# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Extension of Littlewood's rule to the multi-period static revenue management model with standby customers
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Mean-variance investment and contribution decisions for defined benefit pension plans in a stochastic framework
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020156

## Portfolio optimization for jump-diffusion risky assets with regime switching: A time-consistent approach

 1 School of Finance, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China 3 Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

* Corresponding author: Zhibin Liang

Received  February 2019 Revised  June 2020 Published  November 2020

Fund Project: This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.12071224 and Grant No.11771079), the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Project No. HKU17306220), the Philosophy and Social Science Foundation for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (Grant No.2020SJA0261), and the MOE Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (Grant No.19YJCZH083)

In this paper, an optimal portfolio selection problem with mean-variance utility is considered for a financial market consisting of one risk-free asset and two risky assets, whose price processes are modulated by jump-diffusion model, the two jump number processes are correlated through a common shock, and the Brownian motions are supposed to be dependent. Moreover, it is assumed that not only the risk aversion coefficient but also the market parameters such as the appreciation and volatility rates as well as the jump amplitude depend on a Markov chain with finite states. In addition, short selling is supposed to be prohibited. Using the technique of stochastic control theory and the corresponding extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, the explicit expressions of the optimal strategies and value function are obtained within a game theoretic framework, and the existence and uniqueness of the solutions are proved as well. In the end, some numerical examples are presented to show the impact of the parameters on the optimal strategies, and some further discussions on the case of $n\geq 3$ risky assets are given to demonstrate the important effect of the correlation coefficient of the Brownian motions on the optimal results.

Citation: Caibin Zhang, Zhibin Liang, Kam Chuen Yuen. Portfolio optimization for jump-diffusion risky assets with regime switching: A time-consistent approach. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020156
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The comparison of value functions with and without constraint
The comparison of optimal strategies between regime 1 and regime 2
The effect of parameter $\lambda_{01}$ on optimal strategies with regime 1
The effect of jump's parameters on optimal strategies with regime 1
The effect of risk-free rate on optimal strategies with regime 1
The value of parameters
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.30 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.055 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.25 0.07 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.30 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.055 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.25 0.07 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
The parameters-set
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.65 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.045 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.35 0.37 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.65 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.045 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.35 0.37 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
 [1] Jiannan Zhang, Ping Chen, Zhuo Jin, Shuanming Li. Open-loop equilibrium strategy for mean-variance portfolio selection: A log-return model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 765-777. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019133 [2] Siyang Cai, Yongmei Cai, Xuerong Mao. A stochastic differential equation SIS epidemic model with regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020317 [3] Sergey Rashkovskiy. Hamilton-Jacobi theory for Hamiltonian and non-Hamiltonian systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020, 12 (4) : 563-583. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020024 [4] Bing Liu, Ming Zhou. Robust portfolio selection for individuals: Minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 937-952. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020005 [5] Junkee Jeon. Finite horizon portfolio selection problems with stochastic borrowing constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 733-763. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019132 [6] Lin Jiang, Song Wang. Robust multi-period and multi-objective portfolio selection. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 695-709. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019130 [7] Alain Bensoussan, Xinwei Feng, Jianhui Huang. Linear-quadratic-Gaussian mean-field-game with partial observation and common noise. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 23-46. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020025 [8] Ágota P. Horváth. Discrete diffusion semigroups associated with Jacobi-Dunkl and exceptional Jacobi polynomials. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021002 [9] Puneet Pasricha, Anubha Goel. Pricing power exchange options with hawkes jump diffusion processes. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 133-149. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019103 [10] Ahmad El Hajj, Hassan Ibrahim, Vivian Rizik. $BV$ solution for a non-linear Hamilton-Jacobi system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020405 [11] Olivier Ley, Erwin Topp, Miguel Yangari. Some results for the large time behavior of Hamilton-Jacobi equations with Caputo time derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2021007 [12] Haixiang Yao, Ping Chen, Miao Zhang, Xun Li. Dynamic discrete-time portfolio selection for defined contribution pension funds with inflation risk. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020166 [13] Azmy S. Ackleh, Nicolas Saintier. Diffusive limit to a selection-mutation equation with small mutation formulated on the space of measures. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1469-1497. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020169 [14] Maho Endo, Yuki Kaneko, Yoshio Yamada. Free boundary problem for a reaction-diffusion equation with positive bistable nonlinearity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3375-3394. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020033 [15] Attila Dénes, Gergely Röst. Single species population dynamics in seasonal environment with short reproduction period. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020288 [16] Alberto Bressan, Carlotta Donadello. On the convergence of viscous approximations after shock interactions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 29-48. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.29 [17] Shuxing Chen, Jianzhong Min, Yongqian Zhang. Weak shock solution in supersonic flow past a wedge. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 115-132. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.115 [18] Angelica Pachon, Federico Polito, Costantino Ricciuti. On discrete-time semi-Markov processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1499-1529. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020170 [19] Jie Li, Xiangdong Ye, Tao Yu. Mean equicontinuity, complexity and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 359-393. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020167 [20] Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li, Jianfeng Lu. Ensemble Kalman Inversion for nonlinear problems: Weights, consistency, and variance bounds. Foundations of Data Science, 2020  doi: 10.3934/fods.2020018

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366