American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Solving fuzzy linear fractional set covering problem by a goal programming based solution approach
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Time-consistent multiperiod mean semivariance portfolio selection with the real constraints
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020158

A robust time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study for a bridge construction project

Reza Lotfi 1,, , Zahra Yadegari 2, , Seyed Hossein Hosseini 3, , Amir Hossein Khameneh 4, , Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee 5, and  Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber 6,

1. 

Department of Industrial Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2. 

Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3. 

Department of Project and ConstructionManagement, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
4. 

Department of Project Management & Construction, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran, MAPNA Group, Oil & Gas Division, Tehran, Iran
5. 

Department of Industrial Engineering, Mazandaran University of Science and Technology, Babol, Iran, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
6. 

Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Management, Poznan, Poland, Institute of Applied Mathematics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

* Corresponding author: Reza Lotfi (Reza.lotfi.ieng@gmail.com, Rezalotfi@stu.yazd.ac.ir)

Received  December 2019 Revised  July 2020 Published  November 2020

Sustainable development requires scheduling and implementation of projects by considering cost, environment, energy, and quality factors. Using a robust approach, this study investigates the time-cost-quality-energy-environment problem in executing projects and practically indicates its implementation capability in the form of a case study of a bridge construction project in Tehran, Iran. This study aims to take into account the sustainability pillars in scheduling projects and uncertainties in modeling them. To model the study problem, robust nonlinear programming (NLP) involving the objectives of cost, quality, energy, and pollution level is applied with resource-constrained. According to the results, as time diminished, the cost, energy, and pollution initially decreased and then increased, witha reduction in quality. To make the model close to the real world by considering uncertainties, the cost and quality tangibly improved, and pollution and energy consumption declined. We applied the augmented $ \varepsilon $-constraint method to solve the proposed model. According to the result of the research, with regard to the time-cost, time-quality, time-energy, and time-pollution charts, as uncertainty increases, the cost and quality will improve, and pollution and energy will decrease.

The proposed model can be employed for all industrial projects, including roads, construction, and manufacturing.

Keywords: Robust optimization, Multi-objective optimization, Time-Cost-Quality-Energy-Environment Trade-off, Augmented $ \varepsilon $-Constraint Method.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 90B36.
Citation: Reza Lotfi, Zahra Yadegari, Seyed Hossein Hosseini, Amir Hossein Khameneh, Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. A robust time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study for a bridge construction project. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020158
References:
[1]

A. Azaron, C. Perkgoz and M. Sakawa, A genetic algorithm approach for the time-cost trade-off in PERT networks, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 168 (2005), 1317-1339.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.10.021.  Google Scholar

[2]

R. Abbasnia, A. Afshar and E. Eshtehardian, Time-cost trade-off problem in construction project management, based on fuzzy logic, Journal of Applied Sciences, 8 (2008), 4159-4165.   Google Scholar

[3]

H. N. Ahuja, S. Dozzi and S. M. AbouRizk, Project Management: Techniques in Planning and Controlling Construction Projects, John Wiley & Sons, 1994. Google Scholar

[4]

A. J. G. Babu and N. Suresh, Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations, European Journal of Operational Research, 88 (1996), 320-327.  doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00202-9.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data, Mathematical Programming, 88 (2000), 411-424.  doi: 10.1007/PL00011380.  Google Scholar

[6]

A.-P. Chang, Research on defining green road project management operating scope by application of PDRI. Advances in Civil, Architectural, Structural and Constructional Engineering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Architectural, Structural and Constructional Engineering, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea, CRC Press, (2015-2016). Google Scholar

[7]

I. Cohen, B. Golany and A. Shtub, The stochastic timecost tradeoff problem: A robust optimization approach, Networks: An International Journal, 49 (2007), 175-188.  doi: 10.1002/net.20153.  Google Scholar

[8]

E. Demeulemeester, B. De Reyck, B. Foubert, W. Herroelen and and M. Vanhoucke, New computational results on the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49 (1998), 1153-1163.   Google Scholar

[9]

G. Deǧirmenci and M. Azizoǧlu, Branch and bound based solution algorithms for the budget constrained discrete time/cost trade-off problem, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64 (2013), 1474-1484.   Google Scholar

[10]

K. El-Rayes and A. Kandil, Time-cost-quality trade-off analysis for highway construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131 (2005), 477-486.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(477).  Google Scholar

[11]

R. H. A. El Razek, A. M. Diab, S. M. Hafez and R. F. Aziz, Time-cost-quality trade-off software by using simplified genetic algorithm for typical repetitive construction projects, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 37 (2010), 312-320.   Google Scholar

[12]

C.-W. Feng, L. Liu and S. A. Burns, Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 11 (1997), 184-189.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1997)11:3(184).  Google Scholar

[13]

C.-W. Feng and L. Liu, Burns SA. Stochastic construction time-cost trade-off analysis, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 14 (2000), 117-126.   Google Scholar

[14]

M.-B. Fakhrzad and R. Lotfi, Green vendor managed inventory with backorder in two echelon supply chain with epsilon-constraint and NSGA-Ⅱ approach, Journal of Industrial Engineering Research in Production Systems, 5 (2018), 193-209.   Google Scholar

[15]

Ö. Hazir, E. Erel and Y. Günalay, Robust optimization models for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem, International Journal of Production Economics, 130 (2011), 87-95.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.018.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. H. Haghighi, S. M. Mousavi, J. Antuchevičien$\dot{e}$ and V. Mohagheghi, A new analytical methodology to handle time-cost trade-off problem with considering quality loss cost under interval-valued fuzzy uncertainty, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25 (2019), 277-299.  doi: 10.3846/tede.2019.8422.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. Hariga, A. Shamayleh and F. El-Wehedi, Integrated timecost tradeoff and resources leveling problems with allowed activity splitting, International Transactions in Operational Research, 26 (2019), 80-99.  doi: 10.1111/itor.12329.  Google Scholar

[18]

A. Hafezalkotob, E. Hosseinpour, M. Moradi and K. Khalili-Damghani, Multi-resource trade-off problem of the project contractors in a cooperative environment: Highway construction case study, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 13 (2018), 129-138.  doi: 10.1080/17509653.2017.1323240.  Google Scholar

[19]

E. Hemat and M. V. N Sivakumar, An effective method for simultaneously considering time-cost trade-off and constraint resource scheduling using nonlinear integer framework, International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 7 (2017), 211-230.   Google Scholar

[20]

B.-G. Hwang and J. S. Tan, Green building project management: Obstacles and solutions for sustainable development, Sustainable Development, 20 (2012), 335-349.  doi: 10.1002/sd.492.  Google Scholar

[21]

B.-G. Hwang and W. J. Ng, Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges, International Journal of Project Management, 31 (2013), 272-284.   Google Scholar

[22]

A. Hand, J. Zuo, B. Xia, X. Jin and P. Wu, Are green project management practices applicable to traditional projects, Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, Springer, (2015). Google Scholar

[23]

C. Hendrickson, C. T. Hendrickson and T. Au, Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders, Chris Hendrickson, 1989. Google Scholar

[24]

T. Hegazy, Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26 (1999), 685-697.  doi: 10.1139/l99-031.  Google Scholar

[25]

H. Iranmanesh, M. Skandari and M. Allahverdiloo, Finding Pareto optimal front for the multi-mode time, cost quality trade-off in project scheduling, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 40 (2008), 346-350.   Google Scholar

[26]

D. B. Khang and Y. M. Myint, Time cost and quality trade-off in project management: A case study, International Journal of Project Management, 17 (1999), 249-256.  doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00043-X.  Google Scholar

[27]

C. Li, Y. Liao, X. Wen, Y. Wang and F. Yang, The development and countermeasures of household biogas in northwest grain for green project areas of China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44 (2015), 835-846.  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.027.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. Li and P. Love, Using improved genetic algorithms to facilitate time-cost optimization, Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 123 (1997), 233-237.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:3(233).  Google Scholar

[29]

X. Li, Z. He and N. Wang, Multi-mode time-cost-robustness trade-off project scheduling problem under uncertainty, 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), IEEE, (2019), 1–5. doi: 10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948120.  Google Scholar

[30]

D. Liu, H. Li, H. Wang, C. Qi and T. Rose, Discrete symbiotic organisms search method for solving large-scale time-cost trade-off problem in construction scheduling, Expert Systems with Applications, 148 (2020), 113230. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113230.  Google Scholar

[31]

R. Lotfi, Y. Zare Mehrjerdi and M. S. Pishvaee, A robust optimization approach to Resilience and sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design under risk averse, in 15th Iran International Industrial Engineering Conference, Yazd university, (2019). Google Scholar

[32]

R. Lotfi, M. A. Nayeri, S. M. Sajadifar and N. Mardani, Determination of start times and ordering plans for two-period projects with interdependent demand in project-oriented organizations: A case study on molding industry, Journal of Project Management, 2 (2017), 119-142.  doi: 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.9.001.  Google Scholar

[33]

R. Lotfi, G.-W. Weber, S. M. Sajadifar and N. Mardani, Interdependent demand in the two-period newsvendor problem, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 16 (2020), 117-140.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018143.  Google Scholar

[34]

R. Lotfi, Y. Zare Mehrjerdi, M. S. Pishvaee, A. Sadeghieh and G.-W. Weber, A robust optimization model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at risk, Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020023.  Google Scholar

[35] R. Maltzman and D. Shirley, Green Project Management, CRC Press, 2010.  doi: 10.1201/EBK1439830017.  Google Scholar
[36]

S. Mandal, Supply chain resilience: A state-of-the-art review and research directions, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5 (2014), 427-453.   Google Scholar

[37]

G. Mavrotas, Effective implementation of the $\varepsilon$-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213 (2009), 455-465.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037.  Google Scholar

[38]

A. V. Moreira, Development of an optimization methodology for pavement management systems, 2018. Google Scholar

[39]

O. Moselhi, Schedule compression using the direct stiffness method, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20 (1993), 65-72.  doi: 10.1139/l93-007.  Google Scholar

[40]

A. Özmen, G. W. Weber, İ. Batmaz and E. Kropat, RCMARS: Robustification of CMARS with different scenarios under polyhedral uncertainty set, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 16 (2011), 4780-4787.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.04.001.  Google Scholar

[41]

A. Pagnoni, Project Engineering: Computer–Oriented Planning and Operational Decision Making, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Google Scholar

[42]

J. H. Patterson and W. D. Huber, A horizon-varying, zero-one approach to project scheduling, Management Science, 20 (1974), 903-1022.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.20.6.990.  Google Scholar

[43]

W. Prager, A structural method of computing project cost polygons, Management Science, 9 (1963), 351-515.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.394.  Google Scholar

[44]

M. S. Pishvaee, M. Rabbani and S. A. Torabi, A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (2011), 637-649.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.013.  Google Scholar

[45]

Q.-K. Pan, L. Gao, L. Wang, J. Liang and X.-Y. Li, Effective heuristics and metaheuristics to minimize total flowtime for the distributed permutation flowshop problem, Expert Systems with Applications, 124 (2019), 309-324.  doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.062.  Google Scholar

[46]

R. Ruiz, Q.-K. Pan and B. Naderi, Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem, Omega, 83 (2019), 213-222.  doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.03.004.  Google Scholar

[47]

M. Rahimi and H. Iranmanesh, Multi objective particle swarm optimization for a discrete time, cost and quality trade-off problem, World Applied Sciences Journal, 4 (2008), 270-276.   Google Scholar

[48]

K. Roper and R. Payant, The Facility Management Handbook, Amacom, 2014. Google Scholar

[49]

A. L. Soyster, Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming, Operations Research, 21 (1973), 1154-1157.   Google Scholar

[50]

N. Siemens, A simple CPM time-cost tradeoff algorithm, Management Science, 17 (1971), B354–B363. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.17.6.B354.  Google Scholar

[51]

A. K. Sangaiah, A. Goli, E. B. Tirkolaee, M. Ranjbar-Bourani, H. M. Pandey and W. Zhang, Big data-driven cognitive computing system for optimization of social media analytics, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 82215-82226.  doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991394.  Google Scholar

[52]

R. Sonmez, M. A. Iranagh and F. Uysal, Critical sequence crashing heuristic for resource-constrained discrete timecost trade-off problem, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142 (2016), 04015090. Google Scholar

[53]

H. R. Tareghian and S. H. Taheri, A solution procedure for the discrete time, cost and quality tradeoff problem using electromagnetic scatter search, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 190 (2007), 1136-1145.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.01.100.  Google Scholar

[54]

E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Goli, M. Hematian, A. K. Sangaiah and T. Han, Multi-objective multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem using Pareto-based algorithms, Computing, 101 (2019), 547-570.  doi: 10.1007/s00607-018-00693-1.  Google Scholar

[55]

E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Goli and G. W. Weber, Fuzzy mathematical programming and self-adaptive artificial fish swarm algorithm for just-in-time energy-aware flow shop scheduling problem with outsourcing option, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, (2020). Google Scholar

[56]

M. Van Den Eeckhout, B. Maenhout and M. Vanhoucke, A heuristic procedure to solve the project staffing problem with discrete time/resource trade-offs and personnel scheduling constraints, Computers & Operations Research, 101 (2019), 144-161.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.09.008.  Google Scholar

[57]

M. Vanhoucke and D. Debels, The discrete time/cost trade-off problem: Extensions and heuristic procedures, Journal of Scheduling, 10 (2007), 311-326.  doi: 10.1007/s10951-007-0031-y.  Google Scholar

[58]

C. Vira and Y. Y. Haimes, Multiobjective decision making: Theory and methodology, North Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, North-Holland, (1983).  Google Scholar

[59]

W. Wang and Q. Feng, Multi-objective optimization in construction project based on a hierarchical subpopulation particle swarm optimization algorithm, in 2008 Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, IEEE, Shanghai, (2008), 746–750. doi: 10.1109/IITA.2008.99.  Google Scholar

[60]

D. X. Zheng, S. T. Ng and M. M. Kumaraswamy, Applying Pareto ranking and niche formation to genetic algorithm-based multiobjective timecost optimization, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131 (2005), 81-91.   Google Scholar

[61]

X. Zhao, B.-G. Hwang and Y. Gao, A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: A case of Singapore's green projects, Journal of Cleaner Production, 115 (2016), 203-213.  doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.042.  Google Scholar

[62]

H. Zhang and H. Li, Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for construction time-cost tradeoff problems, Construction Management and Economics, 28 (2010), 75-88.  doi: 10.1080/01446190903406170.  Google Scholar

[63]

H. Zhang, H. Li and C. Tam, Particle swarm optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling, International Journal of Project Management, 24 (2006), 83-92.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.006.  Google Scholar

[64]

Y. Zare Mehrjerdi and R. Lotfi, Development of a mathematical model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain with efficiency and resilience systematic framework, International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 6 (2019), 360-388.   Google Scholar

[65]

F. Zhao, F. Xue, Y. Zhang, W. Ma, C. Zhang and H. Song, A hybrid algorithm based on self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm and differential evolution, Expert Systems with Applications, 113 (2018), 515-530.  doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.008.  Google Scholar

[66]

F. Zhao, S. Qin, Y. Zhang, W. Ma, C. Zhang and H. Song, A two-stage differential biogeography-based optimization algorithm and its performance analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 115 (2019), 329-345.  doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.012.  Google Scholar

[67]

J.-W. Zhang and H.-F. Shan, Multi-resource constrained discrete time/cost trade-off problem and its improved genetic algorithm, in 2010 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, 17-th Annual Conference Proceedings, IEEE, (2010), 123–128. doi: 10.1109/ICMSE.2010.5719794.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

A. Azaron, C. Perkgoz and M. Sakawa, A genetic algorithm approach for the time-cost trade-off in PERT networks, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 168 (2005), 1317-1339.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.10.021.  Google Scholar

[2]

R. Abbasnia, A. Afshar and E. Eshtehardian, Time-cost trade-off problem in construction project management, based on fuzzy logic, Journal of Applied Sciences, 8 (2008), 4159-4165.   Google Scholar

[3]

H. N. Ahuja, S. Dozzi and S. M. AbouRizk, Project Management: Techniques in Planning and Controlling Construction Projects, John Wiley & Sons, 1994. Google Scholar

[4]

A. J. G. Babu and N. Suresh, Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations, European Journal of Operational Research, 88 (1996), 320-327.  doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00202-9.  Google Scholar

[5]

A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data, Mathematical Programming, 88 (2000), 411-424.  doi: 10.1007/PL00011380.  Google Scholar

[6]

A.-P. Chang, Research on defining green road project management operating scope by application of PDRI. Advances in Civil, Architectural, Structural and Constructional Engineering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Architectural, Structural and Constructional Engineering, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea, CRC Press, (2015-2016). Google Scholar

[7]

I. Cohen, B. Golany and A. Shtub, The stochastic timecost tradeoff problem: A robust optimization approach, Networks: An International Journal, 49 (2007), 175-188.  doi: 10.1002/net.20153.  Google Scholar

[8]

E. Demeulemeester, B. De Reyck, B. Foubert, W. Herroelen and and M. Vanhoucke, New computational results on the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49 (1998), 1153-1163.   Google Scholar

[9]

G. Deǧirmenci and M. Azizoǧlu, Branch and bound based solution algorithms for the budget constrained discrete time/cost trade-off problem, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64 (2013), 1474-1484.   Google Scholar

[10]

K. El-Rayes and A. Kandil, Time-cost-quality trade-off analysis for highway construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131 (2005), 477-486.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(477).  Google Scholar

[11]

R. H. A. El Razek, A. M. Diab, S. M. Hafez and R. F. Aziz, Time-cost-quality trade-off software by using simplified genetic algorithm for typical repetitive construction projects, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 37 (2010), 312-320.   Google Scholar

[12]

C.-W. Feng, L. Liu and S. A. Burns, Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 11 (1997), 184-189.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1997)11:3(184).  Google Scholar

[13]

C.-W. Feng and L. Liu, Burns SA. Stochastic construction time-cost trade-off analysis, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 14 (2000), 117-126.   Google Scholar

[14]

M.-B. Fakhrzad and R. Lotfi, Green vendor managed inventory with backorder in two echelon supply chain with epsilon-constraint and NSGA-Ⅱ approach, Journal of Industrial Engineering Research in Production Systems, 5 (2018), 193-209.   Google Scholar

[15]

Ö. Hazir, E. Erel and Y. Günalay, Robust optimization models for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem, International Journal of Production Economics, 130 (2011), 87-95.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.018.  Google Scholar

[16]

M. H. Haghighi, S. M. Mousavi, J. Antuchevičien$\dot{e}$ and V. Mohagheghi, A new analytical methodology to handle time-cost trade-off problem with considering quality loss cost under interval-valued fuzzy uncertainty, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25 (2019), 277-299.  doi: 10.3846/tede.2019.8422.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. Hariga, A. Shamayleh and F. El-Wehedi, Integrated timecost tradeoff and resources leveling problems with allowed activity splitting, International Transactions in Operational Research, 26 (2019), 80-99.  doi: 10.1111/itor.12329.  Google Scholar

[18]

A. Hafezalkotob, E. Hosseinpour, M. Moradi and K. Khalili-Damghani, Multi-resource trade-off problem of the project contractors in a cooperative environment: Highway construction case study, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 13 (2018), 129-138.  doi: 10.1080/17509653.2017.1323240.  Google Scholar

[19]

E. Hemat and M. V. N Sivakumar, An effective method for simultaneously considering time-cost trade-off and constraint resource scheduling using nonlinear integer framework, International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 7 (2017), 211-230.   Google Scholar

[20]

B.-G. Hwang and J. S. Tan, Green building project management: Obstacles and solutions for sustainable development, Sustainable Development, 20 (2012), 335-349.  doi: 10.1002/sd.492.  Google Scholar

[21]

B.-G. Hwang and W. J. Ng, Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges, International Journal of Project Management, 31 (2013), 272-284.   Google Scholar

[22]

A. Hand, J. Zuo, B. Xia, X. Jin and P. Wu, Are green project management practices applicable to traditional projects, Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, Springer, (2015). Google Scholar

[23]

C. Hendrickson, C. T. Hendrickson and T. Au, Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders, Chris Hendrickson, 1989. Google Scholar

[24]

T. Hegazy, Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26 (1999), 685-697.  doi: 10.1139/l99-031.  Google Scholar

[25]

H. Iranmanesh, M. Skandari and M. Allahverdiloo, Finding Pareto optimal front for the multi-mode time, cost quality trade-off in project scheduling, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 40 (2008), 346-350.   Google Scholar

[26]

D. B. Khang and Y. M. Myint, Time cost and quality trade-off in project management: A case study, International Journal of Project Management, 17 (1999), 249-256.  doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00043-X.  Google Scholar

[27]

C. Li, Y. Liao, X. Wen, Y. Wang and F. Yang, The development and countermeasures of household biogas in northwest grain for green project areas of China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44 (2015), 835-846.  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.027.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. Li and P. Love, Using improved genetic algorithms to facilitate time-cost optimization, Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 123 (1997), 233-237.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:3(233).  Google Scholar

[29]

X. Li, Z. He and N. Wang, Multi-mode time-cost-robustness trade-off project scheduling problem under uncertainty, 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), IEEE, (2019), 1–5. doi: 10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948120.  Google Scholar

[30]

D. Liu, H. Li, H. Wang, C. Qi and T. Rose, Discrete symbiotic organisms search method for solving large-scale time-cost trade-off problem in construction scheduling, Expert Systems with Applications, 148 (2020), 113230. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113230.  Google Scholar

[31]

R. Lotfi, Y. Zare Mehrjerdi and M. S. Pishvaee, A robust optimization approach to Resilience and sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design under risk averse, in 15th Iran International Industrial Engineering Conference, Yazd university, (2019). Google Scholar

[32]

R. Lotfi, M. A. Nayeri, S. M. Sajadifar and N. Mardani, Determination of start times and ordering plans for two-period projects with interdependent demand in project-oriented organizations: A case study on molding industry, Journal of Project Management, 2 (2017), 119-142.  doi: 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.9.001.  Google Scholar

[33]

R. Lotfi, G.-W. Weber, S. M. Sajadifar and N. Mardani, Interdependent demand in the two-period newsvendor problem, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 16 (2020), 117-140.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018143.  Google Scholar

[34]

R. Lotfi, Y. Zare Mehrjerdi, M. S. Pishvaee, A. Sadeghieh and G.-W. Weber, A robust optimization model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at risk, Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020023.  Google Scholar

[35] R. Maltzman and D. Shirley, Green Project Management, CRC Press, 2010.  doi: 10.1201/EBK1439830017.  Google Scholar
[36]

S. Mandal, Supply chain resilience: A state-of-the-art review and research directions, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5 (2014), 427-453.   Google Scholar

[37]

G. Mavrotas, Effective implementation of the $\varepsilon$-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213 (2009), 455-465.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037.  Google Scholar

[38]

A. V. Moreira, Development of an optimization methodology for pavement management systems, 2018. Google Scholar

[39]

O. Moselhi, Schedule compression using the direct stiffness method, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20 (1993), 65-72.  doi: 10.1139/l93-007.  Google Scholar

[40]

A. Özmen, G. W. Weber, İ. Batmaz and E. Kropat, RCMARS: Robustification of CMARS with different scenarios under polyhedral uncertainty set, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 16 (2011), 4780-4787.  doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.04.001.  Google Scholar

[41]

A. Pagnoni, Project Engineering: Computer–Oriented Planning and Operational Decision Making, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Google Scholar

[42]

J. H. Patterson and W. D. Huber, A horizon-varying, zero-one approach to project scheduling, Management Science, 20 (1974), 903-1022.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.20.6.990.  Google Scholar

[43]

W. Prager, A structural method of computing project cost polygons, Management Science, 9 (1963), 351-515.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.394.  Google Scholar

[44]

M. S. Pishvaee, M. Rabbani and S. A. Torabi, A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (2011), 637-649.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.013.  Google Scholar

[45]

Q.-K. Pan, L. Gao, L. Wang, J. Liang and X.-Y. Li, Effective heuristics and metaheuristics to minimize total flowtime for the distributed permutation flowshop problem, Expert Systems with Applications, 124 (2019), 309-324.  doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.062.  Google Scholar

[46]

R. Ruiz, Q.-K. Pan and B. Naderi, Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem, Omega, 83 (2019), 213-222.  doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.03.004.  Google Scholar

[47]

M. Rahimi and H. Iranmanesh, Multi objective particle swarm optimization for a discrete time, cost and quality trade-off problem, World Applied Sciences Journal, 4 (2008), 270-276.   Google Scholar

[48]

K. Roper and R. Payant, The Facility Management Handbook, Amacom, 2014. Google Scholar

[49]

A. L. Soyster, Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming, Operations Research, 21 (1973), 1154-1157.   Google Scholar

[50]

N. Siemens, A simple CPM time-cost tradeoff algorithm, Management Science, 17 (1971), B354–B363. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.17.6.B354.  Google Scholar

[51]

A. K. Sangaiah, A. Goli, E. B. Tirkolaee, M. Ranjbar-Bourani, H. M. Pandey and W. Zhang, Big data-driven cognitive computing system for optimization of social media analytics, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 82215-82226.  doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991394.  Google Scholar

[52]

R. Sonmez, M. A. Iranagh and F. Uysal, Critical sequence crashing heuristic for resource-constrained discrete timecost trade-off problem, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142 (2016), 04015090. Google Scholar

[53]

H. R. Tareghian and S. H. Taheri, A solution procedure for the discrete time, cost and quality tradeoff problem using electromagnetic scatter search, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 190 (2007), 1136-1145.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.01.100.  Google Scholar

[54]

E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Goli, M. Hematian, A. K. Sangaiah and T. Han, Multi-objective multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem using Pareto-based algorithms, Computing, 101 (2019), 547-570.  doi: 10.1007/s00607-018-00693-1.  Google Scholar

[55]

E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Goli and G. W. Weber, Fuzzy mathematical programming and self-adaptive artificial fish swarm algorithm for just-in-time energy-aware flow shop scheduling problem with outsourcing option, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, (2020). Google Scholar

[56]

M. Van Den Eeckhout, B. Maenhout and M. Vanhoucke, A heuristic procedure to solve the project staffing problem with discrete time/resource trade-offs and personnel scheduling constraints, Computers & Operations Research, 101 (2019), 144-161.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.09.008.  Google Scholar

[57]

M. Vanhoucke and D. Debels, The discrete time/cost trade-off problem: Extensions and heuristic procedures, Journal of Scheduling, 10 (2007), 311-326.  doi: 10.1007/s10951-007-0031-y.  Google Scholar

[58]

C. Vira and Y. Y. Haimes, Multiobjective decision making: Theory and methodology, North Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, North-Holland, (1983).  Google Scholar

[59]

W. Wang and Q. Feng, Multi-objective optimization in construction project based on a hierarchical subpopulation particle swarm optimization algorithm, in 2008 Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, IEEE, Shanghai, (2008), 746–750. doi: 10.1109/IITA.2008.99.  Google Scholar

[60]

D. X. Zheng, S. T. Ng and M. M. Kumaraswamy, Applying Pareto ranking and niche formation to genetic algorithm-based multiobjective timecost optimization, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131 (2005), 81-91.   Google Scholar

[61]

X. Zhao, B.-G. Hwang and Y. Gao, A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: A case of Singapore's green projects, Journal of Cleaner Production, 115 (2016), 203-213.  doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.042.  Google Scholar

[62]

H. Zhang and H. Li, Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for construction time-cost tradeoff problems, Construction Management and Economics, 28 (2010), 75-88.  doi: 10.1080/01446190903406170.  Google Scholar

[63]

H. Zhang, H. Li and C. Tam, Particle swarm optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling, International Journal of Project Management, 24 (2006), 83-92.  doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.006.  Google Scholar

[64]

Y. Zare Mehrjerdi and R. Lotfi, Development of a mathematical model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain with efficiency and resilience systematic framework, International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 6 (2019), 360-388.   Google Scholar

[65]

F. Zhao, F. Xue, Y. Zhang, W. Ma, C. Zhang and H. Song, A hybrid algorithm based on self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm and differential evolution, Expert Systems with Applications, 113 (2018), 515-530.  doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.008.  Google Scholar

[66]

F. Zhao, S. Qin, Y. Zhang, W. Ma, C. Zhang and H. Song, A two-stage differential biogeography-based optimization algorithm and its performance analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 115 (2019), 329-345.  doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.012.  Google Scholar

[67]

J.-W. Zhang and H.-F. Shan, Multi-resource constrained discrete time/cost trade-off problem and its improved genetic algorithm, in 2010 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, 17-th Annual Conference Proceedings, IEEE, (2010), 123–128. doi: 10.1109/ICMSE.2010.5719794.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Schematic of time parameters
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Schematic performance of the $ \varepsilon $-constraint algorithm [38]
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  the underpass bridge in Tehran
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Network Graph of the bridge construction project
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Time-cost, Time-quality, Time-Energy and Time-Pollution Charts
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Effects of uncertainty changes on Cost, Quality, Energy and Pollution
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Survey on related works
Reference Problem Objective Algorithms Case Study Uncertainty
[43] TCTP One Heuristic algorithm NE -
[50] TCTP One Heuristic algorithm NE -
[39] TCTP One Heuristic algorithm NE -
[4] TCQTP Multi Unknown Solver NE -
[42] RCTCTP One Min and Max Bound NE -
[12] TCTP One GA NE -
[28] TCTP One GA Household biogas -
[8] RCDTCTP One Branch-and-bound NE -
[24] TCTP One GA Construction -
[26] TCQTP Multi LINDO Cement factory -
[60] TCTP Multi GA NE -
[10] RCDTCQTP Multi GA Highway construction -
[47] TCQTP Multi PSO NE -
[53] DTCQTP Multi Electromagnetism algorithm NE -
[2] FTCTP One ACO Construction Fuzzy logic
[25] MMTCTP One FAST PGA Pareto optimal front NE -
[59] TCTP One Hierarchical PSO NE -
[11] TCQTP Multi Simplified GA Construction -
[7] RTCTP One GAMS NE Robust optimization
[15] RMMDTCTP One Benders Decomposition and Tabu search NE Robust optimization
[9] MMDTCTP One Branch and bound and heuristic algorithms NE -
[16] FTCQTP Multi GAMS NE Interval-valued fuzzy
[54] MMRCPSP Multi $ \varepsilon $-constraint method NSGA-Ⅱ MOSA NE -
[17] MMRCTCTP One Cplex-Soler NE -
[56] RCTCTP One Heuristic procedure NE -
[18] CRCTCTP One LINGO Highway -
[19] RCDTCTP Multi Microsoft Excel and project NE -
[52] MMRCTCTP One Heuristic method NE -
[57] RCDTCTP One Hybrid heuristic method NE -
[67] MMRCTCTP One GA NE -
[29] MMRCTCTP Multi $ \varepsilon $-constraint method Nesting GA NE -
[30] MMDTCTP One Discrete symbiotic organisms search NE -
This research RRCTCQEPTP Multi GAMS Augmented $ \varepsilon $-constraint Bridge Construction Robust optimization
● NE: Numerical Example.
● NSGA-Ⅱ: Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Ⅱ. MOSA: Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing Algorithm
● TCTP: Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● FTCTP: Fuzzy Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● RTCTP: Robust Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● RMMDTCTP: Robust Multi-mode Discrete Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● MMTCTP: Multi-mode Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● MMDTCTP: Multi-mode Discrete Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● TCQTP: Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● FTCQTP: Fuzzy Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● RCTCTP: Resource Constraint Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● DTCQTP: Discrete Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● RCDTCTP: Resource Constraint Discrete Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● MMRCSP: Multi-mode Resource Constraint Scheduling Problem
● MMRCTCTP: Multi-mode Resource Constraint Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● CRCTCTP: Cooperation Resource Constraint Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● RRCTCQEPTP: Robust Resource Constraint Time-Cost- Quality-Energy-Pollution Trade-off Problem
Table Options

Download as excel

Reference Problem Objective Algorithms Case Study Uncertainty
[43] TCTP One Heuristic algorithm NE -
[50] TCTP One Heuristic algorithm NE -
[39] TCTP One Heuristic algorithm NE -
[4] TCQTP Multi Unknown Solver NE -
[42] RCTCTP One Min and Max Bound NE -
[12] TCTP One GA NE -
[28] TCTP One GA Household biogas -
[8] RCDTCTP One Branch-and-bound NE -
[24] TCTP One GA Construction -
[26] TCQTP Multi LINDO Cement factory -
[60] TCTP Multi GA NE -
[10] RCDTCQTP Multi GA Highway construction -
[47] TCQTP Multi PSO NE -
[53] DTCQTP Multi Electromagnetism algorithm NE -
[2] FTCTP One ACO Construction Fuzzy logic
[25] MMTCTP One FAST PGA Pareto optimal front NE -
[59] TCTP One Hierarchical PSO NE -
[11] TCQTP Multi Simplified GA Construction -
[7] RTCTP One GAMS NE Robust optimization
[15] RMMDTCTP One Benders Decomposition and Tabu search NE Robust optimization
[9] MMDTCTP One Branch and bound and heuristic algorithms NE -
[16] FTCQTP Multi GAMS NE Interval-valued fuzzy
[54] MMRCPSP Multi $ \varepsilon $-constraint method NSGA-Ⅱ MOSA NE -
[17] MMRCTCTP One Cplex-Soler NE -
[56] RCTCTP One Heuristic procedure NE -
[18] CRCTCTP One LINGO Highway -
[19] RCDTCTP Multi Microsoft Excel and project NE -
[52] MMRCTCTP One Heuristic method NE -
[57] RCDTCTP One Hybrid heuristic method NE -
[67] MMRCTCTP One GA NE -
[29] MMRCTCTP Multi $ \varepsilon $-constraint method Nesting GA NE -
[30] MMDTCTP One Discrete symbiotic organisms search NE -
This research RRCTCQEPTP Multi GAMS Augmented $ \varepsilon $-constraint Bridge Construction Robust optimization
● NE: Numerical Example.
● NSGA-Ⅱ: Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Ⅱ. MOSA: Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing Algorithm
● TCTP: Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● FTCTP: Fuzzy Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● RTCTP: Robust Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● RMMDTCTP: Robust Multi-mode Discrete Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● MMTCTP: Multi-mode Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● MMDTCTP: Multi-mode Discrete Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● TCQTP: Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● FTCQTP: Fuzzy Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● RCTCTP: Resource Constraint Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● DTCQTP: Discrete Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● RCDTCTP: Resource Constraint Discrete Time-Cost- Quality Trade-Off Problem
● MMRCSP: Multi-mode Resource Constraint Scheduling Problem
● MMRCTCTP: Multi-mode Resource Constraint Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● CRCTCTP: Cooperation Resource Constraint Time-cost Trade-off Problem
● RRCTCQEPTP: Robust Resource Constraint Time-Cost- Quality-Energy-Pollution Trade-off Problem
Table 2.  Cost, Quality, Energy, and Pollution Information for the bridge
ID-Code Activity Predecessor Nominal Normal Nominal Compacted Resource
Time (day) Cost (Million Toman) Quality (%) Energy (KJ) $ CO_2 $ Pollution(Ton) Time (day) Cost (Million Toman) Quality (%) Energy (KJ) $ CO_2 $ Pollution (Ton) Men (Person/day) Machine (per day)
$ \bar{t_i} $ $ \bar{c_i} $ $ \bar{q_i} $ $ \bar{e_i} $ $ \bar{p_i} $ $ \bar{t_i}' $ $ \bar{c_i}' $ $ \bar{q_i}' $ $ \bar{e_i}' $ $ \bar{p_i}' $ $ \bar{d_i1}' $ $ \bar{d_i2}' $
1 Workplace equipment 12 100 100 900 300 10 110 96 932 370 7 10
2 Foundation pile 1FS 40 40 100 400 400 37 60 98 406 572 8 12
3 Foundation 2FS 7 40 100 500 100 5 48 96 535 162 5 7
4 Column 3FS 5 40 100 600 300 3 44 97 608 438 6 5
5 Girder construction 1FS 80 200 100 400 200 73 300 98 413 329 7 9
6 Bearings installation 4.5FS 5 5 100 200 400 2 6 98 213 677 10 7
7 Girder installation 6FS 30 20 100 300 500 28 22 100 312 820 11 8
8 Bolting 7FS 10 5 100 450 600 8 7.5 100 450 962 15 5
9 Welding 8FS 10 40 100 300 400 8 48 97 300 614 20 6
10 Slab form working 9FS 30 50 100 200 200 28 55 99 215 220 10 7
11 Cantilever form working 10FS 20 40 100 300 300 18 60 98 322 450 14 10
12 Reinforcement 11FS 48 60 100 700 450 46 72 99 740 750 7 11
13 Concreting 12FS 6 45 100 300 300 4 49.5 99 310 355 8 7
14 Cantilever coffrage 13FS 3 20 100 100 200 2 30 99 108 289 9 8
15 Bituminizing 14FS 4 60 100 200 300 3 72 100 210 506 10 9
16 East all 15FS 24 50 100 300 700 22 55 96 320 868 5 6
17 East ramp 16FS 10 40 100 600 300 7 60 98 639 348 6 7
18 Ramp and deck guard rail installation 17.2 7 100 100 300 60 6 150 99 307 76 8 8
FS
19 West wall 15FS 24 50 100 400 60 23 60 97 434 100 7 9
20 West ramp 19FS 10 40 100 200 100 7 66 97 218 150 8 10
21 Ramp and desk curb installation 18FS 5 60 100 450 40 4 72 95 458 51 9 5
22 Ramp and deck side walk implementation 21FS 10 40 100 300 60 6 44 99 323 77 5 6
23 Ramp and deck (asphalt) 22FS 4 60 100 200 40 3 90 99 217 59 2 8
24 Take workshop down 23FS 10 40 100 300 200 9 48 95 313 251 1 1
Resource need in all project 3387 3532
Table Options

Download as excel

ID-Code Activity Predecessor Nominal Normal Nominal Compacted Resource
Time (day) Cost (Million Toman) Quality (%) Energy (KJ) $ CO_2 $ Pollution(Ton) Time (day) Cost (Million Toman) Quality (%) Energy (KJ) $ CO_2 $ Pollution (Ton) Men (Person/day) Machine (per day)
$ \bar{t_i} $ $ \bar{c_i} $ $ \bar{q_i} $ $ \bar{e_i} $ $ \bar{p_i} $ $ \bar{t_i}' $ $ \bar{c_i}' $ $ \bar{q_i}' $ $ \bar{e_i}' $ $ \bar{p_i}' $ $ \bar{d_i1}' $ $ \bar{d_i2}' $
1 Workplace equipment 12 100 100 900 300 10 110 96 932 370 7 10
2 Foundation pile 1FS 40 40 100 400 400 37 60 98 406 572 8 12
3 Foundation 2FS 7 40 100 500 100 5 48 96 535 162 5 7
4 Column 3FS 5 40 100 600 300 3 44 97 608 438 6 5
5 Girder construction 1FS 80 200 100 400 200 73 300 98 413 329 7 9
6 Bearings installation 4.5FS 5 5 100 200 400 2 6 98 213 677 10 7
7 Girder installation 6FS 30 20 100 300 500 28 22 100 312 820 11 8
8 Bolting 7FS 10 5 100 450 600 8 7.5 100 450 962 15 5
9 Welding 8FS 10 40 100 300 400 8 48 97 300 614 20 6
10 Slab form working 9FS 30 50 100 200 200 28 55 99 215 220 10 7
11 Cantilever form working 10FS 20 40 100 300 300 18 60 98 322 450 14 10
12 Reinforcement 11FS 48 60 100 700 450 46 72 99 740 750 7 11
13 Concreting 12FS 6 45 100 300 300 4 49.5 99 310 355 8 7
14 Cantilever coffrage 13FS 3 20 100 100 200 2 30 99 108 289 9 8
15 Bituminizing 14FS 4 60 100 200 300 3 72 100 210 506 10 9
16 East all 15FS 24 50 100 300 700 22 55 96 320 868 5 6
17 East ramp 16FS 10 40 100 600 300 7 60 98 639 348 6 7
18 Ramp and deck guard rail installation 17.2 7 100 100 300 60 6 150 99 307 76 8 8
FS
19 West wall 15FS 24 50 100 400 60 23 60 97 434 100 7 9
20 West ramp 19FS 10 40 100 200 100 7 66 97 218 150 8 10
21 Ramp and desk curb installation 18FS 5 60 100 450 40 4 72 95 458 51 9 5
22 Ramp and deck side walk implementation 21FS 10 40 100 300 60 6 44 99 323 77 5 6
23 Ramp and deck (asphalt) 22FS 4 60 100 200 40 3 90 99 217 59 2 8
24 Take workshop down 23FS 10 40 100 300 200 9 48 95 313 251 1 1
Resource need in all project 3387 3532
Table 3.  Augmented $ \varepsilon $-constraint method results for RRCTCQEPTP
Time
(day)		 Cost
(Million Toman)		 Quality
(%)		 Energy
(KJ)		 CO2 Pollution
(Ton)		 Time
(day)		 Cost
(Million Toman)		 Quality
(%)		 Energy
(KJ)		 CO2 Pollution
(Ton)
328 4525 92 10540 8150 305 4362 90 10596 9828
328 4525 92 10540 8150 305 4461 91 10554 9445
328 4533 92 10540 8590 305 4464 91 10504 9427
328 4525 92 10540 8150 305 4556 91 10610 8488
328 4802 89 10816 10249 305 4610 89 10745 10474
320 4453 92 10542 8653 297 4378 89 10626 10378
320 4557 92 10522 8405 297 4483 91 10608 10016
320 4512 92 10508 8757 297 4454 90 10541 9927
320 4508 92 10553 8172 297 4518 90 10622 9124
320 4741 89 10794 10344 297 4554 89 10730 10596
312 4390 91 10535 9187 289 4430 89 10679 10535
312 4488 92 10527 8892 289 4472 89 10645 10359
312 4484 91 10496 9098 289 4464 89 10639 10495
312 4558 91 10538 8276 289 4473 89 10679 10277
312 4672 89 10768 10397 289 450 88 10718 10734
Table Options

Download as excel

Time
(day)		 Cost
(Million Toman)		 Quality
(%)		 Energy
(KJ)		 CO2 Pollution
(Ton)		 Time
(day)		 Cost
(Million Toman)		 Quality
(%)		 Energy
(KJ)		 CO2 Pollution
(Ton)
328 4525 92 10540 8150 305 4362 90 10596 9828
328 4525 92 10540 8150 305 4461 91 10554 9445
328 4533 92 10540 8590 305 4464 91 10504 9427
328 4525 92 10540 8150 305 4556 91 10610 8488
328 4802 89 10816 10249 305 4610 89 10745 10474
320 4453 92 10542 8653 297 4378 89 10626 10378
320 4557 92 10522 8405 297 4483 91 10608 10016
320 4512 92 10508 8757 297 4454 90 10541 9927
320 4508 92 10553 8172 297 4518 90 10622 9124
320 4741 89 10794 10344 297 4554 89 10730 10596
312 4390 91 10535 9187 289 4430 89 10679 10535
312 4488 92 10527 8892 289 4472 89 10645 10359
312 4484 91 10496 9098 289 4464 89 10639 10495
312 4558 91 10538 8276 289 4473 89 10679 10277
312 4672 89 10768 10397 289 450 88 10718 10734
[1]

Qiang Long, Xue Wu, Changzhi Wu. Non-dominated sorting methods for multi-objective optimization: Review and numerical comparison. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 1001-1023. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020009
[2]

Lin Jiang, Song Wang. Robust multi-period and multi-objective portfolio selection. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 695-709. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019130
[3]

Ripeng Huang, Shaojian Qu, Xiaoguang Yang, Zhimin Liu. Multi-stage distributionally robust optimization with risk aversion. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 233-259. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019109
[4]

Mahdi Karimi, Seyed Jafar Sadjadi. Optimization of a Multi-Item Inventory model for deteriorating items with capacity constraint using dynamic programming. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021013
[5]

Claudia Lederman, Noemi Wolanski. An optimization problem with volume constraint for an inhomogeneous operator with nonstandard growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020391
[6]

Haodong Yu, Jie Sun. Robust stochastic optimization with convex risk measures: A discretized subgradient scheme. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 81-99. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019100
[7]

Bing Yu, Lei Zhang. Global optimization-based dimer method for finding saddle points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 741-753. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020139
[8]

C. J. Price. A modified Nelder-Mead barrier method for constrained optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/naco.2020058
[9]

Hui Gao, Jian Lv, Xiaoliang Wang, Liping Pang. An alternating linearization bundle method for a class of nonconvex optimization problem with inexact information. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 805-825. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019135
[10]

Lekbir Afraites, Chorouk Masnaoui, Mourad Nachaoui. Shape optimization method for an inverse geometric source problem and stability at critical shape. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021006
[11]

Tien-Yu Lin, Bhaba R. Sarker, Chien-Jui Lin. An optimal setup cost reduction and lot size for economic production quantity model with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 467-484. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020043
[12]

Mohammed Abdulrazaq Kahya, Suhaib Abduljabbar Altamir, Zakariya Yahya Algamal. Improving whale optimization algorithm for feature selection with a time-varying transfer function. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 87-98. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020017
[13]

Hedy Attouch, Aïcha Balhag, Zaki Chbani, Hassan Riahi. Fast convex optimization via inertial dynamics combining viscous and Hessian-driven damping with time rescaling. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021010
[14]

Xiaoxiao Li, Yingjing Shi, Rui Li, Shida Cao. Energy management method for an unpowered landing. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020180
[15]

Min Xi, Wenyu Sun, Jun Chen. Survey of derivative-free optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (4) : 537-555. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020050
[16]

Predrag S. Stanimirović, Branislav Ivanov, Haifeng Ma, Dijana Mosić. A survey of gradient methods for solving nonlinear optimization. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1573-1624. doi: 10.3934/era.2020115
[17]

Xinpeng Wang, Bingo Wing-Kuen Ling, Wei-Chao Kuang, Zhijing Yang. Orthogonal intrinsic mode functions via optimization approach. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 51-66. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019098
[18]

Wolfgang Riedl, Robert Baier, Matthias Gerdts. Optimization-based subdivision algorithm for reachable sets. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (1) : 99-130. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021005
[19]

Manxue You, Shengjie Li. Perturbation of Image and conjugate duality for vector optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020176
[20]

Marek Macák, Róbert Čunderlík, Karol Mikula, Zuzana Minarechová. Computational optimization in solving the geodetic boundary value problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 987-999. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020381

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (60)
  • HTML views (91)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences