# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Multi-item deteriorating two-echelon inventory model with price- and stock-dependent demand: A trade-credit policy
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Note on : Supply chain inventory model for deteriorating items with maximum lifetime and partial trade credit to credit risk customers
July  2019, 15(3): 1317-1344. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018097

## An inventory model with imperfect item, inspection errors, preventive maintenance and partial backlogging in uncertainty environment

 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Kharazmi University, 15719-14911 Tehran, Iran

Received  September 2017 Revised  October 2017 Published  July 2018

In this paper investigate a production system with the defective quality process and preventive maintenance to establish the inspection policy and optimum inventory level for production items with considering uncertainty environment. The shortage occurs because of preventive maintenance and is considered as partial backlogging. Through the production process, at a random moment, the production of items from the state in-control turns into an out-of-control mode, so that parts of the defective product are manufactured an in-control state and outside of the control process mode. The online item inspection process begins after a time variable through the production period. The human inspection process has also been considered for the classify of defective goods. Uninspected products are accepted to the customer/buyer with minimal repair warranty and the defective items classify by the inspector at fixed cost before being shipped subject to salvaged items. Also, the inspection process of manufactured goods includes a human inspection error. Therefore, two types of classification errors (Type Ⅰ & Ⅱ) are considered to be more realistic than the proposed model. The input parameters of the model are considered as a triangular fuzzy environment, and the output parameters of the model are solved by the Zadeh's extension principle and nonlinear parametric programming. As a final point, a numerical example by graphical representations is obtainable to illustrate the proposed model.

Citation: Javad Taheri-Tolgari, Mohammad Mohammadi, Bahman Naderi, Alireza Arshadi-Khamseh, Abolfazl Mirzazadeh. An inventory model with imperfect item, inspection errors, preventive maintenance and partial backlogging in uncertainty environment. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (3) : 1317-1344. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018097
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Schematic representation of inventory system
Flowchart the solution procedure
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.1$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.2$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.3$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.4$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.5$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.6$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.7$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.8$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 0.9$
Behavior of the target function at $\alpha = 1$
Membership function of output parameters-optimal solution
Membership function of output parameters-optimal solution
Membership function of output parameters-optimal solution
Membership function of output parameters-optimal solution
Membership function of Hessian matrix
General data - input parameters
 Triangular Fuzzy Number: [a, b, c] General Data Symbol a b c Production rate $P$ 300 500 700 Annual demand rate $D$ 250 450 650 Setup cost $k$ 400 600 800 Holding cost $c_h$ 1.5 2.5 4 Variable cost $c_m$ 75 100 125 Inspection cost $I_c$ 0.75 1 1.25 Repair cost for warranty $w$ 35 50 65 Salvage cost $s$ 10 15 20 Cost of falsely accepted imperfect item $c_a$ 23 28 33 Cost of falsely rejected perfect item $c_r$ 7 10 13 Maintenance cost $M_c$ 75 100 125 Shortage cost $s_c$ 5.5 6.5 7.5 Fraction of product shortage that is backorder $\gamma$ 0.6 0.75 0.9 Percentage of defective products/in control $\theta_1$ 0.05 0.15 0.25 Percentage of defective products/out-of-control $\theta_2$ 0.05 0.30 0.60
 Triangular Fuzzy Number: [a, b, c] General Data Symbol a b c Production rate $P$ 300 500 700 Annual demand rate $D$ 250 450 650 Setup cost $k$ 400 600 800 Holding cost $c_h$ 1.5 2.5 4 Variable cost $c_m$ 75 100 125 Inspection cost $I_c$ 0.75 1 1.25 Repair cost for warranty $w$ 35 50 65 Salvage cost $s$ 10 15 20 Cost of falsely accepted imperfect item $c_a$ 23 28 33 Cost of falsely rejected perfect item $c_r$ 7 10 13 Maintenance cost $M_c$ 75 100 125 Shortage cost $s_c$ 5.5 6.5 7.5 Fraction of product shortage that is backorder $\gamma$ 0.6 0.75 0.9 Percentage of defective products/in control $\theta_1$ 0.05 0.15 0.25 Percentage of defective products/out-of-control $\theta_2$ 0.05 0.30 0.60
General data - input parameters
 General Data Symbol Probability Density Function Type-Ⅰ error $\alpha$ $f(\alpha)=0.04e^{0.04\alpha}$ Type-Ⅱ error $\beta$ $f(\beta)=0.05e^{0.05\beta}$ Preventive maintenance time $PM_T$ $f(PM_T)=0.25e^{0.25PM_T}$ Time after which the production process shifts in control to out-of-control state $\sigma$ $f(\sigma)=0.33e^{0.33\sigma}$
 General Data Symbol Probability Density Function Type-Ⅰ error $\alpha$ $f(\alpha)=0.04e^{0.04\alpha}$ Type-Ⅱ error $\beta$ $f(\beta)=0.05e^{0.05\beta}$ Preventive maintenance time $PM_T$ $f(PM_T)=0.25e^{0.25PM_T}$ Time after which the production process shifts in control to out-of-control state $\sigma$ $f(\sigma)=0.33e^{0.33\sigma}$
General data - $\alpha$ cuts input parameters
 Lower and upper bound of $P$ Lower and upper bound of $D$ Lower and upper bound of $k$ $P_{\alpha}^L$ $P_{\alpha}^U$ $D_{\alpha}^L$ $D_{\alpha}^U$ $k_{\alpha}^L$ $k_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 300 700 250 650 400 800 0.1 320 680 270 630 420 780 0.2 340 660 290 610 440 760 0.3 360 640 310 590 460 740 0.4 380 620 330 570 480 720 0.5 400 600 350 550 500 700 0.6 420 580 370 530 520 680 0.7 440 560 390 510 540 660 0.8 460 540 410 490 560 640 0.9 480 520 430 470 580 620 1 500 500 450 450 600 600
 Lower and upper bound of $P$ Lower and upper bound of $D$ Lower and upper bound of $k$ $P_{\alpha}^L$ $P_{\alpha}^U$ $D_{\alpha}^L$ $D_{\alpha}^U$ $k_{\alpha}^L$ $k_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 300 700 250 650 400 800 0.1 320 680 270 630 420 780 0.2 340 660 290 610 440 760 0.3 360 640 310 590 460 740 0.4 380 620 330 570 480 720 0.5 400 600 350 550 500 700 0.6 420 580 370 530 520 680 0.7 440 560 390 510 540 660 0.8 460 540 410 490 560 640 0.9 480 520 430 470 580 620 1 500 500 450 450 600 600
General data - $\alpha$ cuts input
 Lower and upper bound of $c_h$ Lower and upper bound of $c_m$ Lower and upper bound of $I_c$ ${c_h}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_h}_{\alpha}^U$ ${c_m}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_m}_{\alpha}^U$ ${I_c}_{\alpha}^L$ ${I_c}_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 1.5 4 75 125 0.75 1.25 0.1 1.6 3.85 77.5 122.5 0.775 1.225 0.2 1.7 3.7 80 120 0.8 1.2 0.3 1.8 3.55 82.5 117.5 0.825 1.175 0.4 1.9 3.4 85 115 0.85 1.15 0.5 2 3.25 87.5 112.5 0.875 1.125 0.6 2.1 3.1 90 110 0.9 1.1 0.7 2.2 2.95 92.5 107.5 0.925 1.075 0.8 2.3 2.8 95 105 0.95 1.05 0.9 2.4 2.65 97.5 102.5 0.975 1.025 1 2.5 2.5 100 100 1 1
 Lower and upper bound of $c_h$ Lower and upper bound of $c_m$ Lower and upper bound of $I_c$ ${c_h}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_h}_{\alpha}^U$ ${c_m}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_m}_{\alpha}^U$ ${I_c}_{\alpha}^L$ ${I_c}_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 1.5 4 75 125 0.75 1.25 0.1 1.6 3.85 77.5 122.5 0.775 1.225 0.2 1.7 3.7 80 120 0.8 1.2 0.3 1.8 3.55 82.5 117.5 0.825 1.175 0.4 1.9 3.4 85 115 0.85 1.15 0.5 2 3.25 87.5 112.5 0.875 1.125 0.6 2.1 3.1 90 110 0.9 1.1 0.7 2.2 2.95 92.5 107.5 0.925 1.075 0.8 2.3 2.8 95 105 0.95 1.05 0.9 2.4 2.65 97.5 102.5 0.975 1.025 1 2.5 2.5 100 100 1 1
General data - $\alpha$ cuts input parameters
 Lower and upper bound of $w$ Lower and upper bound of $s$ Lower and upper bound of $c_a$ $w_{\alpha}^L$ $w_{\alpha}^U$ $s_{\alpha}^L$ $s_{\alpha}^U$ ${c_a}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_a}_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 35 65 10 20 23 33 0.1 36.5 63.5 10.5 19.5 23.5 32.5 0.2 38 62 11 19 24 32 0.3 39.5 60.5 11.5 18.5 24.5 31.5 0.4 41 59 12 18 25 31 0.5 42.5 57.5 12.5 17.5 25.5 30.5 0.6 44 56 13 17 26 30 0.7 45.5 54.5 13.5 16.5 26.5 29.5 0.8 47 53 14 16 27 29 0.9 48.5 51.5 14.5 15.5 27.5 28.5 1 50 50 15 15 28 28
 Lower and upper bound of $w$ Lower and upper bound of $s$ Lower and upper bound of $c_a$ $w_{\alpha}^L$ $w_{\alpha}^U$ $s_{\alpha}^L$ $s_{\alpha}^U$ ${c_a}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_a}_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 35 65 10 20 23 33 0.1 36.5 63.5 10.5 19.5 23.5 32.5 0.2 38 62 11 19 24 32 0.3 39.5 60.5 11.5 18.5 24.5 31.5 0.4 41 59 12 18 25 31 0.5 42.5 57.5 12.5 17.5 25.5 30.5 0.6 44 56 13 17 26 30 0.7 45.5 54.5 13.5 16.5 26.5 29.5 0.8 47 53 14 16 27 29 0.9 48.5 51.5 14.5 15.5 27.5 28.5 1 50 50 15 15 28 28
General data - $\alpha$ cuts input parameters
 Lower and upper bound of $c_r$ Lower and upper bound of $M_c$ Lower and upper bound of $s_c$ ${c_r}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_r}_{\alpha}^U$ ${M_c}_{\alpha}^L$ ${M_c}_{\alpha}^U$ ${s_c}_{\alpha}^L$ ${s_c}_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 7 13 75 125 5.5 7.5 0.1 7.3 12.7 77.5 122.5 5.6 7.4 0.2 7.6 12.4 80 120 5.7 7.3 0.3 7.9 12.1 82.5 117.5 5.8 7.2 0.4 8.2 11.8 85 115 5.9 7.1 0.5 8.5 11.5 87.5 112.5 6 7 0.6 8.8 11.2 90 110 6.1 6.9 0.7 9.1 10.9 92.5 107.5 6.2 6.8 0.8 9.4 10.6 95 105 6.3 6.7 0.9 9.7 10.3 97.5 102.5 6.4 6.6 1 10 10 100 100 6.5 6.5
 Lower and upper bound of $c_r$ Lower and upper bound of $M_c$ Lower and upper bound of $s_c$ ${c_r}_{\alpha}^L$ ${c_r}_{\alpha}^U$ ${M_c}_{\alpha}^L$ ${M_c}_{\alpha}^U$ ${s_c}_{\alpha}^L$ ${s_c}_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 7 13 75 125 5.5 7.5 0.1 7.3 12.7 77.5 122.5 5.6 7.4 0.2 7.6 12.4 80 120 5.7 7.3 0.3 7.9 12.1 82.5 117.5 5.8 7.2 0.4 8.2 11.8 85 115 5.9 7.1 0.5 8.5 11.5 87.5 112.5 6 7 0.6 8.8 11.2 90 110 6.1 6.9 0.7 9.1 10.9 92.5 107.5 6.2 6.8 0.8 9.4 10.6 95 105 6.3 6.7 0.9 9.7 10.3 97.5 102.5 6.4 6.6 1 10 10 100 100 6.5 6.5
General data - $\alpha$ cuts input parameters
 Lower and upper bound of $\theta_1$ Lower and upper bound of $\theta_2$ Lower and upper bound of $\gamma$ ${\theta_1}_{\alpha}^L$ ${\theta_1}_{\alpha}^U$ ${\theta_2}_{\alpha}^L$ ${\theta_2}_{\alpha}^U$ $\gamma_{\alpha}^L$ $\gamma_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 0.6 0.9 0.05 0.25 0.05 0.6 0.1 0.615 0.885 0.06 0.24 0.075 0.57 0.2 0.63 0.87 0.07 0.23 0.1 0.54 0.3 0.645 0.855 0.08 0.22 0.125 0.51 0.4 0.66 0.84 0.09 0.21 0.15 0.48 0.5 0.675 0.825 0.1 0.2 0.175 0.45 0.6 0.69 0.81 0.11 0.19 0.2 0.42 0.7 0.705 0.795 0.12 0.18 0.225 0.39 0.8 0.72 0.78 0.13 0.17 0.25 0.36 0.9 0.735 0.765 0.14 0.16 0.275 0.33 1 0.75 0.75 0.15 0.15 0.3 0.3
 Lower and upper bound of $\theta_1$ Lower and upper bound of $\theta_2$ Lower and upper bound of $\gamma$ ${\theta_1}_{\alpha}^L$ ${\theta_1}_{\alpha}^U$ ${\theta_2}_{\alpha}^L$ ${\theta_2}_{\alpha}^U$ $\gamma_{\alpha}^L$ $\gamma_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 0.6 0.9 0.05 0.25 0.05 0.6 0.1 0.615 0.885 0.06 0.24 0.075 0.57 0.2 0.63 0.87 0.07 0.23 0.1 0.54 0.3 0.645 0.855 0.08 0.22 0.125 0.51 0.4 0.66 0.84 0.09 0.21 0.15 0.48 0.5 0.675 0.825 0.1 0.2 0.175 0.45 0.6 0.69 0.81 0.11 0.19 0.2 0.42 0.7 0.705 0.795 0.12 0.18 0.225 0.39 0.8 0.72 0.78 0.13 0.17 0.25 0.36 0.9 0.735 0.765 0.14 0.16 0.275 0.33 1 0.75 0.75 0.15 0.15 0.3 0.3
General data - $\alpha$ cuts input parameters
 Lower and upper bound of $E[TCU]$ Lower and upper bound of $I_m$ Lower and upper bound of $\delta$ $E[TCU]_{\alpha}^L$ $E[TCU]_{\alpha}^U$ ${I_m}_{\alpha}^L$ ${I_m}_{\alpha}^U$ $\delta_{\alpha}^L$ $\delta_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 87.0133 145.1221 261.5060 334.5721 0 1 0.1 89.9842 142.218 268.8547 332.0059 0 0.6745 0.2 92.9146 139.3142 276.4437 329.4848 0 0.4356 0.3 95.8269 136.4106 282.4803 327.0103 0 0.3054 0.4 98.7300 133.5071 287.6358 324.5838 0 0.2221 0.5 101.627 130.6038 292.2257 322.2072 0 0.1640 0.6 104.522 127.7005 296.4265 319.8825 0 0.1211 0.7 107.414 124.7973 300.3485 317.6118 0 0.0882 0.8 110.305 121.8939 304.0651 315.3975 0 0.0622 0.9 113.195 118.9902 307.6279 313.2330 0.0096 0.0412 1 116.0856 116.0856 311.0745 311.0745 0.0239 0.0239
 Lower and upper bound of $E[TCU]$ Lower and upper bound of $I_m$ Lower and upper bound of $\delta$ $E[TCU]_{\alpha}^L$ $E[TCU]_{\alpha}^U$ ${I_m}_{\alpha}^L$ ${I_m}_{\alpha}^U$ $\delta_{\alpha}^L$ $\delta_{\alpha}^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 87.0133 145.1221 261.5060 334.5721 0 1 0.1 89.9842 142.218 268.8547 332.0059 0 0.6745 0.2 92.9146 139.3142 276.4437 329.4848 0 0.4356 0.3 95.8269 136.4106 282.4803 327.0103 0 0.3054 0.4 98.7300 133.5071 287.6358 324.5838 0 0.2221 0.5 101.627 130.6038 292.2257 322.2072 0 0.1640 0.6 104.522 127.7005 296.4265 319.8825 0 0.1211 0.7 107.414 124.7973 300.3485 317.6118 0 0.0882 0.8 110.305 121.8939 304.0651 315.3975 0 0.0622 0.9 113.195 118.9902 307.6279 313.2330 0.0096 0.0412 1 116.0856 116.0856 311.0745 311.0745 0.0239 0.0239
General data - $\alpha$ cuts Hessian matrix
 Lower and upper bound of $H_1$ Lower and upper bound of $H_2$ $H_1^L$ $H_1^U$ $H_2^L$ $H_2^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 0.176880867 5.9687669 9.23117E-06 0.000239 0.1 0.366359442 5.691024185 1.82229E-05 0.000228 0.2 0.652038831 5.417609624 3.09138E-05 0.000218 0.3 0.947627216 5.148450421 4.33739E-05 0.000208 0.4 1.25140767 4.883472592 5.57048E-05 0.000197 0.5 1.562433439 4.622600569 6.79622E-05 0.000187 0.6 1.880135101 4.365756781 8.01786E-05 0.000177 0.7 2.204158168 4.112861206 9.23724E-05 0.000166 0.8 2.534281476 3.863830732 0.000104554 0.000156 0.9 2.870373498 3.546574322 0.000116726 0.000143 1 3.212363938 3.212363938 0.000128889 0.000129
 Lower and upper bound of $H_1$ Lower and upper bound of $H_2$ $H_1^L$ $H_1^U$ $H_2^L$ $H_2^U$ $\alpha~ level$ 0 0.176880867 5.9687669 9.23117E-06 0.000239 0.1 0.366359442 5.691024185 1.82229E-05 0.000228 0.2 0.652038831 5.417609624 3.09138E-05 0.000218 0.3 0.947627216 5.148450421 4.33739E-05 0.000208 0.4 1.25140767 4.883472592 5.57048E-05 0.000197 0.5 1.562433439 4.622600569 6.79622E-05 0.000187 0.6 1.880135101 4.365756781 8.01786E-05 0.000177 0.7 2.204158168 4.112861206 9.23724E-05 0.000166 0.8 2.534281476 3.863830732 0.000104554 0.000156 0.9 2.870373498 3.546574322 0.000116726 0.000143 1 3.212363938 3.212363938 0.000128889 0.000129
General data - optimal output parameters in crisp state
 Defuzzification method Variable Centroid Signed distance $E[TCU]$ 116.07 116.08 $I_m$ 302.38 304.56 $\delta$ 0.3413 0.262 Hessian matrix $H_1$ 3.1193 3.1426 Hessian matrix $H_2$ 0.0001 0.0001
 Defuzzification method Variable Centroid Signed distance $E[TCU]$ 116.07 116.08 $I_m$ 302.38 304.56 $\delta$ 0.3413 0.262 Hessian matrix $H_1$ 3.1193 3.1426 Hessian matrix $H_2$ 0.0001 0.0001
 [1] Luke Finlay, Vladimir Gaitsgory, Ivan Lebedev. Linear programming solutions of periodic optimization problems: approximation of the optimal control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (2) : 399-413. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.399 [2] Fumihiko Nakamura. Asymptotic behavior of non-expanding piecewise linear maps in the presence of random noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (6) : 2457-2473. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018055 [3] Ardeshir Ahmadi, Hamed Davari-Ardakani. A multistage stochastic programming framework for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (3) : 359-377. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017023 [4] Bin Pei, Yong Xu, Yuzhen Bai. Convergence of p-th mean in an averaging principle for stochastic partial differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (3) : 1141-1158. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019213 [5] Z. Reichstein and B. Youssin. Parusinski's "Key Lemma" via algebraic geometry. Electronic Research Announcements, 1999, 5: 136-145. [6] Ronald E. Mickens. Positivity preserving discrete model for the coupled ODE's modeling glycolysis. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 623-629. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.623 [7] Bernold Fiedler, Carlos Rocha, Matthias Wolfrum. Sturm global attractors for $S^1$-equivariant parabolic equations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (4) : 617-659. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.617 [8] Diana Keller. Optimal control of a linear stochastic Schrödinger equation. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 437-446. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.437 [9] Guillaume Bal, Wenjia Jing. Homogenization and corrector theory for linear transport in random media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (4) : 1311-1343. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1311 [10] Alberto Bressan, Ke Han, Franco Rampazzo. On the control of non holonomic systems by active constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (8) : 3329-3353. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3329 [11] Alexander A. Davydov, Massimo Giulietti, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda Pambianco. Linear nonbinary covering codes and saturating sets in projective spaces. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2011, 5 (1) : 119-147. doi: 10.3934/amc.2011.5.119 [12] W. Cary Huffman. On the theory of $\mathbb{F}_q$-linear $\mathbb{F}_{q^t}$-codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2013, 7 (3) : 349-378. doi: 10.3934/amc.2013.7.349 [13] Xinyuan Liao, Caidi Zhao, Shengfan Zhou. Compact uniform attractors for dissipative non-autonomous lattice dynamical systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (4) : 1087-1111. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.1087 [14] Pascal Noble, Sebastien Travadel. Non-persistence of roll-waves under viscous perturbations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2001, 1 (1) : 61-70. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2001.1.61 [15] Zhiming Guo, Zhi-Chun Yang, Xingfu Zou. Existence and uniqueness of positive solution to a non-local differential equation with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition---A non-monotone case. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (5) : 1825-1838. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.1825 [16] Hakan Özadam, Ferruh Özbudak. A note on negacyclic and cyclic codes of length $p^s$ over a finite field of characteristic $p$. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2009, 3 (3) : 265-271. doi: 10.3934/amc.2009.3.265 [17] Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056 [18] Misha Bialy, Andrey E. Mironov. Rich quasi-linear system for integrable geodesic flows on 2-torus. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (1) : 81-90. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.81 [19] Hyeong-Ohk Bae, Hyoungsuk So, Yeonghun Youn. Interior regularity to the steady incompressible shear thinning fluids with non-Standard growth. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13 (3) : 479-491. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018021 [20] Emma D'Aniello, Saber Elaydi. The structure of $\omega$-limit sets of asymptotically non-autonomous discrete dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (3) : 903-915. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019195

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366