American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Designing prorated lifetime warranty strategy for high-value and durable products under two-dimensional warranty
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    A non-zero-sum reinsurance-investment game with delay and asymmetric information
March  2021, 17(2): 937-952. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020005

Robust portfolio selection for individuals: Minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin

Bing Liu 1, and  Ming Zhou 2,,

1. 

School of Finance, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
2. 

China Institute for Actuarial Science, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China

* Corresponding author: Ming Zhou

Received  August 2018 Revised  June 2019 Published  March 2021 Early access  January 2020

Fund Project: This research is supported by by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11971506, 11571388), Beijing Social Science Foundation (15JGB046), the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Science at Universities (15JJD790036), and the 111 Project (B17050)

Robust portfolio selection has become a popular problem in recent years. In this paper, we study the optimal investment problem for an individual who carries a constant consumption rate but worries about the model ambiguity of the financial market. Instead of using a conventional value function such as the utility of terminal wealth maximization, here, we focus on the purpose of risk control and seek to minimize the probability of lifetime ruin. This study is motivated by the work of [3], except that we use a standardized penalty for ambiguity aversion. The reason for taking a standardized penalty is to convert the penalty to units of the value function, which makes the difference meaningful in the definition of the value function. The advantage of taking a standardized penalty is that the closed-form solutions to both the robust investment policy and the value function can be obtained. More interestingly, we use the "Ambiguity Derived Ratio" to characterize the existence of model ambiguity which significantly affects the optimal investment policy. Finally, several numerical examples are given to illustrate our results.

Keywords: A standardized penalty, ambiguity derived ratio, HJB equation, model ambiguity, optimal investment, probability of lifetime ruin.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 91B30; Secondary: 91B42.
Citation: Bing Liu, Ming Zhou. Robust portfolio selection for individuals: Minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 937-952. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020005
References:
[1]

E. Anderson, L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, A quartet of semigroups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (2003), 68-123.   Google Scholar

[2]

E. Bayraktar and V. R. Young, Correspondence between lifetime minimum wealth and utility of consumption, Finance Stochastics, 11 (2007), 213-236.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-007-0035-7.  Google Scholar

[3]

E. Bayraktar and Y. Zhang, Minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin under ambiguity aversion, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 53 (2015), 58-90.  doi: 10.1137/140955999.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Browne, Risk-constrained dynamic active portfolio management, World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series, 3 (2011), 373-354.  doi: 10.1142/9789814293501_0026.  Google Scholar

[5]

W. H. Fleming and M. Soner, Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions, 2nd edition, Springer, New York, 2006.  Google Scholar

[6]

L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robust control and model uncertainty, American Economic Review, 91 (2001), 60-66.   Google Scholar

[7] L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robustness, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008.  doi: 10.1515/9781400829385.  Google Scholar
[8]

L. P. Hansen, T. J. Sargent, G. Turmuhambetova and N. Williams, Robust control and model misspecification, Journal of Economic Theory, 128 (2006), 45-90.  doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2004.12.006.  Google Scholar

[9] F. C. Klebaner, Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications, 2 edition, Imperial College Press, 2005.  doi: 10.1142/p386.  Google Scholar
[10]

P. J. Maenhout, Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing, Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2004), 951-983.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhh003.  Google Scholar

[11]

H. Meng, F. L. Yuen, K. T. Siu and H. L. Yang, Optimal portfolio in a continuous-time self-exciting threshold model, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 9 (2013), 487-504.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.487.  Google Scholar

[12]

R. C. Merton, Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51 (1969), 247-257.  doi: 10.2307/1926560.  Google Scholar

[13]

R. C. Merton, Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model, Journal of Economic Theory, 3 (1971), 373-413.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-X.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. E. Shreve and H. M. Soner, Optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs, Annals of Applied Probability, 4 (1994), 609-692.  doi: 10.1214/aoap/1177004966.  Google Scholar

[15]

L. Sun and L. H. Zhang, Optimal consumption and investment under irrational beliefs, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 7 (2011), 139-156.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.139.  Google Scholar

[16]

R. Uppal and T. Wang, Model misspecification and underdiversification, The Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2465-2486.  doi: 10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00612.x.  Google Scholar

[17]

B. Yi, Z. Li, F. G. Viens and Y. Zeng, Robust optimal control for an insurer with reinsurance and investment under heston's stochastic volatility model, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53 (2013), 601-614.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.08.011.  Google Scholar

[18]

C. C. Yin and Y. Z. Wen, An extension of Paulsen-Gjessing's risk model with stochastic return on investments, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52 (2013), 469-476.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.02.014.  Google Scholar

[19]

V. R. Young, Optimal investment strategy to minimize the probability of lifetime ruin, North American Actuarial Journal, 8 (2004), 105-126.  doi: 10.1080/10920277.2004.10596174.  Google Scholar

[20]

T. Zariphopoulou, Consumption-investment models with constraints, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 32 (1994), 59-85.  doi: 10.1137/S0363012991218827.  Google Scholar

[21]

X. Zhang, T. K. Siu and Q. B. Meng, Portfolio selection in the enlarged Markovian regime-switching market, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 48 (2010), 3368-3388.  doi: 10.1137/080736351.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. Zhou and K. C. Yuen, Portfolio selection by minimizing the present value of capital injection costs, Astin Bulletin, 45 (2015), 207-238.  doi: 10.1017/asb.2014.22.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Zhou, K. C. Yuen and C. C. Yin, Optimal investment and premium control for insurers with a nonlinear diffusion model, Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica (English Series), 33 (2017), 945-958.  doi: 10.1007/s10255-017-0709-7.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

E. Anderson, L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, A quartet of semigroups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (2003), 68-123.   Google Scholar

[2]

E. Bayraktar and V. R. Young, Correspondence between lifetime minimum wealth and utility of consumption, Finance Stochastics, 11 (2007), 213-236.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-007-0035-7.  Google Scholar

[3]

E. Bayraktar and Y. Zhang, Minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin under ambiguity aversion, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 53 (2015), 58-90.  doi: 10.1137/140955999.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Browne, Risk-constrained dynamic active portfolio management, World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series, 3 (2011), 373-354.  doi: 10.1142/9789814293501_0026.  Google Scholar

[5]

W. H. Fleming and M. Soner, Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions, 2nd edition, Springer, New York, 2006.  Google Scholar

[6]

L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robust control and model uncertainty, American Economic Review, 91 (2001), 60-66.   Google Scholar

[7] L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robustness, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008.  doi: 10.1515/9781400829385.  Google Scholar
[8]

L. P. Hansen, T. J. Sargent, G. Turmuhambetova and N. Williams, Robust control and model misspecification, Journal of Economic Theory, 128 (2006), 45-90.  doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2004.12.006.  Google Scholar

[9] F. C. Klebaner, Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications, 2 edition, Imperial College Press, 2005.  doi: 10.1142/p386.  Google Scholar
[10]

P. J. Maenhout, Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing, Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2004), 951-983.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhh003.  Google Scholar

[11]

H. Meng, F. L. Yuen, K. T. Siu and H. L. Yang, Optimal portfolio in a continuous-time self-exciting threshold model, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 9 (2013), 487-504.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.487.  Google Scholar

[12]

R. C. Merton, Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51 (1969), 247-257.  doi: 10.2307/1926560.  Google Scholar

[13]

R. C. Merton, Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model, Journal of Economic Theory, 3 (1971), 373-413.  doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-X.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. E. Shreve and H. M. Soner, Optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs, Annals of Applied Probability, 4 (1994), 609-692.  doi: 10.1214/aoap/1177004966.  Google Scholar

[15]

L. Sun and L. H. Zhang, Optimal consumption and investment under irrational beliefs, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 7 (2011), 139-156.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.139.  Google Scholar

[16]

R. Uppal and T. Wang, Model misspecification and underdiversification, The Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2465-2486.  doi: 10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00612.x.  Google Scholar

[17]

B. Yi, Z. Li, F. G. Viens and Y. Zeng, Robust optimal control for an insurer with reinsurance and investment under heston's stochastic volatility model, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53 (2013), 601-614.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.08.011.  Google Scholar

[18]

C. C. Yin and Y. Z. Wen, An extension of Paulsen-Gjessing's risk model with stochastic return on investments, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52 (2013), 469-476.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.02.014.  Google Scholar

[19]

V. R. Young, Optimal investment strategy to minimize the probability of lifetime ruin, North American Actuarial Journal, 8 (2004), 105-126.  doi: 10.1080/10920277.2004.10596174.  Google Scholar

[20]

T. Zariphopoulou, Consumption-investment models with constraints, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 32 (1994), 59-85.  doi: 10.1137/S0363012991218827.  Google Scholar

[21]

X. Zhang, T. K. Siu and Q. B. Meng, Portfolio selection in the enlarged Markovian regime-switching market, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 48 (2010), 3368-3388.  doi: 10.1137/080736351.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. Zhou and K. C. Yuen, Portfolio selection by minimizing the present value of capital injection costs, Astin Bulletin, 45 (2015), 207-238.  doi: 10.1017/asb.2014.22.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Zhou, K. C. Yuen and C. C. Yin, Optimal investment and premium control for insurers with a nonlinear diffusion model, Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica (English Series), 33 (2017), 945-958.  doi: 10.1007/s10255-017-0709-7.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Optimal investment policies with respect to the wealth and the model ambiguity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Ambiguity Derived Ratio with respect to model ambiguity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Optimal investment policies with respect to the lifetime
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  The value function with respect to model ambiguity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Return rate of the risky asset under robust risk measure ($ \mu = 0.1 $)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Yu Yuan, Hui Mi. Robust optimal asset-liability management with penalization on ambiguity. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021121
[2]

Zhilin Kang, Xingyi Li, Zhongfei Li. Mean-CVaR portfolio selection model with ambiguity in distribution and attitude. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (6) : 3065-3081. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019094
[3]

Rongfei Liu, Dingcheng Wang, Jiangyan Peng. Infinite-time ruin probability of a renewal risk model with exponential Levy process investment and dependent claims and inter-arrival times. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 995-1007. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016058
[4]

Yinghui Dong, Guojing Wang. Ruin probability for renewal risk model with negative risk sums. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (2) : 229-236. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.229
[5]

Emilija Bernackaitė, Jonas Šiaulys. The finite-time ruin probability for an inhomogeneous renewal risk model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 207-222. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016012
[6]

Feimin Zhong, Wei Zeng, Zhongbao Zhou. Mechanism design in a supply chain with ambiguity in private information. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (1) : 261-287. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018151
[7]

Hanqing Jin, Xun Yu Zhou. Continuous-time portfolio selection under ambiguity. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 475-488. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.475
[8]

Ludovic Tangpi. Efficient hedging under ambiguity in continuous time. Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk, 2020, 5 (0) : 6-. doi: 10.1186/s41546-020-00048-9
[9]

Jiongmin Yong. Time-inconsistent optimal control problems and the equilibrium HJB equation. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2012, 2 (3) : 271-329. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.271
[10]

Meng Wu, Jiefeng Yang. The optimal exit of staged investment when consider the posterior probability. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 1105-1123. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016064
[11]

Yu Yuan, Zhibin Liang, Xia Han. Optimal investment and reinsurance to minimize the probability of drawdown with borrowing costs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021003
[12]

Xia Han, Zhibin Liang, Yu Yuan, Caibin Zhang. Optimal per-loss reinsurance and investment to minimize the probability of drawdown. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021145
[13]

Baoyin Xun, Kam C. Yuen, Kaiyong Wang. The finite-time ruin probability of a risk model with a general counting process and stochastic return. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021032
[14]

Qingwu Gao, Zhongquan Huang, Houcai Shen, Juan Zheng. Asymptotics for random-time ruin probability in a time-dependent renewal risk model with subexponential claims. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (1) : 31-43. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.31
[15]

Yuebao Wang, Qingwu Gao, Kaiyong Wang, Xijun Liu. Random time ruin probability for the renewal risk model with heavy-tailed claims. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 719-736. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.719
[16]

Haiyang Wang, Zhen Wu. Time-inconsistent optimal control problem with random coefficients and stochastic equilibrium HJB equation. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 651-678. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.651
[17]

Zuo Quan Xu, Fahuai Yi. An optimal consumption-investment model with constraint on consumption. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (3) : 517-534. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016014
[18]

Jiangyan Peng, Dingcheng Wang. Asymptotics for ruin probabilities of a non-standard renewal risk model with dependence structures and exponential Lévy process investment returns. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 155-185. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016010
[19]

Davide La Torre, Simone Marsiglio, Franklin Mendivil, Fabio Privileggi. Public debt dynamics under ambiguity by means of iterated function systems on density functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (11) : 5873-5903. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021070
[20]

Hiroaki Hata, Li-Hsien Sun. Optimal investment and reinsurance of insurers with lognormal stochastic factor model. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021033

2020 Impact Factor: 1.801

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy