American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Supplier financing service decisions for a capital-constrained supply chain: Trade credit vs. combined credit financing
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    An improved total variation regularized RPCA for moving object detection with dynamic background
July  2020, 16(4): 1699-1729. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019025

Fast calibration of the Libor market model with stochastic volatility and displaced diffusion

Laurent Devineau 1, , Pierre-Edouard Arrouy 2, , Paul Bonnefoy 2, and  Alexandre Boumezoued 2,,

1. 

Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Laboratoire de Science Actuarielle et Financière, ISFA, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
2. 

Milliman R & D, 14 Avenue de la Grande Armée, 75017, Paris, France

*Corresponding author

Received  May 2017 Revised  November 2018 Published  May 2019

Fund Project: This research is supported by Milliman Paris. The authors thank Jean-Baptiste Garnier, Bernard Lapeyre, Abdallah Laraisse, Damien Louvet, Sophian Mehalla and Julien Vedani for their help

This paper demonstrates the efficiency of using Edgeworth and Gram-Charlier expansions in the calibration of the Libor Market Model with Stochastic Volatility and Displaced Diffusion (DD-SV-LMM). Our approach brings together two research areas; first, the results regarding the SV-LMM since the work of [26], especially on the moment generating function, and second the approximation of density distributions based on Edgeworth or Gram-Charlier expansions. By exploring the analytical tractability of moments up to fourth order, we are able to perform an adjustment of the reference Bachelier model with normal volatilities for skewness and kurtosis, and as a by-product to derive a smile formula relating the volatility to the moneyness with interpretable parameters. As a main conclusion, our numerical results show a 98% reduction in computational time for the DD-SV-LMM calibration process compared to the classical numerical integration method developed by [17].

Keywords: Libor market model, stochastic volatility, displaced diffusion, swaption pricing, model calibration, Edgeworth expansions, Gram-Charlier expansions.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 60J60, 90-08; Secondary: 60G99.
Citation: Laurent Devineau, Pierre-Edouard Arrouy, Paul Bonnefoy, Alexandre Boumezoued. Fast calibration of the Libor market model with stochastic volatility and displaced diffusion. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1699-1729. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019025
References:
[1]

H. Albrecher, P. Mayer, W. Schoutens and J. Tistaert, The Little Heston Trap, KU Leuven Section of Statistics Technical Report, 2006. Google Scholar

[2]

L. Andersen and J. Andreasen, Volatility skews and extensions of the LIBOR market model, Applied Mathematical Finance, 7 (2000), 1-32.   Google Scholar

[3]

R. Balieiro Filho and R. Rosenfeld, Testing option pricing with the Edgeworth expansion, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 344 (2004), 482-490.   Google Scholar

[4]

D. Bauer, A. Reuss and D. Singer, On the calculation of the solvency capital requirement based on nested simulations, ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 42 (2012), 453-499.   Google Scholar

[5] J. Bouchaud and M. Potters, Theory of Financial Risk and Derivative Pricing: From Statistical Physics to Risk Management, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.   Google Scholar
[6]

D. Brigo and F. Mercurio, Interest Rate Models-Theory and Practice: With Smile, Inflation and Credit, Springer Finance. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.  Google Scholar

[7]

P. Carr and D. Madan, Option valuation using the fast Fourier transform, Journal of Computational Finance, 2 (1999), 61-73.  doi: 10.21314/JCF.1999.043.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. Chateau, Valuing european put options under skewness and increasing [excess] kurtosis, Journal of Mathematical Finance, 4 (2014), Article ID: 45662, 17 pages. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2014.43015.  Google Scholar

[9]

B. Choy, T. Dun and E. Schlögl, Correlating market models, RISK, (2004), 124–129. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.395640.  Google Scholar

[10]

C. Corrado and T. Su, Skewness and kurtosis in S & P 500 index returns implied by option prices, Journal of Financial Research, 19 (1996), 175-192.  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1996.tb00592.x.  Google Scholar

[11]

C. Cuchiero, M. Keller-Ressel and J. Teichmann, Polynomial processes and their applications to mathematical finance, Finance and Stochastics, 16 (2012), 711-740.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-012-0188-x.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. De Leo, V. Vargas and S. Ciliberti and J. Bouchaud, We've walked a million miles for one of these smiles, preprint, 2012, arXiv: 1203.5703v2. Google Scholar

[13]

L. Devineau and S. Loisel, Construction d'un algorithme d'accélération de la méthode des "simulations dans les simulations" pour le calcul du capital économique Solvabilité Ⅱ, Bulletin Français d'Actuariat, 10 (2009), 188–221. Google Scholar

[14]

W. Feller, Introduction to the Theory of Probability and its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Vol. 2, 1971.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. Filipović and M. Larsson, Polynomial diffusions and applications in finance, Finance and Stochastics, 20 (2016), 931-972.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-016-0304-4.  Google Scholar

[16]

P. Hall, The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion, Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4384-7.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. Heston, A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, The Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1993), 327-343.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/6.2.327.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. Heston and A. Rossi, A spanning series approach to options, The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 6 (2016), 2-42.   Google Scholar

[19]

R. Jarrow and A. Rudd, Approximate option valuation for arbitrary stochastic processes, Financial Derivatives Pricing, (2008), 9–31. doi: 10.1142/9789812819222_0001.  Google Scholar

[20]

M. Joshi and R. Rebonato, A stochastic-volatility, displaced-diffusion extension of the LIBOR market model, Quantitative Finance, 3 (2003), 458-469.  doi: 10.1088/1469-7688/3/6/305.  Google Scholar

[21]

C. Kahl and P. Jäckel, Not-so-complex logarithms in the Heston model, Wilmott Magazine, 19 (2005), 94-103.   Google Scholar

[22]

C. Necula, G. Drimus and W. Farkas, A general closed form option pricing formula, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, (2017), 15–53. Google Scholar

[23]

M. Potters, R. Cont and J. Bouchaud, Financial markets as adaptive systems, EPL (Europhysics Letters), 41 (1998), 239-239.  doi: 10.1209/epl/i1998-00136-9.  Google Scholar

[24]

E. Schlögl, Option pricing where the underlying assets follow a Gram/Charlier density of arbitrary order, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37 (2013), 611-632.  doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.10.001.  Google Scholar

[25]

J. Vedani and L. Devineau, Solvency assessment within the ORSA framework: issues and quantitative methodologies, Bulletin Français d'Actuariat, 13 (2013), 35–71. Google Scholar

[26]

L. Wu and F. Zhang, LIBOR market model with stochastic volatility, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2 (2006), 199-227.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.199.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

H. Albrecher, P. Mayer, W. Schoutens and J. Tistaert, The Little Heston Trap, KU Leuven Section of Statistics Technical Report, 2006. Google Scholar

[2]

L. Andersen and J. Andreasen, Volatility skews and extensions of the LIBOR market model, Applied Mathematical Finance, 7 (2000), 1-32.   Google Scholar

[3]

R. Balieiro Filho and R. Rosenfeld, Testing option pricing with the Edgeworth expansion, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 344 (2004), 482-490.   Google Scholar

[4]

D. Bauer, A. Reuss and D. Singer, On the calculation of the solvency capital requirement based on nested simulations, ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 42 (2012), 453-499.   Google Scholar

[5] J. Bouchaud and M. Potters, Theory of Financial Risk and Derivative Pricing: From Statistical Physics to Risk Management, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.   Google Scholar
[6]

D. Brigo and F. Mercurio, Interest Rate Models-Theory and Practice: With Smile, Inflation and Credit, Springer Finance. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.  Google Scholar

[7]

P. Carr and D. Madan, Option valuation using the fast Fourier transform, Journal of Computational Finance, 2 (1999), 61-73.  doi: 10.21314/JCF.1999.043.  Google Scholar

[8]

J. Chateau, Valuing european put options under skewness and increasing [excess] kurtosis, Journal of Mathematical Finance, 4 (2014), Article ID: 45662, 17 pages. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2014.43015.  Google Scholar

[9]

B. Choy, T. Dun and E. Schlögl, Correlating market models, RISK, (2004), 124–129. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.395640.  Google Scholar

[10]

C. Corrado and T. Su, Skewness and kurtosis in S & P 500 index returns implied by option prices, Journal of Financial Research, 19 (1996), 175-192.  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1996.tb00592.x.  Google Scholar

[11]

C. Cuchiero, M. Keller-Ressel and J. Teichmann, Polynomial processes and their applications to mathematical finance, Finance and Stochastics, 16 (2012), 711-740.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-012-0188-x.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. De Leo, V. Vargas and S. Ciliberti and J. Bouchaud, We've walked a million miles for one of these smiles, preprint, 2012, arXiv: 1203.5703v2. Google Scholar

[13]

L. Devineau and S. Loisel, Construction d'un algorithme d'accélération de la méthode des "simulations dans les simulations" pour le calcul du capital économique Solvabilité Ⅱ, Bulletin Français d'Actuariat, 10 (2009), 188–221. Google Scholar

[14]

W. Feller, Introduction to the Theory of Probability and its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Vol. 2, 1971.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. Filipović and M. Larsson, Polynomial diffusions and applications in finance, Finance and Stochastics, 20 (2016), 931-972.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-016-0304-4.  Google Scholar

[16]

P. Hall, The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion, Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4384-7.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. Heston, A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, The Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1993), 327-343.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/6.2.327.  Google Scholar

[18]

S. Heston and A. Rossi, A spanning series approach to options, The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 6 (2016), 2-42.   Google Scholar

[19]

R. Jarrow and A. Rudd, Approximate option valuation for arbitrary stochastic processes, Financial Derivatives Pricing, (2008), 9–31. doi: 10.1142/9789812819222_0001.  Google Scholar

[20]

M. Joshi and R. Rebonato, A stochastic-volatility, displaced-diffusion extension of the LIBOR market model, Quantitative Finance, 3 (2003), 458-469.  doi: 10.1088/1469-7688/3/6/305.  Google Scholar

[21]

C. Kahl and P. Jäckel, Not-so-complex logarithms in the Heston model, Wilmott Magazine, 19 (2005), 94-103.   Google Scholar

[22]

C. Necula, G. Drimus and W. Farkas, A general closed form option pricing formula, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, (2017), 15–53. Google Scholar

[23]

M. Potters, R. Cont and J. Bouchaud, Financial markets as adaptive systems, EPL (Europhysics Letters), 41 (1998), 239-239.  doi: 10.1209/epl/i1998-00136-9.  Google Scholar

[24]

E. Schlögl, Option pricing where the underlying assets follow a Gram/Charlier density of arbitrary order, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37 (2013), 611-632.  doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.10.001.  Google Scholar

[25]

J. Vedani and L. Devineau, Solvency assessment within the ORSA framework: issues and quantitative methodologies, Bulletin Français d'Actuariat, 13 (2013), 35–71. Google Scholar

[26]

L. Wu and F. Zhang, LIBOR market model with stochastic volatility, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2 (2006), 199-227.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.199.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  ATM Monte Carlo swaption volatilities for 5-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Monte Carlo swaption volatility skews for 5-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  ATM swaption volatilities with given parameters for 5-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Swaption volatility skew with given parameters for 5-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  ATM Monte Carlo swaption volatilities for 10-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Monte Carlo swaption volatility skews for 10-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  ATM swaption volatilities with given parameters for 10-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Swaption volatility skews with given parameters for 10-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  ATM Monte Carlo swaption volatilities for 20-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  Monte Carlo swaption volatility skews for 20-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11.  ATM swaption volatilities with given parameters for 20-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12.  Swaption volatility skews with given parameters for 20-years maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Sum of squared differences between market volatilities and those calculated with each method after calibration
Method Target function value
Gram-Charlier (pricing) 3.59E-05
Edgeworth (pricing) 3.02E-05
Edgeworth (smile) 3.00E-05
Heston 2.03E-05
Table Options

Download as excel

Method Target function value
Gram-Charlier (pricing) 3.59E-05
Edgeworth (pricing) 3.02E-05
Edgeworth (smile) 3.00E-05
Heston 2.03E-05
Table 2.  CPU time required for calibration using a 2500 optimization iterations budget
Method CPU Time
Heston 425.1
Edgeworth 8.2
Table Options

Download as excel

Method CPU Time
Heston 425.1
Edgeworth 8.2
[1]

Rui Hu, Yuan Yuan. Stability, bifurcation analysis in a neural network model with delay and diffusion. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 367-376. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.367
[2]

Yizhuo Wang, Shangjiang Guo. A SIS reaction-diffusion model with a free boundary condition and nonhomogeneous coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (4) : 1627-1652. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018223
[3]

Shihu Li, Wei Liu, Yingchao Xie. Large deviations for stochastic 3D Leray-$ \alpha $ model with fractional dissipation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (5) : 2491-2509. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019113
[4]

Jan Prüss, Laurent Pujo-Menjouet, G.F. Webb, Rico Zacher. Analysis of a model for the dynamics of prions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 225-235. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.225
[5]

Johannes Kellendonk, Lorenzo Sadun. Conjugacies of model sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (7) : 3805-3830. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017161
[6]

Didier Bresch, Thierry Colin, Emmanuel Grenier, Benjamin Ribba, Olivier Saut. A viscoelastic model for avascular tumor growth. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 101-108. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.101
[7]

Ondrej Budáč, Michael Herrmann, Barbara Niethammer, Andrej Spielmann. On a model for mass aggregation with maximal size. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (2) : 427-439. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.427
[8]

Martin Bohner, Sabrina Streipert. Optimal harvesting policy for the Beverton--Holt model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (4) : 673-695. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016014
[9]

Juan Manuel Pastor, Javier García-Algarra, Javier Galeano, José María Iriondo, José J. Ramasco. A simple and bounded model of population dynamics for mutualistic networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (1) : 53-70. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.53
[10]

Chin-Chin Wu. Existence of traveling wavefront for discrete bistable competition model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (3) : 973-984. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.973
[11]

Michael Grinfeld, Amy Novick-Cohen. Some remarks on stability for a phase field model with memory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 15 (4) : 1089-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.1089
[12]

Alba Málaga Sabogal, Serge Troubetzkoy. Minimality of the Ehrenfest wind-tree model. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2016, 10: 209-228. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2016.10.209
[13]

Xingchun Wang, Yongjin Wang. Variance-optimal hedging for target volatility options. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (1) : 207-218. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.207
[14]

Paula A. González-Parra, Sunmi Lee, Leticia Velázquez, Carlos Castillo-Chavez. A note on the use of optimal control on a discrete time model of influenza dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (1) : 183-197. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.183
[15]

Martial Agueh, Reinhard Illner, Ashlin Richardson. Analysis and simulations of a refined flocking and swarming model of Cucker-Smale type. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (1) : 1-16. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.1
[16]

Ronald E. Mickens. Positivity preserving discrete model for the coupled ODE's modeling glycolysis. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 623-629. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.623
[17]

Yuncherl Choi, Taeyoung Ha, Jongmin Han, Sewoong Kim, Doo Seok Lee. Turing instability and dynamic phase transition for the Brusselator model with multiple critical eigenvalues. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021035
[18]

Guirong Jiang, Qishao Lu. The dynamics of a Prey-Predator model with impulsive state feedback control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (6) : 1301-1320. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1301
[19]

Michel Chipot, Mingmin Zhang. On some model problem for the propagation of interacting species in a special environment. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020401
[20]

Mansour Shrahili, Ravi Shanker Dubey, Ahmed Shafay. Inclusion of fading memory to Banister model of changes in physical condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 881-888. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020051

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (107)
  • HTML views (707)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences