American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
January  2019, 15(1): 293-318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018044

Pricing vulnerable options under a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model with fire sales

Qing-Qing Yang 1, , Wai-Ki Ching 1, , Wanhua He 1, and  Tak-Kuen Siu 2,

1. 

Advanced Modeling and Applied Computing Laboratory, Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
2. 

Department of Actuarial Studies and Business Analytics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

Received  May 2017 Revised  October 2017 Published  April 2018

In this paper, we consider the valuation of vulnerable options under a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model, where the option writer's asset value is subject to price pressure from other financial institutions due to distressed selling. A change of numéraire technique, proposed by Geman et al. [14], is employed to obtain a semi-analytical pricing formula for an vulnerable European option in the presence of regime switching effect. The method is numerically implemented using the multinomial approach in Costabile et al. [6]. We study the impacts of distressed selling and regime switching on the European option prices via numerical experiments.

Keywords: Vulnerable option, regime-switching, change of numéraire, distressed selling, multinomial approach.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 91G80; Secondary: 90B50.
Citation: Qing-Qing Yang, Wai-Ki Ching, Wanhua He, Tak-Kuen Siu. Pricing vulnerable options under a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model with fire sales. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 293-318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018044
References:
[1]

M. Anton and C. Polk, Connected stocks, The Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 1099-1127.   Google Scholar

[2]

F. Black and M. Scholes, The valuation of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 637-654.  doi: 10.1086/260062.  Google Scholar

[3]

G. Cheang and G. Teh, Change of num$\acute{e}$raire and a jump-diffusion option pricing formula, Springer International Publishing, (2014), 371-389.   Google Scholar

[4]

R. Cont and P. Tankov, Financial Modeling with Jump Processes, Chapman & Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2004.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. Cont and L. Wagalath, Fire sales forensics: Measuring endogenous risk, Mathematical Finance, 26 (2016), 835-866.  doi: 10.1111/mafi.12071.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Costabile, A. Leccadito, I. Massabó and E. Russo, Option Pricing under Regime-switching Jump-diffusion Models, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 256 (2014), 152-167.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.07.046.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Coval and E. Stafford, Asset fire sales (and purchases) in equity markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 86 (2007), 479-512.   Google Scholar

[8]

D. Duffie and K. Singleton, Modeling Term Structures of Defaultable Bonds, Review of Financial Studies, 12 (1999), 197-226.   Google Scholar

[9]

R. Elliott, T. Siu, L. Chan and J. Lau, Pricing options under a generalized Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 25 (2007), 821-843.  doi: 10.1080/07362990701420118.  Google Scholar

[10]

R. Elliott and T. Siu, Option pricing and filtering with hidden Markov-modulated pure-jump processes, Applied Mathematical Finance, 20 (2013), 1-25.  doi: 10.1080/1350486X.2012.655929.  Google Scholar

[11]

R. Elliott and T. Siu, Asset pricing using trading volumes in a hidden regime-switching environment, Asia-Pacific Financial Market, 22 (2015), 133-149.   Google Scholar

[12]

F. A. Fard, Analytical pricing of vulnerable options under a generalized jump-diffusion model, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 60 (2015), 19-28.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.10.007.  Google Scholar

[13]

I. Florescu, R. Liu and M. Mariani, Solutions to a partial integro-differential parabolic system arising in the pricing of financial options in regime-switching jump diffusion models, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 2012 (2012), 1-12.   Google Scholar

[14]

H. Geman, N. Karoui and J. Rochet, Change of numéaire, changes of probability measure and option pricing, Journal of Applied Probability, 32 (1995), 443-458.  doi: 10.2307/3215299.  Google Scholar

[15]

R. Greenwood and D. Thesmar, Stock price fragility, Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 471-490.   Google Scholar

[16]

X. Guo and Q. Zhang, Closed-form solutions for perpetual American put options with regime switching, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 64 (2004), 2034-2049.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139903426083.  Google Scholar

[17]

T. Hida, J. Potthoff and L. Streit, Dirichlet forms and white noise analysis, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 116 (1988), 235-245.  doi: 10.1007/BF01225257.  Google Scholar

[18]

M. Hung and Y. Liu, Pricing vulnerable options in incomplete markets, Journal of Futures Markets, 25 (2005), 135-170.   Google Scholar

[19]

R. Jarrow and S. Turnbull, Credit risk: Drawing the analogy, Risk Magazine, 5 (1992), 63-70.   Google Scholar

[20]

R. Jarrow and S. Turnbull, Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk, Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 53-85.   Google Scholar

[21]

H. Johnson and R. Stulz, The pricing of options with default risk, Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 267-280.   Google Scholar

[22]

P. Klein, Pricing black-scholes options with correlated credit risk, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20 (1996), 1211-1229.   Google Scholar

[23]

S. Kou, A jump-diffusion model for option pricing, Management Science, 48 (2002), 1086-1101.   Google Scholar

[24]

L. Liew and T. Siu, A hidden markov regime-switching model for option valuation, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 47 (2010), 374-384.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.08.003.  Google Scholar

[25]

R. Merton, Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 125-144.   Google Scholar

[26]

V. Naik, Option valuation and hedging strategies with jumps in the volatility of asset returns, The Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1969-1984.   Google Scholar

[27]

H. Niu and D. Wang, Pricing vulnerable options with correlated jump-diffusion processes depending on various states of the economy, Quantitative Finance, 16 (2016), 1129-1145.  doi: 10.1080/14697688.2015.1090623.  Google Scholar

[28]

A. Pascucci, PDE and Martingale Methods in Option Pricing, Bocconi & Springer Series, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2011.  Google Scholar

[29]

P. Pedler, Occupation time for two state markov chains, Journal of Applied Probability, 8 (1971), 381-390.  doi: 10.2307/3211908.  Google Scholar

[30]

W. J. Runggaldier, Jump diffusion models, In S. T. Rachev (Ed.), Handbook of heavy tailed distributions in finance, (2003), 169-209. Google Scholar

[31]

B. Sericola, Occupation times in Markov processes, Stochastic Models, 16 (2000), 479-510.  doi: 10.1080/15326340008807601.  Google Scholar

[32]

Y. Shen and T. Siu, Pricing variance swaps under a stochastic interest rate and volatility model with regime-switching, Operations Research Letters, 41 (2013), 180-187.  doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2012.12.008.  Google Scholar

[33]

A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach, Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1343-1366.   Google Scholar

[34]

A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, Fire sales in finance and macroeconomics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (2011), 29-48.   Google Scholar

[35]

S. Shreve, Stochastic calculus for finance II: Continuous-time models, Springer Finance Series, (2003), 404-459.   Google Scholar

[36]

T. Siu, J. Lau and H. Yang, Pricing participating products under a generalized jump-diffusion, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis, (2008), Article ID 474623, 30 Pages. doi: 10.1155/2008/474623.  Google Scholar

[37]

T. Siu, A BSDE approach to optimal investment of an insurer with hidden regime switching, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 31 (2013), 1-18.  doi: 10.1080/07362994.2012.727144.  Google Scholar

[38]

T. Siu, A stochastic flows approach for asset allocation with hidden economic environment, International Journal of Stochastic Analysis, (2015), Article ID 462524, 11 pages. doi: 10.1155/2015/462524.  Google Scholar

[39]

R. Wiggins, T. Piontek and A. Metrick, The Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy A: Overview, Yale Program on Financial Stability Case Study, 2014. Google Scholar

[40]

S. Yang, M. Lee and J. Kim, Pricing Vulnerable Options under a Stochastic Volatility Model, Applied Mathematics Letters, 34 (2014), 7-12.  doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2014.03.007.  Google Scholar

[41]

Q. Yang, W. Ching, J. Gu and T. Siu, Optimal liquidation strategy across multiple exchanges under a jump-diffusion fast mean-reverting model, (2016), available at arXiv: 1607.04553. Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. Anton and C. Polk, Connected stocks, The Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 1099-1127.   Google Scholar

[2]

F. Black and M. Scholes, The valuation of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 637-654.  doi: 10.1086/260062.  Google Scholar

[3]

G. Cheang and G. Teh, Change of num$\acute{e}$raire and a jump-diffusion option pricing formula, Springer International Publishing, (2014), 371-389.   Google Scholar

[4]

R. Cont and P. Tankov, Financial Modeling with Jump Processes, Chapman & Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2004.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. Cont and L. Wagalath, Fire sales forensics: Measuring endogenous risk, Mathematical Finance, 26 (2016), 835-866.  doi: 10.1111/mafi.12071.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Costabile, A. Leccadito, I. Massabó and E. Russo, Option Pricing under Regime-switching Jump-diffusion Models, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 256 (2014), 152-167.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.07.046.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Coval and E. Stafford, Asset fire sales (and purchases) in equity markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 86 (2007), 479-512.   Google Scholar

[8]

D. Duffie and K. Singleton, Modeling Term Structures of Defaultable Bonds, Review of Financial Studies, 12 (1999), 197-226.   Google Scholar

[9]

R. Elliott, T. Siu, L. Chan and J. Lau, Pricing options under a generalized Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 25 (2007), 821-843.  doi: 10.1080/07362990701420118.  Google Scholar

[10]

R. Elliott and T. Siu, Option pricing and filtering with hidden Markov-modulated pure-jump processes, Applied Mathematical Finance, 20 (2013), 1-25.  doi: 10.1080/1350486X.2012.655929.  Google Scholar

[11]

R. Elliott and T. Siu, Asset pricing using trading volumes in a hidden regime-switching environment, Asia-Pacific Financial Market, 22 (2015), 133-149.   Google Scholar

[12]

F. A. Fard, Analytical pricing of vulnerable options under a generalized jump-diffusion model, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 60 (2015), 19-28.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.10.007.  Google Scholar

[13]

I. Florescu, R. Liu and M. Mariani, Solutions to a partial integro-differential parabolic system arising in the pricing of financial options in regime-switching jump diffusion models, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 2012 (2012), 1-12.   Google Scholar

[14]

H. Geman, N. Karoui and J. Rochet, Change of numéaire, changes of probability measure and option pricing, Journal of Applied Probability, 32 (1995), 443-458.  doi: 10.2307/3215299.  Google Scholar

[15]

R. Greenwood and D. Thesmar, Stock price fragility, Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 471-490.   Google Scholar

[16]

X. Guo and Q. Zhang, Closed-form solutions for perpetual American put options with regime switching, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 64 (2004), 2034-2049.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139903426083.  Google Scholar

[17]

T. Hida, J. Potthoff and L. Streit, Dirichlet forms and white noise analysis, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 116 (1988), 235-245.  doi: 10.1007/BF01225257.  Google Scholar

[18]

M. Hung and Y. Liu, Pricing vulnerable options in incomplete markets, Journal of Futures Markets, 25 (2005), 135-170.   Google Scholar

[19]

R. Jarrow and S. Turnbull, Credit risk: Drawing the analogy, Risk Magazine, 5 (1992), 63-70.   Google Scholar

[20]

R. Jarrow and S. Turnbull, Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk, Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 53-85.   Google Scholar

[21]

H. Johnson and R. Stulz, The pricing of options with default risk, Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 267-280.   Google Scholar

[22]

P. Klein, Pricing black-scholes options with correlated credit risk, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20 (1996), 1211-1229.   Google Scholar

[23]

S. Kou, A jump-diffusion model for option pricing, Management Science, 48 (2002), 1086-1101.   Google Scholar

[24]

L. Liew and T. Siu, A hidden markov regime-switching model for option valuation, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 47 (2010), 374-384.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.08.003.  Google Scholar

[25]

R. Merton, Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 125-144.   Google Scholar

[26]

V. Naik, Option valuation and hedging strategies with jumps in the volatility of asset returns, The Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1969-1984.   Google Scholar

[27]

H. Niu and D. Wang, Pricing vulnerable options with correlated jump-diffusion processes depending on various states of the economy, Quantitative Finance, 16 (2016), 1129-1145.  doi: 10.1080/14697688.2015.1090623.  Google Scholar

[28]

A. Pascucci, PDE and Martingale Methods in Option Pricing, Bocconi & Springer Series, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2011.  Google Scholar

[29]

P. Pedler, Occupation time for two state markov chains, Journal of Applied Probability, 8 (1971), 381-390.  doi: 10.2307/3211908.  Google Scholar

[30]

W. J. Runggaldier, Jump diffusion models, In S. T. Rachev (Ed.), Handbook of heavy tailed distributions in finance, (2003), 169-209. Google Scholar

[31]

B. Sericola, Occupation times in Markov processes, Stochastic Models, 16 (2000), 479-510.  doi: 10.1080/15326340008807601.  Google Scholar

[32]

Y. Shen and T. Siu, Pricing variance swaps under a stochastic interest rate and volatility model with regime-switching, Operations Research Letters, 41 (2013), 180-187.  doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2012.12.008.  Google Scholar

[33]

A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach, Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1343-1366.   Google Scholar

[34]

A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, Fire sales in finance and macroeconomics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (2011), 29-48.   Google Scholar

[35]

S. Shreve, Stochastic calculus for finance II: Continuous-time models, Springer Finance Series, (2003), 404-459.   Google Scholar

[36]

T. Siu, J. Lau and H. Yang, Pricing participating products under a generalized jump-diffusion, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis, (2008), Article ID 474623, 30 Pages. doi: 10.1155/2008/474623.  Google Scholar

[37]

T. Siu, A BSDE approach to optimal investment of an insurer with hidden regime switching, Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 31 (2013), 1-18.  doi: 10.1080/07362994.2012.727144.  Google Scholar

[38]

T. Siu, A stochastic flows approach for asset allocation with hidden economic environment, International Journal of Stochastic Analysis, (2015), Article ID 462524, 11 pages. doi: 10.1155/2015/462524.  Google Scholar

[39]

R. Wiggins, T. Piontek and A. Metrick, The Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy A: Overview, Yale Program on Financial Stability Case Study, 2014. Google Scholar

[40]

S. Yang, M. Lee and J. Kim, Pricing Vulnerable Options under a Stochastic Volatility Model, Applied Mathematics Letters, 34 (2014), 7-12.  doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2014.03.007.  Google Scholar

[41]

Q. Yang, W. Ching, J. Gu and T. Siu, Optimal liquidation strategy across multiple exchanges under a jump-diffusion fast mean-reverting model, (2016), available at arXiv: 1607.04553. Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Vulnerable European call option price against spot-to-strike ratio. The figure above shows the trend of the time-zero call price conditional on the Markov chain being in the good state at the initial time, and the figure below illustrates the momentum of the time zero call price conditional on the Markov chain being in the bad state at the initial time.
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  The choices of the jump parameters and volatility parameters indicate that the risky asset values have larger jumps and larger volatilities in the bad economic state than in the good one.
Parameters Values Parameters Values
Dimension of $W_t$ $n=4$ Tolerance level $\epsilon=0.01$
Transition rate $\theta_1=5$ Transition rate $\theta_2=5$
Jump in $S$ $u^{S,1}=1.015$ Jump in $S$ $d^{S,1}=0.98$
$u^{S,2}=1.25$ $d^{S,2}=0.75$
Jump in $B$ $u^{B,1}=1.0125$ Jump in $B$ $d^{B,1}=0.99$
$u^{B,2}=1.1250$ $d^{B,2}=0.85$
Jump in $X$ $u^{X,1}=1.04$ Jump in $X$ $d^{X,1}=0.97$
$u^{X,2}=1.15$ $d^{X,2}=0.85$
Jump in $V$ $u^{V, 1}=1.03$ Jump in $V$ $d^{V, 1}=0.96$
$u^{V, 2}=1.36$ $d^{V, 2}=0.75$
Probability $p_1=0.75$ Probability $ p_2=0.5$
Market depth $L=5000$ MLR $\eta=10$
$\alpha^S(1)$ $(0.1,0.15,0.1,0.2)$ $\alpha^S(2)$ $(0.3,0.15,0.13,0.3)$
$\alpha^B(1)$ $(0.2,0.12,0.13,0.25)$ $\alpha^B(2)$ $(0.02,0.1,0.3,0.005)$
$\alpha^X(1)$ $(0.26,0.4,0.1,0.15)$ $\alpha^X(2)$ $(0.6,0.4,0.16,0.1)$
$\alpha^V(1)$ $(0.1,0.2,0.1,0.2)$ $\alpha^V(2)$ $(0.1,0.3,0.2,0.27)$
Intensity $\lambda_1=2$ Intensity $\lambda_2=3$
Default boundary $d^*=5$ Outstanding Claims $d=25$
Deadweight cost $\alpha=0.4$ Time to maturity $T=1$
Initial price $S_0=40$ Strike price $K=40$
Initial price $V_0=50$ Initial price $X_0=100$
Initial price $B(0,T)=0.05$ Time steps $N=100$
Table Options

Download as excel

Parameters Values Parameters Values
Dimension of $W_t$ $n=4$ Tolerance level $\epsilon=0.01$
Transition rate $\theta_1=5$ Transition rate $\theta_2=5$
Jump in $S$ $u^{S,1}=1.015$ Jump in $S$ $d^{S,1}=0.98$
$u^{S,2}=1.25$ $d^{S,2}=0.75$
Jump in $B$ $u^{B,1}=1.0125$ Jump in $B$ $d^{B,1}=0.99$
$u^{B,2}=1.1250$ $d^{B,2}=0.85$
Jump in $X$ $u^{X,1}=1.04$ Jump in $X$ $d^{X,1}=0.97$
$u^{X,2}=1.15$ $d^{X,2}=0.85$
Jump in $V$ $u^{V, 1}=1.03$ Jump in $V$ $d^{V, 1}=0.96$
$u^{V, 2}=1.36$ $d^{V, 2}=0.75$
Probability $p_1=0.75$ Probability $ p_2=0.5$
Market depth $L=5000$ MLR $\eta=10$
$\alpha^S(1)$ $(0.1,0.15,0.1,0.2)$ $\alpha^S(2)$ $(0.3,0.15,0.13,0.3)$
$\alpha^B(1)$ $(0.2,0.12,0.13,0.25)$ $\alpha^B(2)$ $(0.02,0.1,0.3,0.005)$
$\alpha^X(1)$ $(0.26,0.4,0.1,0.15)$ $\alpha^X(2)$ $(0.6,0.4,0.16,0.1)$
$\alpha^V(1)$ $(0.1,0.2,0.1,0.2)$ $\alpha^V(2)$ $(0.1,0.3,0.2,0.27)$
Intensity $\lambda_1=2$ Intensity $\lambda_2=3$
Default boundary $d^*=5$ Outstanding Claims $d=25$
Deadweight cost $\alpha=0.4$ Time to maturity $T=1$
Initial price $S_0=40$ Strike price $K=40$
Initial price $V_0=50$ Initial price $X_0=100$
Initial price $B(0,T)=0.05$ Time steps $N=100$
Table 2.  We use the multinomial recombining grid approximation method to calculate the vulnerable European call option prices with different strike prices, initial states and state persistence under different setting of market impact, without market impact (No) and subject to market impact (Impact). The default choices are given by the basic parameters in Table 1. We present, in this table, a comparison for the vulnerable European call option prices subject to different levels of persistence of the underlying economic state process in the good and bad economic states.
$\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -5&5 \\ 3&-3 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$ $\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -3&3 \\ 5&-5 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$ $\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -5&5 \\ 5&-5 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$ $\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -3&3 \\ 3&-3 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$
$\frac{S(0)}{K}$ $\chi_0$ No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact
0.8 1 0.5445 0.2324 0.0469 0.0200 0.0836 0.0357 0.3153 0.3146
2 1.7845 0.7617 0.2812 0.1200 0.4341 0.1853 1.1786 0.5030
1.0 1 0.5520 0.2354 0.0475 0.0203 0.0848 0.0362 0.3197 0.1363
2 1.8093 0.7716 0.2851 0.1216 0.4403 0.1877 1.1949 0.5096
1.25 1 0.5581 0.2378 0.0480 0.0205 0.0857 0.0365 0.3232 0.1377
2 1.8291 0.7796 0.2882 0.1228 0.4450 0.1897 1.2080 0.5148
Table Options

Download as excel

$\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -5&5 \\ 3&-3 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$ $\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -3&3 \\ 5&-5 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$ $\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -5&5 \\ 5&-5 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$ $\mathcal{Q}=\left[ \begin{matrix} -3&3 \\ 3&-3 \\ \end{matrix} \right]$
$\frac{S(0)}{K}$ $\chi_0$ No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact
0.8 1 0.5445 0.2324 0.0469 0.0200 0.0836 0.0357 0.3153 0.3146
2 1.7845 0.7617 0.2812 0.1200 0.4341 0.1853 1.1786 0.5030
1.0 1 0.5520 0.2354 0.0475 0.0203 0.0848 0.0362 0.3197 0.1363
2 1.8093 0.7716 0.2851 0.1216 0.4403 0.1877 1.1949 0.5096
1.25 1 0.5581 0.2378 0.0480 0.0205 0.0857 0.0365 0.3232 0.1377
2 1.8291 0.7796 0.2882 0.1228 0.4450 0.1897 1.2080 0.5148
[1]

Christoforidou Amalia, Christian-Oliver Ewald. A lattice method for option evaluation with regime-switching asset correlation structure. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020042
[2]

Zhuo Jin, Linyi Qian. Lookback option pricing for regime-switching jump diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (2) : 237-258. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.237
[3]

Fuke Wu, George Yin, Zhuo Jin. Kolmogorov-type systems with regime-switching jump diffusion perturbations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2293-2319. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016048
[4]

Mourad Bellassoued, Raymond Brummelhuis, Michel Cristofol, Éric Soccorsi. Stable reconstruction of the volatility in a regime-switching local-volatility model. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020, 10 (1) : 189-215. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019036
[5]

Jiaqin Wei. Time-inconsistent optimal control problems with regime-switching. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (4) : 585-622. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017022
[6]

Kun Fan, Yang Shen, Tak Kuen Siu, Rongming Wang. On a Markov chain approximation method for option pricing with regime switching. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (2) : 529-541. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.529
[7]

Zhuo Jin, George Yin, Hailiang Yang. Numerical methods for dividend optimization using regime-switching jump-diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2011, 1 (1) : 21-40. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2011.1.21
[8]

Ping Chen, Haixiang Yao. Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection with no-shorting constraints and regime-switching. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (2) : 531-551. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018166
[9]

Yinghui Dong, Kam Chuen Yuen, Guojing Wang. Pricing credit derivatives under a correlated regime-switching hazard processes model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1395-1415. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016079
[10]

Chao Xu, Yinghui Dong, Zhaolu Tian, Guojing Wang. Pricing dynamic fund protection under a Regime-switching Jump-diffusion model with stochastic protection level. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (6) : 2603-2623. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019072
[11]

Jiaqin Wei, Zhuo Jin, Hailiang Yang. Optimal dividend policy with liability constraint under a hidden Markov regime-switching model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (4) : 1965-1993. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018132
[12]

Jiapeng Liu, Ruihua Liu, Dan Ren. Investment and consumption in regime-switching models with proportional transaction costs and log utility. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (3) : 465-491. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017017
[13]

Tak Kuen Siu, Yang Shen. Risk-minimizing pricing and Esscher transform in a general non-Markovian regime-switching jump-diffusion model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (7) : 2595-2626. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017100
[14]

Caibin Zhang, Zhibin Liang, Kam Chuen Yuen. Portfolio optimization for jump-diffusion risky assets with regime switching: A time-consistent approach. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020156
[15]

Na Song, Yue Xie, Wai-Ki Ching, Tak-Kuen Siu. A real option approach for investment opportunity valuation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1213-1235. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016069
[16]

Junkee Jeon, Jehan Oh. Valuation of American strangle option: Variational inequality approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 755-781. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018206
[17]

Lin Xu, Rongming Wang, Dingjun Yao. Optimal stochastic investment games under Markov regime switching market. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (3) : 795-815. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.795
[18]

Nguyen Huu Du, Nguyen Thanh Dieu, Tran Dinh Tuong. Dynamic behavior of a stochastic predator-prey system under regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (9) : 3483-3498. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017176
[19]

Hongfu Yang, Xiaoyue Li, George Yin. Permanence and ergodicity of stochastic Gilpin-Ayala population model with regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (10) : 3743-3766. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016119
[20]

Rui Wang, Xiaoyue Li, Denis S. Mukama. On stochastic multi-group Lotka-Volterra ecosystems with regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (9) : 3499-3528. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017177

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (259)
  • HTML views (1385)
  • Cited by (3)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences