# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
A nonhomogeneous quasi-birth-death process approach for an $(s, S)$ policy for a perishable inventory system with retrial demands
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Effect of information on the strategic behavior of customers in a discrete-time bulk service queue
May  2020, 16(3): 1389-1414. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019008

## Optimal production, pricing and government subsidy policies for a closed loop supply chain with uncertain returns

 1 School of Business, Central South University, The Collaborative Innovation Center for Resource-conserving & Environment-friendly Society and Ecological Civilization, Changsha 410083, China 2 Hunan University of Commerce, Changsha 410205, China 3 School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

* Corresponding author: Fuqiang Wang

Received  February 2018 Revised  October 2018 Published  March 2019

This paper studies an original equipment manufacturer's (OEM's) optimal production and pricing decisions and the governments optimal subsidy level when the number of used products returning to the OEM is uncertain. The government aims to minimize its total expenditures but also attempt to achieve a given target collection level. We model the problem as an extended price-setting newsvendor model, which simultaneously incorporates supply uncertainty and external government influence. Moreover, we consider separately the cases of stochastic supplies with additive and multiplicative return uncertainty. We show that under the above settings, the governments optimal strategy is to provide only sufficient subsidies that cause its target to be met exactly. The government subsidies will mitigate the cost of remanufacturing and increase the total collection efforts of the government and the manufacturer. Moreover, the return uncertainty lowers both the manufacturers profits and selling price, whereas its effects on the governments optimal subsidies and the manufacturers optimal return efforts are insignificant. Therefore, the manufacturer is worse off but consumers are better off under the conditions of uncertain returns. By comparing the optimal decisions when the government is a central planner with the case of decentralized decision making, or comparing the arrangement in which the government provides subsidies directly to the manufacturer rather than to consumers, we find that the government subsidies would coordinate the supply chain only when its target collection level is high. Moreover, no essential differences exist between providing subsidies directly to the manufacturer and to consumers. Our results are robust under both the additive and multiplicative uncertainty models.

Citation: Xiaohong Chen, Kui Li, Fuqiang Wang, Xihua Li. Optimal production, pricing and government subsidy policies for a closed loop supply chain with uncertain returns. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (3) : 1389-1414. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019008
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Order of events: (1) subsidies; (2) price, quantity and return price; (3) sales
Notations
 $d(p)$ Demand for new products $p$ Selling price $M$ Market size $a$ Price sensitivity factor $q_{n}$ Number of new products produced from raw materials $q_{r}$ Number of new products produced from used products $q$ Total number of products produced $c_{n}$ Unit cost of producing a new product from raw materials $c_{r}$ Unit cost of producing a new product from used products $r$ Price of the returned products $\eta$ Per unit subsidy for returned products the government provides for consumers $\eta^\prime$ Per unit subsidy for returned products the government provides for the manufacturers $z$ Effective price of the returned products $\Gamma$ Target collection level $s$ Salvage value for each unit of unsold product $f_{\epsilon}( \cdot )$ Probability density function of random variable $\epsilon$ $F_{\epsilon}( \cdot )$ Cumulative distribution function of random variable $\epsilon$ $\Pi$ Manufacturer's profit $Exp$ Minimal expected subsidy expenditure
 $d(p)$ Demand for new products $p$ Selling price $M$ Market size $a$ Price sensitivity factor $q_{n}$ Number of new products produced from raw materials $q_{r}$ Number of new products produced from used products $q$ Total number of products produced $c_{n}$ Unit cost of producing a new product from raw materials $c_{r}$ Unit cost of producing a new product from used products $r$ Price of the returned products $\eta$ Per unit subsidy for returned products the government provides for consumers $\eta^\prime$ Per unit subsidy for returned products the government provides for the manufacturers $z$ Effective price of the returned products $\Gamma$ Target collection level $s$ Salvage value for each unit of unsold product $f_{\epsilon}( \cdot )$ Probability density function of random variable $\epsilon$ $F_{\epsilon}( \cdot )$ Cumulative distribution function of random variable $\epsilon$ $\Pi$ Manufacturer's profit $Exp$ Minimal expected subsidy expenditure
 [1] Jan Prüss, Laurent Pujo-Menjouet, G.F. Webb, Rico Zacher. Analysis of a model for the dynamics of prions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 225-235. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.225 [2] Johannes Kellendonk, Lorenzo Sadun. Conjugacies of model sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (7) : 3805-3830. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017161 [3] Didier Bresch, Thierry Colin, Emmanuel Grenier, Benjamin Ribba, Olivier Saut. A viscoelastic model for avascular tumor growth. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 101-108. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.101 [4] Ondrej Budáč, Michael Herrmann, Barbara Niethammer, Andrej Spielmann. On a model for mass aggregation with maximal size. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (2) : 427-439. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.427 [5] Martin Bohner, Sabrina Streipert. Optimal harvesting policy for the Beverton--Holt model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (4) : 673-695. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016014 [6] Juan Manuel Pastor, Javier García-Algarra, Javier Galeano, José María Iriondo, José J. Ramasco. A simple and bounded model of population dynamics for mutualistic networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (1) : 53-70. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.53 [7] Chin-Chin Wu. Existence of traveling wavefront for discrete bistable competition model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (3) : 973-984. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.973 [8] Michael Grinfeld, Amy Novick-Cohen. Some remarks on stability for a phase field model with memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (4) : 1089-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.1089 [9] Alba Málaga Sabogal, Serge Troubetzkoy. Minimality of the Ehrenfest wind-tree model. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2016, 10: 209-228. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2016.10.209 [10] Paula A. González-Parra, Sunmi Lee, Leticia Velázquez, Carlos Castillo-Chavez. A note on the use of optimal control on a discrete time model of influenza dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (1) : 183-197. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.183 [11] Martial Agueh, Reinhard Illner, Ashlin Richardson. Analysis and simulations of a refined flocking and swarming model of Cucker-Smale type. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (1) : 1-16. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.1 [12] Ronald E. Mickens. Positivity preserving discrete model for the coupled ODE's modeling glycolysis. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 623-629. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.623 [13] Rui Hu, Yuan Yuan. Stability, bifurcation analysis in a neural network model with delay and diffusion. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 367-376. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.367 [14] Yuncherl Choi, Taeyoung Ha, Jongmin Han, Sewoong Kim, Doo Seok Lee. Turing instability and dynamic phase transition for the Brusselator model with multiple critical eigenvalues. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021035 [15] Guirong Jiang, Qishao Lu. The dynamics of a Prey-Predator model with impulsive state feedback control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (6) : 1301-1320. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1301 [16] Michel Chipot, Mingmin Zhang. On some model problem for the propagation of interacting species in a special environment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020401 [17] Mansour Shrahili, Ravi Shanker Dubey, Ahmed Shafay. Inclusion of fading memory to Banister model of changes in physical condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 881-888. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020051 [18] Seung-Yeal Ha, Shi Jin. Local sensitivity analysis for the Cucker-Smale model with random inputs. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (4) : 859-889. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018034 [19] A. K. Misra, Anupama Sharma, Jia Li. A mathematical model for control of vector borne diseases through media campaigns. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (7) : 1909-1927. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1909 [20] Yunfei Lv, Rong Yuan, Yuan He. Wavefronts of a stage structured model with state--dependent delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (10) : 4931-4954. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4931

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366