American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    A lattice method for option evaluation with regime-switching asset correlation structure
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    The Glowinski–Le Tallec splitting method revisited: A general convergence and convergence rate analysis
July  2021, 17(4): 1713-1727. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020041

Optimal control and stabilization of building maintenance units based on minimum principle

Shi'an Wang , and  N. U. Ahmed

School of EECS, University of Ottawa, 800 King Edward Ave. Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada

* Corresponding author: Shi'an Wang

Received  August 2019 Revised  October 2019 Published  February 2020

In this paper we present a mathematical model describing the physical dynamics of a building maintenance unit (BMU) equipped with reaction jets. The momentum provided by reaction jets is considered as the control variable. We introduce an objective functional based on the deviation of the BMU from its equilibrium state due to external high-wind forces. Pontryagin minimum principle is then used to determine the optimal control policy so as to minimize possible deviation from the rest state thereby increasing the stability of the BMU and reducing the risk to the workers as well as the public. We present a series of numerical results corresponding to three different scenarios for the formulated optimal control problem. These results show that, under high-wind conditions the BMU can be stabilized and brought to its equilibrium state with appropriate controls in a short period of time. Therefore, it is believed that the dynamic model presented here would be potentially useful for stabilizing building maintenance units thereby reducing the risk to the workers and the general public.

Keywords: Building maintenance units, mathematical modeling, optimal control, stabilization, Pontryagin minimum principle.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 49J15; Secondary: 93C95.
Citation: Shi'an Wang, N. U. Ahmed. Optimal control and stabilization of building maintenance units based on minimum principle. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1713-1727. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020041
References:
[1]

N. U. Ahmed, Dynamic Systems and Control with Applications, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2006. doi: 10.1142/6262.  Google Scholar

[2]

N. U. Ahmed, Elements of Finite Dimensional Systems and Control Theory, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 37, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1988.  Google Scholar

[3]

T. Ahmed and N.U. Ahmed, Optimal Control of Antigen-Antibody Interactions for Cancer Immunotherapy, Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Applications & Algorithms, 26 (2019), 135-152.   Google Scholar

[4]

D. Allen, What is building maintenance?, Facilities, 11 (1993), 7-12.  doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000002230.  Google Scholar

[5]

Building Maintenance Units, Report of Alimak Group AB. Available from: https://alimakservice.com/building-maintenance-units/. Google Scholar

[6]

T. R. Chandrupatla, A. D. Belegundu and T. Ramesh, et al., Introduction to Finite Elements in Engineering, Prentice Hall, 2002. Google Scholar

[7]

J. C. P. Cheng, W. Chen and Y. Tan, et al., A BIM-based decision support system framework for predictive maintenance management of building facilities, 16th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Osaka, Japan, 2016, 711–718. Google Scholar

[8] T. Glad and L. Ljung, Control Theory, CRC Press, London, 2014.  doi: 10.1201/9781315274737.  Google Scholar
[9]

R. M. W. Horner, M. A. El-Haram and A. K. Munns, Building maintenance strategy: A new management approach, J. Quality Maintenance Engineering, 3 (1997), 273-280.  doi: 10.1108/13552519710176881.  Google Scholar

[10]

Instability of Building Maintenance Units, WorkSafe Victoria, 2018. Available from: https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/safety-alerts/instability-building-maintenance-units. Google Scholar

[11]

C. H. Ko, RFID-based building maintenance system, Automat. Construction, 18 (2009), 275-284.  doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.001.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. Lind and H. Muyingo, Building maintenance strategies: Planning under uncertainty, Property Management, 30 (2012), 14-28.  doi: 10.1108/02637471211198152.  Google Scholar

[13]

P. Maryam, N.U. Ahmed and M.C.E. Yagoub, Optimum Decision Policy for Replacement of Conventional Energy Sources by Renewable Ones, International Journal of Energy Science, 3 (2013), 311-319.  doi: 10.14355/ijes.2013.0305.03.  Google Scholar

[14]

I. Motawa and A. Almarshad, A knowledge-based BIM system for building maintenance, Automat. Construction, 29 (2013), 173-182.  doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.008.  Google Scholar

[15]

K. Ogata and Y. Yang, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002. Google Scholar

[16]

L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii and R. V. Gamkrelidze, et al., The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, The Macmillan Co., New York, 1964.  Google Scholar

[17]

I. H. Seeley, Building Maintenance, Building and Surveying Series, Palgrave, London, 1987. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-18925-0.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. Shen, A. K. Sanyal and N. A. Chaturvedi, et al., Dynamics and control of a 3D pendulum, 43$^rd$ IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Bahamas, 2004, 323–328. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2004.1428650.  Google Scholar

[19]

M.M. Suruz, N.U. Ahmed and M. Chowdhury, Optimum policy for integration of renewable energy sources into the power generation system, Energy Economics, 34 (2012), 558-567.  doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.002.  Google Scholar

[20]

K. L. Teo, C. J. Goh and K. H. Wong, A Unified Computational Approach to Optimal Control Problems, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 55, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991. doi: 20.500.11937/24319.  Google Scholar

[21]

S. Wang and N.U. Ahmed, Dynamic model of urban traffic and optimum management of its flow and congestion, Dynamic Systems and Applications, 26 (2017), 575-588.  doi: 10.12732/dsa.v26i34.12.  Google Scholar

[22]

S. Wang, N.U. Ahmed and T.H. Yeap, Optimum management of urban traffic flow based on a stochastic dynamic model, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20 (2019), 4377-4389.  doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2884463.  Google Scholar

[23]

X. Wang, Solving optimal control problems with MATLAB: Indirect methods, ISE Dept., NCSU, Raleigh, NC, 2009. Google Scholar

[24]

D. V. Zenkov, On Hamel's equations, Theoret. Appl. Mechanics, 43 (2016), 191-220.  doi: 10.2298/TAM160612011Z.  Google Scholar

[25]

D. V. Zenkov, M. Leok and A. M. Bloch, Hamel's formalism and variational integrators on a sphere, 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Hawaii, 2012, 7504–7510. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2012.6426779.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

N. U. Ahmed, Dynamic Systems and Control with Applications, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2006. doi: 10.1142/6262.  Google Scholar

[2]

N. U. Ahmed, Elements of Finite Dimensional Systems and Control Theory, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 37, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1988.  Google Scholar

[3]

T. Ahmed and N.U. Ahmed, Optimal Control of Antigen-Antibody Interactions for Cancer Immunotherapy, Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems Series B: Applications & Algorithms, 26 (2019), 135-152.   Google Scholar

[4]

D. Allen, What is building maintenance?, Facilities, 11 (1993), 7-12.  doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000002230.  Google Scholar

[5]

Building Maintenance Units, Report of Alimak Group AB. Available from: https://alimakservice.com/building-maintenance-units/. Google Scholar

[6]

T. R. Chandrupatla, A. D. Belegundu and T. Ramesh, et al., Introduction to Finite Elements in Engineering, Prentice Hall, 2002. Google Scholar

[7]

J. C. P. Cheng, W. Chen and Y. Tan, et al., A BIM-based decision support system framework for predictive maintenance management of building facilities, 16th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Osaka, Japan, 2016, 711–718. Google Scholar

[8] T. Glad and L. Ljung, Control Theory, CRC Press, London, 2014.  doi: 10.1201/9781315274737.  Google Scholar
[9]

R. M. W. Horner, M. A. El-Haram and A. K. Munns, Building maintenance strategy: A new management approach, J. Quality Maintenance Engineering, 3 (1997), 273-280.  doi: 10.1108/13552519710176881.  Google Scholar

[10]

Instability of Building Maintenance Units, WorkSafe Victoria, 2018. Available from: https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/safety-alerts/instability-building-maintenance-units. Google Scholar

[11]

C. H. Ko, RFID-based building maintenance system, Automat. Construction, 18 (2009), 275-284.  doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.001.  Google Scholar

[12]

H. Lind and H. Muyingo, Building maintenance strategies: Planning under uncertainty, Property Management, 30 (2012), 14-28.  doi: 10.1108/02637471211198152.  Google Scholar

[13]

P. Maryam, N.U. Ahmed and M.C.E. Yagoub, Optimum Decision Policy for Replacement of Conventional Energy Sources by Renewable Ones, International Journal of Energy Science, 3 (2013), 311-319.  doi: 10.14355/ijes.2013.0305.03.  Google Scholar

[14]

I. Motawa and A. Almarshad, A knowledge-based BIM system for building maintenance, Automat. Construction, 29 (2013), 173-182.  doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.008.  Google Scholar

[15]

K. Ogata and Y. Yang, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002. Google Scholar

[16]

L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii and R. V. Gamkrelidze, et al., The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, The Macmillan Co., New York, 1964.  Google Scholar

[17]

I. H. Seeley, Building Maintenance, Building and Surveying Series, Palgrave, London, 1987. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-18925-0.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. Shen, A. K. Sanyal and N. A. Chaturvedi, et al., Dynamics and control of a 3D pendulum, 43$^rd$ IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Bahamas, 2004, 323–328. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2004.1428650.  Google Scholar

[19]

M.M. Suruz, N.U. Ahmed and M. Chowdhury, Optimum policy for integration of renewable energy sources into the power generation system, Energy Economics, 34 (2012), 558-567.  doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.002.  Google Scholar

[20]

K. L. Teo, C. J. Goh and K. H. Wong, A Unified Computational Approach to Optimal Control Problems, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 55, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991. doi: 20.500.11937/24319.  Google Scholar

[21]

S. Wang and N.U. Ahmed, Dynamic model of urban traffic and optimum management of its flow and congestion, Dynamic Systems and Applications, 26 (2017), 575-588.  doi: 10.12732/dsa.v26i34.12.  Google Scholar

[22]

S. Wang, N.U. Ahmed and T.H. Yeap, Optimum management of urban traffic flow based on a stochastic dynamic model, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20 (2019), 4377-4389.  doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2884463.  Google Scholar

[23]

X. Wang, Solving optimal control problems with MATLAB: Indirect methods, ISE Dept., NCSU, Raleigh, NC, 2009. Google Scholar

[24]

D. V. Zenkov, On Hamel's equations, Theoret. Appl. Mechanics, 43 (2016), 191-220.  doi: 10.2298/TAM160612011Z.  Google Scholar

[25]

D. V. Zenkov, M. Leok and A. M. Bloch, Hamel's formalism and variational integrators on a sphere, 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Hawaii, 2012, 7504–7510. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2012.6426779.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The schematic of a BMU
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The schematic of the BMU body
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Simulation results of scenario 1
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Simulation results corresponding to $ U_{1} $ in scenario 2
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Simulation results corresponding to $ U_{2} $ in scenario 2
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Simulation results of case 1 in scenario 3
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Simulation results of case 2 in scenario 3
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Definition of Notations
Notation Description
$ x_{1} = \omega_{x} $ First component of the angular velocity
$ x_{2} = \omega_{y} $ Second component of the angular velocity
$ x_{3} = \gamma_{x} $ First component of the unit vertical vector $ \gamma $
$ x_{4} = \gamma_{y} $ Second component of the unit vertical vector $ \gamma $
$ x_{5} = \gamma_{z} $ Third component of the unit vertical vector $ \gamma $
$ \psi $ Costate vector (adjoint state)
$ C $ Constant inertia matrix
$ I=[0,T] $ Total operating period in seconds
$ U $ Control (decision) constraint set
$ {\mathcal U}_{ad} $ Set of admissible controls
$ \underline{u} $ Lower bound of the control variable
$ \overline{u} $ Upper bound of the control variable
$ J(u) $ Objective (cost) functional
$ \ell $ Integrand of running cost
$ \Phi $ Terminal cost
$ H $ Hamiltonian function
$ V(x) $ Lyapunov function candidate
$ x^{d} $ Desired state during the operating period
$ \bar{x} $ Target state at the terminal time
$ x^{e} $ Equilibrium state of the system
$ \langle a,\; b \rangle $ Scalar product of vectors $ a $ and $ b $
$ a \times b $ Cross product of vectors $ a $ and $ b $
$ x^{T} $ Transpose of vector $ x $
Table Options

Download as excel

Notation Description
$ x_{1} = \omega_{x} $ First component of the angular velocity
$ x_{2} = \omega_{y} $ Second component of the angular velocity
$ x_{3} = \gamma_{x} $ First component of the unit vertical vector $ \gamma $
$ x_{4} = \gamma_{y} $ Second component of the unit vertical vector $ \gamma $
$ x_{5} = \gamma_{z} $ Third component of the unit vertical vector $ \gamma $
$ \psi $ Costate vector (adjoint state)
$ C $ Constant inertia matrix
$ I=[0,T] $ Total operating period in seconds
$ U $ Control (decision) constraint set
$ {\mathcal U}_{ad} $ Set of admissible controls
$ \underline{u} $ Lower bound of the control variable
$ \overline{u} $ Upper bound of the control variable
$ J(u) $ Objective (cost) functional
$ \ell $ Integrand of running cost
$ \Phi $ Terminal cost
$ H $ Hamiltonian function
$ V(x) $ Lyapunov function candidate
$ x^{d} $ Desired state during the operating period
$ \bar{x} $ Target state at the terminal time
$ x^{e} $ Equilibrium state of the system
$ \langle a,\; b \rangle $ Scalar product of vectors $ a $ and $ b $
$ a \times b $ Cross product of vectors $ a $ and $ b $
$ x^{T} $ Transpose of vector $ x $
Table201 
Algorithm 1: Computational Algorithm $ (\bullet) $
Require:
Choose the appropriate initial state $ x(0) $;
Set the length of time horizon $ T \in R^{+} $ and the number of subintervals (of equal length) $ N \in \mathbb{Z}^{+} $;
Set step size $ \epsilon $, stopping criterion $ \tau $, maximum number of iterations $ K $ and control bounds $ \underline{u}, \; \overline{u} $.
Ensure:
Optimal cost $ J^o $;
Optimal state trajectory $ x^{o} $;
Optimal control trajectory $ u^o $.

1: Subdivide equally the time horizon $ I = [0, T] $ into $ N $ subintervals and assume the control function is piecewise-constant. That is, $ u^{n}(t) = u^{n}(t_{i}) $, for $ t \in [t_{i}, t_{i+1}),\; i = 0, 1, \cdots, N-1 $, where $ u^{n}(t),\; t \in I $ is the control (decision) policy at the $ n $th iteration (starting from $ n = 0 $).
2: Integrate the state equations from 0 to $ T $ with initial state $ x(0) = x_{0} $ and the assumed controls $ u^{(n)} \equiv u^{n}(t),\; t \in I $, store the obtained state trajectory $ x^{(n)} $ and the control vector $ u^{(n)} $.
3: Use $ x^{(n)} $ and $ u^{(n)} $ to integrate the adjoint equations backward in time starting from the costate $ \psi^{(n)}(T) $ at the terminal time. The terminal costate is given by $ \psi^{(n)}(T) = \Phi_{x}(x^{(n)}(T)) $ where $ \Phi $ is the terminal cost.
4: Use the triple {$ u^{(n)},\; x^{(n)},\; \psi^{(n)} $} to compute the gradient $ g_{n}(t) = \frac{\partial H}{\partial u^{(n)}}(x^{(n)},\; u^{(n)},\; \psi^{(n)}) = H_{u}(x^{(n)},\; u^{(n)},\; \psi^{(n)}) $ and store this vector.
5: Compute the cost functional $ J^{(n)}(u) $ using equation (19) and store this value.
6: If $ \| g_{n} \| < \tau $ then set
$ u^{o} = u^{(n)} $, $ J^{o} = J^{(n)} $
return
Otherwise, go to Step 7.
7: Construct the control policy for the next iteration as
$ u^{(n+1)}(t) = u^{(n)}(t) - \epsilon g_{n}(t),\; t \in I $ by choosing an appropriate $ \epsilon \in (0,1) $ such that $ u^{(n+1)} \in U $. For the chosen $ \epsilon $, if $ u^{(n+1)} > \overline{u} $ set $ u^{(n+1)} = \overline{u} $; if $ u^{(n+1)} < \underline{u} $ set $ u^{(n+1)} = \underline{u} $.
8: If $ n < K $ then set
$ n = n + 1 $, go to Step 2.
Otherwise, display "Stopped before required residual is obtained''.
Table Options

Download as excel

Algorithm 1: Computational Algorithm $ (\bullet) $
Require:
Choose the appropriate initial state $ x(0) $;
Set the length of time horizon $ T \in R^{+} $ and the number of subintervals (of equal length) $ N \in \mathbb{Z}^{+} $;
Set step size $ \epsilon $, stopping criterion $ \tau $, maximum number of iterations $ K $ and control bounds $ \underline{u}, \; \overline{u} $.
Ensure:
Optimal cost $ J^o $;
Optimal state trajectory $ x^{o} $;
Optimal control trajectory $ u^o $.

1: Subdivide equally the time horizon $ I = [0, T] $ into $ N $ subintervals and assume the control function is piecewise-constant. That is, $ u^{n}(t) = u^{n}(t_{i}) $, for $ t \in [t_{i}, t_{i+1}),\; i = 0, 1, \cdots, N-1 $, where $ u^{n}(t),\; t \in I $ is the control (decision) policy at the $ n $th iteration (starting from $ n = 0 $).
2: Integrate the state equations from 0 to $ T $ with initial state $ x(0) = x_{0} $ and the assumed controls $ u^{(n)} \equiv u^{n}(t),\; t \in I $, store the obtained state trajectory $ x^{(n)} $ and the control vector $ u^{(n)} $.
3: Use $ x^{(n)} $ and $ u^{(n)} $ to integrate the adjoint equations backward in time starting from the costate $ \psi^{(n)}(T) $ at the terminal time. The terminal costate is given by $ \psi^{(n)}(T) = \Phi_{x}(x^{(n)}(T)) $ where $ \Phi $ is the terminal cost.
4: Use the triple {$ u^{(n)},\; x^{(n)},\; \psi^{(n)} $} to compute the gradient $ g_{n}(t) = \frac{\partial H}{\partial u^{(n)}}(x^{(n)},\; u^{(n)},\; \psi^{(n)}) = H_{u}(x^{(n)},\; u^{(n)},\; \psi^{(n)}) $ and store this vector.
5: Compute the cost functional $ J^{(n)}(u) $ using equation (19) and store this value.
6: If $ \| g_{n} \| < \tau $ then set
$ u^{o} = u^{(n)} $, $ J^{o} = J^{(n)} $
return
Otherwise, go to Step 7.
7: Construct the control policy for the next iteration as
$ u^{(n+1)}(t) = u^{(n)}(t) - \epsilon g_{n}(t),\; t \in I $ by choosing an appropriate $ \epsilon \in (0,1) $ such that $ u^{(n+1)} \in U $. For the chosen $ \epsilon $, if $ u^{(n+1)} > \overline{u} $ set $ u^{(n+1)} = \overline{u} $; if $ u^{(n+1)} < \underline{u} $ set $ u^{(n+1)} = \underline{u} $.
8: If $ n < K $ then set
$ n = n + 1 $, go to Step 2.
Otherwise, display "Stopped before required residual is obtained''.
[1]

Stefan Doboszczak, Manil T. Mohan, Sivaguru S. Sritharan. Pontryagin maximum principle for the optimal control of linearized compressible navier-stokes equations with state constraints. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020110
[2]

Huaiqiang Yu, Bin Liu. Pontryagin's principle for local solutions of optimal control governed by the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with mixed control-state constraints. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2012, 2 (1) : 61-80. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.61
[3]

John A. Adam. Inside mathematical modeling: building models in the context of wound healing in bone. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 1-24. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.1
[4]

Loïc Louison, Abdennebi Omrane, Harry Ozier-Lafontaine, Delphine Picart. Modeling plant nutrient uptake: Mathematical analysis and optimal control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2015, 4 (2) : 193-203. doi: 10.3934/eect.2015.4.193
[5]

Urszula Ledzewicz, Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler, Nicolas André, Marie Amélie Heng, Eddy Pasquier. On drug resistance and metronomic chemotherapy: A mathematical modeling and optimal control approach. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 217-235. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017014
[6]

Omid S. Fard, Javad Soolaki, Delfim F. M. Torres. A necessary condition of Pontryagin type for fuzzy fractional optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (1) : 59-76. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018004
[7]

Guy Barles, Ariela Briani, Emmanuel Trélat. Value function for regional control problems via dynamic programming and Pontryagin maximum principle. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 509-533. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018021
[8]

Zaidong Zhan, Shuping Chen, Wei Wei. A unified theory of maximum principle for continuous and discrete time optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2012, 2 (2) : 195-215. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2012.2.195
[9]

Marco Caponigro, Massimo Fornasier, Benedetto Piccoli, Emmanuel Trélat. Sparse stabilization and optimal control of the Cucker-Smale model. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2013, 3 (4) : 447-466. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.447
[10]

Andrei V. Dmitruk, Nikolai P. Osmolovskii. Necessary conditions for a weak minimum in optimal control problems with integral equations on a variable time interval. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (9) : 4323-4343. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4323
[11]

Andrei V. Dmitruk, Alexander M. Kaganovich. Quadratic order conditions for an extended weak minimum in optimal control problems with intermediate and mixed constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (2) : 523-545. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.523
[12]

Andrei V. Dmitruk, Nikolai P. Osmolovski. Necessary conditions for a weak minimum in a general optimal control problem with integral equations on a variable time interval. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (4) : 507-535. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017019
[13]

Joseph Malinzi, Rachid Ouifki, Amina Eladdadi, Delfim F. M. Torres, K. A. Jane White. Enhancement of chemotherapy using oncolytic virotherapy: Mathematical and optimal control analysis. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (6) : 1435-1463. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018066
[14]

Shuo Wang, Heinz Schättler. Optimal control of a mathematical model for cancer chemotherapy under tumor heterogeneity. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : 1223-1240. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016040
[15]

Cristiana J. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres. Modeling and optimal control of HIV/AIDS prevention through PrEP. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (1) : 119-141. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018008
[16]

Carmen Chicone, Stephen J. Lombardo, David G. Retzloff. Modeling, approximation, and time optimal temperature control for binder removal from ceramics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021034
[17]

Stanisław Migórski. A note on optimal control problem for a hemivariational inequality modeling fluid flow. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 545-554. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.545
[18]

Md. Haider Ali Biswas, Maria do Rosário de Pinho. A nonsmooth maximum principle for optimal control problems with state and mixed constraints - convex case. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 174-183. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.174
[19]

Hans Josef Pesch. Carathéodory's royal road of the calculus of variations: Missed exits to the maximum principle of optimal control theory. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (1) : 161-173. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.161
[20]

Dingjun Yao, Kun Fan. Optimal risk control and dividend strategies in the presence of two reinsurers: Variance premium principle. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 1055-1083. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017090

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (132)
  • HTML views (456)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences