American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021213
Online First

Online First articles are published articles within a journal that have not yet been assigned to a formal issue. This means they do not yet have a volume number, issue number, or page numbers assigned to them, however, they can still be found and cited using their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Online First publication benefits the research community by making new scientific discoveries known as quickly as possible.

Readers can access Online First articles via the “Online First” tab for the selected journal.

Optimal control of fish-feeding in a three-dimensional calm freshwater pond considering environmental concern

H. W. J. Lee 1, , Kar Hung Wong 2,, and  Y. C. E. Lee 1,

1. 

Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
2. 

School of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

* Corresponding author: Kar Hung Wong

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by AIMS, LLC. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).

Received  June 2021 Revised  September 2021 Early access December 2021

This paper describes the optimal fish-feeding in a three-dimensional calm freshwater pond based on the concentrations of seven water quality variables. A certain number of baby fishes are inserted into the pond simultaneously. They are then taken out of the pond simultaneously for harvest after having gone through a feeding program. This feeding program creates additional loads of water quality variables in the pond, which becomes pollutants. Thus, an optimal fish-feeding problem is formulated to maximize the final weight of the fishes, subject to the restrictions that the fishes are not under-fed and over-fed and the concentrations of the pollutants created by the fish-feeding program are not too large. A computational scheme using the finite element Galerkin scheme for the three-dimensional cubic domain and the control parameterization method is developed for solving the problem. Finally, a numerical example is solved.

Keywords: Optimal Control of Fish Feeding, Three-Dimensional Calm Water Pond, Fishes' Health, Environmental Protection, Water Quality Variables, Source, Input Pollution Load, Chemical Process, Galerkin Scheme, Control Parametrization.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 49M15, 65M60; Secondary: 35Q92.
Citation: H. W. J. Lee, Kar Hung Wong, Y. C. E. Lee. Optimal control of fish-feeding in a three-dimensional calm freshwater pond considering environmental concern. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021213
References:
[1]

V. S. Amundsen and T. C. Osmundsen, Sustainability indicators for salmon aquaculture, Data Brief, 20 (2018), 20-29.  doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.043.

[2]

F. A. Bohnes and A. Laurent, Environmental impacts of existing and future aquaculture production: Comparison of technologies and feed options in singapore, Aquaculture, 532 (2021), 736001.  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736001.

[3]

C. B. C. K. Cerbule, P. Senff and I. K. Stolz, Towards environmental sustainability in marine finfish aquaculture, Frontier in Marine Science, 2021.

[4]

R. A. Falconer and M. Hartnett, Mathematical modeling of flow, pesticide and nutrient transport for fish-farm planning and management, Ocean Coastal Management, 19 (1993), 37-57. 

[5]

M. Kumlu and M. Aktas, Optimal feeding rates for european sea bass dicentrarchus labrax L. reared in seawater and freshwater, Aquaculture, 231 (2004), 501-515. 

[6]

GERSAMP, Monitoring the ecological effects of coastal aquaculture wastes food and agriculture, IMO/FAO/UNESCO/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP joint group of experts on the scientific aspects of marine pollution, GESAMP Rep Stud., (1996), 57.

[7]

S. Goyal, D. Ott, J. Liebscher, J. Dautz, H. O. Gutzeit, D. Schmidt and R. Reuss, Sustainability analysis of fish feed derived from aquatic plant and insect, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 7371.  doi: 10.3390/su13137371.

[8]

H. W. J. Lee, C. K. Chan, K. Yau, K. H. Wong and C. Myburgh, Control parametrization and finite element method for controlling multi-species reactive transport in a circular Pool, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 9 (2013), 505-524.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.505.

[9]

Q. Lin, R. Loxton and K. L. Teo, The control parametrization method for nonlinear optimal control: A survey, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 10 (2014), 275-309.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.275.

[10]

J. L. Lions, Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1971.

[11]

C. Liu, Z. Gong, E. Feng and H. Yin, Optimal switching control of a fed-batch fermentation process, J. Global Optim., 52 (2012), 265-280.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-011-9663-8.

[12]

A. I. Stamou, M. Karamanoli, N. Vasiliadou, E. Douka, A. Bergamasco and L. Genovese, Mathematical modelling of the interactions between aquacultures and the sea environment, Desalination, 248 (2009), 826-835. 

[13]

K. L. Teo, C. J. Goh and K. H. Wong, A Unified Computational Approach to Optimal Control Problems, Longman Scientific and Technical, 1991.

[14]

K. H. Wong, L. S. Jennings and F. Benyah, Control parametrization method for free planning time optimal control problems with time-delayed argument, Nonlinear Anal., 47 (2001), 5679-5689.  doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00669-1.

[15]

K. H. Wong, H. W. J. Lee and C. K. Chan, Control parametrization and finite element method for controlling multi-species reactive transport in a rectangular diffuser unit, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 150 (2011), 118-141.  doi: 10.1007/s10957-011-9826-2.

[16]

K. H. Wong, H. W. J. Lee, C. K. Chan and C. Myburgh, Control parametrization and finite element method for controlling multi-species reactive transport in an underground tunnel, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 157 (2013), 168-187.  doi: 10.1007/s10957-012-0148-9.

[17]

D. Wu, Y. Bai and C. Yu, A new computational approach for optimal control problems with multiple time-delay, Automatica, 101 (2019), 388-395.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.12.036.

[18]

R. S. S. Wu, The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 31 (1995), 159-166.  doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(95)00100-2.

[19]

R. S. S. Wu, P. K. S. Shin, D. W. MacKay, M. Mollowney and D. Johnson, Management of marine fish farming in the sub-tropical environment: A modelling approach, Aquaculture, 174 (1999), 279-298.  doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00024-1.

[20]

Z. S. Wu and K. L. Teo, Optimal control problems involving second boundary value problems of parabolic type, SIAM J. Control Optim., 21 (1983), 729-756.  doi: 10.1137/0321045.

[21]

F. Yang, K. L. Teo, R. Loxton, V. Rehbock, B. Li, C. Yu and L. Jennings, Visual MISER: An efficient user-friendly visual program for solving optimal control problems, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 12 (2016), 781-810.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.781.

[22]

C. Yu, Q. Lin, R. Loxton, K. L. Teo and G. Wang, A hybrid time-scaling transformation for time-delay optimal control problems, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 169 (2016), 867-901.  doi: 10.1007/s10957-015-0783-z.

[23]

X. Zeng, T. C. Rasmussen, M. B. Beck, A. K. Parker and Z. Lin, A biogeochemical model for metabolism and nutrient cycling in a southeastern piedmont impoundment, Environmental Modelling and Software, 21 (2006), 1073-1095.  doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.05.009.

show all references

References:
[1]

V. S. Amundsen and T. C. Osmundsen, Sustainability indicators for salmon aquaculture, Data Brief, 20 (2018), 20-29.  doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.043.

[2]

F. A. Bohnes and A. Laurent, Environmental impacts of existing and future aquaculture production: Comparison of technologies and feed options in singapore, Aquaculture, 532 (2021), 736001.  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736001.

[3]

C. B. C. K. Cerbule, P. Senff and I. K. Stolz, Towards environmental sustainability in marine finfish aquaculture, Frontier in Marine Science, 2021.

[4]

R. A. Falconer and M. Hartnett, Mathematical modeling of flow, pesticide and nutrient transport for fish-farm planning and management, Ocean Coastal Management, 19 (1993), 37-57. 

[5]

M. Kumlu and M. Aktas, Optimal feeding rates for european sea bass dicentrarchus labrax L. reared in seawater and freshwater, Aquaculture, 231 (2004), 501-515. 

[6]

GERSAMP, Monitoring the ecological effects of coastal aquaculture wastes food and agriculture, IMO/FAO/UNESCO/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP joint group of experts on the scientific aspects of marine pollution, GESAMP Rep Stud., (1996), 57.

[7]

S. Goyal, D. Ott, J. Liebscher, J. Dautz, H. O. Gutzeit, D. Schmidt and R. Reuss, Sustainability analysis of fish feed derived from aquatic plant and insect, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 7371.  doi: 10.3390/su13137371.

[8]

H. W. J. Lee, C. K. Chan, K. Yau, K. H. Wong and C. Myburgh, Control parametrization and finite element method for controlling multi-species reactive transport in a circular Pool, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 9 (2013), 505-524.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.505.

[9]

Q. Lin, R. Loxton and K. L. Teo, The control parametrization method for nonlinear optimal control: A survey, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 10 (2014), 275-309.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.275.

[10]

J. L. Lions, Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1971.

[11]

C. Liu, Z. Gong, E. Feng and H. Yin, Optimal switching control of a fed-batch fermentation process, J. Global Optim., 52 (2012), 265-280.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-011-9663-8.

[12]

A. I. Stamou, M. Karamanoli, N. Vasiliadou, E. Douka, A. Bergamasco and L. Genovese, Mathematical modelling of the interactions between aquacultures and the sea environment, Desalination, 248 (2009), 826-835. 

[13]

K. L. Teo, C. J. Goh and K. H. Wong, A Unified Computational Approach to Optimal Control Problems, Longman Scientific and Technical, 1991.

[14]

K. H. Wong, L. S. Jennings and F. Benyah, Control parametrization method for free planning time optimal control problems with time-delayed argument, Nonlinear Anal., 47 (2001), 5679-5689.  doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00669-1.

[15]

K. H. Wong, H. W. J. Lee and C. K. Chan, Control parametrization and finite element method for controlling multi-species reactive transport in a rectangular diffuser unit, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 150 (2011), 118-141.  doi: 10.1007/s10957-011-9826-2.

[16]

K. H. Wong, H. W. J. Lee, C. K. Chan and C. Myburgh, Control parametrization and finite element method for controlling multi-species reactive transport in an underground tunnel, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 157 (2013), 168-187.  doi: 10.1007/s10957-012-0148-9.

[17]

D. Wu, Y. Bai and C. Yu, A new computational approach for optimal control problems with multiple time-delay, Automatica, 101 (2019), 388-395.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.12.036.

[18]

R. S. S. Wu, The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 31 (1995), 159-166.  doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(95)00100-2.

[19]

R. S. S. Wu, P. K. S. Shin, D. W. MacKay, M. Mollowney and D. Johnson, Management of marine fish farming in the sub-tropical environment: A modelling approach, Aquaculture, 174 (1999), 279-298.  doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00024-1.

[20]

Z. S. Wu and K. L. Teo, Optimal control problems involving second boundary value problems of parabolic type, SIAM J. Control Optim., 21 (1983), 729-756.  doi: 10.1137/0321045.

[21]

F. Yang, K. L. Teo, R. Loxton, V. Rehbock, B. Li, C. Yu and L. Jennings, Visual MISER: An efficient user-friendly visual program for solving optimal control problems, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 12 (2016), 781-810.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.781.

[22]

C. Yu, Q. Lin, R. Loxton, K. L. Teo and G. Wang, A hybrid time-scaling transformation for time-delay optimal control problems, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 169 (2016), 867-901.  doi: 10.1007/s10957-015-0783-z.

[23]

X. Zeng, T. C. Rasmussen, M. B. Beck, A. K. Parker and Z. Lin, A biogeochemical model for metabolism and nutrient cycling in a southeastern piedmont impoundment, Environmental Modelling and Software, 21 (2006), 1073-1095.  doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.05.009.

Figure 1.  Boundary conditions of the water pollution model
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The Front Part of the Fish Pond
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  The global node point of the fish pond
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Instantaneous average concentration in the No-Fish-Feeding Water Pollution (NFFWP) sub-model

(a) Phytoplankton (PHY) (b) Organic Nitrogen (NOR) (c) Ammonia (NAM) (d) Nitrates (NIT) (e) Organic Phosphorous (POR) (f) Inorganic Phosphorous (PIN) (g) Suspended Solid (SS)

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Comparison of the instantaneous average concentration between the NFFWP sub-model, the FFWP sub-model with $ u(t) = 1.25 $ for all $ t\in[180, 550] $, and the FFWP sub-model with $ u(t) = 1.5 $ for all $ t\in[180, 550] $

(a) Organic Nitrogen (NOR) (b) Ammonia (NAM) (c) Nitrates (NIT) (d)Organic Phosphorous(POR) (e)Inorganic Phosphorous(PIN) (f)Suspended Solid(SS) (The purple and the brown curve in Figure 5(e) almost coincide with each other.)

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  The instantaneous optimal control (i.e. the instantaneous optimal fishes' feeding rate)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Comparison of the instantaneous average concentration between the NFFWP sub-model and the FFWP sub-model obtained by using the optimal control $ u^*(t) $

(a) Ammonia (NAM) (b) Nitrates (NIT) (c) Inorganic Phosphorous (PIN) (In Figure 7(a)-Figure 7(c), the black curves represent the instantaneous concentrations of the water quality variables of the No-Fish-Feeding Water Pollution (NFFWP) sub-model, and the brown curves represent the instantaneous Fish-Feeding Water Pollution (FFWP) sub-model obtained by using the optimal control $ u^*(t) $.)

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Weight of the fishes at the final time
Table Options

Download as excel

Table 2.  Maximum concentration at various places of the pond in the fish-feeding water pollution (FFWP) model obtained by using optimal fish-feeding rate
Table Options

Download as excel

Table A1.  Processes described in the Three-Dimensional Water Pollution Model and their equations
D. Decay of PHY $ \left(D_{1}\right) $ with releases of NOR $ \left(D_{2}\right) $, POR $ \left(D_{5}\right) $, and SS $ \left(D_{7}\right). $
$ D_{1} = k_{d 1} \times X_{P H Y}, D_{2} = k_{d 2} \times X_{P H Y}, D_{5} = k_{d 5} \times X_{P H Y}, D_{7} = k_{d 7} \times X_{P H Y}, $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{d 1} = -k_{d}, k_{d 2} = 0.1761 \times k_{d}, k_{d 5} = 0.1761 \times k_{d}, k_{d 7} = 0.379 \times k_{d}, $
(ⅱ) $ k_{d} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table 2.
G. Photosynthesis (Growth of PHY, $ G_1 $), with uptakes of NAM ($ G_3 $), NIT($ G_4 $), and PIN($ G_6 $).
$ G_1 = k_{g1}(t)\times X_{PHY} $, $ G_3 = k_{g3}(t)\times X_{PHY} $, $ G_4 = k_{g4}(t)\times X_{PHY} $, $ G_6 = k_{g6}(t)\times X_{PHY} $,
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{g 1}(t) = k_{g \max }(t) \times e f(L(t)) \times[ $ $ e f(N)+e f(P)] $
is the growth rate of PHY; $ k_{g \max }(t) = k_{g \max 20} \times 1.047^{Tenp(t)-20} $
is the effect of the temperature on the growth of PHY at temperature $ Temp(t){ }^{\circ} C $, where $ Temp(t) $ is the water temperature in at time $ t $ given by $ Temp(t) = Temp_{\min }+\frac{\left(Temp_{\max }-Temp_{\min }\right)}{2}\left(1-\cos \frac{360(t-76)}{365} \times \frac{\pi}{180}\right) $,
with $ Tem p_{\min } = 13.7 $ and $ Tem p_{\max } = 25.9 $;
$ e f $$ (L(t)) = \frac{L(t)}{L_{S}} \exp \left(1-\frac{L(t)}{L_{S}}\right) $ is the effect of light on the growth rate of PHY, where $ L(t) $ is the incident solar radiation (expressed in cal/$ \text{cm}^{2} $) given by
$ L(t) = L_{\min }+\frac{\left(L_{\max }-L_{\min }\right)}{2}\left(1-\cos \frac{(t-15) \times 360}{365} \times \frac{\pi}{180}\right) $
with $ L_{\min } = 120 \mathrm{cal} / \mathrm{cm}^{2} $, and $ L_{\max } = 192 \mathrm{cal} / \mathrm{cm}^{2} $;
$ ef $$ (N) $ is the effect of nutrients due to the uptake of NAM and NIT,
$ ef $$ (P) $ is the effect of nutrients due to the uptake of PIN; their average values are given in Table $A2$; $ k_{g \max 20} $ and $ L_{S} $ are parameters, whose values are given in Table A2,
(ⅱ) $ k_{g 3}(t) = -0.1761 \times P_{N A M} \times k_{g 1}(t) $,
$ k_{g 4}(t) = -0.1761 \times\left(1-P_{N A M}\right) k_{g 1}(t) $, $ k_{g 6}(t) = -0.1761 \times k_{g 1}(t) $,
$ P_{N A M} $ is the preference term for NAM whose approximated value is also given in Table A2.
A. Adsorption of NAM $ \left(A_{3}\right) $ and PIN $ \left(A_{6}\right) $.
$ A_{3} = k_{A 3} \times X_{S S}, \ A_{6} = k_{A 6} \times X_{S S}, $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{A 3} = -\frac{S V_{S S}}{H} \times a_{NAM}, k_{A 6} = -\frac{S V_{S S}}{H} \times a_{P I N} $,
(ⅱ) $ S V_{S S}, a_{N A M}, H, a_{P I N} $ are parameters whose values are given in Table 2.
Set. Settling of PHY $ \left(S_{1}\right) $, NOR $ \left(S_{2}\right) $, POR $ \left(S_{5}\right) $, and SS $ \left(S_{7}\right) $
$ \begin{align*} &Set_{1} = k_{S e t 1} \times X_{P H Y}, \ Set_{2} = k_{S e t 2} \times X_{N O R}, \ \quad Set_{5} = k_{S e t 5} \times X_{P O R}, \\ &Set_{7} = k_{Set7} \times X_{S S}, \end{align*}$
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{Set1} = -\frac{S V_{P H Y}}{H}, \ k_{Set2} = -\frac{S V_{N O R}}{H}\left(1-C_{N O R}\right) $, $ k_{Set5} = -\frac{S V_{P O R}}{H}\left(1-C_{P O R}\right), \ k_{Set7} = -\frac{S V_{S S}}{H}, $
(ii) $ S V_{P H Y}, \ S V_{S S}, \ S V_{N O R}, \ S V_{P O R}, \ C_{N O R}, \ C_{P O R} $ and $ H $ are parameters whose values are given in Table 2.
Am. Ammonification - Mineralization of NOR $ A m_{2} = k_{A m 2}(t) \times X_{N O R}, A m_{3} = k_{A m 3}(t) \times X_{N O R} $ where
(ⅰ) $ k_{A m 2}(t) = -k_{N min }(t) \times c_{N O R}, k_{A m 3}(t) = k_{N min }(t) \times c_{N O R} $,
(ⅱ) $ k_{N min }(t) = k_{N min } \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $
is the saturation constant for Nitrogen mineralization at $ Temp(t){ }^{o} C $, where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process,
(ⅲ) $ c_{N O R} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table 2.
N. Nitrification $ \left(N i t_{3}\right. $ and $ \left.N i t_{4}\right) $.
$N i t_{3} = k_{N i t 3}(t) \times X_{N A M}, N i t_{4} = k_{N i t 4}(t) \times X_{N A M}, $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{N i t 3}(t) = -k_{N i t}(t), k_{N i t 4}(t) = k_{N i t}(t), $
(ⅱ) $ k_{N i t}(t) = k_{N i t 20} \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $ is the nitrification rate at $ Temp(t)^{o} C $, where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process.
(ⅲ) $ k_{N i t 20} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table A2.
R. Endogenous respiration of PHY $ \left(R_{1}\right) $ with the release of NOR $ \left(R_{2}\right) $, NAM $ \left(R_{3}\right) $, POR $ \left(R_{5}\right) $ and $ \operatorname{PIN}\left(R_{6}\right) $.
$ \begin{align*} &R_{1} = k_{r 1}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \ R_{2} = k_{r 2}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \ R_{3} = k_{r 3}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \\ &R_{5} = k_{r 5}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \ R_{6} = k_{r 6}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \end{align*} $
where
$ \text {(ⅰ) } k_{r 1}(t) = -k_{r}(t), \\ k_{r 2}(t) = 0.1761 \times f_{N O R} \times k_{r}(t), \\ k_{r 3}(t) = 0.1761 \times\left(1-f_{N O R}\right)\times k_{r}(t)\\ k_{r 5}(t) = 0.1761 \times f_{P O R} \times k_{r}(t), \\ k_{r 6}(t) = 0.1761 \times\left(1-f_{P O R}\right) \times k_{r}(t), $
(ⅱ) $ k_{r}(t) = k_{r 20} \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $ is the respiration rate at $ Temp(t)^{o} C, $
where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process,
(ⅲ) $k_{r 20}, f_{N O R} $ are parameters whose values are given in Table 2.
P. Mineralization of POR $ \left(P_{5}\right. $ and $ \left.P_{6}\right) $.
$Min_{5} = k_{Min 5}(t) \times X_{P O R}, M i n_{6} = k_{Min6}(t) \times X_{P O R} $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{min 5}(t) = -k_{P min }(t) \times c_{P O R}, k_{Min 6}(t) = k_{P min }(t) \times c_{P O R} $,
(ⅱ) $ k_{P min } = k_{P min 20} \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $
is the mineralization rate of $ \mathrm{NOR} $ at $ Temp(t)^{o} C $, where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process,
(ⅲ) $ c_{P O R} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table A2.
Table Options

Download as excel

D. Decay of PHY $ \left(D_{1}\right) $ with releases of NOR $ \left(D_{2}\right) $, POR $ \left(D_{5}\right) $, and SS $ \left(D_{7}\right). $
$ D_{1} = k_{d 1} \times X_{P H Y}, D_{2} = k_{d 2} \times X_{P H Y}, D_{5} = k_{d 5} \times X_{P H Y}, D_{7} = k_{d 7} \times X_{P H Y}, $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{d 1} = -k_{d}, k_{d 2} = 0.1761 \times k_{d}, k_{d 5} = 0.1761 \times k_{d}, k_{d 7} = 0.379 \times k_{d}, $
(ⅱ) $ k_{d} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table 2.
G. Photosynthesis (Growth of PHY, $ G_1 $), with uptakes of NAM ($ G_3 $), NIT($ G_4 $), and PIN($ G_6 $).
$ G_1 = k_{g1}(t)\times X_{PHY} $, $ G_3 = k_{g3}(t)\times X_{PHY} $, $ G_4 = k_{g4}(t)\times X_{PHY} $, $ G_6 = k_{g6}(t)\times X_{PHY} $,
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{g 1}(t) = k_{g \max }(t) \times e f(L(t)) \times[ $ $ e f(N)+e f(P)] $
is the growth rate of PHY; $ k_{g \max }(t) = k_{g \max 20} \times 1.047^{Tenp(t)-20} $
is the effect of the temperature on the growth of PHY at temperature $ Temp(t){ }^{\circ} C $, where $ Temp(t) $ is the water temperature in at time $ t $ given by $ Temp(t) = Temp_{\min }+\frac{\left(Temp_{\max }-Temp_{\min }\right)}{2}\left(1-\cos \frac{360(t-76)}{365} \times \frac{\pi}{180}\right) $,
with $ Tem p_{\min } = 13.7 $ and $ Tem p_{\max } = 25.9 $;
$ e f $$ (L(t)) = \frac{L(t)}{L_{S}} \exp \left(1-\frac{L(t)}{L_{S}}\right) $ is the effect of light on the growth rate of PHY, where $ L(t) $ is the incident solar radiation (expressed in cal/$ \text{cm}^{2} $) given by
$ L(t) = L_{\min }+\frac{\left(L_{\max }-L_{\min }\right)}{2}\left(1-\cos \frac{(t-15) \times 360}{365} \times \frac{\pi}{180}\right) $
with $ L_{\min } = 120 \mathrm{cal} / \mathrm{cm}^{2} $, and $ L_{\max } = 192 \mathrm{cal} / \mathrm{cm}^{2} $;
$ ef $$ (N) $ is the effect of nutrients due to the uptake of NAM and NIT,
$ ef $$ (P) $ is the effect of nutrients due to the uptake of PIN; their average values are given in Table $A2$; $ k_{g \max 20} $ and $ L_{S} $ are parameters, whose values are given in Table A2,
(ⅱ) $ k_{g 3}(t) = -0.1761 \times P_{N A M} \times k_{g 1}(t) $,
$ k_{g 4}(t) = -0.1761 \times\left(1-P_{N A M}\right) k_{g 1}(t) $, $ k_{g 6}(t) = -0.1761 \times k_{g 1}(t) $,
$ P_{N A M} $ is the preference term for NAM whose approximated value is also given in Table A2.
A. Adsorption of NAM $ \left(A_{3}\right) $ and PIN $ \left(A_{6}\right) $.
$ A_{3} = k_{A 3} \times X_{S S}, \ A_{6} = k_{A 6} \times X_{S S}, $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{A 3} = -\frac{S V_{S S}}{H} \times a_{NAM}, k_{A 6} = -\frac{S V_{S S}}{H} \times a_{P I N} $,
(ⅱ) $ S V_{S S}, a_{N A M}, H, a_{P I N} $ are parameters whose values are given in Table 2.
Set. Settling of PHY $ \left(S_{1}\right) $, NOR $ \left(S_{2}\right) $, POR $ \left(S_{5}\right) $, and SS $ \left(S_{7}\right) $
$ \begin{align*} &Set_{1} = k_{S e t 1} \times X_{P H Y}, \ Set_{2} = k_{S e t 2} \times X_{N O R}, \ \quad Set_{5} = k_{S e t 5} \times X_{P O R}, \\ &Set_{7} = k_{Set7} \times X_{S S}, \end{align*}$
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{Set1} = -\frac{S V_{P H Y}}{H}, \ k_{Set2} = -\frac{S V_{N O R}}{H}\left(1-C_{N O R}\right) $, $ k_{Set5} = -\frac{S V_{P O R}}{H}\left(1-C_{P O R}\right), \ k_{Set7} = -\frac{S V_{S S}}{H}, $
(ii) $ S V_{P H Y}, \ S V_{S S}, \ S V_{N O R}, \ S V_{P O R}, \ C_{N O R}, \ C_{P O R} $ and $ H $ are parameters whose values are given in Table 2.
Am. Ammonification - Mineralization of NOR $ A m_{2} = k_{A m 2}(t) \times X_{N O R}, A m_{3} = k_{A m 3}(t) \times X_{N O R} $ where
(ⅰ) $ k_{A m 2}(t) = -k_{N min }(t) \times c_{N O R}, k_{A m 3}(t) = k_{N min }(t) \times c_{N O R} $,
(ⅱ) $ k_{N min }(t) = k_{N min } \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $
is the saturation constant for Nitrogen mineralization at $ Temp(t){ }^{o} C $, where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process,
(ⅲ) $ c_{N O R} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table 2.
N. Nitrification $ \left(N i t_{3}\right. $ and $ \left.N i t_{4}\right) $.
$N i t_{3} = k_{N i t 3}(t) \times X_{N A M}, N i t_{4} = k_{N i t 4}(t) \times X_{N A M}, $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{N i t 3}(t) = -k_{N i t}(t), k_{N i t 4}(t) = k_{N i t}(t), $
(ⅱ) $ k_{N i t}(t) = k_{N i t 20} \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $ is the nitrification rate at $ Temp(t)^{o} C $, where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process.
(ⅲ) $ k_{N i t 20} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table A2.
R. Endogenous respiration of PHY $ \left(R_{1}\right) $ with the release of NOR $ \left(R_{2}\right) $, NAM $ \left(R_{3}\right) $, POR $ \left(R_{5}\right) $ and $ \operatorname{PIN}\left(R_{6}\right) $.
$ \begin{align*} &R_{1} = k_{r 1}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \ R_{2} = k_{r 2}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \ R_{3} = k_{r 3}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \\ &R_{5} = k_{r 5}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \ R_{6} = k_{r 6}(t) \times X_{P H Y}, \end{align*} $
where
$ \text {(ⅰ) } k_{r 1}(t) = -k_{r}(t), \\ k_{r 2}(t) = 0.1761 \times f_{N O R} \times k_{r}(t), \\ k_{r 3}(t) = 0.1761 \times\left(1-f_{N O R}\right)\times k_{r}(t)\\ k_{r 5}(t) = 0.1761 \times f_{P O R} \times k_{r}(t), \\ k_{r 6}(t) = 0.1761 \times\left(1-f_{P O R}\right) \times k_{r}(t), $
(ⅱ) $ k_{r}(t) = k_{r 20} \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $ is the respiration rate at $ Temp(t)^{o} C, $
where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process,
(ⅲ) $k_{r 20}, f_{N O R} $ are parameters whose values are given in Table 2.
P. Mineralization of POR $ \left(P_{5}\right. $ and $ \left.P_{6}\right) $.
$Min_{5} = k_{Min 5}(t) \times X_{P O R}, M i n_{6} = k_{Min6}(t) \times X_{P O R} $
where
(ⅰ) $ k_{min 5}(t) = -k_{P min }(t) \times c_{P O R}, k_{Min 6}(t) = k_{P min }(t) \times c_{P O R} $,
(ⅱ) $ k_{P min } = k_{P min 20} \times 1.047^{Temp(t)-20} $
is the mineralization rate of $ \mathrm{NOR} $ at $ Temp(t)^{o} C $, where the formula for $ Temp(t) $ is as given in the Photosynthesis process,
(ⅲ) $ c_{P O R} $ is a parameter whose value is given in Table A2.
Table A2.  Parameters of the three-dimensional water pollution model and their values
Table Options

Download as excel

[1]

Calin I. Martin. On three-dimensional free surface water flows with constant vorticity. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2022, 21 (7) : 2415-2431. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2022053
[2]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov. Optimal control of pollution stock. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 578-588. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.578
[3]

Wanli Yang, Jie Sun, Su Zhang. Analysis of optimal boundary control for a three-dimensional reaction-diffusion system. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2017, 7 (3) : 325-344. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017021
[4]

Hannes Uecker. Optimal spatial patterns in feeding, fishing, and pollution. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021099
[5]

Aurea Martínez, Francisco J. Fernández, Lino J. Alvarez-Vázquez. Water artificial circulation for eutrophication control. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 277-313. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018012
[6]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov, Andrei Korobeinikov. Parametrization of the attainable set for a nonlinear control model of a biochemical process. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (4) : 1067-1094. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1067
[7]

M. Alipour, M. A. Vali, A. H. Borzabadi. A hybrid parametrization approach for a class of nonlinear optimal control problems. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2019, 9 (4) : 493-506. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019037
[8]

Volker Rehbock, Iztok Livk. Optimal control of a batch crystallization process. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (3) : 585-596. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.585
[9]

Lino J. Alvarez-Vázquez, Néstor García-Chan, Aurea Martínez, Miguel E. Vázquez-Méndez. Optimal control of urban air pollution related to traffic flow in road networks. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 177-193. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018008
[10]

Giuseppe Buttazzo, Lorenzo Freddi. Optimal control problems with weakly converging input operators. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1995, 1 (3) : 401-420. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.401
[11]

Wendai Lv, Siping Ji. Atmospheric environmental quality assessment method based on analytic hierarchy process. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 941-955. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019063
[12]

Vladimir Turetsky, Valery Y. Glizer. Optimal decision in a Statistical Process Control with cubic loss. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021096
[13]

Bin Li, Xiaolong Guo, Xiaodong Zeng, Songyi Dian, Minhua Guo. An optimal pid tuning method for a single-link manipulator based on the control parametrization technique. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (6) : 1813-1823. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020107
[14]

Bo You. Optimal distributed control of the three dimensional primitive equations of large-scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2021, 10 (4) : 937-963. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020097
[15]

Térence Bayen, Alain Rapaport, Fatima-Zahra Tani. Optimal periodic control for scalar dynamics under integral constraint on the input. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2020, 10 (3) : 547-571. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020010
[16]

Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Subhas Khajanchi, Yun Kang, Arvind Kumar Misra. A mathematical model to restore water quality in urban lakes using Phoslock. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3143-3175. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020223
[17]

Guangzhou Chen, Guijian Liu, Jiaquan Wang, Ruzhong Li. Identification of water quality model parameters using artificial bee colony algorithm. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 157-165. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.157
[18]

Ting Kang, Qimin Zhang, Haiyan Wang. Optimal control of an avian influenza model with multiple time delays in state and control variables. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (8) : 4147-4171. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020278
[19]

Andrzej Just, Zdzislaw Stempień. Optimal control problem for a viscoelastic beam and its galerkin approximation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (1) : 263-274. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018018
[20]

Christine Burggraf, Wilfried Grecksch, Thomas Glauben. Stochastic control of individual's health investments. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 159-168. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0159

2020 Impact Factor: 1.801

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (225)
  • HTML views (160)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy