American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
April  2009, 3(2): 271-309. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.271

The variance of arithmetic measures associated to closed geodesics on the modular surface

Wenzhi Luo 1, , Zeév Rudnick 2, and  Peter Sarnak 3,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, 100 Math Tower, 231 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1174, United States
2. 

Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel and School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States
3. 

Department of Mathematics, Princeton University, Fine Hall,Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544 and School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States

Received  October 2008 Published  May 2009

We determine the variance for the fluctuations of the arithmetic measures obtained by collecting all closed geodesics on the modular surface with the same discriminant and ordering them by the latter. This arithmetic variance differs by subtle factors from the variance that one gets when considering individual closed geodesics when ordered by their length. The arithmetic variance is the same one that appears in the fluctuations of measures associated with quantum states on the modular surface.
Keywords: Arithmetic variance, modular surface, closed geodesics..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 11F72; Secondary: 37D4.
Citation: Wenzhi Luo, Zeév Rudnick, Peter Sarnak. The variance of arithmetic measures associated to closed geodesics on the modular surface. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (2) : 271-309. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.271
[1]

Alex Eskin, Maryam Mirzakhani. Counting closed geodesics in moduli space. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2011, 5 (1) : 71-105. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2011.5.71
[2]

Chad Schoen. An arithmetic ball quotient surface whose Albanese variety is not of CM type. Electronic Research Announcements, 2014, 21: 132-136. doi: 10.3934/era.2014.21.132
[3]

Artur O. Lopes, Rafael O. Ruggiero. Large deviations and Aubry-Mather measures supported in nonhyperbolic closed geodesics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (3) : 1155-1174. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1155
[4]

Feng Luo. On non-separating simple closed curves in a compact surface. Electronic Research Announcements, 1995, 1: 18-25.

[5]

Miroslav KolÁŘ, Michal BeneŠ, Daniel ŠevČoviČ. Area preserving geodesic curvature driven flow of closed curves on a surface. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (10) : 3671-3689. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017148
[6]

Bennett Palmer. Stable closed equilibria for anisotropic surface energies: Surfaces with edges. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2012, 4 (1) : 89-97. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.89
[7]

Hui Liu, Yiming Long, Yuming Xiao. The existence of two non-contractible closed geodesics on every bumpy Finsler compact space form. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (8) : 3803-3829. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018165
[8]

Francisco Arana-Herrera. Counting square-tiled surfaces with prescribed real and imaginary foliations and connections to Mirzakhani's asymptotics for simple closed hyperbolic geodesics. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2020, 16: 81-107. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2020004
[9]

Richard Hofer, Arne Winterhof. On the arithmetic autocorrelation of the Legendre sequence. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (1) : 237-244. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017015
[10]

Manish K. Gupta, Chinnappillai Durairajan. On the covering radius of some modular codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2014, 8 (2) : 129-137. doi: 10.3934/amc.2014.8.129
[11]

Tanja Eisner, Rainer Nagel. Arithmetic progressions -- an operator theoretic view. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (3) : 657-667. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.657
[12]

Mehdi Pourbarat. On the arithmetic difference of middle Cantor sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (9) : 4259-4278. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018186
[13]

Dubi Kelmer. Quadratic irrationals and linking numbers of modular knots. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2012, 6 (4) : 539-561. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2012.6.539
[14]

Robert L. Griess Jr., Ching Hung Lam. Groups of Lie type, vertex algebras, and modular moonshine. Electronic Research Announcements, 2014, 21: 167-176. doi: 10.3934/era.2014.21.167
[15]

Vladimir Dragović, Milena Radnović. Pseudo-integrable billiards and arithmetic dynamics. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2014, 8 (1) : 109-132. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2014.8.109
[16]

Gerhard Frey. Relations between arithmetic geometry and public key cryptography. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2010, 4 (2) : 281-305. doi: 10.3934/amc.2010.4.281
[17]

Igor E. Shparlinski. Close values of shifted modular inversions and the decisional modular inversion hidden number problem. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2015, 9 (2) : 169-176. doi: 10.3934/amc.2015.9.169
[18]

Jingzhen Liu, Ka Fai Cedric Yiu, Alain Bensoussan. The optimal mean variance problem with inflation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (1) : 185-203. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.185
[19]

Alexander Nabutovsky and Regina Rotman. Lengths of geodesics between two points on a Riemannian manifold. Electronic Research Announcements, 2007, 13: 13-20.

[20]

Samir Chowdhury, Facundo Mémoli. Explicit geodesics in Gromov-Hausdorff space. Electronic Research Announcements, 2018, 25: 48-59. doi: 10.3934/era.2018.25.006

2020 Impact Factor: 0.848

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (69)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (5)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy