s=0.016$ $x^{1}=(-0.5843,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.6200, 1.6180, 1.6216)$ $x^{\ast}=(-1.1281, 1.0720, 1.9694)$ $2.3078, 3.3435)$ $x^{0}=(10, 0, 10)$ $k=93; s =0.090$ $k=84; s=0.085$ $x^{1}=(2.0825,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9000, -1.7152, 1.7074)$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.1061, -1.4514, 2.1596)$ $-2.5275, 6.4589)$ $x^{0}=(2, -5, 2)$ $k=73; s =0.075$ $k=35; s =0.035$ $x^{1}=(1.3327,$ $x^{\ast}=(1.1512, -2.7679;1.8616)$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9010, -2.1029, 1.8169)$ $-3.2657, 1.9328)$
 Initiative point R-Iter Iner-R-Iter $x^{0}=(3.2, 4.2, 5.2)$ $k=74; s =0.068$ $k=5; s=0.016$ $x^{1}=(-0.5843,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.6200, 1.6180, 1.6216)$ $x^{\ast}=(-1.1281, 1.0720, 1.9694)$ $2.3078, 3.3435)$ $x^{0}=(10, 0, 10)$ $k=93; s =0.090$ $k=84; s=0.085$ $x^{1}=(2.0825,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9000, -1.7152, 1.7074)$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.1061, -1.4514, 2.1596)$ $-2.5275, 6.4589)$ $x^{0}=(2, -5, 2)$ $k=73; s =0.075$ $k=35; s =0.035$ $x^{1}=(1.3327,$ $x^{\ast}=(1.1512, -2.7679;1.8616)$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9010, -2.1029, 1.8169)$ $-3.2657, 1.9328)$
The numerical results of example 5.1
 Initiative point $\alpha_{k}$ Iner-KM-R-Iter $x^{0}=(3.2, 4.2, 5.2)$ 0.4 $k=3; s=0.016$ $x^{1}=(-0.5843, 2.3078, 3.3435)$ $x^{\ast}=(-2.6931, 1.2534, 2.2937)$ 0.8 $k=3; s= 0.013$ $x^{\ast}=(-2.6828, 1.2585, 2.2835)$ $x^{0}=(10, 0, 10)$ 0.4 $k=76; s =0.086$ $x^{1}=(2.0825, -2.5275, 6.4589)$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.1346, -2.6392, 2.3046)$ 0.8 $k= 74; s=0.085$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0799, -2.6190, 2.3611)$ $x^{0}=(2, -5, 2)$ 0.6 $k=62; s =0.056$ $x^{1}=(1.3327, -3.2657, 1.9328)$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9006, -2.1031, 1.8171)$ 0.8 $k=45; s= 0.046$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9008, -2.1030, 1.8170)$
 Initiative point $\alpha_{k}$ Iner-KM-R-Iter $x^{0}=(3.2, 4.2, 5.2)$ 0.4 $k=3; s=0.016$ $x^{1}=(-0.5843, 2.3078, 3.3435)$ $x^{\ast}=(-2.6931, 1.2534, 2.2937)$ 0.8 $k=3; s= 0.013$ $x^{\ast}=(-2.6828, 1.2585, 2.2835)$ $x^{0}=(10, 0, 10)$ 0.4 $k=76; s =0.086$ $x^{1}=(2.0825, -2.5275, 6.4589)$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.1346, -2.6392, 2.3046)$ 0.8 $k= 74; s=0.085$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0799, -2.6190, 2.3611)$ $x^{0}=(2, -5, 2)$ 0.6 $k=62; s =0.056$ $x^{1}=(1.3327, -3.2657, 1.9328)$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9006, -2.1031, 1.8171)$ 0.8 $k=45; s= 0.046$ $x^{\ast}=(0.9008, -2.1030, 1.8170)$
The numerical results of example 5.2
 Initiative point R-Iter Iner-R-Iter $x^{0}=(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$ $k=15$; s $=0.675$ $k=5$; s $=0.018$ $x^{1}=(-0.0092, 0,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0208, 0,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.0015, 0,$ $-0.0132, -0.0026, -0.0092)$ $-0.0297, -0.0059, -0.0208)$ $-0.0412, -0.0082, -0.0288)$ $x^{0}=(1, 1, 1, 1, 1)$ $k=20$; s $=0.083$ $k=3$; s $=0.0272$ $x^{1}=(0.3237, 0.5471,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.0171, 0.3822,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0784, 0.2935,$ $0.2280, 0.4833, 0.3237)$ $-0.1394, 0.2779, 0.0171)$ $-0.2378, 0.1873, -0.0784)$ $x^{0}=(20, 10, 20, 10, 20)$ $k=22$; s $=0.090$ $k=6$; s $=0.067$ $x^{1}=(6.1605, 5.0023,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.0837, 0.3910,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.2490, -0.2117,$ $4.5130, 3.9040, 6.1605)$ $-0.2155, 0.1915, 0.0837)$ $-0.1742, -0.1619, -0.2490)$
 Initiative point R-Iter Iner-R-Iter $x^{0}=(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$ $k=15$; s $=0.675$ $k=5$; s $=0.018$ $x^{1}=(-0.0092, 0,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0208, 0,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.0015, 0,$ $-0.0132, -0.0026, -0.0092)$ $-0.0297, -0.0059, -0.0208)$ $-0.0412, -0.0082, -0.0288)$ $x^{0}=(1, 1, 1, 1, 1)$ $k=20$; s $=0.083$ $k=3$; s $=0.0272$ $x^{1}=(0.3237, 0.5471,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.0171, 0.3822,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0784, 0.2935,$ $0.2280, 0.4833, 0.3237)$ $-0.1394, 0.2779, 0.0171)$ $-0.2378, 0.1873, -0.0784)$ $x^{0}=(20, 10, 20, 10, 20)$ $k=22$; s $=0.090$ $k=6$; s $=0.067$ $x^{1}=(6.1605, 5.0023,$ $x^{\ast}=(0.0837, 0.3910,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.2490, -0.2117,$ $4.5130, 3.9040, 6.1605)$ $-0.2155, 0.1915, 0.0837)$ $-0.1742, -0.1619, -0.2490)$
The numerical results of example 5.2
 Initiative point $\alpha_{k}$ Iner-KM-R-Iter $x^{0}=(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$ 0.6 $k=6$; s $=0.020$ $x^{1}=(-0.0092, 0, -0.0132,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0209, 0, -0.0299, -0.0059, -0.0209)$ $-0.0026, -0.0092)$ 0.8 k=5; s=0.018 $x^{\ast}=(-0.0212, 0, -0.0304, -0.0060, -0.0212)$ $x^{0}=(1, 1, 1, 1, 1)$ 0.4 $k=3$; s $=0.034$ $x^{1}=(0.3237, 0.5471,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0644, 0.2935, -0.2177, 0.1913, -0.0644)$ $0.2280, 0.4833, 0.3237)$ 0.6 k=3; s=0.034 $x^{\ast}=(-0.0691, 0.2935, -0.2244, 0.1899, -0.0691)$ $x^{0}=(20, 10, 20, 10, 20)$ 0.6 $k=9$; s $=0.072$ $x^{1}=(6.1605, 5.0023,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.2263, -0.1045, -0.2337, -0.1094, -0.2263)$ $4.5130, 3.9040, 6.1605)$ 0.8 k= 7; s=0.071 $x^{\ast}=(-0.2283, -0.1610, -0.1881, -0.1342, -0.2283)$
 Initiative point $\alpha_{k}$ Iner-KM-R-Iter $x^{0}=(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$ 0.6 $k=6$; s $=0.020$ $x^{1}=(-0.0092, 0, -0.0132,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0209, 0, -0.0299, -0.0059, -0.0209)$ $-0.0026, -0.0092)$ 0.8 k=5; s=0.018 $x^{\ast}=(-0.0212, 0, -0.0304, -0.0060, -0.0212)$ $x^{0}=(1, 1, 1, 1, 1)$ 0.4 $k=3$; s $=0.034$ $x^{1}=(0.3237, 0.5471,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.0644, 0.2935, -0.2177, 0.1913, -0.0644)$ $0.2280, 0.4833, 0.3237)$ 0.6 k=3; s=0.034 $x^{\ast}=(-0.0691, 0.2935, -0.2244, 0.1899, -0.0691)$ $x^{0}=(20, 10, 20, 10, 20)$ 0.6 $k=9$; s $=0.072$ $x^{1}=(6.1605, 5.0023,$ $x^{\ast}=(-0.2263, -0.1045, -0.2337, -0.1094, -0.2263)$ $4.5130, 3.9040, 6.1605)$ 0.8 k= 7; s=0.071 $x^{\ast}=(-0.2283, -0.1610, -0.1881, -0.1342, -0.2283)$
The numerical results of example 5.3
 $M, N$ R-Iter Iner-R-Iter Iner-KM-R-Iter $M=20, N=10$ $k=436, s =0.970$ $k=174, s =0.500$ $k=210, s =0.270$ $M=100, N=90$ $k=3788, s =0.130$ $k=602, s =0.680$ $k=534, s =0.690$
 $M, N$ R-Iter Iner-R-Iter Iner-KM-R-Iter $M=20, N=10$ $k=436, s =0.970$ $k=174, s =0.500$ $k=210, s =0.270$ $M=100, N=90$ $k=3788, s =0.130$ $k=602, s =0.680$ $k=534, s =0.690$
 [1] Grace Nnennaya Ogwo, Chinedu Izuchukwu, Oluwatosin Temitope Mewomo. A modified extragradient algorithm for a certain class of split pseudo-monotone variational inequality problem. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/naco.2021011 [2] Jiangxing Wang. Convergence analysis of an accurate and efficient method for nonlinear Maxwell's equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2429-2440. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020185 [3] Zehui Jia, Xue Gao, Xingju Cai, Deren Han. The convergence rate analysis of the symmetric ADMM for the nonconvex separable optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1943-1971. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020053 [4] Yaonan Ma, Li-Zhi Liao. The Glowinski–Le Tallec splitting method revisited: A general convergence and convergence rate analysis. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1681-1711. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020040 [5] Hailing Xuan, Xiaoliang Cheng. Numerical analysis and simulation of an adhesive contact problem with damage and long memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2781-2804. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020205 [6] Hailing Xuan, Xiaoliang Cheng. Numerical analysis of a thermal frictional contact problem with long memory. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021031 [7] Cheng Wang. Convergence analysis of Fourier pseudo-spectral schemes for three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2021019 [8] Li Chu, Bo Wang, Jie Zhang, Hong-Wei Zhang. Convergence analysis of a smoothing SAA method for a stochastic mathematical program with second-order cone complementarity constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1863-1886. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020050 [9] Xue-Ping Luo, Yi-Bin Xiao, Wei Li. Strict feasibility of variational inclusion problems in reflexive Banach spaces. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (5) : 2495-2502. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019065 [10] Samir Adly, Oanh Chau, Mohamed Rochdi. Solvability of a class of thermal dynamical contact problems with subdifferential conditions. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 91-104. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.91 [11] Vaibhav Mehandiratta, Mani Mehra, Günter Leugering. Existence results and stability analysis for a nonlinear fractional boundary value problem on a circular ring with an attached edge : A study of fractional calculus on metric graph. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16 (2) : 155-185. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021003 [12] Zhaoxia Wang, Hebai Chen. A nonsmooth van der Pol-Duffing oscillator (I): The sum of indices of equilibria is $-1$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021096 [13] Zhaoxia Wang, Hebai Chen. A nonsmooth van der Pol-Duffing oscillator (II): The sum of indices of equilibria is $1$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021101 [14] Tengteng Yu, Xin-Wei Liu, Yu-Hong Dai, Jie Sun. Variable metric proximal stochastic variance reduced gradient methods for nonconvex nonsmooth optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021084 [15] Jan Prüss, Laurent Pujo-Menjouet, G.F. Webb, Rico Zacher. Analysis of a model for the dynamics of prions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 225-235. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.225 [16] J. Frédéric Bonnans, Justina Gianatti, Francisco J. Silva. On the convergence of the Sakawa-Shindo algorithm in stochastic control. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (3) : 391-406. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016008 [17] Fernando P. da Costa, João T. Pinto, Rafael Sasportes. On the convergence to critical scaling profiles in submonolayer deposition models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1359-1376. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018053 [18] Alberto Bressan, Carlotta Donadello. On the convergence of viscous approximations after shock interactions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 29-48. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.29 [19] Caifang Wang, Tie Zhou. The order of convergence for Landweber Scheme with $\alpha,\beta$-rule. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (1) : 133-146. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.133 [20] Mayte Pérez-Llanos, Juan Pablo Pinasco, Nicolas Saintier. Opinion fitness and convergence to consensus in homogeneous and heterogeneous populations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16 (2) : 257-281. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021006

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366