American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020124

On the $ BMAP_1, BMAP_2/PH/g, c $ retrial queueing system

Yi Peng 1, and  Jinbiao Wu 2,,

1. 

School of Mathematical Science, Changsha Normal University, Changsha 410100, Hunan, China
2. 

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China

* Corresponding author: Jinbiao Wu

Received  December 2019 Revised  April 2020 Published  June 2020

Fund Project: The first author is supported by Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan under Grant 2019JJ50677 and the Program of Hehua Excellent Young Talents of Changsha Normal University. The second author is supported by Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan under Grant 2020JJ4760

In this paper, we consider the BMAP/PH/c retrial queue with two types of customers where the rate of individual repeated attempts from the orbit is modulated according to a Markov Modulated Poisson Process. Using the theory of multi-dimensional asymptotically quasi-Toeplitz Markov chain, we obtain the algorithm for calculating the stationary distribution of the system. Main performance measures are presented. Furthermore, we investigate some optimization problems. The algorithm for determining the optimal number of guard servers and total servers is elaborated. Finally, this queueing system is applied to the cellular wireless network. Numerical results to illustrate the optimization problems and the impact of retrial on performance measures are provided. We find that the performance measures are mainly affected by the two types of customers' arrivals and service patterns, but the retrial rate plays a less crucial role.

Keywords: Retrial queueing systems, batch Markovian arrival processes, asymptotically quasi-Toeplitz Markov chains, multi-objective optimization, cellular wireless networks.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 60K25; Secondary: 90B22.
Citation: Yi Peng, Jinbiao Wu. On the $ BMAP_1, BMAP_2/PH/g, c $ retrial queueing system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020124
References:
[1]

J. R. Artalejo, Accessible bibliography on retrial queues, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 30 (1999), 1-6.   Google Scholar

[2]

J. R. Artalejo, A classified bibliography of research on retrial queues: Progress in 1990-1999, Top, 7 (1999), 187-211.  doi: 10.1007/BF02564721.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Breuer, A. Dudin and V. Klimenok, A retrial $BMAP/PH/N$ system, Queueing Systems, 40 (2002), 433-457.  doi: 10.1023/A:1015041602946.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. R. Chakravarthy, The batch Markovian arrival process: A review and future work, Advances in Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes, (1999), 21–49. Google Scholar

[5]

A. Dudin and V. Klimenok, A retrial BMAP/PH/N queueing system with Markov modulated retrials, 2012 2nd Baltic Congress on Future Internet Communications, IEEE, (2012), 246–251. doi: 10.1109/BCFIC.2012.6217953.  Google Scholar

[6]

A. N. Dudin, G. V. Tsarenkov and V. I. Klimenok, Software "SIRIUS++" for performance evaluation of modern communication networks, Modelling and Simulation 2002. 16th European Simulation Multi-conference, Darmstadt, (2002), 489–493. Google Scholar

[7]

G. Falin, A survey of retrial queues, Queueing Systems Theory Appl., 7 (1990), 127-167.  doi: 10.1007/BF01158472.  Google Scholar

[8]

A. Graham, Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus with Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, Halsted Press [John Wiley & Sons, Inc.], New York, 1981,130 pp.  Google Scholar

[9]

R. Guerin, Queueing-blocking system with two arrival streams and guard channels, IEEE Transations in Communications, 36 (1988), 153-163.  doi: 10.1109/26.2745.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Hong and S.S. Rappaport, Traffic model and performance analysis for cellular mobile radio telephone systems with prioritized and nonprioritized handoff procedures, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 35 (1996), 77-99.   Google Scholar

[11]

C. S. Kim, V. I. Klimenok and D. S. Orlovsky, The BMAP/PH/N retrial queue with Markovian flow of breakdowns, European Journal of Operational Research, 189 (2008), 1057-1072.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.053.  Google Scholar

[12]

C. S. Kim, V. Klimenok, V. Mushko and A. Dudin, The BMAP/PH/N retrial queueing system operating in {M}arkovian random environment, Comput. Oper. Res., 37 (2010), 1228-1237.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2009.09.008.  Google Scholar

[13]

C. S. Kim, V. I. Klimenok and A. N. Dudin, Analysis and optimization of guard channel policy in cellular mobile networks with account of retrials, Comput. Oper. Res., 43 (2014), 181-190.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.09.005.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. Klemm, C. Lindemann and M. Lohmann, Modeling IP traffic using the batch Markovian arrival process, Performance Evaluation, 54 (2003), 149-173.  doi: 10.1007/3-540-46029-2_6.  Google Scholar

[15]

V. I. Klimenok, D. S. Orlovsky and A. N. Dudin, A $BMAP/PH/N$ system with impatient repeated Calls, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 24 (2007), 293-312.  doi: 10.1142/S0217595907001310.  Google Scholar

[16]

V. I. Klimenok and A. N. Dudin, Multi-dimensional asymptotically quasi-Toeplitz Markov chains and their application in queueing theory, Queueing Systems, 54 (2006), 245-259.  doi: 10.1007/s11134-006-0300-z.  Google Scholar

[17]

G. Latouche and V. Ramaswami, Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modeling, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, 1999. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719734.  Google Scholar

[18]

D. M. Lucantoni, New results on the single server queue with a batch Markovian arrival process, Stochastic Models, 7 (1991), 1-46.  doi: 10.1080/15326349108807174.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Martin and J. R. Artalejo, Analysis of an $M/G/1$ queue with two types of impatient units, Advances in Applied Probability, 27 (1995), 840-861.  doi: 10.2307/1428136.  Google Scholar

[20]

E. Morozov, A. Rumyantsev, S. Dey and T. G. Deepak, Performance analysis and stability of multiclass orbit queue with constant retrial rates and balking, Performance Evaluation, 134 (2019), 102005. doi: 10.1016/j.peva.2019.102005.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. F. Neuts, A versatile Markovian point process, Journal of Applied Probability, 16 (1979), 764-779.  doi: 10.2307/3213143.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. F. Neuts, Structured Stochastic Matrices of M/G/1-type and their Applications, Probability: Pure and Applied, 5. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. F. Neuts, Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach, Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences, 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1981.  Google Scholar

[24]

P. I. Panagoulias, I. D. Moscholios, P. G. Sarigiannidis and M. D. Logothetis, Congestion probabilities in OFDM wireless networks with compound Poisson arrivals, IET Communications, 14 (2020), 674-681.  doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2019.0845.  Google Scholar

[25]

K. S. Trivedi, S. Dharmaraja and X. M. Ma, Analytic modeling of handoffs in wireless cellular networks, Information Sciences, 148 (2000), 155-166.  doi: 10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00292-X.  Google Scholar

[26]

T. M. Walingo and F. Takawira, Performance analysis of a connection admission scheme for future networks, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14 (2015), 1994-2006.  doi: 10.1109/TWC.2014.2378777.  Google Scholar

[27]

Y. L. Wu, G. Y. Min and L. T. Yang, Performance analysis of hybrid wireless networks under bursty and correlated traffic, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62 (2013), 449-454.  doi: 10.1109/TVT.2012.2219890.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. B. Wu, Z. M. Lian and G. Yang, Analysis of the finite source MAP/PH/N retrial G-queue operating in a random environment, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (2011), 1184-1193.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.08.006.  Google Scholar

[29]

J. B. Wu and Z. T. Lian, Analysis of $M_1, M_2/G/1$ G-queueing system with retrial customers, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 14 (2013), 365-382.  doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.06.009.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

J. R. Artalejo, Accessible bibliography on retrial queues, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 30 (1999), 1-6.   Google Scholar

[2]

J. R. Artalejo, A classified bibliography of research on retrial queues: Progress in 1990-1999, Top, 7 (1999), 187-211.  doi: 10.1007/BF02564721.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Breuer, A. Dudin and V. Klimenok, A retrial $BMAP/PH/N$ system, Queueing Systems, 40 (2002), 433-457.  doi: 10.1023/A:1015041602946.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. R. Chakravarthy, The batch Markovian arrival process: A review and future work, Advances in Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes, (1999), 21–49. Google Scholar

[5]

A. Dudin and V. Klimenok, A retrial BMAP/PH/N queueing system with Markov modulated retrials, 2012 2nd Baltic Congress on Future Internet Communications, IEEE, (2012), 246–251. doi: 10.1109/BCFIC.2012.6217953.  Google Scholar

[6]

A. N. Dudin, G. V. Tsarenkov and V. I. Klimenok, Software "SIRIUS++" for performance evaluation of modern communication networks, Modelling and Simulation 2002. 16th European Simulation Multi-conference, Darmstadt, (2002), 489–493. Google Scholar

[7]

G. Falin, A survey of retrial queues, Queueing Systems Theory Appl., 7 (1990), 127-167.  doi: 10.1007/BF01158472.  Google Scholar

[8]

A. Graham, Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus with Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, Halsted Press [John Wiley & Sons, Inc.], New York, 1981,130 pp.  Google Scholar

[9]

R. Guerin, Queueing-blocking system with two arrival streams and guard channels, IEEE Transations in Communications, 36 (1988), 153-163.  doi: 10.1109/26.2745.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Hong and S.S. Rappaport, Traffic model and performance analysis for cellular mobile radio telephone systems with prioritized and nonprioritized handoff procedures, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 35 (1996), 77-99.   Google Scholar

[11]

C. S. Kim, V. I. Klimenok and D. S. Orlovsky, The BMAP/PH/N retrial queue with Markovian flow of breakdowns, European Journal of Operational Research, 189 (2008), 1057-1072.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.053.  Google Scholar

[12]

C. S. Kim, V. Klimenok, V. Mushko and A. Dudin, The BMAP/PH/N retrial queueing system operating in {M}arkovian random environment, Comput. Oper. Res., 37 (2010), 1228-1237.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2009.09.008.  Google Scholar

[13]

C. S. Kim, V. I. Klimenok and A. N. Dudin, Analysis and optimization of guard channel policy in cellular mobile networks with account of retrials, Comput. Oper. Res., 43 (2014), 181-190.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.09.005.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. Klemm, C. Lindemann and M. Lohmann, Modeling IP traffic using the batch Markovian arrival process, Performance Evaluation, 54 (2003), 149-173.  doi: 10.1007/3-540-46029-2_6.  Google Scholar

[15]

V. I. Klimenok, D. S. Orlovsky and A. N. Dudin, A $BMAP/PH/N$ system with impatient repeated Calls, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 24 (2007), 293-312.  doi: 10.1142/S0217595907001310.  Google Scholar

[16]

V. I. Klimenok and A. N. Dudin, Multi-dimensional asymptotically quasi-Toeplitz Markov chains and their application in queueing theory, Queueing Systems, 54 (2006), 245-259.  doi: 10.1007/s11134-006-0300-z.  Google Scholar

[17]

G. Latouche and V. Ramaswami, Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modeling, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, 1999. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719734.  Google Scholar

[18]

D. M. Lucantoni, New results on the single server queue with a batch Markovian arrival process, Stochastic Models, 7 (1991), 1-46.  doi: 10.1080/15326349108807174.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Martin and J. R. Artalejo, Analysis of an $M/G/1$ queue with two types of impatient units, Advances in Applied Probability, 27 (1995), 840-861.  doi: 10.2307/1428136.  Google Scholar

[20]

E. Morozov, A. Rumyantsev, S. Dey and T. G. Deepak, Performance analysis and stability of multiclass orbit queue with constant retrial rates and balking, Performance Evaluation, 134 (2019), 102005. doi: 10.1016/j.peva.2019.102005.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. F. Neuts, A versatile Markovian point process, Journal of Applied Probability, 16 (1979), 764-779.  doi: 10.2307/3213143.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. F. Neuts, Structured Stochastic Matrices of M/G/1-type and their Applications, Probability: Pure and Applied, 5. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. F. Neuts, Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach, Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences, 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., 1981.  Google Scholar

[24]

P. I. Panagoulias, I. D. Moscholios, P. G. Sarigiannidis and M. D. Logothetis, Congestion probabilities in OFDM wireless networks with compound Poisson arrivals, IET Communications, 14 (2020), 674-681.  doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2019.0845.  Google Scholar

[25]

K. S. Trivedi, S. Dharmaraja and X. M. Ma, Analytic modeling of handoffs in wireless cellular networks, Information Sciences, 148 (2000), 155-166.  doi: 10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00292-X.  Google Scholar

[26]

T. M. Walingo and F. Takawira, Performance analysis of a connection admission scheme for future networks, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14 (2015), 1994-2006.  doi: 10.1109/TWC.2014.2378777.  Google Scholar

[27]

Y. L. Wu, G. Y. Min and L. T. Yang, Performance analysis of hybrid wireless networks under bursty and correlated traffic, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62 (2013), 449-454.  doi: 10.1109/TVT.2012.2219890.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. B. Wu, Z. M. Lian and G. Yang, Analysis of the finite source MAP/PH/N retrial G-queue operating in a random environment, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (2011), 1184-1193.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.08.006.  Google Scholar

[29]

J. B. Wu and Z. T. Lian, Analysis of $M_1, M_2/G/1$ G-queueing system with retrial customers, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 14 (2013), 365-382.  doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.06.009.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  $ L_{orb} $ as function of the parameter $ g $ with $ (c, \lambda_o, \lambda_h) = (10, 2, 2) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Dependence of the blocking probability for originating calls on the value $ g $ with $ (c, \lambda_o, \lambda_h) = (10, 2, 2) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Dependence of the blocking probability for handoff calls on the value $ g $ with $ (c, \lambda_o, \lambda_h) = (10, 2, 2) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  The stationary join distribution of the system with $(c, g, \lambda_o, \lambda_h, \lambda_r) = (8, 6, 2, 2, 2)$
$i$ $\backslash$ $b$ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 $sum$
0 0.0467 0.1413 0.2136 0.2148 0.1604 0.0923 0.0376 0.0016 0.0001 0.9084
1 0.0001 0.0006 0.0020 0.0047 0.0091 0.0149 0.0208 0.0013 0.0001 0.0536
2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0008 0.0023 0.0054 0.0109 0.0008 0.0000 0.0206
3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0007 0.0022 0.0055 0.0005 0.0000 0.0092
4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0009 0.0028 0.0003 0.0000 0.0043
5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0004 0.0014 0.0001 0.0000 0.0020
1.0e-003 $\times$
6 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.0055 0.0334 0.1661 0.6986 0.0667 0.0051 0.9761
1.0e-003 $\times$
7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0019 0.0130 0.0731 0.3474 0.0337 0.0027 0.4721
1.0e-003$\times$
8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.0052 0.0325 0.1724 0.0169 0.0014 0.2291
1.0e-004$\times$
9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0025 0.0211 0.1460 0.8533 0.0846 0.0069 1.1145
1.0e-004$\times$
10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0009 0.0087 0.0660 0.4217 0.0421 0.0035 0.5429
$sum$ 0.0468 0.1419 0.2158 0.2206 0.1728 0.1162 0.0800 0.0047 0.0002 0.999
Table Options

Download as excel

$i$ $\backslash$ $b$ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 $sum$
0 0.0467 0.1413 0.2136 0.2148 0.1604 0.0923 0.0376 0.0016 0.0001 0.9084
1 0.0001 0.0006 0.0020 0.0047 0.0091 0.0149 0.0208 0.0013 0.0001 0.0536
2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0008 0.0023 0.0054 0.0109 0.0008 0.0000 0.0206
3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0007 0.0022 0.0055 0.0005 0.0000 0.0092
4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0009 0.0028 0.0003 0.0000 0.0043
5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0004 0.0014 0.0001 0.0000 0.0020
1.0e-003 $\times$
6 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.0055 0.0334 0.1661 0.6986 0.0667 0.0051 0.9761
1.0e-003 $\times$
7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0019 0.0130 0.0731 0.3474 0.0337 0.0027 0.4721
1.0e-003$\times$
8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.0052 0.0325 0.1724 0.0169 0.0014 0.2291
1.0e-004$\times$
9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0025 0.0211 0.1460 0.8533 0.0846 0.0069 1.1145
1.0e-004$\times$
10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0009 0.0087 0.0660 0.4217 0.0421 0.0035 0.5429
$sum$ 0.0468 0.1419 0.2158 0.2206 0.1728 0.1162 0.0800 0.0047 0.0002 0.999
Table 2.  The the optimal value $ g^* $ for the optimization problem (I) with $ (c, \lambda_o, p_0) = (20, 10, 0.0001) $
$ \lambda_r $ $ \backslash $ $ \lambda_h $ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20
1 18 18 18 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 13
10 18 18 18 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 13
20 18 18 18 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 13
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \lambda_r $ $ \backslash $ $ \lambda_h $ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20
1 18 18 18 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 13
10 18 18 18 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 13
20 18 18 18 17 17 17 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 13
Table 3.  The optimal value $ c^* $ for the optimization problem (II) with $ (\lambda_r, p_1, p_2) = (10, 0.001, 0.0001) $
$ \lambda_h $ $ \backslash $ $ \lambda_o $ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20
1 8 11 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 29 31 33 35 37 45
5 10 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 30 32 34 36 38 46
10 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 32 34 36 37 39 47
Table Options

Download as excel

$ \lambda_h $ $ \backslash $ $ \lambda_o $ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20
1 8 11 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 29 31 33 35 37 45
5 10 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 30 32 34 36 38 46
10 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 32 34 36 37 39 47
[1]

Qiang Long, Xue Wu, Changzhi Wu. Non-dominated sorting methods for multi-objective optimization: Review and numerical comparison. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 1001-1023. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020009
[2]

Lin Jiang, Song Wang. Robust multi-period and multi-objective portfolio selection. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 695-709. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019130
[3]

Philipp Harms. Strong convergence rates for markovian representations of fractional processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020367
[4]

Angelica Pachon, Federico Polito, Costantino Ricciuti. On discrete-time semi-Markov processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1499-1529. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020170
[5]

Leslaw Skrzypek, Yuncheng You. Feedback synchronization of FHN cellular neural networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021001
[6]

Hanyu Gu, Hue Chi Lam, Yakov Zinder. Planning rolling stock maintenance: Optimization of train arrival dates at a maintenance center. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020177
[7]

Jian Zhang, Tony T. Lee, Tong Ye, Liang Huang. An approximate mean queue length formula for queueing systems with varying service rate. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 185-204. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019106
[8]

Zsolt Saffer, Miklós Telek, Gábor Horváth. Analysis of Markov-modulated fluid polling systems with gated discipline. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 575-599. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019124
[9]

Hui Lv, Xing'an Wang. Dissipative control for uncertain singular markovian jump systems via hybrid impulsive control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 127-142. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020020
[10]

Ying Lv, Yan-Fang Xue, Chun-Lei Tang. Ground state homoclinic orbits for a class of asymptotically periodic second-order Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1627-1652. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020176
[11]

Ripeng Huang, Shaojian Qu, Xiaoguang Yang, Zhimin Liu. Multi-stage distributionally robust optimization with risk aversion. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 233-259. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019109
[12]

Mahdi Karimi, Seyed Jafar Sadjadi. Optimization of a Multi-Item Inventory model for deteriorating items with capacity constraint using dynamic programming. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021013
[13]

Guillaume Cantin, M. A. Aziz-Alaoui. Dimension estimate of attractors for complex networks of reaction-diffusion systems applied to an ecological model. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020283
[14]

Yongjie Wang, Nan Gao. Some properties for almost cellular algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1681-1689. doi: 10.3934/era.2020086
[15]

Xiaoxian Tang, Jie Wang. Bistability of sequestration networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1337-1357. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020165
[16]

Puneet Pasricha, Anubha Goel. Pricing power exchange options with hawkes jump diffusion processes. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 133-149. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019103
[17]

Sishu Shankar Muni, Robert I. McLachlan, David J. W. Simpson. Homoclinic tangencies with infinitely many asymptotically stable single-round periodic solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021010
[18]

D. R. Michiel Renger, Johannes Zimmer. Orthogonality of fluxes in general nonlinear reaction networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 205-217. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020346
[19]

Bernold Fiedler. Global Hopf bifurcation in networks with fast feedback cycles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 177-203. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020344
[20]

Lars Grüne. Computing Lyapunov functions using deep neural networks. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021006

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (53)
  • HTML views (194)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences